Computerized clinical decision support improves warfarin management and decreases recurrent venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: An explicit approach to warfarin dose adjustment using computerized clinical decision support (CDS) improves warfarin management. We report metrics of quality for warfarin management before and after implementation of CDS in a large health care system. METHODS: A total of 2591 chronically anticoagulated patients were eligible for inclusion. We compared interpatient time in therapeutic range (TTR) and international normalized ratio (INR) variability before and after implementation of CDS. We report outcomes of major bleeding, thrombosis, and health care utilization. RESULTS: Implementation of CDS significantly improved TTR (from 63.99% to 65.13%; P = .04) and reduced out-of-range INRs (from 42.39% to 39.97%; P < .001). Venous thromboembolism (relative risk [RR] 0.41; P < .001) emergency department utilization (RR 0.62; P < .001), and hospitalization (RR 0.62; P < .001) were reduced after CDS implementation. Major hemorrhage was more frequent after CDS implementation (RR 1.42; P = .01). CONCLUSION: The CDS warfarin management was associated with improved TTR and decreased INR variability in a large cohort of chronically anticoagulated patients. Clinically relevant outcomes were broadly improved, although more bleeding events were observed.

Effect of screening for coronary artery disease using CT angiography on mortality and cardiac events in high-risk patients with diabetes: the FACTOR-64 randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus, yet CAD often is asymptomatic prior to myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary death. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether routine screening for CAD by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes deemed to be at high cardiac risk followed by CCTA-directed therapy would reduce the risk of death and nonfatal coronary outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The FACTOR-64 study was a randomized clinical trial in which 900 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes of at least 3 to 5 years' duration and without symptoms of CAD were recruited from 45 clinics and practices of a single health system (Intermountain Healthcare, Utah), enrolled at a single-site coordinating center, and randomly assigned to CAD screening with CCTA (n = 452) or to standard national guidelines-based optimal diabetes care (n = 448) (targets: glycated hemoglobin level <7.0%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level <100 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg). All CCTA imaging was performed at the coordinating center. Standard therapy or aggressive therapy (targets: glycated hemoglobin level <6.0%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level <70 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level >50 mg/dL [women] or >40 mg/dL [men], triglycerides level <150 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg), or aggressive therapy with invasive coronary angiography, was recommended based on CCTA findings. Enrollment occurred between July 2007 and May 2013, and follow-up extended to August 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization; the secondary outcome was ischemic major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of CAD death, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina). RESULTS: At a mean follow-up time of 4.0 (SD, 1.7) years, the primary outcome event rates were not significantly different between the CCTA and the control groups (6.2% [28 events] vs 7.6% [34 events]; hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.49-1.32]; P = .38). The incidence of the composite secondary end point of ischemic major adverse cardiovascular events also did not differ between groups (4.4% [20 events] vs 3.8% [17 events]; hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.60-2.19]; P = .68). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among asymptomatic patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, use of CCTA to screen for CAD did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization at 4 years. These findings do not support CCTA screening in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00488033.

Chronic disease management at Intermountain Healthcare.

The care of patients with chronic disease is a significant challenge for any healthcare system. Intermountain Healthcare is trying a variety of approaches to chronic disease management. There are five general areas that have been organized centrally. These areas are provider education, patient education, outcomes data, clinical support (ideas that make it easier to do the right thing), and multidisciplinary coordination of care. Typically within each area a variety of tools are developed. The clinical application of the tools varies from provider to provider and from patient to patient. Innovative tools have come from unexpected sources. Significant improvement in measured outcomes has been demonstrated.

Computerized management of chronic anticoagulation: three years of experience.

Chronically anticoagulated patients taking the drug Warfarin require time intensive management and followup processes to avoid complications. The "Chronic Anticoagulation Clinic" (CAC) protocol is a set of production rules that help manage, treat, and follow-up such patients. The CAC protocol has been in regular use at Intermountain Healthcare (Salt Lake City, UT, USA) for over three years. The results demonstrate an improvement on the number of patients with anticoagulation levels within the desired target range. The protocol alerts have a high acceptance rate (83.4%) and were able to help patients remember to collect their next coagulation test. The CAC protocol results show that production rules can improve the management of chronically anticoagulated patients. Additional studies are required to verify if this experience can be transferred to other institutions.

Longitudinal assessment of a diabetes care management system in an integrated health network.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of longitudinal assessment of the results of a disease management process developed in a large integrated health care system that successfully improved care for patients with diabetes. Outcome measures included rates of testing of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), rate of annual eye exams, and LDL and HbA1c values. METHODS: Intermountain Health Care (IHC) initiated the development of a Diabetes Care Management System (DCMS) in early 1998. The DCMS was developed as a comprehensive population-based disease management system. It includes provider education programs; performance feedback to physicians; clinical quality performance incentives for physicians; patient education programs; patient incentive, reminder systems to encourage compliance with best care process models; and tracking of physician behavior change and patient compliance with diabetes therapy. A multifaceted intervention and education approach was chosen because of the complexity of the diabetes treatment process. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with at least one annual HbA1c test increased from 78.5% in 1998 to 90.5% in 2002. During the same time period, the percentage of patients whose most recent HbA1c was less than 7.0 increased from 33.5% to 52.8%, average HbA1c decreased from 8.1 to 7.3, and the percentage of patients whose most recent HbA1c was greater than 9.5 decreased from 34.6% to 21.4%. The percentage of patients who had an LDL cholesterol screening test within the prior 2 years increased from 65.9% in 1998 to 91.7% in 2002. During the same time period, the percentage of patients whose most recent LDL cholesterol was less than 130 mg/dL increased from 39.9% to 69.8%. The percentage of diabetes patients who had an annual eye exam increased from 52% in 1998 to 62% in 2002. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted approach to improving diabetes management has led to improved performance in clinical measures related to diabetes care that have been shown to reduce the risk of patients with diabetes developing diabetes- related complications. All components of the diabetes management continuum of care, including primary care physicians, specialists, office staff, patients, diabetes educators, and others, were involved in the care improvement activities.