Bone Turnover Markers in Patients With Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Thoracic Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, single-center, observational study. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between serum levels of bone turnover markers and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relationship between bone turnover markers, such as N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) or tartrate-resistant acid phosphate 5b (TRACP-5b), and OPLL has previously been examined. However, the correlation between these markers and thoracic OPLL, which is more severe than cervical-only OPLL, remains unclear. METHODS: This prospective study included 212 patients from a single institution with compressive spinal myelopathy and divided them into those without OPLL (Non-OPLL group, 73 patients) and those with OPLL (OPLL group, 139 patients). The OPLL group was further subdivided into cervical OPLL (C-OPLL, 92 patients) and thoracic OPLL (T-OPLL, 47 patients) groups. Patients' characteristics and biomarkers related to bone metabolism, such as calcium, inorganic phosphate (Pi), 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1α,25 dihydroxyvitamin D, PINP, and TRACP-5b, were compared between the Non-OPLL and OPLL groups, as well as the C-OPLL and T-OPLL groups. Bone metabolism biomarkers were also compared after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and the presence of renal impairment using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: The OPLL group had significantly lower serum levels of Pi and higher levels of PINP versus the Non-OPLL group as determined by propensity score-matched analysis. The comparison results between the C-OPLL and T-OPLL groups using a propensity score-matched analysis showed that T-OPLL patients had significantly higher concentrations of bone turnover markers, such as PINP and TRACP-5b, compared with C-OPLL patients. CONCLUSIONS: Increased systemic bone turnover may be associated with the presence of OPLL in the thoracic spine, and bone turnover markers such as PINP and TRACP-5b can help screen for thoracic OPLL.

Comparative Analysis of Microendoscopic and Open Laminectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis at L1-L2 or L2-L3.

BACKGROUND: Several reports have highlighted comparable surgical outcomes between microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL) and open laminectomy (open) for lumbar spinal stenosis. However, the unilateral approach in MEL may present challenges for the upper lumbar levels, where facet joints are located deeper inside. Our objective was to compare surgical outcomes and radiographic evaluations for single-level decompression cases at L1-L2 or L2-L3 between MEL and open laminectomy. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent single-level decompression for upper lumbar spinal stenosis at 12 distinguished spine centers from April 2017 to September 2021. Baseline demographics, preoperative, and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes, along with imaging parameters, were compared between the MEL and open groups. To account for potential confounding, patients' backgrounds were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method based on propensity scores. RESULTS: Among the 2487 patients undergoing decompression surgery, 118 patients (4.7%) underwent single-level decompression at L1-L2 or L2-L3. Finally, 80 patients (51 in the MEL group, 29 in the open group) with postoperative data were deemed eligible for analysis. The MEL group exhibited significantly improved postoperative EuroQol 5-Dimension values compared to the open group. Additionally, the MEL group showed a lower facet preservation rate according to computed tomography examination, whereas the open group had a higher incidence of retrolisthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall surgical outcomes were similar, the MEL group demonstrated potential advantages in enhancing EuroQol 5-Dimension scores. The MEL group's lower facet preservation rate did not translate into a higher postoperative instability rate.

