Four clinical and biological phenotypes in antiphospholipid syndrome: a cluster analysis of 174 patients with antinuclear antibody tests.

Introduction: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune thrombotic disease with various systemic presentations. This study aimed to identify homogeneous groups of patients based on a non-supervised hierarchical cluster analysis and assess the rate of relapse associated with antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Methods: This retrospective observational study enrolled patients, over a 90-month period, who had APS as defined by the 2006 Sydney classification criteria, and for whom ANA workup was performed. Agglomerative unsupervised hierarchical clustering was conducted to classify patients into subgroups using 24 variables reflecting a range of clinical and biological baseline features associated with APS. Results: Hundred and seventy-four patients were included and were categorized into four phenotypes. Cluster 1 (n=73) associated mostly middle-aged men with risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Obstetrical APS with low-risk thrombosis made up cluster 2 (n=25). Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), microvascular findings and double/triple positive APL antibodies (50%) were represented in cluster 3 (n=33). Whereas cluster 4 (n=43) characterized a predominantly female subpopulation with positive ANA and systemic lupus (n=23) that exhibited a high thrombotic risk and more frequent relapses (n=38) (p<0.001). Conclusions: This study identified four homogenous groups of patients with APS listed as: i) cardiovascular and arterial risk, ii) obstetrical, iii) VTE and microvascular, and iv) ANA-positive APS. We found that ANA-positivity was associated with higher rates of relapse. Applying ANA status to classification criteria could constitute a novel approach to tailoring management for APS, based on phenotypic patterns and risk assessment.

Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off levels to rule out venous thromboembolism in patients with non-high pre-test probability: Clinical performance and cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: As aging was found to be associated with increased D-dimer levels, the question arose whether D-dimer measurement was useful in the diagnostic strategy of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in elderly patients. AIM OF THE STUDY: To compare retrospectively the performance of six diagnostic strategies based on the three-level Wells scores and various cut-off levels for D-dimer, evaluated using the HemosIL D-Dimer HS 500 assay, in a derivation cohort of 644 outpatients with non-high pretest probability (PTP) of VTE. The clinical usefulness of the best-performing strategy was then confirmed in a multicenter validation study involving 1255 consecutive outpatients with non-high PTP. RESULTS: The diagnostic strategy based on the age-adjusted cut-off level calculated by multiplying the patient's age by 10 above 50 years was found to perform the best in the derivation study with a better sensitivity-to-specificity ratio than the conventional strategy based on the fixed cut-off level (500 ng/ml), a higher specificity and a negative predictive value (NPV) above 99%. Such an increase in test specificity was confirmed in the validation cohort, with the NPV remaining above 99%. Taking into account the local reimbursement rates of diagnostic tests, using this strategy led to a 6.9% reduction of diagnostic costs for pulmonary embolism and a 5.1% reduction for deep vein thrombosis, as imaging tests would be avoided in a higher percentage of patients. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic strategy of VTE based on the age-adjusted cut-off level for D-dimer in patients over 50 years was found to be safe, with NPV above 99%, and cost-effective.

APTT therapeutic range for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy. Significant impact of the anti-Xa reagent used for correlation.

INTRODUCTION: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy is monitored by using the anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) activity, or the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), which remains the most widely used assay. One of the main advantages of anti-Xa relies on its hypothesized standardization, with a unique therapeutic range (0.30-0.70 IU/ml) for all reagents, whereas APTT is influenced by numerous preanalytical and analytical parameters not related to the anticoagulant activity of UFH. METHODS: The aim of this study was to compare the anti-Xa-correlated APTT therapeutic ranges calculated using different combinations of APTT (n = 4) and anti-Xa reagents (n = 4) in frozen citrated plasmas from 87 inpatients on UFH. RESULTS: The median APTT ratio ranged from 2.19 for the less sensitive to 3.23 for the most sensitive reagent, whereas the median anti-Xa activity was between 0.37 IU/ml and 0.57 IU/ml. The APTT therapeutic ranges calculated to correlate with anti-Xa activities between 0.30 and 0.70 IU/ml were found to be highly different from one combination of APTT reagent and analyzer to another. The same applied to the therapeutic range of a single APTT reagent calculated using different anti-Xa assays performed on the same analyzer, leading to a lack of agreement as to whether a sample was classified as subtherapeutic, therapeutic or supratherapeutic in 8.0% to 23.0% of the patients, with kappa coefficients between 0.908 and 0.753. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the APTT therapeutic range calculated to correlate with anti-Xa activities between 0.30 and 0.70 IU/ml is influenced not only by the APTT reagent, but also by the anti-Xa reagent used for calculation.

