Evaluation of the frequency and characteristics of drug hypersensitivity reactions in hospitalized children: Real life-cohort study.

Introduction: There are limited data regarding the characteristics and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) in hospitalized children. This study aims to determine the prevalence, clinical features, and management of DHRs in pediatric inpatients. Methods: Children who had pediatric allergy consultation for suspected DHR during hospitalization in Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between August 1, 2020, and July 30, 2021, were included. Patient and reaction characteristics, culprit drugs, and management strategies were recorded. When possible, diagnostic tests (skin or provocation tests) were performed after discharge. Results: Among the 14,090 hospitalized children, 165 (72% male, median age: 106 months) underwent consultation for 192 suspected DHRs with 246 drugs. Cutaneous eruptions were the most common (94.3%). There was anaphylaxis in 40 patients and severe cutaneous adverse drug reaction in 4 patients (drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in 3, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis in 1). Antimicrobials were the leading cause (78.4%, n = 193/246). In 48 reactions, 60 (24%) culprit drugs could be readministered with close follow-up or desensitization (n = 12). In total, 186 suspected drugs were discontinued, and 115 were replaced with alternative drugs. After discharge, 38 provocation tests (2 positives) and 36 skin tests (1 positive prick test, 1 positive intradermal test, and 1 positive patch test) were performed. Discussion/conclusions: The incidence of suspected DHR among pediatric inpatients was approximately 1.1%. Skin symptoms were the most common manifestation. Twenty-four percent of suspected drugs could be continued during hospitalization. Patients with DHR during hospitalization should be evaluated with a drug allergy work-up unless there are contraindications to testing.

The frequency of sleep-disordered breathing in preschool children with asthma and its effects on control of asthma.

CONCLUSION: The frequency and score of SDB were higher in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Frequency and score of SDB were significantly affected by the severity of asthma. SDB must be evaluated in preschool children with uncontrolled asthma. CONCLUSION: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is more common in asthmatic patients than in non-asthmatic persons, and SDB affects negatively to control asthma. A limited number of studies are discovered on the effect of SDB in preschool asthmatic children. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of SDB and its effect on control and severity of asthma in preschool children. A pediatric sleep questionnaire was completed by parents of asthmatic children. Patients who received a score of 0.33 or higher were diagnosed with SDB. Control and severity of asthma was assessed by a pediatric allergy specialist based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria. The study included 249 patients, with a mean±SD age of 4.37±1.04 (range: 2-5.9) years; 69% were boys; 56.6% children had uncontrolled asthma and 28.7% had SDB. The SDB score was significantly different between controlled and uncontrolled asthma (0.19 vs 0.28; P < 0.001). The frequency of uncontrolled asthma in patients with and without SDB was 74.3% and 49.4%, respectively (P < 0.010). Based on the severity of asthma, the frequency of SDB among patients with mild, moderate, and severe asthma was 23.4%, 35.2%, and 47.4%, respectively (P = 0.010).

The frequency of sleep-disordered breathing in preschool children with asthma and its effects on control of asthma

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is more common in asthmatic patients than in non-asthmatic persons, and SDB affects negatively to control asthma. A limited number of studies are discovered on the effect of SDB in preschool asthmatic children. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of SDB and its effect on control and severity of asthma in preschool children. A pediatric sleep questionnaire was completed by parents of asthmatic children. Patients who received a score of 0.33 or higher were diagnosed with SDB. Control and severity of asthma was assessed by a pediatric allergy specialist based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria. The study included 249 patients, with a mean±SD age of 4.37±1.04 (range: 2–5.9) years; 69% were boys; 56.6% children had uncontrolled asthma and 28.7% had SDB. The SDB score was significantly different between controlled and uncontrolled asthma (0.19 vs 0.28; P < 0.001). The frequency of uncontrolled asthma in patients with and without SDB was 74.3% and 49.4%, respectively (P < 0.010). Based on the severity of asthma, the frequency of SDB among patients with mild, moderate, and severe asthma was 23.4%, 35.2%, and 47.4%, respectively (P = 0.010). Conclusion: The frequency and score of SDB were higher in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Frequency and score of SDB were significantly affected by the severity of asthma. SDB must be evaluated in preschool children with uncontrolled asthma (AU)

Development of anaphylaxis upon oral food challenge and drug provocation tests in pediatric patients.