Quality of Life and Postoperative Satisfaction in Patients with Benign Extramedullary Spinal Tumors: A Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected registry data. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and postoperative satisfaction in patients with different histotypes of benign extramedullary spinal tumors (ESTs). BACKGROUND: Little is known about how different histotypes influence HRQOL and postoperative satisfaction in EST patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary benign EST surgery at 11 tertiary referral hospitals between 2017 and 2021 who completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative questionnaires were included. HRQOL assessment included the Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of Short Form-12, EuroQol 5-dimension, Oswestry/Neck Disability Index (ODI/NDI), and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for upper/lower extremities (UEP/LEP) and back pain (BP). Patients who answered "very satisfied," "satisfied," or "somewhat satisfied" on a seven-point Likert scale were considered to be satisfied with treatment. Student t -tests or Welch's t -test were used to compare continuous variables between two groups, and one-way analysis of variance was used to compare outcomes between the three groups of EST histotypes (schwannoma, meningioma, atypical). Categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 test or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 140 consecutive EST patients were evaluated; 100 (72%) had schwannomas, 30 (21%) had meningiomas, and 10 (7%) had other ESTs. Baseline Physical Component Summary was significantly worse in patients with meningiomas ( P =0.04), and baseline NRS-LEP was significantly worse in patients with schwannomas ( P =0.03). However, there were no significant differences in overall postoperative HRQOL or patient satisfaction between histology types. Overall, 121 (86%) patients were satisfied with surgery. In a subgroup analysis comparing intradural schwannomas and meningiomas adjusted for patient demographics and tumor location with inverse probability weighting, schwannoma patients had worse baseline MCS ( P =0.03), ODI ( P =0.03), NRS-BP ( P <.001), and NRS-LEP ( P =0.001). Schwannoma patients also had worse postoperative MCS ( P =0.03) and NRS-BP ( P =0.001), with no significant difference in the percentage of satisfied patients ( P =0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent primary benign EST resection had a significant improvement in HRQOL postoperatively, and ~90% of these patients reported being satisfied with their treatment outcomes one year after surgery. EST patients may exhibit a relatively lower threshold for postoperative satisfaction compared with patients undergoing surgery for degenerative spine conditions.

Adaptation and Limitations of painDETECT Questionnaire Score Approach Before and After Posterior Cervical Decompression Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ) is one of the available screening tools for neuropathic pain (NeP), with a cut-off score of 13. This study aimed to investigate changes in PDQ scores in patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). METHODS: Patients with DCM undergoing cervical laminoplasty or laminectomy with posterior fusion were recruited. They were asked to complete a booklet questionnaire including PDQ and Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for pain at baseline and one year after surgery. Patients with a preoperative PDQ score ≥13 were further investigated. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients (mean age = 70.1 years; 77 male and 54 female) were analyzed. After posterior cervical decompression surgery for DCM, mean PDQ scores decreased from 8.93 to 7.28 (P = 0.008) in all patients. Of the 35 patients (27%) with preoperative PDQ scores ≥13, mean PDQ changed from 18.83 to 12.09 (P < 0.001). Comparing the NeP improved group (17 patients with postoperative PDQ scores ≤12) with the NeP residual group (18 patients with postoperative PDQ scores ≥13), the NeP improved group showed less preoperative neck pain (2.8 vs. 4.4, P = 0.043) compared to the NeP residual group. There was no difference in the postoperative satisfaction rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 30% of patients exhibited preoperative PDQ scores ≥13, and about half of these patients demonstrated improvements to below to the cut-off value for NeP after posterior cervical decompression surgery. The PDQ score change was relatively associated with preoperative neck pain.

Effect of Early Postoperative Resolution of MRI Signal Intensity Changes on the Outcomes of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the timing of postoperative resolution of increased signal intensity (ISI) in the spinal cord is associated with surgical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It remains unclear whether changes in ISI in the early postoperative period influence surgical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated consecutive patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy at a single academic hospital between January 2012 and September 2019. These patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively, within two weeks postoperatively (early MRI) and after six months postoperatively (late MRI). ISI was classified as follows: grade 0, none; grade 1, light (obscure); and grade 2, intense (bright). Patients were categorized into the following three groups: those with postoperative ISI resolution at early MRI (group E) or only at the late MRI (group L) stage and those whose ISI was persistent (group P). The surgical outcomes were compared between these three groups. RESULTS: We included 204 patients with complete data eligible for the analysis, and 163 of them had preoperative ISI. Postoperative ISI regression was observed in 49 (30.1%) patients. Of these 49 patients, 25 showed ISI resolution at early MRI (group E) and 24 only at late MRI (group L). All 49 were grade 1 on preoperative MRI, and this was not found to significantly impact surgical outcomes. In comparing surgical outcomes between the groups, group E had better postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association scores and Japanese Orthopedic Association recovery rates than groups L and P. No significant differences were observed between groups L and P. CONCLUSIONS: Early resolution of preoperative grade 1 ISI on postoperative T2-weighted MRI may be associated with better surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy undergoing cervical spinal surgery.

