The presence of extensive lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is associated with higher risks of local-regional recurrence compared to usual LVI in curatively treated breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Several datasets have demonstrated a correlation between lymph-vascular invasion (LVI) and local-regional recurrence (LRR). Whether the observation of "extensive LVI" is a further and incremental determinant of LRR risk is unknown. We describe clinical outcomes in women with invasive breast cancer stratified by: 1) absence of LVI (neg), 2) LVI focal or suspicious (FS-LVI), 3) usual (non-extensive) LVI (LVI) and 4) extensive LVI (E-LVI). MATERIALS/METHODS: Between 12/2009 and 8/2021, 8837 patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated with curative intent and were evaluable. Clinical-pathological details were abstracted by retrospective review. The description of LVI was abstracted from pathology reports. Recurrence and survival outcomes were compared based on the extent of LVI. A matched propensity score analysis compared outcomes between patients with LVI vs. E-LVI. RESULTS: Of the 8837 patients studied, 5584 were neg, 461 had FS-LVI, 2315 had LVI, and 477 had E-LVI. Patient with E-LVI had an adverse risk profile compared to the other groups. The 5- and 10-year local regional recurrence (LRR) cumulative incidence estimates in patients with E-LVI were 9.6% (95% CI: 7.1-13) and 13% (95% CI: 10-17), which were significantly higher than observed in the usual LVI group (6.8% [5.7-7.9] and 10% [8.8-12], respectively). A statistically significant difference in LRR was demonstrated on univariable (HR 1.4, 95% CI [1.03-1.89], p-value 0.029) and multivariable regression analysis (HR 1.62, 95% CI [1.15-2.27], p-value 0.005) when compared to non-extensive LVI. In an alternative approach, we performed a 2:1 propensity-matched analysis comparing LVI to E-LVI patients. The hazard ratio for LRR (HR 1.47 (CI 1.02-2.14, p=0.041) was suggestive of a higher risk with E-LVI. CONCLUSIONS: Our work suggests that patients with E-LVI are at a higher risk for LRR than those with usual LVI. For patients who are borderline candidates for regional nodal irradiation or PMRT, the finding of E-LVI might be decisive in favor of intensified treatment.

High-Risk Features Associated with Recurrence in Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of knowledge regarding the use of prognostic features in stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Thus, we investigated clinicopathologic features associated with recurrence after complete resection for stage I LUAD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with pathologic stage I LUAD who underwent R0 resection from 2010 to 2020. Exclusion criteria included history of lung cancer, induction or adjuvant therapy, noninvasive or mucinous LUAD, and death within 90 days of surgery. Fine and Gray competing-risk regression assessed associations between clinicopathologic features and disease recurrence. RESULTS: In total, 1912 patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients (1565 [82%]) had stage IA LUAD, and 250 developed recurrence: 141 (56%) distant and 109 (44%) locoregional only. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 12% (95% confidence interval, 11%-14%). Higher maximum standardized uptake value of the primary tumor (hazard ratio [HR]=1.04), sublobar resection (HR=2.04), higher IASLC grade (HR=5.32 [grade 2]; HR=7.93 [grade 3]), lymphovascular invasion (HR=1.70), visceral pleural invasion (HR=1.54), and tumor size (HR=1.30) were independently associated with hazard of recurrence. Tumors with 3-4 high-risk features had a higher cumulative incidence of recurrence at 5 years than tumors without these features (30% vs. 4%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence after resection for stage I LUAD remains an issue for select patients. Commonly reported clinicopathologic features can be used to define patients at high risk of recurrence and should be considered when assessing the prognosis of patients with stage I disease.

Combined RAF and MEK Inhibition to Treat Activated Non-V600 BRAF-Altered Advanced Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Cancers with non-V600 BRAF-activating alterations have no matched therapy. Preclinical data suggest that these tumors depend on ERK signaling; however, clinical response to MEK/ERK inhibitors has overall been low. We hypothesized that a narrow therapeutic index, driven by ERK inhibition in healthy (wild-type) tissues, limits the efficacy of these inhibitors. As these mutants signal as activated dimers, we further hypothesized that RAF inhibitors given concurrently would improve the therapeutic index by opposing ERK inhibition in normal tissues and not activate ERK in the already activated tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using cell lines and patient-derived xenografts, we evaluated the effect of RAF inhibition, alone and in combination with MEK/ERK inhibitors. We then undertook a phase I/II clinical trial of a higher dose of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib combined with the RAF inhibitor encorafenib in patients with advanced cancer with activating non-V600 BRAF alterations. RESULTS: RAF inhibition led to modest inhibition of signaling and growth in activated non-V600 BRAF preclinical models and allowed higher dose of MEK/ERK inhibitors in vivo for more profound tumor regression. Fifteen patients received binimetinib 60 mg twice daily plus encorafenib 450 mg daily (6 gastrointestinal primaries, 6 genitourinary primaries, 3 melanoma, and 2 lung cancer; 7 BRAF mutations and 8 BRAF fusions). Treatment was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities. One patient had a confirmed partial response, 8 had stable disease, and 6 had radiographic or clinical progression as best response. On-treatment biopsies revealed incomplete ERK pathway inhibition. CONCLUSION: Combined RAF and MEK inhibition does not sufficiently inhibit activated non-V600 BRAF-mutant tumors in patients.