High Prevalence of Acquired Thrombophilia Without Prognosis Value in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Background Recent literature reports a strong thrombotic tendency in patients hospitalized for a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This characteristic is unusual and seems specific to COVID-19 infections, especially in their severe form. Viral infections can trigger acquired thrombophilia, which can then lead to thrombotic complications. We investigate for the presence of acquired thrombophilia, which could participate in this phenomenon, and report its prevalence. We also wonder if these thrombophilias participate in the bad prognosis of severe COVID-19 infections. Methods and Results In 89 consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, we found a 20% prevalence of PS (protein S) deficiency and a high (ie, 72%) prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies: mainly lupus anticoagulant. The presence of PS deficiency or antiphospholipid antibodies was not linked with a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time nor with D-dimer, fibrinogen, or CRP (C-reactive protein) concentrations. These coagulation abnormalities are also not linked with thrombotic clinical events occurring during hospitalization nor with mortality. Conclusions We assess a high prevalence of positive tests detecting thrombophilia in COVID-19 infections. However, in our series, these acquired thrombophilias are not correlated with the severity of the disease nor with the occurrence of thrombotic events. Albeit the strong thrombotic tendency in COVID-19 infections, the presence of frequent acquired thrombophilia may be part of the inflammation storm of COVID-19 and should not systematically modify our strategy on prophylactic anticoagulant treatment, which is already revised upwards in this pathological condition. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04335162.

Monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy: Lack of standardization of anti-Xa activity reagents.

INTRODUCTION: One of the main advantages of using anti-Xa instead of activated partial thromboplastin time in monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy relies on its hypothesized standardization, with a unique therapeutic range defined to be 0.30 to 0.70 IU/mL. The aim of the present study was to compare the inter-reagent agreement of anti-Xa activity. METHODS: Citrate tubes were obtained from 104 inpatients on UFH. Plasma samples were stored frozen in aliquots at -70°C before being shipped to three accredited coagulation laboratories to be evaluated for anti-Xa activity using their routine assay(s). Pooled normal plasmas spiked with dilutions of the 6th International Standard of UFH to achieve anti-Xa activities up to 1.0 IU/mL were evaluated using the same techniques. RESULTS: In the plasmas from patients on UFH, the median anti-Xa activity ranged from 0.37 IU/mL with one reagent to 0.57 IU/mL with another; results were in between (0.45 IU/mL) using two other reagents. Comparisons of results obtained using the different reagents demonstrated unacceptable bias up to 0.24 IU/mL between some reagents (41% difference). The concordance as whether anti-Xa activities measured using different reagents were within or outside the therapeutic range was between 0.411 and 0.939 (kappa). Similar discrepancy was demonstrated for anti-Xa activities when evaluating normal plasma spiked with the International Standard. A discrepancy of the same order of magnitude was demonstrated in the 2017 External Quality Assessment Program provided by the External Quality Control in Assays and Tests exercises. CONCLUSIONS: The reported discrepancy between test results obtained using different anti-Xa assays clearly suggests a lack of standardization of that assay with potentially significant impact on the patients' anticoagulation.

Factor VIII and IX assays for post-infusion monitoring in hemophilia patients: Guidelines from the French BIMHO group (GFHT).