Noninvasive Skin Autofluorescence of Advanced Glycation End Products for Detecting Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in the Thoracic Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: A single-center prospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to clarify the usefulness of assessing advanced glycation end products (AGEs) by noninvasive skin autofluorescence in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: AGE accumulation is associated with various systemic disorders, including aging, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. AGEs have also been associated with OPLL, but their assessment by noninvasive skin autofluorescence has not been yet studied in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with degenerative spinal spondylosis and divided them into non-OPLL and OPLL groups. The OPLL group was further subdivided into cervical OPLL (C-OPLL) and thoracic OPLL (T-OPLL) groups. We compared patients' characteristics, serum laboratory data (i.e. hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate), and the skin autofluorescence intensity of AGEs (the AGE score) between the non-OPLL and OPLL groups and among the non-OPLL, C-OPLL, T-OPLL groups. Finally, the association of the AGE score with the presence of C-OPLL or T-OPLL was assessed by multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 240 eligible patients, 102 were in the non-OPLL group and 138 were in the OPLL group (92 with C-OPLL and 46 with T-OPLL). We observed no significant difference in the AGE score between the non-OPLL and OPLL groups, but when comparing the score among the non-OPLL, C-OPLL, and T-OPLL groups, we found that the T-OPLL group had a significantly higher AGE score. The results of multinomial regression analysis showed that a higher AGE score was significantly associated with T-OPLL (odds ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.01-2.11; P=0.044). CONCLUSION: The AGE score determined by noninvasive skin autofluorescence could help to screen for OPLL in the thoracic spine.

Does Surgical Treatment Affect the Degree of Anxiety or Depression in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Preoperative mental state has been reported as one of the factors affecting the surgical outcomes of spine surgery, but few studies have examined in detail how patients' mental state is affected by spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) whether surgery improves preoperative depression and anxiety in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. METHODS: We investigated patient-reported outcomes (Mental Component Summary, Physical Component Summary of SF-12 Health Survey, and EQ-5D, Neck Disability Index, JOACMEQ, satisfaction with treatment) and HADS one year after surgery, comparing them before and after surgery between April 2017 and February 2020. Among the cases diagnosed as preoperative anxiety and depression, we additionally compared the patient-reported outcomes based on the presence or absence of postoperative improvement in mental state, having also investigated the correlation between patient-reported outcomes and HADS for sub-analysis. RESULTS: Among the 99 patients eligible for inclusion in the present study, we found that patient-reported outcomes and the HADS scores improved significantly after surgery. There was a moderate correlation between the amount of change in HADS-D score before and after surgery and the amount of change in NDI (moderate, r = .41), NRS of neck (moderate, r = .46), and JOACMEQ (cervical spine function; moderate, r = .43, upper extremity function; moderate, r = .41, QOL; moderate, r = .41). CONCLUSIONS: We found that surgical treatment for patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy may improve postoperative anxiety and depression as well as other patient-reported outcomes.

Association Between Deep Posterior Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Morphology and Clinical Features in Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the association of the paraspinal muscle area and composition with clinical features in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: Consecutive patients with cervical OPLL who underwent cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before surgery were reviewed. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and fatty infiltration ratio (FI%) of deep posterior cervical paraspinal muscles (multifidus [MF] and semispinalis cervicis [SCer]) were examined. We assessed the association of paraspinal muscle measurements with the clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes, such as Neck Disability Index (NDI) score. Moreover, we divided the patients into 2 groups according to the extent of the ossified lesion (segmental and localized [OPLL-SL] and continuous and mixed [OPLL-CM] groups) and compared these variables between the 2 groups. RESULTS: 49 patients with cervical OPLL were enrolled in this study. The FI% of the paraspinal muscles was significantly associated with the number of vertebrae (ρ = 0.283, p = 0.049) or maximum occupancy ratio of OPLL (ρ = 0.397, p = 0.005). The comparative study results indicated that the NDI score was significantly worse (OPLL-SL, 22.9 ± 13.7 vs. OPLL-CM, 34.4 ± 13.7) and FI% of SCer higher (OPLL-SL, 9.1 ± 1.7% vs. OPLL-CM, 11.1 ± 3.7%) in the OPLL-CM group than those in the OPLL-SL group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that OPLL severity may be associated with fatty infiltration of deep posterior cervical paraspinal muscles, which could affect neck disability in patients with cervical OPLL.

