A Collaborative Multidisciplinary Trauma Program Improvement Team Improves VTE Chemoprophylaxis Guideline Compliance In Non-Operative Stable TBI.

BACKGROUND: Delays in initiating venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) persist despite guidelines recommending early initiation. We hypothesized that the expansion of a Trauma Program Performance Improvement (PI) team will improve compliance of early (24-48 hour) initiation of VTE prophylaxis and will decrease VTE events in TBI patients. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all TBI patients admitted to a Level I trauma center before (2015-2016,) and after (2019-2020,) the expansion of the Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety (PIPS) team and the creation of trauma process and outcome dashboards. Exclusion criteria included discharge or death within 48 hours of admission, expanding intracranial hemorrhage on CT scan, and a neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, pressure monitor, or drains) prior to chemoprophylaxis initiation. RESULTS: A total of 1,112 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 54% (n = 604) were admitted after Trauma PIPS expansion. Following the addition of a dedicated PIPS nurse in the trauma program and creation of process dashboards, the time from stable CT to VTE prophylaxis initiation decreased (52 hours to 35 hours; p < 0.001) and more patients received chemoprophylaxis at 24-48 hours (59% from 36%, p < 0.001) after stable head CT. There was no significant difference in time from first head CT to stable CT (9 vs 9 hours; p = 0.15). The Contemporary group had a lower rate of VTE events (1% vs 4%; p < 0.001) with no increase in bleeding events (2% vs 2%; p = 0.97). On multivariable analysis, being in the Early cohort was an independent predictor of VTE events (aOR: 3.74; 95%CI: 1.45-6.16). CONCLUSION: A collaborative multidisciplinary Trauma PIPS team improves guideline compliance. Initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis within 24-48 hours of stable head CT is safe and effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic/Care Management.

Improved follow-up care for gun violence survivors in the Trauma Quality of Life Clinic.

Background: Outpatient follow-up represents a crucial opportunity to re-engage with gun violence survivors (GVS) and to facilitate positive health outcomes. Current outpatient models for firearm-related injuries and trauma care are inconsistent and unstandardized across trauma centers. This project describes the patient population served by the multidisciplinary Trauma Quality of Life (TQoL) Clinic for GVS. Also of primary interest was the outpatient follow-up services used by patients prior to their clinic appointment. Subsequent referrals placed during Clinic, as well as rate of attendance, was a secondary aim. Methods: This was a descriptive retrospective analysis of a quality improvement project of the TQoL Clinic. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record and were supplemented with information from the trauma registry and the hospital-based violence intervention program database. Descriptive statistics characterized the patient population served. A Χ2 analysis was used to compare no-show rates for the TQoL Clinic against two historical cohorts of trauma clinic attendees. Results: Most attendees were young (M=32.0, SD=1.8, range=15-88 years), Black (80.1%), and male (82.0%). Of the 306 total TQoL Clinic attendees, 82.3% attended their initial scheduled appointment. Most non-attendee patients rescheduled their appointments (92.1%), and 89.5% attended the rescheduled appointment. TQoL Clinic demonstrated a significantly lower no-show rate than the traditional trauma clinic model, including after the implementation of the hospital's inpatient violence intervention program (χ2(2)=75.52, p<0.001). Conclusion: The TQoL Clinic has demonstrated improved outpatient follow-up to address the comprehensive needs of GVS. Trauma centers with high gunshot wound volume should consider the implementation of the multidisciplinary TQoL Clinic model to increase access to care and to continue partnership with violence intervention programs to address health outcomes in those most at risk of future morbidity and mortality. Level of evidence: Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Quantifying the impact of reduced opioid use in patients after emergency laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: Emergency laparotomies have high rates of morbidity and mortality. The evaluation and management of pain are crucial, as poorly managed pain may contribute to postoperative complications and increase the risk of mortality. This study aims to describe the relationship between opioid use and opioid-related adverse effects and identify what constitutes appropriate dose reductions to elicit clinically relevant benefits. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study of patients presenting for emergency laparotomy due to trauma from 2014 to 2018. The primary objective was to define clinical outcomes that may be significantly affected by changes in milligrams of morphine equivalent during the first 72 hours postoperatively; additionally, we sought to quantify the approximate differences in morphine equivalent that correlate with clinically meaningful outcomes such as hospital length of stay, pain scores, and time to first bowel movement. For descriptive summaries, patients were categorized into low, moderate, and high groups based on morphine equivalent requirements of 0 to 25, 25 to 50, and >50, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 102 (35%), 84 (29%), and 105 (36%) patients were stratified into the low, moderate, and high groups, respectively. Mean pain scores for postoperative days 0 to 3 (P = .034), time to first bowel movement (P = .002), and nasogastric tube duration (P = .003) were the clinical outcomes found to be significantly associated with morphine equivalent. Estimated clinically significant reductions in morphine equivalent for these outcomes ranged from 194 to 464. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes, such as pain scores, and opioid-related adverse effects, such as time to first bowel movement and nasogastric tube duration, may be linked with the amount of opioids used.

