End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common and challenging complication after stoma creation, with an estimated 50% incidence 2 years after the index surgery. Mesh repair is the treatment of choice. Laparoscopic and/or robotic approaches allow acceptable outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review from January 2012 to November 2023 was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Embase, PubMed, and Scopus search were performed to select articles dealing with minimally invasive surgical treatment for PSH after end colostomy. RESULTS: 603 studies were found, and 24 were chosen. When compared to open surgery, laparoscopy showed decreased postoperative complications and recurrence. The main laparoscopic approaches are the keyhole (KH), the Sugarbaker (SB), and the sandwich technique. Continuous improvement in surgery, mesh technology, and surgeons' expertise led to an amelioration of surgical outcome and recurrence rate after repair. Recent studies showed comparable outcomes for SB and KH techniques, while novel surgical approaches have been proposed in an attempt to further increase the operative and long-term results. Reports on PSH robotic repairs are scarce and describe small series results, suggesting a role of the initial learning curve as a risk factor for complications. CONCLUSION: End-colostomy PSH surgical repair still represents a challenge for surgeons. Recent evidence has not shown a significant advantage in postoperative complications and recurrence with a specific repair among SB, KH, and sandwich technique. The paucity of data on robotic surgery does not allow to draw definitive conclusion. Further primary, multicentric, and larger cohort studies are needed.

Gastric emptying after sleeve gastrectomy: statistical evidence of a controlled prospective study with gastric scintigraphy.

AIM: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a stand-alone bariatric procedure, its feasibility and efficacy being confirmed by long-term data. The effect of the procedure is believed to be based on the gastric restriction and reduction of ghrelin. Nevertheless it remains still controversial the role of LSG on gastric emptying and the impact that this may have on weight loss outcomes. Our aim is to assess gastric emptying after LSG using gastric scintigraphy. METHODS: For this prospective randomized study, 45 patients undergoing LSG at our Centre for the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Severe Obesity from April 2009 to April 2011 were enrolled and observed prospectively (Group A). The inclusion criteria followed the guidelines for bariatric surgery. All patients performed gastric emptying scintigraphy through a standard semisolid meal (250 kcal), marked with 0.5 mCiTc 99. Group A performed the exam before (A1) and after the operation (A2). A control group (Group B) included 20 patients undergoing scintigraphic assessment for other reasons. RESULTS: LSG was performed following a standardized technique. No complications were observed. The scintigraphic study showed a reduced half-life tracer (A1 vs. A2: 80.4±16.5 min vs. 64.3±22 min P=0.06), without a significant difference. Comparing the two groups no differences occurred before operation (B vs. A1). Gastric emptying time resulted significatively reduced in group A2 rather than in group A1 and B. CONCLUSION: Gastric motility plays a role in the pathogenesis of obesity. Our experience suggests that LSG reduces gastric emptying time, but further studies are necessary to reach statystical significativity.

Heliosphere Bag in the treatment of severe obesity: preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: Various intragastric balloons have been used in obese patients for temporary weight loss. Recently, a new balloon, the Heliosphere Bag, was proposed. In a preliminary study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of this device. METHODS: The Heliosphere Bag was used in 10 patients, selected according to the guidelines for obesity surgery. The manufacturer's instructions were followed in positioning the device. Heliosphere Bag positioning was performed, after diagnostic endoscopy, under unconscious sedation. After placement, the balloon was slowly inflated with 840-960 cc of air, which gives the inflated final volume of 650-700 cc of air, as the air is compressed. On the first and second post-treatment day, intravenous saline (30-35 ml/kg/d) with omeprazole (20 mg/d), ondansetron (8 mg/d) and butylscopolamine bromide (20 mg t.i.d.) were given to all patients. All patients from day 3 after placement began liquid diet and were discharged home on day 4 on a 1000 kcal diet (carbohydrate 146 g, lipid 68 g, protein 1 g/kg ideal weight). After 6 months, the Heliosphere Bag was removed. The patients were followed monthly, and complications and their treatment, post-placement symptoms, BMI and %EWL were recorded. Data were expressed as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: From Sept-Dec 2004, 10 patients (5M/5F) underwent Heliosphere Bag placement, with age 35.2 +/- 15.7 years (17-49), BMI 43.3 +/- 8.1 kg/m(2) (35-51.2), and weight 126.8 +/- 23.7 kg (98.4-148). Heliosphere Bag positioning was quite difficult in all patients due to low pliancy and large size of the bag, causing patient discomfort. System failure at time of Heliosphere Bag positioning was observed in 5/10 patients (50%). At time of removal, the Heliosphere Bag was not found in the stomach in one patient. In 3 other patients, the balloon was found partially deflated. At the time of balloon removal after 6 months, BMI was 37.4 +/- 13.4 (28.9-42.1) and %EWL was 29.1 +/- 20.1 (9.0-57.4). BMI loss was 5.2 +/- 13.1 (1.9-11.2) and mean weight loss was 17.5 +/- 16.2 kg (5-33). CONCLUSIONS: Although weight loss was satisfactory, this device cannot be considered an advance for the temporary treatment of morbid obesity. This balloon still has some instrumental and technical problems that need to be solved: high rate of system failure at positioning, high rate of spontaneous deflation, absence of a marker such as methylene blue, and large size with low pliability that cause significant patient discomfort.

Peroperative control of surgical infections.

The overall incidence of post-surgical infection actually amount to 3-10%, in different multicentric trial, although the data may underrepresent the true incidence of such infections owing to increase of day-surgery. Antibiotic prophylaxis rapresents the first choice in the management of surgical patients, which standardization and selection can determine a real protection for all the operating time. Standardization of intraoperative procedure, considering utility of a multistep precautionary measure and the weight of these measures on post-operative stay of patients, may be an arm for control really post-operative infectious complications, according with control of sterilization's procedures and diffusion of dedicated device.