Replacement therapy with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII and FIX (pdFVIII/pdFIX or rFVIII/rFIX) concentrates is the standard of treatment in patients with haemophilia A and B, respectively. Measurement of factor VIII (FVIII:C) or factor IX (FIX:C) levels can be done by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) or chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). The French study group on the Biology of Hemorrhagic Diseases (a collaborative group of the GFHT and MHEMO network) presents a literature review and proposals for the monitoring of FVIII:C and FIX:C levels in treated haemophilia A and B patients, respectively. The use of CSA is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or rFVIII including extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII. Except for rFVIII-Fc, great caution is required when measuring FVIII:C levels by OSA in patients substituted by EHL-rFVIII. The OSA is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFIX or rFIX. Large discordances in the FIX:C levels measured for extended half-life rFIX (EHL-rFIX), depending on the method and reagents used, must lead to great attention when OSA is used for measuring FIX:C levels in patients substituted by EHL-rFIX. Data of most of recent studies, obtained with spiked plasmas, deserve to be confirmed in plasma samples of treated patients.

Monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy. 4 hour-stability of anti-Xa activity in unspun citrated tubes.

Current guidelines recommend performing laboratory tests aimed at monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH) treatments within a delay not exceeding 1 to 2 h(s) after sampling when blood is collected into citrated tubes. As such a short delay could be an issue, we evaluated the potential impact of longer delays. For that purpose, two citrated tubes were obtained from patients on UFH: one was centrifuged and tested for anti-Xa activity and aPTT within 1 h after collection (T1 h) and one was stored for 4 h at room temperature (T4 h) before being processed. A total of 123 paired tubes were investigated. Anti-Xa activity was significantly lower at T4 h than at T1 h, with a mean bias, calculated according to Bland-Altman, of 0.05 IU/mL. Considering 0.30 to 0.70 IU/mL as the therapeutic range, there were 12 cases of discrepant test results (9.8%). Most of them being around the lower limit of the therapeutic range had no impact on patients' management. APTT was significantly shortened (p < 0.0001) at T4 h vs. T1 h, with a mean bias of -7.9 s. Considering anti-Xa correlated aPTT therapeutic range, 29 cases of discrepant test results (23.6%) were found, 10% would have induce dosage changes. The concordance between anti-Xa activities measured at T4 h and T1 h was excellent (kappa = 0.813) and good for aPTT (kappa = 0.661). In conclusion, extending the delay between blood collection and measurement of tests prescribed for monitoring UFH therapy up to 4 h was found to lead to a systematic reduction in both anti-Xa activity and aPTT in unspun citrated tubes. As changes at T4 h were limited and had few clinically relevance than the ones observed with aPTT testing, a 4 h-delay was found to be acceptable for anti-Xa activity. The maximum delay for aPTT should remain around 1-2 h as changes were more relevant.

[Factor IX assays in treated hemophilia B patients]. / Dosage de l'activité du facteur IX chez les patients hémophiles B substitués.

Replacement therapy with plasma-derived or recombinant FIX (pdFIX or rFIX) concentrates is the standard of treatment in patients with hemophilia B. The method predominantly used for measuring factor IX (FIX:C) levels is the one-stage clotting assay (OSA) but this method depends on the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent and the coagulation analyzer used, and wide variations in the measurements of FIX recovery have been reported with some factor concentrates. The French study group on the biology of hemorrhagic diseases (a collaborative group of the GFHT and MHEMO network), presents a review of the literature and proposals for the monitoring of FIX:C levels in treated hemophilia B patients. The use of OSA calibrated with a plasma reference tested against the current FIX WHO International Standard is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFIX or rFIX. Chromogenic substrate assays (CSA) are adequate for the monitoring of patients treated with Rixubis®, but data available for Benefix® are currently too limited. For extended half-life rFIX (EHL-rFIX), large discordances in the FIX:C levels measured were evidenced, depending on the method and reagents used. Great attention is therefore required for measuring FIX:C levels by OSA in patients substituted by EHL-rFIX. Commercial kits for CSA are not equivalent, and although potentially useful, they are not validated for all EHL-rFIX. Most of recent studies reported data obtained with spiked plasmas, which deserve to be confirmed on plasma samples collected in treated patients.

[Factor VIII assays in treated hemophilia A patients]. / Dosage de l'activité du facteur VIII chez les patients hémophiles A substitués.