Optimizing discharge opioid prescribing in trauma patients: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Patients prescribed higher opioid dosages are at increased risk of overdose and death without added pain reduction. Increases in opioid prescribing continue to fuel the epidemic. We hypothesized a comprehensive guideline to standardize opioid prescribing would decrease postdischarge dosages for patients experiencing trauma without requiring additional refills. METHODS: This quasiexperimental study compared opioid prescribing by trauma providers before and after the implementation of a departmental guideline on April 1, 2019, aimed at aligning opioid prescription patterns with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations. Patients prescribed opioids before implementation were the control group, whereas patients prescribed opioids after were the intervention group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving ≥50 morphine milligram equivalents per day. RESULTS: We identified 293 and 280 patients experiencing trauma in the control and intervention groups, respectively. There were no differences between the groups' Injury Severity Score (P = .69) or the frequency of having a procedure performed (P = .80). Total morphine milligram equivalents and maximum morphine milligram equivalents per day were 16% and 25% lower, respectively, in the intervention group compared with the control group (P < .001). The proportion of trauma patients prescribed ≥50 morphine milligram equivalents per day at discharge decreased from 57% to 18% after implementation (P < .001). The proportion of trauma patients prescribed ≥90 morphine milligram equivalents per day also decreased, from 37% to 14% (P < .001). There was no significant increase in the frequency of refill requests (P = .105) or refill prescriptions (P = .099) after discharge. CONCLUSION: A departmental guideline aimed at optimizing opioid prescription patterns successfully lowers the amount of morphine milligram equivalents prescribed to trauma patients and improves compliance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations.

Association of Gender, Race, Mechanism of Injury on Alcohol Use, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Depression in Trauma.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature documenting whether trauma patients with different mechanisms of injury have different rates of hazardous alcohol use and/or risk for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to determine whether there are associations between mechanism of injury, hazardous drinking, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Secondary objectives were to examine associations prior to and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 5 years of trauma registry data of adult trauma patients (older than 18 years) admitted to a Midwestern Level I trauma center conducted from January 2016 to November 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association of gender, race, and mechanism of injury on hazardous drinking and posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. RESULTS: A total of 9,392 trauma patients completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Items to identify hazardous drinking, and 5,012 completed the Injured Trauma Survivor Screen to identify risk for developing posttraumatic stress disorder and/or depression. The proportion of patients screening positive for hazardous drinking was higher for motor vehicle collisions (21.9%) than for gunshot wounds (17.6%) or falls (18.8%; χ2(2) = 14.311, p < .001). Those involved in motor vehicle collisions were also at a higher risk for the development of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (54.5%) relative to falls (33.5%) but not gunshot wounds (50.7%; χ2(2) = 200.185, p < .001). The impact of COVID-19 revealed increased hazardous drinking, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder in patients with falls and motor vehicle collisions but not gunshot wounds. CONCLUSIONS: Motor vehicle collision patients are at most risk for hazardous drinking concomitant with risk for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. These results help focus future research efforts toward interventions that can reduce these risks.

Serum Concentrations of the Endocannabinoid, 2-Arachidonoylglycerol, in the Peri-Trauma Period Are Positively Associated with Chronic Pain Months Later.

