Evaluation of Insulin Dosing Strategies for Hyperkalemia Management at an Academic Medical Center.

PURPOSE: While intravenous (IV) insulin is often administered at a fixed dose of 10 units for acute hyperkalemia, optimal dosing for minimizing hypoglycemia while effectively reversing hyperkalemia has not been established. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of insulin dosing strategies on hypoglycemia in patients with hyperkalemia. METHODS: Adult patients presenting to an academic medical center who received IV insulin for hyperkalemia between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients treated with 10 units of insulin (fixed) were compared to those who received < 10 units (reduced). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose < 70 mg/dL) within 12 hours of insulin administration. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose < 40 mg/dL) and change in potassium. Multivariable analyses were used to assess for risk factors for hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia. FINDINGS: Of the 2576 patients included, 305 (11.8%) received reduced dosing and 2271 (88.2%) received fixed dosing. Hypoglycemia occurred in 16.7% of the reduced group and 15.9% of the fixed group (P = 0.70). Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 2.3% of the reduced group and 2.5% of the fixed group (P = 0.86). Median potassium reduction from baseline to first check post-insulin was less with reduced dosing (-0.6 mEq/L vs -0.8 mEq/L, P < 0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, greater weight-based insulin dose and ED location were significant predictors for hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia. Location in the intensive care unit was associated with a decreased risk of hypoglycemia. Higher pre-insulin glucose was protective for hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia. IMPLICATIONS: The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar among both groups. Greater weight-based insulin dose was a significant risk factor for hypoglycemia, while higher baseline glucose levels were associated with a decreased risk, indicating that patient-specific insulin dosing for hyperkalemia may be warranted.

Evaluation of Goal Phenytoin Levels After an Initial Intravenous Loading Dose at an Academic Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Phenytoin intravenous loading doses are administered in status epilepticus to rapidly achieve therapeutic levels. Accurately assessing phenytoin levels after the initial load can be challenging because of its complex pharmacokinetic profile and nonstandardized weight-based loading doses. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this analysis were to determine the incidence of patients achieving goal phenytoin levels after the initial loading dose and characterize factors that contribute to achieving the goal level. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort analysis was approved by our institutional review board and included adult patients who received a phenytoin load from May 2016 to March 2021. Patients were excluded if no total phenytoin level was drawn within 24 hours of the load, if the maintenance dose was given before the first level was drawn, or if the patient was on phenytoin before the load. The major endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving a corrected goal phenytoin level of ≥10 mcg/mL after the initial load. Multivariate regression was used to determine predictors of achieving the goal phenytoin level. RESULTS: Of the 152 patients included, 139 patients (91.4%) achieved a corrected goal level after the first load. Patients at goal received a significantly higher median weight-based loading dose (19.1 mg/kg [15.0-20.0] vs 12.6 mg/kg [10.1-15.0], P < 0.01). The multivariate analysis identified weight-based dosing as a statistically significant predictor of achieving the corrected goal level (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.53; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Most patients achieved a corrected goal phenytoin level after the initial load. A higher median weight-based loading dose was shown to be a predictor of achieving the goal level and should be encouraged for rapid seizure termination. Future studies are warranted to confirm patient-specific factors that affect rapid achievement of the goal phenytoin level.

Naloxone Versus Methylnaltrexone for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) may occur in up to 81% of critically ill patients and can lead to many complications. Opioid antagonists are a reasonable approach and may be used for managing OIC. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of enteral naloxone (NLX) versus subcutaneous methylnaltrexone (MNTX) for the management of OIC in critically ill patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients who received NLX or MNTX and a continuous opioid infusion for at least 48 hours. The primary end point was time to resolution of constipation, defined as hours to first bowel movement (BM) after the first dose of an opioid antagonist. Reversal of analgesia was assessed by comparing the total number of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) 24 hours preopioid and postopioid antagonist administration. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess treatment response within 48 hours. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving NTX (n = 89) and MNTX (n = 71). However, the time to the first BM with NLX was 18 hours compared with 41 hours with MNTX (P = 0.004). There was no difference in MME requirements 24 hours pre/post NLX or MNTX administration. Naloxone administration was identified as a statistically significant predictor of BM within 48 hours (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68 [1.33-5.38]). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The time to first BM was shorter with enteral NLX. Both NLX and MNTX appear to be effective for the management of OIC without causing reversal of analgesia. Future controlled, prospective trials comparing these agents are warranted.

Stability of alteplase for ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis is used with low-dose alteplase to treat pulmonary embolism. This reduces the risk of bleeding that accompanies systemic administration of higher alteplase doses. Some studies suggest that alteplase given over 2 to 6 hours is safe and effective, but there are few data to support the stability of alteplase under these conditions. Therefore, we undertook this in vitro study to determine the duration of alteplase stability. Alteplase was prepared in solutions of 8 mg in 100 mL, 6 mg in 150 mL, and 8 mg in 200 mL. Solutions were administered through the EkoSonic Endovascular System (with and without ultrasound) to simulate administration over 2, 4, and 6 hours. Alteplase was assessed with reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). Assays were performed at time 0 and at 30-minute intervals during simulated infusion. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure alteplase concentrations at time 0 and at 15-minute intervals during simulated infusion. By using RP-HPLC in the absence of ultrasound, the alteplase concentration remained within 1% of the original concentration through 120, 240, and 360 minutes of infusion. By using RP-HPLC for measurement, alteplase in the presence of ultrasound degraded steadily over time to ∼90% of its original amount in 120 minutes, ∼80% in 240 minutes, and ∼70% in 360 minutes. The remaining alteplase was available for enzymatic activity. Alteplase solutions of 0.04 and 0.08 mg/mL degraded steadily over time during simulated ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed administration. Alteplase that did not degrade remained available for enzymatic activity.