Surgical outcomes between posterior decompression alone and posterior decompression with fusion surgery among patients with Meyerding grade 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Whether lumbar decompression with fusion surgery is effective against Meyerding grade 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is unknown. Therefore, the current study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes between posterior decompression alone and posterior decompression with fusion surgery among patients with grade 2 DS with central canal stenosis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included prospectively registered patients (n = 3863) who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis at nine high-volume spine centers from April 2017 to July 2019. Patients with grade 2 DS and central canal stenosis were included in the analysis. Patients with radiculopathy, including foraminal stenosis, degenerative scoliosis, and concomitant anterior spinal fusion, and those with a previous history of lumbar surgery were excluded. The participants were divided into the decompression alone group (group D) and decompression with fusion surgery group (group F). Data about patient-reported outcomes, including Numeric Rating Scale (low back pain, leg pain, leg numbness, and foot numbness), Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol Five-Dimensional questionnaire, and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores, were obtained preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: In total, 2354 (61%) patients, including 42 (1.8%) with grade 2 DS (n = 18 in group D and n = 24 in group F), completed the 2-year follow-up. Group D had a higher proportion of female patients than group F. However, the two groups did not significantly differ in terms of other baseline demographic characteristics. Group D had a significantly shorter surgical time and lower volume of intraoperative blood loss than group F. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups, although the preoperative degree of low back pain was higher in group F than in group D. The slip degree of group D did not worsen during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The surgical outcomes were similar regardless of the addition of fusion surgery among patients with grade 2 DS. Decompression alone was superior to decompression with fusion surgery as it was associated with a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss and shorter surgical time.

Association Between Preoperative Neuropathic Pain and Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Cervical Spinal Cord Decompression Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on surgical outcomes of preoperative neuropathic pain (NeP) assessed by the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ) administered to participants undergoing cervical decompression surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). METHODS: Participating patients were separated into the Non-NeP group (preoperative PDQ score ≤ 12), and NeP group (score ≥ 13). They were asked to complete a booklet questionnaire, including NRS for pain, the Short Form-12 for PCS and MCS, EQ-5D, NDI, and COMI-Neck, at baseline and 1 year after surgery. The JOA score for DCM and radiological changes were also evaluated. Propensity scores were used for the generalized linear model to adjust the patients' backgrounds. RESULTS: Of the 116 patients recruited, 105 completed the one-year follow-up. In this study, 31 (29.5%) and 74 (70.5%) patients in the NeP and non-NeP groups, respectively, were compared. Except for the higher female ratio in the NeP group (64.6% vs 33.2%, P = .009), preoperative demographic data and surgical factors were not significantly different between both groups. The NeP group showed greater neck/arm/hand NRS scores and worse pre- and postoperative NDI/EQ-5D/COMI-Neck scores at baseline and 1 year after surgery, but this was not significant in the MCS/PCS and JOA scores. Change scores of neck/arm/hand NRS scores and MCS/PCS/NDI/EQ-5D/COMI-Neck scores were not significant between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative NeP, assessed by PDQ, was observed in approximately 30% of patients with DCM who underwent decompression surgery. The presence of NeP was associated with worse pre- and postoperative NDI/EQ-5D/COMI-Neck scores.