Background: The drug provocation test (DPT) and the oral food challenge (OFC) are considered as the criterion standard for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions and food allergy. Severe allergic reactions may develop during these tests. Objective: To evaluate the frequency and features of anaphylaxis in pediatric patients undergoing OFCs and DPTs. Method: OFCs and DPTs performed in an open method in the pediatric allergy clinic of our institution between January 2014 and January 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The characteristics of anaphylaxis that developed during these tests were evaluated. Results: A total of 3631 OFCs and/or DPTs were performed on 2588 pediatric patients. Reactions were recorded in 317 challenges (8.7%), including 42 (1.2%) in the form of anaphylaxis. Of the patients with anaphylaxis, 31 developed anaphylaxis during OFC and 11 during DPT. Anaphylaxis during OFCs was mostly triggered by yogurt (n = 8), hen's egg (n = 6), baked milk (n = 5), and baked egg (n = 4). Cases with anaphylaxis during DPT were recorded mostly with ibuprofen (54.5% [n = 6]). All patients who developed anaphylaxis during OFC had cutaneous manifestations, and 90.3% had respiratory symptoms. Gastrointestinal involvement was present in 32.3% of the patients. During DPT, cutaneous manifestations were observed in 90.9% in the patients who developed anaphylaxis and the respiratory tract was involved in 81.8%. In terms of concomitant allergic diseases, 51.6% of the patients who developed anaphylaxis during OFC had atopic dermatitis and 38.7% had asthma. All the patients with anaphylaxis triggered by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug DPT had asthma. Of the anaphylaxis, 54.8% were mild, 35.7% were moderate, and 9.5% were severe. Severe anaphylaxis was recorded with baked milk (n = 2), baked egg and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (n = 1, each). The patients did not require intensive care, and no death occurred. Conclusion: Anaphylaxis may develop during OFCs and DPTs. These tests should be carried out by experienced allergists in an appropriate setting where emergency equipment and medications, including epinephrine, are readily available.

Characteristics and management of hypersensitivity reactions with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin in pediatric patients.

Background: Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has been successfully used for decades to prevent graft versus host disease before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as a part of conditioning regimen. However, sometimes hypersensitivity reactions may limit its use. Objective: To evaluate hypersensitivity reactions experienced during rabbit-ATG infusion among children and present successful desensitization protocol. Methods: The medical records of pediatric patients who were given rabbit-ATG treatment at our tertiary center hospital HSCT unit between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Diagnosis of the patients, age at the time of HSCT, gender, presence of hypersensitivity reaction to rabbit-ATG, and management were evaluated. Characteristics of the reaction and presence of hypersensitivity reaction to other drugs were also noted. If performed, desensitization protocols were evaluated retrospectively. Results: We evaluated 81 patients; 66.6% of them (n = 54) were boys. The mean age of the patients was 8.78 ± 5.48 years. Hypersensitivity to rabbit-ATG was seen in six patients (7.4%). Four of them (4.9%) had anaphylaxis; two (2.4%) had urticaria. Intradermal test performed to every patient before the first dose of ATG infusion was detected a positive result in 1 patient (1.2%) . None of these seven patients had allergic reactions to other drugs before. Successful ATG desensitization was performed in five patients by using a 12-16 step protocol due to patients' reaction severity. Conclusion: This study aimed to evaluate hypersensitivity reactions with rabbit-ATG in children. A successful desensitization protocol with rabbit-ATG is presented. Desensitization must be performed with an experienced team very carefully in the absence of alternative drug.

