Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 15(6): e40835, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37489216

RESUMEN

Introduction  Skeletal metastasis is catastrophic in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), leading to skeletal-related events (SRE) such as nerve entrapment, hypercalcemia and even pathological fractures, which may require surgical intervention. The nature of the bone metastasis in advanced RCC is large, destructive, hyper-vascular and mostly lytic. The present retrospective analysis aims to identify potential risk factors for predicting SREs in advanced RCC with bone metastasis. Methods The clinical data of 42 patients with RCC and bone metastasis and at least one episode of SRE were reviewed, and the correlations between erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), C-reactive protein (CRP), haemoglobin (Hb), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and bone metastases were analysed. Risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Bone metastasis was diagnosed on a bone scan. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve calculated the cut-off value of the independent correlation factors. Results The areas under the ROC curve for ALP, Hb, CRP, and ESR were 0.84, 0.76, 0.86 and 0.88, respectively, suggesting excellent discriminatory capability of ALP, CRP, ESR and sufficient discriminative ability of Hb in predicting bone metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed ALP, CRP, Hb and ESR associated with SRE and skeletal metastasis. Conclusion We propose that an A.C.H.E. score encompassing ALP, CRP, Hb, and ESR are potential risk factors for developing SRE and concomitant bone metastasis in advanced RCC patients. For new RCC patients, if values of ALP >128 U/L, CRP ≥74 mg/L, Hb <11.5 g/L, and ESR ≥55 mm/hr are detected, intensive monitoring and bone scanning are warranted as these cases are at a higher risk of skeletal events.

2.
Front Surg ; 9: 911206, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35846972

RESUMEN

Telemedicine has great potential in urology as a strong medium for providing patients with continuous high-quality urological care despite the hurdles involved in its implementation. Both clinicians and patients are crucial factors in determining the success of tele-consults in terms of simplicity of use and overall satisfaction. For it to be successfully incorporated into routine urological practice, rigorous training and evidence-based recommendations are lacking. If these issues are addressed, they can provide a significant impetus for future tele-consults in urology and their successful deployment, even beyond the pandemic, to assure safer and more environment-friendly patient management.

3.
Urology ; 156: 52-57, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33561472

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand the preference and role of 'hybrid' urological meetings compared to face-to-face and online meetings during and after COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary outcome was finding out the most preferable webinar setting. METHODS: An online global survey was done between June 06 and July 05, 2020, using SurveyMonkey. The target participants were urology healthcare providers. The survey was disseminated via mailing lists and the Twitter platform. RESULTS: A total of 526 urology providers from 56 countries responded to the survey and it was completed by 73.3%. Participants' overall experience was better in a face-to-face meeting, followed by a hybrid and webinar only meeting. While opportunities for networking was identified as high in face-to-face meeting, online webinars were more cost effective, and learning opportunity and reach of audience was higher for hybrid meetings. For online webinar format, Zoom platform was used by 73% and majority (69%) saw it on their laptop or desktop. The preference was for a 1-hour webinar in the evenings with 3-5 speakers. Urology residents rated face-to-face meetings to have better cost-effectiveness when compared to consultants. Post COVID-19, more than half of all respondents would prefer hybrid meetings compared to the other formats. CONCLUSION: While there will be a place for face-to-face meetings, COVID-19 situation has led to a preference towards hybrid meetings which is ideal for a global reach in the future. It is plausible that most urological associations will move towards a hybrid model for their meetings.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , COVID-19 , Congresos como Asunto/organización & administración , Urología , Adulto , COVID-19/prevención & control , Congresos como Asunto/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Internet/economía , Internado y Residencia , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distanciamiento Físico , SARS-CoV-2 , Red Social , Programas Informáticos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Urología/educación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...