Evaluation of bone strength using finite-element analysis in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are often reported to have increased bone mineral density (BMD). The bone strength of the proximal femur measured by quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) is reportedly comparable between healthy subjects with and without OPLL. However, the bone strength in symptomatic OPLL patients remains unknown. PURPOSE: To investigate bone strength measured by QCT/FEA in symptomatic patients with OPLL. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A single-center prospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 157 patients with cervical or thoracic compressive myelopathy were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed patients' characteristics, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, serum laboratory tests including calcium (Ca), inorganic phosphate (Pi), and bone turnover markers, BMD of the proximal femur and lumbar spine measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and predicted bone strength (PBS) of the proximal femur and lumbar spine measured using QCT/FEA. METHODS: Eligible patients were divided into the non-OPLL and OPLL groups. We compared the patients' characteristics, JOA scores, laboratory data, BMD, and PBS of the proximal femur and lumbar spine between the non-OPLL and OPLL groups among total, male, and female patients by performing Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the unpaired t test for continuous variables. Then, we used the inverse probability weighted logistic regression model after calculating propensity scores to compare the bone metabolism-associated markers, BMD, and PBS measurements between the groups. RESULTS: Among the eligible 157 patients, 68 were in the non-OPLL group and 89 were in the OPLL group. Compared with the non-OPLL group, the OPLL group had a significantly younger age and higher BMI in the total, male, and female patients. The JOA scores in the total and female patients were significantly higher in the OPLL group than in the non-OPLL group. The OPLL group showed significantly lower Ca levels in the female patients and significantly lower Pi levels in the total or male patients compared with the non-OPLL group in the inverse probability weighting method. The BMD of the proximal femur and lumbar spine and the PBS of the proximal femur were significantly higher in the OPLL group than in the non-OPLL group. There were no significant differences in the PBS and BMD between the male subgroups. However, the BMD and PBS of the proximal femur and lumbar spine were significantly higher in the OPLL females than in the non-OPLL females. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperostosis of the posterior longitudinal ligament in OPLL was associated with higher bone strength by QCT/FEA, especially in female OPLL patients.

Treatment of restenosis after lumbar decompression surgery: decompression versus decompression and fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes between patients with lumbar recurrent stenosis without lumbar instability and radiculopathy who underwent decompression surgery and those who underwent decompression with fusion surgery. METHODS: For this retrospective study, the authors identified 2606 consecutive patients who underwent posterior surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at eight affiliated hospitals between April 2017 and June 2019. Among these patients, those with a history of prior decompression surgery and central canal restenosis with cauda equina syndrome were included in the study. Those patients with instability or radiculopathy were excluded. The patients were divided between the decompression group and decompression with fusion group. The demographic characteristics, numerical rating scale score for low-back pain, incidence rates of lower-extremity pain and lower-extremity numbness, Oswestry Disability Index score, 3-level EQ-5D score, and patient satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups using the Fisher's exact probability test for nominal variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables, with p < 0.05 as the level of statistical significance. RESULTS: Forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria (35 males and 11 females; 19 patients underwent decompression and 27 decompression and fusion; mean ± SD age 72.5 ± 8.8 years; mean ± SD follow-up 18.8 ± 6.0 months). Demographic data and perioperative complication rates were similar. The percentages of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important differences for patient-reported outcomes or satisfaction rate at 1 year were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with central canal stenosis who underwent revision, the short-term outcomes of the patients who underwent decompression were comparable to those of the patients who underwent decompression and fusion. Decompression surgery may be effective for patients without instability or radiculopathy.