Cat allergy in children and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Cat allergen is among the most common household allergens and can cause respiratory allergies and anaphylaxis in children. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of cat allergies in children and the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on these characteristics. Methods: The study included pediatric patients with cat allergen sensitization demonstrated by skin-prick test (SPT) over a period of 2 years: 1 year before and 1 year during the pandemic. Demographic data, clinical features, and laboratory findings were evaluated from the patients' records. Results: Of 7428 SPTs performed, 566 patients (7.6%) were sensitized to cat allergen (56% boys; median age, 11 years). Fifty-eight percent of the patients (n = 329) presented during the pandemic period, 44.5% (n = 252) had symptoms with cat exposure, and 9% (n = 51/566) had anaphylaxis. Allergic rhinitis and asthma were present in 76% (n = 431) and 46.6% (n = 264) of the patients, respectively. When compared to prepandemic period, patients who presented during the pandemic had higher rates of cat sensitization (15% in pandemic group versus 4.4% in prepandemic group of all SPTs performed; p < 0.05), cat ownership (29.1% versus 13.9%; p < 0.001), and symptoms on cat exposure (51% versus 34%; p < 0.001). Factors that predicted symptom development in the patients who were cat sensitized were induration > 5 mm on SPT (odds ratio [OR] 1.9 [95% confidence interval {95% CI}], 1.1-3.2), cat ownership (OR 9.2 [95% CI, 4.9-17.3]), close contact with a cat owner (OR 7.1 [95% CI, 4-12]), allergic rhinitis (OR 3.1 [95% CI, 1.6-5.8]), conjunctivitis (OR 4.7 [95% CI, 2-10]), and atopic dermatitis (OR 2.2 [95% CI, 1-4.7]). Conclusion: We observed an increase in the prevalence of cat allergy among children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Care must be taken in terms of anaphylaxis in patients who were cat sensitized.

Confirmation of drug allergy in a general pediatrics outpatient clinic.

BACKGROUND: Studies including diagnostic workups on true drug allergy in children are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of confirmed drug allergy in children with a history of suspected drug allergy who had applied to the general pediatric outpatient clinics of our hospital owing to various health problems. METHODS: The history of drug allergy was asked among children who applied to the general pediatric outpatient clinics of our hospital. Allergy tests were performed to confirm drug allergy in children whose history was compatible with drug allergy. RESULTS: In this study, parents of 5553 children aged between 4 months and 17.9 years were asked, "Has your child ever developed an allergy after drug use?" A total of 7% of the parents (n = 389/5553) thought that their child had a drug allergy. When these patients were evaluated by a pediatric allergist, it was suspected that 21.1% (n = 82/389) had a drug allergy. When diagnostic tests were performed for drug allergy, drug allergy was confirmed in only 4.2% (n = 3/72). Consequently, the frequency of drug allergy according to the history was 1.47% (n = 82/5553) in the population we studied, whereas the frequency of confirmed drug allergy was found to be 0.05% (n = 3/5553). CONCLUSION: The patient or parent statements alone are not sufficient for the diagnosis of drug allergy in children. To confirm or rule out drug allergy, drug allergy tests must be performed so unnecessary drug restrictions can be avoided.

Evaluation of chronic cough etiology, quality of life, and anxiety level in children.

Introduction: To evaluate the quality of life and anxiety level of school-age children with chronic cough, and changes with treatment. Materials and Methods: Patients aged between 6-18 years with a chronic cough were included in this study. A control group was designed, and the scale scores were compared with each other. Result: The mean age of the 82 patients was 10.9 ± 3.8 years, 62 (75.6%) had at least one specific cough marker. Forty patients (48.8%) were diagnosed with asthma. At their first visit, the psychosocial health scores and the total scale scores (sum of physical and psychosocial total scores) were lower than the control group for both patients and parents. After the resolution of cough, their scores increased to the same level with the control group. It was also found that the level of anxiety was significantly higher than in the control group both before treatment and after the resolution period (p<0.001 and =0.008, respectively). Conclusions: Asthma was the leading cause of chronic cough. Quality of life is impaired in children with chronic cough. Anxiety level in these patients increases and after symptoms improve, continues to be higher than that of healthy children.

Complementary and alternative treatment methods practiced by parents in pediatric cases diagnosed with atopic dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, recurrent, and inflammatory skin disease experienced mostly in childhood. Chronicity of the disease, relapses, constant need of regular skin care causes seeking for alternative treatments. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the complementary and alternative treatments (CAT) used by parents' caregivers in pediatric patients diagnosed with AD, and the association between CAT use and patient characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire questioning the sociocultural and demographic characteristics of the family, the clinical findings of the patients, their treatments and CAT applications was recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included in the study. 68.7% of the patients used at least one type of CAT. Vitamins and oils were the most commonly used CAT (48.8% and 47%, respectively) and 73.3% of the patients using CAT continued normal AD treatment while using CAT. The biggest factor affecting CAT choice was the advice of the immediate circle (75%), and 40.6% of the patients stated that they benefited from the complementary therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CAT are widely used in AD. Physicians should know the socio-cultural structure of the region they are in, the CAT used and their side effects, and inform the families.

