RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autologous breast reconstruction confers favorable patient reports of satisfaction and quality of life compared to implant-based reconstruction over a lifetime. The latissimus dorsi with immediate fat transfer (LIFT) is an alternative approach to abdominally based free flaps (Ab-FF), which expands fully autologous reconstruction to non-microsurgeons. This study aims to compare the two procedures concerning their clinical and patient-reported outcomes one year postoperatively. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of LIFTs and Ab-FFs performed between March 2017 and August 2022. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications, reoperations, and longitudinal BREAST-Q scores. BREAST-Q modules included Satisfaction with Breasts, Abdomen, Back, Psychosocial Well-being, Physical Well-being: Chest, Abdomen, Back, and Sexual Well-being. RESULTS: Of the 281 included patients (408 breasts), 211 received Ab-FF, and 70 received LIFT. One-year follow-up (median [IQR]: 12 [12] months) demonstrated that Ab-FF independently predicted dehiscence, reoperation procedures, and revisional surgery. LIFT independently increased the odds of seroma. In addition, obesity predicted dehiscence, while bilateral reconstructions predicted revisional fat grafting. BREAST-Q scores fluctuated over time but were similar across all measured domains by one year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although Ab-FF is the gold-standard approach for fully autologous reconstruction, LIFT procedures may be associated with a less complicated postoperative course while eliciting similar patient-reported outcomes. LIFT may subsequently be preferred to limit postoperative complications, particularly in patients with obesity. LIFT can also be utilized by more plastic surgeons who are either not microsurgically trained or do not have an environment that fosters Ab-FF.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common cause of lymphedema in the United States and occurs in up to 50% of individuals receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of ALND may prevent lymphedema, but long-term results and anastomotic patency are unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction via coupler-assisted bypass (CAB). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing prophylactic LVB following ALND at two tertiary care centers between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into cohorts based on whether they received the "standard" end-to-end (E-E) suturing or CAB technique. The primary outcome of interest was development of lymphedema. Quantitative and qualitative assessments for lymphedema were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Overall, 63 LVBs were performed, of which 24 lymphatics underwent immediate reconstruction via "CAB" and 39 lymphatics via "standard" end-to-end suture. Patient characteristics, including body mass index, and treatment characteristics, including radiation therapy, did not significantly differ between groups. CAB was associated with a greater mean number of lymphatics bypassed per vein (standard 1.7 vs. CAB 2.6, p = 0.0001) and bypass to larger veins (standard 1.2 vs. CAB 2.2 mm, p < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 9.1% (1/11) of individuals receiving CAB developed lymphedema. These rates were similar to those seen following standard bypass at 4.8% (1/21), although within a significantly shorter follow-up duration (standard 7.8 vs. CAB 14.7 months, p = 0.0170). CONCLUSION: The CAB technique is a viable, effective technical alternative to the standard LVB technique. This comparative study of techniques in prophylactic LVB suggests that CABs maintain long-term patency, possibly due to the ease of anastomosing several lymphatics to single large caliber veins while reducing the technical demands of the procedure.