Comparison between microendoscopic laminectomy and open posterior decompression surgery for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Microendoscopic laminectomy (MEL), in which a 16-mm tubular retractor with an internal scope is used, has shown excellent surgical results for patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. However, no reports have directly compared MEL with open laminectomy. This study aimed to elucidate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and perioperative complications in patients undergoing MEL versus open laminectomy. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of prospectively registered patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery at one of the six high-volume spine centers between April 2017 and September 2018. A total of 258 patients who underwent single posterior lumbar decompression at L4/L5 were enrolled in the study. With regard to demographic data, we prospectively used chart sheets to evaluate the diagnosis, operative procedure, operation time, estimated blood loss, and complications. The follow-up period was 1-year. PROs included a numerical rating scale (NRS) for lower back pain and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and patient satisfaction with the treatment. RESULTS: Of the 258 patients enrolled, 252 (97%) completed the 1-year follow-up. Of the 252, 130 underwent MEL (MEL group) and 122 underwent open decompression (open group). The MEL group required a significantly shorter operating time and sustained lesser intraoperative blood loss compared with the open group. The MEL group showed shorter length of postoperative hospitalization than the open group. The overall complication rate was similar (8.2% in the MEL group versus 7.7% in the open group), and the revision rate did not significantly differ. As for PROs, both preoperative and postoperative values did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, the satisfaction rate was higher in the MEL group (74%) than in the open group (53%) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MEL required a significantly shorter operating time and resulted in lesser intraoperative blood loss compared with laminectomy. Postoperative PROs and complication rates were not significantly different between the procedures, although MEL demonstrated a better satisfaction rate.

Relative Risks and Benefits of Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction During Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Multicenter Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications in patients undergoing multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery, ending at C7 or crossing the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ). METHODS: A total of 96 patients undergoing multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery ending at C7, T1, or T2 were screened. The patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were divided into 2 groups based on the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) level: group C7 (ending at C7) and group T1-T2 (crossing the CTJ). The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups, and the risk factors for instrument failure at LIV were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 73 patients (76%) completed at least 1 year follow-up and divided into group C7 (n = 43) and group T1-T2 (n = 30). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Significantly longer surgical time, increased blood loss, and higher incidence rates of perioperative or postoperative complications were noted in group T1-T2. On the other hand, the incidence of instrument failures at LIV was significantly higher in group C7. Multivariate analysis showed that ending at C7, skipping screw insertion at the proximal vertebra adjacent to LIV, and a large postoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (>40 mm) were risk factors for instrument failure at LIV. CONCLUSIONS: Crossing the CTJ during multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery reduced instrument failures at LIV, but increased the surgical invasiveness and perioperative and postoperative complications.

Diabetes is associated with greater leg pain and worse patient-reported outcomes at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.

Although patients with diabetes reportedly have more back pain and worse patient-reported outcomes than those without diabetes after lumbar spine surgery, the impact of diabetes on postoperative recovery in pain or numbness in other regions is not well characterized. In this study, the authors aimed to elucidate the impact of diabetes on postoperative recovery in pain/numbness in four areas (back, buttock, leg, and sole) after lumbar spine surgery. The authors retrospectively reviewed 993 patients (152 with diabetes and 841 without) who underwent decompression and/or fixation within three levels of the lumbar spine at eight hospitals during April 2017-June 2018. Preoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores in all four areas, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Euro quality of life 5-dimension (EQ-5D) were comparable between the groups. The diabetic group showed worse ODI/EQ-5D and greater NRS scores for leg pain 1 year after surgery than the non-diabetic group. Although other postoperative NRS scores tended to be higher in the diabetic group, the between-group differences were not significant. Diabetic neuropathy caused by microvascular changes may induce irreversible nerve damage especially in leg area. Providers can use this information when counseling patients with diabetes about the expected outcomes of spine surgery.

