Autologous stem cell transplantation in T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma: EBMT Lymphoma Working Party study.

Although broadly employed, consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) has never been specifically investigated. Here we have analyzed outcomes of autoHCT for THRLBCL compared to diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL). Eligible for this retrospective registry study were adult patients with r/r THRLBCL and DLBCL, respectively, who underwent a first autoHCT in a salvage-sensitive disease status as assessed by PET-CT between 2016 and 2021 and were registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) database. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) 2 years after transplantation. Two-hundred-one patients with THRLBCL and 5,543 with DLBCL were included. There were no significant differences in terms of disease status at HCT, pretreatment lines, and interval from diagnosis to transplant between the cohorts, but patients with THRBCL were significantly younger, contained a higher proportion of men, and had a better performance status. Compared to DLBCL, THRLBCL was associated with significantly better 2-year PFS (78% vs. 59%; p<0.001) and overall survival (OS; 81% vs. 74%; p=0.02) because of a significantly lower 2-year relapse incidence (RI; 16% vs. 35%; p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, favorable relapse risk (hazard ratio (HR) 0.46, 95%CI 0.31-0.7) and PFS (HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.41-0.82) of patients with THRLBCL remained significant, while OS benefits (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.54-1.12) did not. These results were validated in a propensity-score matched analysis. These data prove autoHCT as an effective treatment option for salvage-sensitive r/r THRLBCL.

Impact of positron emission tomography - computed tomography status on progression-free survival for relapsed follicular lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

The optimum management approach for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma remains uncertain. Autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) is considered a standard option in suitable, younger patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. AutoSCT is associated with very durable remissions in a minority of subjects, but also with significant, well-established toxicities. Although positron emission tomography (PET) status prior to autoSCT is an established prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma, no data exist in follicular lymphoma. We describe survival outcomes according to pre-transplant PET status, classified by the Lugano criteria into complete metabolic remission (CMR) versus non-CMR, in 172 patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma within a national, multicenter, retrospective British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy registry study. The median number of lines of therapy prior to SCT was three (range, 1-6). The median follow-up after SCT was 27 months (range, 3-70). The median progression-free survival for all patients after autoSCT was 28 months (interquartile range, 23- 36). There was no interaction between age at transplantation, sex, number of months since last relapse, Karnofsky performance status or comorbidity index and achieving CMR prior to autoSCT. Superior progression-free survival was observed in 115 (67%) patients obtaining CMR versus 57 (33%) non-CMR patients (3-year progression-free survival 50% vs. 22%, P=0.011) and by pre-SCT Deauville score (continuous variable 1-5, hazard ratio [HR]=1.32, P=0.049). PET status was independently associated with progression-free status (non-CMR HR=2.02, P=0.003), overall survival (non-CMR HR=3.08, P=0.010) and risk of relapse (non-CMR HR=1.64, P=0.046) after autoSCT by multivariable analysis. Our data suggest that pre- SCT PET status is of clear prognostic value and may help to improve the selection of patients for autoSCT.

Improved intensive care unit survival for critically ill allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients following reduced intensity conditioning.

The use of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is a standard treatment option for many patients with haematological malignancies. Historically, patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission for transplant-related toxicities have fared extremely poorly, with high ICU mortality rates. Little is known about the impact of reduced intensity Allo-HSCT conditioning regimens in older patients on the ICU and subsequent long-term outcomes. A retrospective analysis of data collected from 164 consecutive Allo-HSCT recipients admitted to ICU for a total of 213 admissions, at a single centre over an 11·5-year study period was performed. Follow-up was recorded until 31 March 2011. Autologous HSCT recipients were excluded. In this study we report favourable ICU survival following Allo-HSCT and, for the first time, demonstrate significantly better survival for patients who underwent Allo-HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning compared to those treated with myeloablative conditioning regimens. In addition, we identified the need for ventilation (invasive or non-invasive) as an independently significant adverse factor affecting short-term ICU outcome. For patients surviving ICU admission, subsequent long-term overall survival was excellent; 61% and 51% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Reduced intensity Allo-HSCT patients admitted to ICU with critical illness have improved survival compared to myeloablative Allo-HSCT recipients.