Psychological Distress and Drug Provocation Test-Related Anxiety Levels of Pediatric Patients and Their Parents.

Background: Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are the gold standard for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR). To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous study reporting DPT-related anxiety levels in children and their parents. This study aimed to determine the difference in pre- and post-DPT anxiety levels of parents and children who were informed of the possibility of another DHR during the DPT, and to evaluate the relationship between parental psychological distress and anxiety levels. Methods: The study included children who underwent DPT in our clinic between July 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020, and accompanying parents who consented to participate. Age-appropriate State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scales were used to assess levels of state and trait anxiety in the patients and parents. The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) was used to screen for psychological symptoms in parents. Results: Data were collected from the parents of 69 children who underwent DPTs. The patients' median age was 7.28 (interquartile range: 4.52-10.06) and their parents' mean age was 35.28 ± 5.38 years. Anxiety-related data were collected from 21 pediatric patients. The children and parents had higher state anxiety scores before DPT compared to after DPT. There was a positive correlation between the parents' trait anxiety and pre-DPT state anxiety scores. In addition, parental pre-DPT state anxiety scores were positively correlated with SCL-90-R general severity index, somatization, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and depression subscale scores. Conclusion: The risk of allergic reaction in DPT may cause anxiety. A high level of parental anxiety before DPT, which gradually decreased after negative test results, was associated with history of drug-induced anaphylaxis in their children and high trait anxiety. Appropriate evaluation of patients and parents before DPT and providing detailed information may be important to reduce this anxiety.

The Etiology, Clinical Features, and Severity of Anaphylaxis in Childhood by Age Groups.

INTRODUCTION: Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially fatal systemic hypersensitivity reaction with an acute onset. Etiology, clinical presentation, risk factors, comorbidities of pediatric anaphylaxis may vary depending on the age of the child. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the etiology, clinical features, management of anaphylaxis in infants, preschoolers, school-age children, and adolescents. METHODS: The patients presenting with anaphylaxis between January 2015 and December 2018 in a single pediatric tertiary hospital were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, the triggers, sign-symptoms, severity, and the management of anaphylaxis were recorded. RESULTS: 239 patients were included in the study, 62.3% of whom were boys. The median age was 6.7 (IQR 2.33-12.83) years. 23.8% of the patients were infants, 15.5% were preschoolers, 33.5% were school-age children, and 27.2% were adolescents. Anaphylaxis mostly occurred at home. The most common causative agents were foods (39.3%), drugs (30.1%), and venoms (15.9%) of all cases. Main food allergens were cow's milk and hen's eggs in infants, cow's milk and tree nuts in preschoolers, and tree nuts and legumes in school-age children. Cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA) were recorded mostly with antibiotics (40.3%), followed by NSAIDs (23.6%). The primary trigger of anaphylaxis was foods in infants and preschoolers and drugs in school-age children and adolescents. There was no difference between age groups in terms of the system involved and severity. Severe anaphylaxis was more common with DIA. Adrenaline was used in 69.8% of all cases with no significant difference between age groups. CONCLUSION: Etiology and symptoms of anaphylaxis may differ between age groups. Raising awareness, educating patients and their parents on anaphylaxis and its management is essential.

Prognosis of food-induced anaphylaxis in children: A single-center real-life study.

Background: Food allergies are known to resolve over time, but there is little information on the natural history of food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA). Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the natural history of FIA in children and determine the factors that affect prognosis. Methods: Children with FIA who were followed up for at least 3 years, between 2010 and 2020, were included. Patients' families were contacted by telephone to question their child's tolerance status and invite them for reevaluation if uncertain. The patients were grouped as tolerant or persistent according to parent reports or reevaluation results. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors that affected persistence. Results: The study included 185 patients (62.2% boys) with 243 anaphylactic reactions to various foods. Fifty-eight patients (31%) gained tolerance within a 3-year follow-up period. Tolerance rates were higher in patients with FIA to milk (40%) and egg (43.9%) compared with to tree nuts (18.8%), legumes (5.6%), and/or seafood (11.1%) (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, risk factors for persistent FIA were multiple food anaphylaxis (odds ratio [OR] 3.755 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.134-12.431]; p = 0.030), total IgE > 100 kU/L (OR 5.786 [95% CI, 2.065-16.207]; p = 0.001), and skin-prick test wheal size > 10 mm (OR 4.569 [95% CI, 1.395-14.964]; p = 0 .012) at presentation. Conclusion: Approximately a third of the patients with FIA developed tolerance within 3 years. Clinicians should remember that children with food allergies, even anaphylaxis, may develop tolerance over time. Regular follow up and reevaluation of tolerance status are necessary to avoid unnecessary elimination.

Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Cutaneous Mastocytosis in Childhood: Single-center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Mastocytosis is a rare and heterogenous disease, and in children it is generally limited to the skin and tends to regress spontaneously in adolescence. AIM: In this study, demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of pediatric patients with mastocytosis, and also coexisting diseases were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 61 pediatric patients were included in the study. The male-to-female ratio was 2.2, the median age was 2 years (range, 0.25 to 19 y), and the median follow-up period was 2.0 years (range, 0.25 to 19 y). Types of clinical presentation at diagnosis consisted of mainly urticaria pigmentosa (45.9%). Seven patients were further investigated with suspicion of systemic mastocytosis, they were followed up, median of 9 years (range, 2.5 to 16 y), and none of them developed systemic disease. Coexisting allergic diseases were recorded in total 5 patients (8.2%). Three patients had immunoglobulin A deficiency, 1 patient had elevated immunoglobulin E level. A patient developed mature B-cell lymphoma with a heterozygous mutation in c-KIT exon 11. DISCUSSION: Cutaneous mastocytosis in children may present as a complex disease with different clinical signs and symptoms. Standardized clinical criteria and guidelines for the follow-up of children with mastocytosis are required.

Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Reactions in Pediatric Patients Using Biological Drugs.

INTRODUCTION: Biological drugs are currently used for the treatment of chronic inflammatory, autoimmune, and neoplastic diseases. With their expanding indication spectrum and increasing use, hypersensitivity reactions to these drugs are also becoming more frequent. The present study aimed to report the incidence and the features of such reactions in pediatric patients using biologicals for the treatment of various diseases. METHODS: The medical records of pediatric patients treated with biological agents between October 1, 2011 and August 31, 2019 were reviewed and adverse reactions were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: During the study period, 211 patients (116 boys, 55%) used 21 different biological drugs for the treatment of various diseases. Their median age at the time of the first treatment was 139.9 (IQR: 92.2-187.8) months. Hematologic-oncologic diseases were the most common indication for biological therapy (97/211; 46.0%), followed by rheumatologic diseases (82/211; 38.9%). Of the 211 patients, 14 (6.64%) experienced reactions to biological drugs. The most common culprit agent was rituximab (57.1%). Most of the patients (85.7%) had a history of reactions either during the infusion or within 1 h after taking the drug. Five patients underwent desensitization to the culprit drug, while 7 other patients continued treatment with a reduced dose/infusion rate or premedication. Also 1 patient continued to take the drug without any additional treatment. CONCLUSION: It was reported that 6.64% of the patients who received biologic drug therapy for various reasons in our hospital had hypersensitivity. The most common culprit agent was rituximab, and most of the reactions were immediate reactions.

Frequency and clinical characteristics of allergic transfusion reactions in children.

Allergic transfusion reactions (ATRs)are a common form of acute transfusion reaction. It was aimed to determine the clinical characteristics and frequency of ATRs in children. This study included children who were transfused with red cell concentrate (RCC), fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), platelet concentrates(PC), apheresis granulocyte, and cryoprecipitate.The patients' sociodemographic characteristics, the blood product that caused the reaction, the type and timing of the reaction, the patient's age at time of reaction and their diagnosis, follow-up period, and clinical data were recorded. A total of 89703 bags of blood products were transfused to 4193 children.Two hundred eleven acute transfusion-related reactions occurred in 157 (3.74%) patients.Of these, 125 reactions (59%) were allergic. ATR occurred in 125 of 89703 infusions (0.14%).The median age of patients was 9.99 years (IQR:4.67-14.38) and ATRs occurred at a median of 30 minutes into the transfusion. Eighteen (18%) of the patients also had a history of drug reaction.When the blood products that caused ATRs were examined, 43(34.5%) occurred with apheresis and single-donor PC, 37(29.6%) with FFP, 32 (25.6%) with RCC, 10(8%) with pooled PC, 2(1.6%) with cryoprecipitate, 1(0.8%) with apheresis granulocyte.Ninety-nine(79%) of the reactions were minor allergic reactions and 26(21%) were anaphylaxis.Compared to minor allergic reactions, the proportion of PCs was statistically higher in anaphylaxis(p=0.02). Patients receiving PC should be monitored more carefully during the first half hour of transfusion. In addition, approximately one-fifth of the patients who developed ATR also had a history of drug reaction. Patients with previous reactions to drugs may be more likely to have ATR.

