Effect of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces AF recurrence after catheter ablation with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of CPAP treatment on the recurrence and burden of AF after PVI in patients with OSA. METHODS: We randomized patients with paroxysmal AF and an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 events/hour to treatment with CPAP or standard care. Heart rhythm was monitored by an implantable loop recorder. AF recurrence after PVI was defined as any episode of AF lasting >2 minutes after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: PVI was performed in 83 patients. Thirty-seven patients were randomized to CPAP treatment and 46 patients to standard care. The AHI was reduced from 26.7 ± 14 events/hour to 1.7 ± 1.3 events/hour at follow-up in the CPAP group (P = .001). A total of 57% of patients in both the CPAP group and the standard care group had at least 1 episode of AF 3-12 months after PVI (P for difference = 1). AF burden after ablation was reduced in both groups, with no between-group difference (P = .69). CONCLUSION: In patients with paroxysmal AF and OSA, treatment with CPAP did not further reduce the risk of AF recurrence after ablation. PVI considerably reduced the burden of AF in OSA patients, without any difference between groups.

Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Arrhythmia in Atrial Fibrillation and Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rationale: Sleep apnea (SA) is highly prevalent in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and both conditions are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.Objectives: To determine the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on AF burden.Methods: This open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial included patients with paroxysmal AF and moderate to severe SA (apnea-hypopnea index ⩾15). A computerized system randomized eligible patients (1:1) to 5 months' treatment with CPAP plus usual care (CPAP, n = 55) or usual care alone (control, n = 54). The outcome assessment was blinded. The planned primary outcome was the difference between CPAP treatment and control groups in change of AF burden (percentage of time in AF) as measured by implantable loop recorder.Measurements and Main Results: A total of 579 patients with paroxysmal AF had respiratory polygraphy, of whom 244 (42%) had moderate to severe SA. Of these, 158 (65%) participated in the CPAP run-in period, of whom 39 (25%) patients did not tolerate the treatment. A total of 108 patients were available for the primary analysis. The mean time in AF decreased from 5.6% at baseline to 4.1% during the last 3 months of CPAP intervention and from 5.0% to 4.3% in the control group. The adjusted between-group difference at follow-up was -0.63 (95% confidence interval, -2.55 to 1.30) percentage points (P = 0.52). Seven serious adverse events (13%) occurred in the CPAP group, and two (4%) occurred in the control group.Conclusions: In patients with paroxysmal AF and SA, treatment with CPAP did not result in a statistically significant reduction in the burden of AF.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02727192).

Comparing manual and automatic scoring of sleep monitoring data from portable polygraphy.

We used sleep monitoring data from a study that investigated the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors and type of sleep apnea (SA) in 579 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Most patients were screened for two nights, resulting in 1,043 sleep recordings that each contained data from one night. SA was diagnosed using the Nox T3 portable sleep monitor. An experienced sleep specialist scored the recordings manually using Noxturnal software. A total of 157 women (27%) and 422 men (73%) were examined; 477 (82.7%) had an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5/hr, whereas moderate to severe SA (AHI ≥ 15/hr) was diagnosed in 243 patients (42.1%). The AHI derived from automatic and manual scoring showed a good agreement (Pearson's r coefficient of 0.96). The median difference in AHI was very small (i.e., 0.72 [mean difference, 1.06]), but was statistically significant (p < .0001). Automatic scoring classified sleep recordings with more than 90% accuracy into SA categories of mild (AHI ≥ 5/hr), moderate (AHI ≥ 15/hr) and severe (AHI ≥ 30/hr). We found a minor (11%-21%) mis-estimation of the number of recordings right above and below the boundary separating mild and moderate SA. The accuracy of automatic scoring differed from recording to recording, especially regarding the sensitivity of detecting disrupted breathing events. We found low to moderate agreement for the duration of disrupted breathing events (r = .53), for which the automatic scoring led to a statistically significant overestimation by 5.22 s (p < .0001).

Treatment of sleep apnea in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial.

RATIONALE: Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased mortality as well as morbidity. There is strong evidence for an association between atrial fibrillation and sleep apnea. It is not known whether treatment of sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will reduce the burden of atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVE: The Treatment of Sleep Apnea in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation study will investigate the effects of CPAP in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sleep apnea. DESIGN: The trial has a dual center, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel design. METHODS: Two centers will enroll a total of 100 patients with both paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥ 15 events/h) who are scheduled for catheter ablation. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to CPAP or control group (50 patients in each arm). The effects of CPAP treatment on atrial fibrillation will be determined using an implanted loop recorder (Reveal LINQ™, Medtronic) that detects all arrhythmia episodes. The primary endpoint is a reduction of the total burden of atrial fibrillation in the intervention group, after 5 months' follow-up (preablation). Reduction in the arrhythmia recurrence rate after ablation is the main secondary endpoint. All patients will be followed up for 12 months after ablation. CONCLUSION: This study is the first randomized controlled trial that will provide data on the effects of CPAP therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sleep apnea. The results are expected to improve our understanding of the interaction between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sleep apnea. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier. NCT02727192.