Diagnostic accuracy of urine biomarkers for urinary tract infection in older women: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common among older women. However, diagnosis is challenging because of frequent chronic lower urinary tract symptoms, cognitive impairment, and a high prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). Current urine diagnostics lack specificity, leading to unnecessary treatment and antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 12 urine biomarkers for diagnosing UTI in older women. METHODS: In this case-control study, cases were women ≥65 years with ≥2 new-onset lower urinary tract symptoms, pyuria, and one uropathogen ≥104 CFU/mL. Controls were asymptomatic and classified as ASB (one uropathogen ≥105 CFU/mL), negative culture, or mixed flora. Urine biomarker concentrations were measured through liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and ELISA. Diagnostic accuracy parameters of individual biomarkers and a biomarker model were derived from receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: We included 162 community-dwelling and institutionalized older women. Five urine inflammatory biomarkers demonstrated high discriminative ability (area under the curve ≥0.80): interleukin 6, azurocidin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2, and C-X-C motif chemokine 9. Azurocidin exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 86% [95% CI 75%-93%] and specificity 89% [95% CI 82%-94%] at 16.7 ng/mmol creatinine). A combined biomarker and pyuria model showed improved diagnostic accuracy in patients with UTI and ASB, compared with pyuria alone. DISCUSSION: We identified several urine biomarkers that accurately differentiated older women with UTI from asymptomatic women, including ASB. These findings represent a potential advancement towards improved diagnostics for UTI in older women and warrant validation in a diverse population.

Urinary Kidney Injury Biomarkers Are Associated with Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Severity in Kidney Allograft Recipients.

BACKGROUND: We explored the potential of emerging and conventional urinary kidney injury biomarkers in recipients of living donor (LD) or donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplantation, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and individuals from the general population. METHODS: Urine samples from kidney allograft recipients with mild (LD; n = 199) or severe (DCD; n = 71) ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) were analyzed for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP2), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), chemokine C-X-C motif (CXCL9), solute carrier family 22 member 2 (SLC22A2), nephrin, and uromodulin (UMOD) by quantitative multiplex LC-MS/MS analysis. The fold-change in biomarker levels was determined in mild and severe IRI and in patients with CKD stage 1-2 (n = 127) or stage ≥3 (n = 132) in comparison to the general population (n = 1438). Relationships between the biomarkers and total protein, ß2-microglobulin (B2M), creatinine, and osmolality were assessed. RESULTS: NGAL, IGFBP7, TIMP2, KIM-1, CXCL9, and UMOD were quantifiable, whereas nephrin and SLC22A2 were below the limit of detection. Kidney injury biomarkers were increased up to 6.2-fold in allograft recipients with mild IRI and 8.3-fold in recipients with severe IRI, compared to the reference population, with the strongest response observed for NGAL and B2M. In CKD stage 1-2, B2M, NGAL, IGFBP7, TIMP2, KIM-1, UMOD, and CXCL9 were not altered, but in individuals with CKD stage ≥3, B2M, NGAL, and KIM-1 were increased up to 1.3-fold. IGFBP7, TIMP2, NGAL, and CXCL9 were strongly correlated (all r ≥ 0.8); correlations with B2M and TP were smaller (all r ≤ 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: IRI, but not stable CKD, was associated with increased urinary levels of kidney injury biomarkers determined by LC-MS/MS. Absolute and multiplexed protein quantitation by LC-MS/MS is an effective strategy for biomarker panel evaluation for translation toward the clinical laboratory.

Antithrombin diagnostics by mass spectrometry: Development and analytical validation of a next-generation test.

Background: Antithrombin deficiency is a rare but severe disorder leading to high risk of thrombosis. The current clinical care pathway relies on activity tests, which only provide overall functional information on the in vitro activity of antithrombin. However, antithrombin exists in many different forms, also known as proteoforms, with varying clinical phenotypes. Precision diagnostics, facilitated by mass spectrometry, provides a strategy to improve patient diagnostics by molecular characterization. Objectives: To develop and analytically validate a mass spectrometry-based test for molecular characterization of antithrombin. Methods: The test was analytically validated based on predefined analytical performance specifications. The validation covered imprecision, carryover, linearity, stability, analytical specificity, a provisional reference interval, and an explorative method comparison. Results: The test passed the predefined analytical performance specifications with a mean within-laboratory imprecision of 5.9%, linearity between 0.08 and 2.58 µmol/L, and a provisional reference interval of 1.07 to 1.49 µmol/L. When measuring samples with a suspected quantitative deficiency, the test showed a good correlation with a commercial activity test (Pearson r = 0.88). Conclusion: The test passed the validation, and we now envision the use of the test for exploration of the clinical relevance of specific antithrombin proteoforms. Puzzling cases of antithrombin deficiency, for instance, due to ambiguous activity results or an atypical clinical presentation, can be investigated by the LC-MRM mass spectrometry test serving as an add-on to the activity test and providing a molecular diagnosis. Clinical studies are planned to investigate the potential of the test to improve antithrombin diagnostics. Furthermore, the molecular information gained using the test may aid in establishing better risk stratification and a basis for personalized medicine.