Replacement therapy with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII (pdFVIII or rFVIII) concentrates is the standard of treatment in patients with hemophilia A. The reference method used for measuring factor VIII (FVIII:C) levels in patients treated by FVIII concentrates is the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). However, the one-stage clotting assay (OSA) is predominantly used in current clinical practice, but this method depends on the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent and the coagulation analyzer used, and wide variations in the measurements of FVIII recovery have been reported with some factor concentrates. The French study group on the biology of hemorrhagic diseases (a collaborative group of the GFHT and MHEMO network) presents a review of the literature and proposals for the monitoring of FVIII:C levels in treated hemophilia A patients. The use of CSA calibrated with a plasma reference tested against the current FVIII WHO (World Health Organization) International Standard is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or rFVIII including extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII. OSA are adequate for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or with most of rFVIII concentrates. However, preliminary comparison with CSA is mandatory before measuring FVIII:C by OSA in patients treated by Refacto AF®. For rFVIII-EHL, OSA are only acceptable for Elocta®. Great caution is therefore required when measuring FVIII:C levels by OSA in patients substituted by other EHL-rFVIII. Indeed, most of recent studies reported data obtained with spiked plasmas, which deserve to be confirmed on plasma samples collected in treated patients.

Age dependency for coagulation parameters in paediatric populations. Results of a multicentre study aimed at defining the age-specific reference ranges.

Understanding of developmental haemostasis is critical to ensure optimal prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of haemorrhagic and thrombotic diseases in children. As coagulation test results are known to be dependent on the reagents/analysers used, it is recommended for each laboratory to define the age-dependent reference ranges by using its own technical condition. That study was carried out in seven centers to establish age-specific reference ranges using the same reagents and analyser. Plasma samples were obtained from 1437 paediatric patients from the following age groups: 15 days-4 weeks (n=36), 1-5 months (n=320), 6-12 months (n=176), 1-5 years (n=507), 6-10 years (n=132) and 11-17 years (n=262). Indication of coagulation testing was pre-operative screening for non-acute diseases in most cases. PT values were similar in the different age groups to those in adults, whereas longer aPTTs were demonstrated in the younger children. Plasma levels of all clotting factors, except for FV, were significantly decreased (p<0.0001) in the youngest children, adult values being usually reached before the end of the first year. The same applied to antithrombin, protein C/S, and plasminogen. In contrast, FVIII and VWF levels were elevated in the youngest children and returned to adult values within six months. The same applied to D-dimer levels, which were found elevated, particularly until six months of life, until puberty. These data suggest that most coagulation test results are highly dependent on age, mainly during the first year of life, and that age-specific reference ranges must be used to ensure proper evaluation of coagulation in children.

Underestimation of unfractionated heparin therapy assessment due to platelet activation when using partial-draw (pediatric) citrate collection tubes.

The "so-called" pediatric tubes are often used when collecting smaller blood volume is necessary, particularly in pediatric patients or in case of difficult/recurrent sampling. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare coagulation test results evaluated in evacuated polymer tubes containing 0.109 M citrate (1 vol./9 vol.) specifically designed to allow either a partial (2.0 mL,"pediatric") or a total (3.5 mL) filling. No significantly relevant discrepancy was found between routine coagulation test results in both tubes collected from untreated patients and from patients on vitamin K antagonist or low molecular weight heparin. In contrast, aPTT was significantly shorter and anti-FXa activity was significantly lower in partial-draw than in full-draw tubes collected from 46 patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH). This discrepancy was likely related to increased platelet activation in partial-draw tubes, as suggested by higher platelet factor 4 plasma concentrations and platelet P-Selectin expression in partial-draw than in full-draw citrate tubes. To confirm this hypothesis, we then evaluated partial-draw tubes containing CTAD, a mixture of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents. In 25 patients on UFH, aPTT and anti-FXa activity were not significantly different in partial-draw CTAD tubes and in full-draw citrate tubes. In conclusion, despite increased platelet activation, samples collected into partial-draw citrate tubes allow accurate routine coagulation testing in all patients but those requiring UFH assessment, in which their use could lead to significant underestimation of anticoagulation. In such cases, partial-draw tubes containing CTAD could be validly used to monitor heparin therapy as well as to perform routine coagulation testing.

