Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(1): 107-114, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31368017

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Appendiceal neoplasms are uncommon tumors. Optimal treatment for patients with perforation or high-grade pathology after initial resection is unknown. This study evaluated patients with increased risk for peritoneal dissemination after primary resection, but no evidence of peritoneal disease, who underwent adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: This multi-institutional cohort study evaluated 56 patients with high-risk (HR) appendiceal neoplasms with a peritoneal carcinomatosis index of 0 who underwent HIPEC. The patients were divided into two groups: perforated low-grade appendiceal (LGA) carcinoma and HR neoplasms, which included perforated high-grade appendiceal carcinoma, positive margins after initial resection, minimal macroscopic peritoneal disease that was previously resected or completely responded to systemic chemotherapy prior to HIPEC, goblet cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of patients had perforated LGA and 68% had HR features. Five-year OS probability was 82.1% for the entire cohort, and 100% and 70.1% for patients with perforated LGA and HR features, respectively (p = 0.024). Five-year RFS probability was 79.3% for the entire cohort, and 90.0% and 72.4% for patients with perforated LGA and HR features, respectively (p = 0.025). Eight patients recurred after HIPEC and their OS was significantly worse (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While adjuvant HIPEC is both safe and feasible, there appears to be little benefit over close surveillance when outcomes are compared with historical and prospective studies, especially for perforated LGA carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Apéndice/mortalidad , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/mortalidad , Hipertermia Inducida/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(1): 147-153, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31385130

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) are tumors that often present with widespread mucin in the peritoneal cavity (pseudomyxoma peritonei [PMP]). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are effective treatment, but no published recommendations exist regarding surveillance. METHODS: Data from prospective databases of patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC from 2001 to 2017 at two high-volume institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent complete CRS-HIPEC for PMP secondary to LAMN were included in the analysis. Pathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of LAMN. Cases of mucinous adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors (goblet cell carcinoids) were excluded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 156 patients. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 18 (interquartile range IQR1-3, 12-23), and 125 patients (80.1%) had a CC0 cytoreduction. According to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) grading, 152 patients (97.4%) presented with acellular mucin or G1 implants, 2 patients (1.3%) presented with G2 disease, and 2 patients (1.3%) presented with G3 disease. During the follow-up period (median, 45 months; IQR1-3 23-76 months), 23 patients (14.7%) experienced recurrence. All the recurrences were peritoneal and occurred within 5 years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were respectively 95.5%, 83.4%, and 78.3%. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that higher PCI scores (p < 0.001), a CC1 cytoreduction (p = 0.005), and higher preoperative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (p = 0.012) and CA-125 (p = 0.032) correlated with a shorter DFS. Only higher PCI scores independently predicted earlier recurrences (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most patients had recurrence within 3 years after CRS-HIPEC, and none after 5 years. High PCI was the only independently significant variable. The study findings support intensive surveillance (every 3-6 months) with tumor markers and imaging methods during the first 3 years, and annual surveillance thereafter, with follow-up assessment after 5 years yielding limited benefit.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Apéndice/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Cuidados Posteriores , Neoplasias del Apéndice/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Antígeno Ca-125 , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/patología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...