Microendoscope-Assisted Versus Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and objectives: Minimally invasive surgery has become popular for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Microendoscope-assisted PLIF (ME-PLIF) utilizes a microendoscope within a tubular retractor for PLIF procedures; however, there are no published reports that compare Microendoscope-assisted to open PLIF. Here we compare the surgical and clinical outcomes of ME-PLIF with those of open PLIF. Materials and Methods: A total of 155 consecutive patients who underwent single-level PLIF were registered prospectively. Of the 149 patients with a complete set of preoperative data, 72 patients underwent ME-PLIF (ME-group), and 77 underwent open PLIF (open-group). Clinical and radiographic findings collected one year after surgery were compared. Results: Of the 149 patients, 57 patients in ME-group and 58 patients in the open-group were available. The ME-PLIF procedure required a significantly shorter operating time and involved less intraoperative blood loss. Three patients in both groups reported dural tears as intraoperative complications. Three patients in ME-group experienced postoperative complications, compared to two patients in the open-group. The fusion rate in ME-group at one year was lower than that in the open group (p = 0.06). The proportion of patients who were satisfied was significantly higher in the ME-group (p = 0.02). Conclusions: ME-PLIF was associated with equivalent post-surgical outcomes and significantly higher rates of patient satisfaction than the traditional open PLIF procedure. However, the fusion rate after ME-PLIF tended to be lower than that after the traditional open method.

A Multicenter Observational Study on the Postoperative Outcomes of C3 Laminectomy in Cervical Double-door Laminoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences between C3 laminectomy (LN) and C3 laminoplasty (LP) in cervical LP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Interlaminar bony fusion after cervical LP is reported to be related to a decrease in postoperative range of motion (ROM) or neurological disorder. However, it remains uncertain whether C3 LN affects patient-reported outcomes, especially after double-door LPs. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of C3 LN compared with C3 LP in cervical double-door LP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using our prospective database, consecutive patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy undergoing cervical double-door LP in 7 hospitals between April 2017 and May 2018 were enrolled. Before and 1 year after the surgeries, we collected the details of patient background data, operative factors, radiologic findings such as C2-C7 ROM angle and C2-C3 interlaminar bony fusion, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, postoperative satisfaction, neck pain, and patient-reported outcomes such as Short Form-12 (SF-12), EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. RESULTS: In all, 152 patients were enrolled, including 97 undergoing C3 LP and 55 undergoing C3 LN. There were no significant differences in patient background data, complications, and operative factors. C2-C3 interlaminar bony fusion occurred more often in the C3 LP group (22.6% vs. 5.7%). There were also no differences in the C2-C7 angle, C2-C7 ROM angle, the JOA score, patient satisfaction, neck pain, SF-12, EQ-5D, NDI, and COMI between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: C2-C3 bony fusion after cervical double-door LP occurred more often in the C3 LP group than in the C3 LN group. C3 LN resulted in similar outcomes in complication rate, radiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes compared with those of C3 LP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Outcomes of an Intraoperative Povidone-Iodine Irrigation Protocol in Spinal Surgery for Surgical Site Infection Prevention.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of our new protocol for preventing postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) following spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI following spinal surgery is a serious postoperative complication. Several studies have recently assessed the effectiveness of wound irrigation with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) for SSI prevention, but no consensus has been reached as to how PVP-I should be used in clinical practice. We formed a PVP-I irrigation protocol focusing on the pharmacological properties of PVP-I. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our protocol for preventing SSI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cases of spinal surgery at our hospital between October 2011 and September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The exclusion criteria were PVP-I allergy, prior surgical debridement for infection, and implant removal surgery. The patients were subdivided into those who had received normal saline irrigation after 90 seconds of 1% PVP-I pooling every 1.5 hours (study group) or only routine saline irrigation every 1.5 hours (control group). The study and control groups comprised of 177 and 146 patients, respectively. This study compared the rate of SSI with and without the use of the PVP-I irrigation protocol. RESULTS: The SSI rates were 1.7% for the study group (3/177 patients) and 3.4% for the control group (5/146 patients), showing no significant statistical difference (P=0.32). There were no cases of deep SSI in the study group, whereas there were 4 cases in the control group. The deep SSI rate significantly decreased in the study group (P=0.027). No adverse events occurred in the study group. CONCLUSION: In this study, 90 seconds of 1% PVP-I pooling every 1.5 hours followed by saline irrigation demonstrated the effectiveness of our protocol for the prevention of postoperative deep SSI after spinal surgery.