Evaluation of anaphylaxis recurrence and adrenaline autoinjector use in childhood.

Introduction: Limited data are available on recurrent anaphylaxis in childhood. Delayed adrenaline administration is the major cause of deaths due to anaphylaxis. As well as prescribing the adrenaline autoinjector (AAI), it is important to make sure that the patient carries the device at all times and uses it correctly for the appropriate indication. Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the recurrence of anaphylaxis and AAI use in childhood. Methods: Pediatric patients who were evaluated for anaphylaxis and prescribed AAI between January 2015 and December 2018, in the pediatric allergy and immunology clinic of our hospital were screened retrospectively. A telephone-based survey was conducted with the parents of the patients to investigate the recurrence of anaphylaxis in patients and the use of AAI by their parents for the management of anaphylaxis. Results: A total of 148 patients (64.9% boys) were prescribed an AAI for anaphylaxis. The telephone survey could be conducted with 111 parents (75%) with an AAI prescription. Of these patients, 23.4% (n = 26) of the parents reported that their children experienced recurrent episodes of anaphylaxis. In the recurrent anaphylaxis cases, the triggers were foods in 77%, venoms in 11.5%, drugs in 3.8%, and idiopathic anaphylaxis in 7.7% of the patients. AAI use at the time of anaphylaxis was reported by 42.3% of the parents. The reasons cited by the parents for not using AAI during an episode of anaphylaxis included the preference to have adrenaline administered at a health care facility because of its proximity (60%), fear of using the device (13.3%), hesitation (6.7%), not having the device with them (13.3%), and unavailability of the device (6.7%). Conclusion: Educating the patients and families about the importance of using AAI is crucial, and training on how to use the device should be repeated at each clinic visit and every opportunity.

Immediate local anesthetic reactions and diagnostic test results in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Adverse reactions to local anesthetics are relatively common, but proven IgE-mediated allergy is extremely rare. We aimed to determine the frequency of local anesthetic allergy in pediatric patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 73 patients who presented to our clinic with a history of suspected allergic reaction to local anesthetics and underwent diagnostic testing between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnoses were based on case histories, skin tests, and subcutaneous challenge tests. RESULTS: A total of 75 test series were carried out on the 73 patients (43 boys; median [IQR] age 9.25 [7.26-14.25] years, range 3-17.8 years). The most commonly tested drugs were lidocaine (n = 38; 50.6%) and prilocaine (n = 15; 20%). Local anesthetic allergy was confirmed in one (1.3%) of the 73 patients by positive subcutaneous challenge test with mepivacaine. CONCLUSION: There are limited data in the current literature regarding local anesthetic allergies and diagnosis test results in pediatric patients. Proven local anesthetic allergy is less common than expected by society and physicians, and therefore diagnostic tests are needed for patients with no contra-indications such as severe or life-threatening reactions.

Immediate local anesthetic reactions and diagnostic test results in pediatric patients

Background/objectives: Adverse reactions to local anesthetics are relatively common, but proven IgE-mediated allergy is extremely rare. We aimed to determine the frequency of local anesthetic allergy in pediatric patients. Patients and methods: The medical records of 73 patients who presented to our clinic with a history of suspected allergic reaction to local anesthetics and underwent diagnostic testing between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnoses were based on case histories, skin tests, and subcutaneous challenge tests. Results: A total of 75 test series were carried out on the 73 patients (43 boys; median [IQR] age 9.25 [7.26–14.25] years, range 3–17.8 years). The most commonly tested drugs were lidocaine (n = 38; 50.6%) and prilocaine (n = 15; 20%). Local anesthetic allergy was confirmed in one (1.3%) of the 73 patients by positive subcutaneous challenge test with mepivacaine. Conclusion: There are limited data in the current literature regarding local anesthetic allergies and diagnosis test results in pediatric patients. Proven local anesthetic allergy is less common than expected by society and physicians, and therefore diagnostic tests are needed for patients with no contra-indications such as severe or life-threatening reactions (AU)