Intravenous levothyroxine stewardship program at a tertiary academic medical center.

PURPOSE: Based on the pharmacokinetic profile of levothyroxine, a 3-day hold guideline for adult patients ordered for intravenous (IV) levothyroxine was implemented at a tertiary academic medical center. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of an IV levothyroxine hold guideline. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective analysis identified patients ordered for IV levothyroxine during a 13-week period before and after implementation of the guideline. The primary outcome was guideline adherence, defined as full implementation of the 3-day hold. Secondary outcomes included the number of IV levothyroxine administrations avoided in the post-guideline group, extrapolated yearly cost avoidance (EYCA) after guideline implementation, reasons for guideline non-adherence, and number of safety reports involving IV levothyroxine. RESULTS: A total of 166 and 134 patients met inclusion criteria for the pre- and post-guideline groups, respectively. Guideline adherence was observed in 94 (70.1%) patients, resulting in 276 vials saved in the 13-week post-guideline period, which translated to an EYCA of $139,877. Forty orders (29.9%) were non-adherent to the guideline, with the most common reason stated as nil per os (NPO). No difference in safety outcomes was seen between the pre- and post-guideline groups, as evidenced by 1 safety report in each group. CONCLUSION: We observed a high rate of adherence to an IV levothyroxine hold guideline. This was associated with a substantial cost savings over the study period with no increase in reported safety events. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of an inpatient IV levothyroxine 3-day hold guideline.

Evaluation of Desmopressin in Critically Ill Patients with Hyponatremia Requiring 3% Hypertonic Saline.

BACKGROUND: Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used for hyponatremia management but has been associated with increases in hospital length of stay and duration of hypertonic saline use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hyponatremia management strategies and their effect on sodium correction in critically ill patients requiring 3% hypertonic saline (3HS). METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included critically ill patients with hyponatremia (serum sodium ≤ 125 mEq/L) receiving 3HS from May 31 2015, to May 31 2019. Patients were divided into those who received 3HS for hyponatremia management (HTS) and those who received proactive or reactive DDAVP in addition to 3HS (D-HTS). Patients in either group could receive rescue DDAVP. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving goal sodium correction of 5-10 mEq/L 24 h after 3HS initiation. RESULTS: Goal sodium correction was achieved in 52.5% of patients in HTS compared to 65.6% of patients in D-HTS (p = 0.21). Patients in HTS had a shorter duration of 3HS infusion (p = 0.0022) with no difference in ICU length of stay, free water intake, urine output, or serum sodium increases 12 and 24 h after receiving 3HS. Overcorrection during any 24- or 48 h period was not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients in HTS and D-HTS had similar rates of achieving goal sodium correction at 24 h. A proactive or reactive DDAVP strategy led to an increase in 3HS duration and total amount with no significant difference in rates of overcorrection. Prospective, randomized studies assessing standardized strategies for hyponatremia management and DDAVP administration are warranted.

Evaluation of Cost, Workflow, and Safety of Implementing a Vial Transfer Device for Ready-to-Mix Drugs at an Academic Medical Center.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost, workflow, and safety of implementing a vial transfer device system. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, pharmacy systems and electronic health record reports identified high-volume and high-cost medications prepared by a Vial2Bag® (V2B) system from July 2017 to June 2018. The major outcome was the extrapolated yearly cost avoidance (EYCA) from utilization of a V2B system, calculated by subtracting total costs of the V2B system from total cost of ready-to-use products and locally compounded sterile products. Secondary outcomes included a workflow and safety analysis. RESULTS: Implementing a V2B system led to a total EYCA of $2 295 261. A total of 283 209 potential V2B units were available for dispensing from automated dispensing systems and 41 082 yearly sterile product room units were avoided. A 0.02% safety report incidence per V2B administration was calculated at our institution. CONCLUSION: Use of a V2B system resulted in a substantial cost avoidance compared to purchasing commercial products and preparing locally compounded sterile products. The V2B system appears to be a safe addition to further optimize workflow but may require further investigation in prospective analyses.

Safety of Intravenous Push Lacosamide Compared With Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the incidence of adverse events associated with administering lacosamide by intravenous push (IVP) compared with IV piggyback (IVPB). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to compare the safety profile, including cardiovascular effects, sedative effects, and IV site reactions of IVP and IVPB lacosamide administration. METHODS: A retrospective pre/post cohort analysis comparing patients who received lacosamide via IVP and IVPB was conducted. Safety end points included hypotension, bradycardia, medication-related sedation, and IV site reactions. The relationship between patient characteristics and the incidence of safety end points was analyzed using the Student t-test and χ2 test as appropriate. RESULTS: Bradycardia occurred after 0.19% of IVP administrations and 1.09% of IVPB administrations assessed (P = 0.07). Hypotension was observed in 3.16% of IVP administrations compared to 1.59% in the IVPB cohort (P = 0.12). Post lacosamide-related sedation was noted in 11.32% and 11.68% of the IVP and IVPB cohorts, respectively (P = 0.87). Infusion site reaction rates of 1.80% and 0.84% were documented in the IVP and IVPB cohorts, respectively (P = 0.33). Of note, only 1 adverse event required clinical intervention. One 200-mg dose in the IVP cohort required a fluid bolus postadministration. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: IVP lacosamide was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, neurological, and infusion site-related adverse events compared with IVPB, in which nearly every adverse event was deemed clinically insignificant. Lacosamide administered via IVP may be considered a safe alternative method of administration in the acute care setting.