The level of glucose in pancreatic cyst fluid is more accurate than carcinoembryonic antigen to identify mucinous tumors: A French multicenter study.

Background and Objectives: Pancreatic cyst fluid level of glucose is a promising marker to identify mucinous from nonmucinous tumors, but the glucose assay has not yet been recommended. The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic performances of pancreatic cyst fluid level of glucose and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Methods: In this French multicenter study, data of consecutive patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cyst with intracyst glucose assay between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of glucose and corresponding sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), accuracy (Acc), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated and compared with those of CEA. The best threshold of glucose was identified using the Youden index. Results: Of the 121 patients identified, 81 had a definitive diagnosis (46 mucinous, 35 nonmucinous tumors) and were included for analysis. An intracystic glucose level <41.8 mg/dL allowed identification of mucinous tumors with better diagnostic performances (AUROC, 93.6%; 95% confidence interval, 87.2%-100%; Se, 95.3%; Sp, 91.2%; Acc, 93.5%; PPV, 93.2%; NPV, 93.9%) compared with CEA level >192 ng/mL (AUROC, 81.2%; 95% confidence interval, 71.3%-91.1%; Se, 41.7%; Sp, 96.9%; Acc, 67.6%; PPV, 93.8%; NPV, 59.6%) (P = 0.035). Combining values of glucose and CEA did not offer additional benefit in terms of diagnosis. Conclusion: Our results confirm previously published data and support the use of pancreatic cyst fluid glucose for the identification of mucinous tumors when the definitive diagnosis remains uncertain.

A Systematic Review on the Interest of Drug-tolerant Assay in the Monitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] are treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapies, of which infliximab [IFX] is most commonly used. Loss of response [LOR] to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenic failure accounts for 20% of subsequent medical intervention and is defined, using a drug-sensitive assay, as low or undetectable concentration of drug with high titres of anti-drug antibodies [ADAb]. We performed a systematic review to investigate the use of a drug-tolerant assay during both induction and maintenance, to monitor patients treated with anti-TNFs. After the search on PubMed, 90 publications were reviewed. Most ADAb detection methods are drug-sensitive, cannot detect ADAb in the presence of drug, and therefore cannot be used close to drug administration when the drug concentration is too high. To overcome this major limitation, several drug-tolerant techniques have been developed and will be discussed in this review. Using drug-tolerant assays, ADAb against IFX or adalimumab [ADM] can be detected during induction and predict primary non-response or LOR. Drug-sensitive assays do not allow detection of ADAb during the induction phase when IFX or ADM concentration is typically high.

Early detection of anti-drug antibodies during initiation of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy predicts treatment discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Anti-drug antibodies develop mostly during the induction therapy with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs and can be revealed by means of a drug-tolerant assay. AIM: To investigate whether the early detection of anti-drug antibodies during the induction therapy was predictive of treatment discontinuation. METHODS: In a prospective study, consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), who should start an anti-TNF, were enrolled and followed regularly during 24 months or less in case of non- or loss of response (LOR) or adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation. Anti-TNF levels and anti-drug antibodies were measured at week 2 for adalimumab (ADA) and weeks 2 and 6 for infliximab (IFX) using a drug-tolerant assay. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were enrolled (54 under ADA). At week 2, antibodies to ADA and to IFX were detected in 76% and 67% of patients. Time to treatment discontinuation was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) in patients with antibodies to ADA ≥2.0 µg/mL-eq (6.0 vs 24 months, HR = 18.51, 95% CI [4.35-78.71]) or with antibodies to IFX ≥4.0 µg/mL-eq (5.5 vs >24 months, HR = 13.89, 95% CI [4.08-47.31]) at week 2 compared to patients without positive antibodies. Antibodies to ADA and to IFX were predictive of treatment failure within 24 months with a sensitivity of 79% and 62%, and specificities and positive predictive values of 100%. In multivariate analysis, antibodies to ADA or to IFX at week 2 were the only factors associated with treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of antibodies to anti-TNF is high when detected early using a drug-tolerant assay, and their appearance predicts further treatment discontinuation.

Effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Yield of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) compared with standard colonoscopy is conflicting in terms of adenoma detection rate (ADR). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) appears necessary. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched in December 2017. Abstracts from Digestive Disease Week and United European Gastroenterology Week meetings were also searched to 2017. All RCTs comparing EAC with standard colonoscopy were included. Analysis was conducted by using the Mantel-Haenszel models. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 test. RESULTS: Of the 265 articles reviewed, 12 RCTs were included, with a total of 8376 patients (EAC group 4225; standard colonoscopy group 4151). In the meta-analysis, ADR was significantly increased in the EAC group vs. the standard colonoscopy group (41.3 % vs. 34.2 %; risk ratio [RR] = 1.20, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.36; P = 0.003; I2 = 79 %), especially for operators with low-to-moderate ADRs (< 35 %): RR = 1.51, 95 %CI 1.35 to 1.69; P < 0.001; I2 = 43 %). In contrast, this benefit was not reached for operators with high ADRs (> 45 %): RR = 1.01, 95 %CI 0.93 to 1.09; P = 0.87; I2 = 0.0 %). The mean number of adenomas per patient tended to be higher with EAC (mean difference = 0.11 adenomas/patient, 95 %CI - 0.17 to 0.38). Similar results were shown for polyp detection rates (61.6 % vs. 51.4 %; RR = 1.20, 95 %CI 1.06 to 1.36; P = 0.004). Use of the Endocuff did not impact the cecal intubation rate (95.1 % vs. 95.7 %; P = 0.08), or the procedure time compared with standard colonoscopy. Adverse events related to Endocuff were rare and exclusively mild mucosal erosion (4.0 %; 95 %CI 2.0 % to 8.0 %). CONCLUSION: With moderate-quality evidence, this study showed an improvement in ADR with EAC without major adverse events, especially for operators with low-to-moderate ADRs.