Evaluation and performance characteristics of the Q Hemostasis Analyzer, an automated coagulation analyzer.

The Q Hemostasis Analyzer (Grifols, Barcelona, Spain) is a fully-automated random-access multiparameter analyzer, designed to perform coagulation, chromogenic and immunologic assays. It is equipped with a cap-piercing system. The instrument was evaluated in a hemostasis laboratory of a University Hospital with respect to its technical features in the determination of coagulation i.e. prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time, fibrinogen and single coagulation factors V (FV) and VIII (FVIII), chromogenic [antithrombin (AT) and protein C activity] and immunologic assays [von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag) concentration], using reagents from the analyzer manufacturer. Total precision (evaluated as the coefficient of variation) was below 6% for most parameters both in normal and in pathological ranges, except for FV, FVIII, AT and vWF:Ag both in the normal and pathological samples. No carryover was detected in alternating aPTT measurement in a pool of normal plasma samples and in the same pool spiked with unfractionated heparin (>1.5 IU/mL). The effective throughput was 154 PT, 66 PT/aPTT, 42 PT/aPTT/fibrinogen, and 38 PT/aPTT/AT per hour, leading to 154 to 114 tests performed per hour, depending of the tested panel. Test results obtained on the Q Hemostasis Analyzer were well correlated with those obtained on the ACL TOP analyzer (Instrumentation Laboratory), with r between 0.862 and 0.989. In conclusion, routine coagulation testing can be performed on the Q Hemostasis Analyzer with satisfactory precision and the same apply to more specialized and specific tests.

Monitoring treatments with unfractionated heparin: CTAD must be used instead of citrate as the anticoagulant solution when using partial-draw collection tubes. Results of a multicenter evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Sampling small volumes of blood may be necessary, particularly in pediatric patients, or in case of difficult or recurrent venipunctures. METHODS: Routine hemostasis test results evaluated in partial- and full-draw evacuated polymer tubes obtained in 4 centers were compared. RESULTS: No relevant discrepancy (Bland-Altman) was found between test results measured in partial- and full-draw tubes obtained from untreated patients and from patients on vitamin K-antagonist or low molecular weight heparin. In patients on unfractionated heparin (UFH), significantly lower anti-FXa activity [median=0.29IU/mL (range:0.04-1.15) vs. 0.39 (0.05-1.25), n=89, p<0.0001] and shorter aPTT were measured in partial-draw tubes. This discrepancy was likely to be related to the release of higher amounts of PF4 after increased platelet activation in partial-draw tubes. As CTAD is known to counteract platelet activation, we then collected blood into partial-draw CTAD tube and full-draw citrate tube. Both in patients on UFH and in untreated patients, no relevant difference could be demonstrated for all studied parameters (Bland-Altman), including aPTT and anti-FXa activity, even if analytical comparison showed significantly higher anti-FXa activity in partial-draw CTAD than in full-draw citrated tubes with a mean bias of 0.02 IU/mL, identical throughout the measuring range. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that samples collected into partial-draw citrate tubes allow accurate routine coagulation testingin all patients but those requiring UFH assessment,in which their use led to a significant underestimation ofanticoagulation. In such cases, partial-draw tubes containing CTAD could be validly used to monitor heparin therapy as well as to perform routine coagulation testing.