Lung resection after initial nonoperative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to assess the outcomes of lung resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with nonoperative treatment and to identify prognostic factors associated with survival. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery (2010-2022) after initial nonoperative treatment at a single institution were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Exclusion criteria included metachronous cancer, planned neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery for diagnostic or palliative indications. Cox models were constructed for overall survival and event-free survival. Survival of patients with stage IV disease was compared with survival of a nonstudy cohort who did not undergo surgery. RESULTS: In total, 120 patients met the inclusion criteria. Initial clinical stage was early stage in 16%, locoregionally advanced in 25%, and metastatic in 59% of patients. The indication for surgery was recurrence in 18%, local persistent disease in 23%, oligoprogression in 22%, and local control of oligometastatic disease in 38% of patients. Grade 3 or greater complications occurred in 5% of patients; 90-day mortality was 3%. Three-year event-free survival and overall survival were 39% and 73%, respectively. Male sex and lymphovascular invasion were associated with shorter event-free survival and overall survival; younger age and prior radiation therapy were associated with shorter overall survival. Patients with stage IV disease who received salvage lung resection had better overall survival than similar patients who received subsequent systemic therapy and no surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected, heterogeneous population, lung resection after initial nonoperative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer was safe. Surgery as local consolidative therapy was associated with encouraging outcomes and should be considered for these patients.

Long-term Outcomes from a Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients with Low- or Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ultrahypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a standard treatment intervention for localized prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To report final long-term tumor control outcomes and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities from a single-center phase 1 dose escalation study using SBRT for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2009 and 2012, 136 patients were enrolled and treated. The initial dose level was 32.5 Gy in five fractions. Doses were then sequentially escalated to 35 Gy, 37.5 Gy, and 40 Gy in five fractions delivered every other day. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was late treatment-related toxicity. Secondary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up was 10.5 yr for the 32.5-Gy group, 9.9 yr for the 35-Gy group, 8.2 yr for the 37.5-Gy group, and 7.3 yr for the 40-Gy group. The 8-yr cumulative incidence of PSA failure was 26% for 32.5 Gy, 15% for 35 Gy, 3.4% for 37.5 Gy, and 6.6% for 40 Gy. Higher radiation dose (37.5-40 Gy) and favorable intermediate risk (vs unfavorable intermediate risk) were associated with better PSA recurrence rates (p = 0.011 and 0.002, respectively). The 8-yr actuarial probability rates for survival free from late grade ≥2 toxicity were 94% for GI toxicity and 86% for GU toxicity. No grade 4 events were recorded. Higher dose levels were not associated with higher rates of late grade ≥2 GI (p = 0.2) or GU (p > 0.9) toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT doses ranging from 32.5 to 40 Gy were associated with low incidence of moderate or severe toxicities. Higher doses resulted in superior disease control outcomes 8 yr after treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated the association between the radiotherapy dose used and the rate of control of prostate cancer. We found that higher doses resulted in more favorable outcomes without excess toxicity. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00911118.

Optimal allocation in annual plants with density-dependent fitness.

We study optimal two-sector (vegetative and reproductive) allocation models of annual plants in temporally variable environments that incorporate effects of density-dependent lifetime variability and juvenile mortality in a fitness function whose expected value is maximized. Only special cases of arithmetic and geometric mean maximizers have previously been considered in the literature, and we also allow a wider range of production functions with diminishing returns. The model predicts that the time of maturity is pushed to an earlier date as the correlation between individual lifetimes increases, and while optimal schedules are bang-bang at the extremes, the transition is mediated by schedules where vegetative growth is mixed with reproduction for a wide intermediate range. The mixed growth lasts longer when the production function is less concave allowing for better leveraging of plant size when generating seeds. Analytic estimates are obtained for the power means that interpolate between arithmetic and geometric mean and correspond to partially correlated lifetime distributions.