Multicenter evaluation of a new quantitative highly sensitive D-dimer assay, the Hemosil D-dimer HS 500, in patients with clinically suspected venous thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: D-dimer testing is widely used in conjunction with clinical pretest probability (PTP) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) exclusion. We report on a multicenter evaluation of a new, automated, latex enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay [HemosIL D-Dimer HS 500, Instrumentation Laboratory (IL)]. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 747 consecutive outpatients with suspected proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT, n=401) or pulmonary embolism (PE, n=346) were evaluated at four university hospitals in a management study with a 3 month follow-up. Samples were tested at each center using the new D-dimer assay on an automated coagulation analyzer [ACL TOP (IL)], with clinical cut-off for VTE at 500 ng/mL (FEU). RESULTS: The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100% for all PTP subgroups (no false negative results); for both sensitivity and NPV the lower limit of the 95% CI in patients with moderate/low PTP was higher than 95%. The overall specificity was 45.1% (95%CI: 41.1-49.3%). Higher specificity value was recorded in the low PTP subgroup [49.2% (95%CI: 41.7-56.7)]. No significant differences were found between patients suspected of having DVT or PE; sensitivity and NPV were 100%. The reproducibility of the assay was good, being the total CVs% less than 10% for D-dimer concentration near the clinical cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: The new, highly sensitive D-dimer assay proved to be accurate when used for VTE diagnostic work-up in outpatients. Based on 100% sensitivity and NPV and lower limit of the 95% CI higher than 95%, the assay can be used as a stand-alone test in patients with non high PTP.

Point-of-care versus central laboratory coagulation testing during haemorrhagic surgery. A multicenter study.

Delay in collecting coagulation test results from a central laboratory is one of the critical issues to efficiently control haemostasis during surgery. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare the performance of a point-of-care (POC) device (CoaguChek Pro DM) with the central laboratory-based coagulation testing during haemorrhagic surgery. For this purpose, 93 patients undergoing major surgical procedure were prospectively included in three centers. Blood was drawn from all patients before surgical incision and from most patients during surgical procedure after a blood loss of 25% or more was observed. When expressed in activity percentage, POC-based prothrombin time (PT) was in good agreement with central laboratory test result with coefficient of correlation in the range from 0.711 to 0.960 in the three centers. Comparison was less conclusive when PT was expressed in seconds or as the patient-to-control ratio and for activated partial thromboplastin time, with significantly shorter clotting times and lower ratios obtained on the POC device. On-site PT (in activity percentage) monitoring would have induced no significant change in fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion in patients when compared to central laboratory monitoring. Test results were obtained in less than 5 minutes when performed using the POC device versus a median turnaround time of 88 minutes (range: 29-235 minutes) when blood collection tubes were sent to the central laboratory. These results suggest that, in providing a rapid answer, POC-based monitoring of PT (in percentage) using the CoaguChek device could be validly used in patients undergoing haemorrhagic surgical procedures.

A new chromogenic assay (HemosIL ThromboPath) is sensitive to major prothrombotic risk factors affecting the protein C pathway. Results of a multicenter study.

The HemosIL ThromboPath assay (Instrumentation Laboratory) is a new chromogenic assay designed to globally evaluate the functionality of the protein C (PC) pathway. It is based on the ability of endogenous APC generated after activation of PC by a snake venom extract (Protac) to reduce the thrombin generation induced by a reagent containing tissue factor. The aim of this multicenter study involving three laboratories was to evaluate the test sensitivity to PC pathway abnormalities by retrospectively testing frozen plasma samples obtained in the different laboratories. Test results were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in subjects who presented with any confirmed PC pathway abnormality than in those without. The cut-off value, defined in each participating center as the mean value minus one standard deviation of test results obtained in 30 normal samples, was found to provide a sensitivity-to-specificity ratio similar to that obtained using ROC-analysis. The assay performed well in carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation (n = 81), patients with PC deficiency (n = 40), combined defects (n = 55) or lupus anticoagulant (n = 44), with test results below the locally defined cut-off values in 97.5%, 95.0%, 100% and 100% of the tested subjects, respectively. The assay sensitivity for PS deficiency (n = 62) was 87.1%. Only 13.6% of the 272 subjects without any PC pathway abnormality had a decreased test result. So, using the locally defined cut-off values, the overall test sensitivity to all tested PC pathway abnormalities was 95.0% (95%CI = 91.8-97.3), its specificity 86.4% (95%CI = 81.8-90.2), its negative predictive value 94.4% (95%CI = 90.8-96.9) and its positive predictive value 87.9% (95%CI = 83.7-91.3).