Endocannabinoid signaling and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis are activated by trauma and both stress systems regulate the transition from acute to chronic pain. This study aimed to develop a model of relationships among circulating concentrations of cortisol and endocannabinoids (eCBs) immediately after traumatic injury and the presence of chronic pain months later. Pain scores and serum concentrations of eCBs and cortisol were measured during hospitalization and 5-10 months later in 147 traumatically injured individuals. Exploratory correlational analyses and path analysis were completed. The study sample was 50% Black and Latino and primarily male (69%); 34% percent endorsed a pain score of 4 or greater at follow-up and were considered to have chronic pain. Path analysis was used to model relationships among eCB, 2-arachidonolyglycerol (2-AG), cortisol, and pain, adjusting for sex and injury severity (ISS). Serum 2-AG concentrations at the time of injury were associated with chronic pain in 3 ways: a highly significant, independent positive predictor; a mediator of the effect of ISS, and through a positive relationship with cortisol concentrations. These data indicate that 2-AG concentrations at the time of an injury are positively associated with chronic pain and suggest excessive activation of endocannabinoid signaling contributes to risk for chronic pain.

The role of pain and socioenvironmental factors on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in traumatically injured adults: A 1-year prospective study.

Approximately 20% of individuals who experience a traumatic injury will subsequently develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Physical pain following traumatic injury has received increasing attention as both a distinct, functionally debilitating disorder and a comorbid symptom related to PTSD. Studies have demonstrated that both clinician-assessed injury severity and patient pain ratings can be important predictors of nonremitting PTSD; however, few have examined pain and PTSD alongside socioenvironmental factors. We postulated that both area- and individual-level socioeconomic circumstances and lifetime trauma history would be uniquely associated with PTSD symptoms and interact with the pain-PTSD association. To test these effects, pain and PTSD symptoms were assessed at four visits across a 1-year period in a sample of 219 traumatically injured participants recruited from a Level 1 trauma center. We used a hierarchal linear modeling approach to evaluate whether (a) patient-reported pain ratings were a better predictor of PTSD than clinician-assessed injury severity scores and (b) socioenvironmental factors, specifically neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, individual income, and lifetime trauma history, influenced the pain-PTSD association. Results demonstrated associations between patient-reported pain ratings, but not clinician-assessed injury severity scores, and PTSD symptoms, R2( fvm ) = .65. There was a significant interaction between neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and pain such that higher disadvantage decreased the strength of the pain-PTSD association but only among White participants, R2( fvm ) = .69. Future directions include testing this question in a larger, more diverse sample of trauma survivors (e.g., geographically diverse) and examining factors that may alleviate both pain and PTSD symptoms.

Relationship Between Decreased Cortisol and Development of Chronic Pain in Traumatically Injured.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between pain and stress is widely accepted, yet the underlying neuroendocrine mechanisms are poorly understood. Cortisol secretion during a stress response, may distract attention from a painful stimulus, inhibiting pain. However, when pain is the stressor, cortisol secretion may intensify the pain experience and condition a fear-based memory of pain. This study attempts to determine the relationship between acute pain, chronic pain, and cortisol in the traumatically injured population. METHODS: Secondary analyses of a prospective observational study with participants from a Midwestern Adult Level I Trauma Center post traumatic injury, with interview and serum cortisol taken at hospitalization (baseline) and 6 mo after discharge, was completed using Ward's Method hierarchical cluster analysis, Pearson's correlations, and linear regressions. RESULTS: Two major clusters were identified. The Chronic Pain group were those who had severe pain at discharge and continued to have severe pain as defined by Numeric Pain Score. The Resolved Pain group were those who had moderate pain at discharge and their pain improved or resolved. Pain score at discharge significantly, negatively correlated with baseline cortisol levels (r = -0.142, P = 0.02). Minority status, single individuals, low cortisol at baseline, and greater psychological distress at baseline significantly increased the likelihood of developing chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Low cortisol and greater psychological stress, which are also associated with minority status and single individuals, contribute to chronic pain in the traumatically injured population. Trauma victims without an adequate cortisol response to acute injury and pain are at risk for development of chronic pain after injury.

Perforated appendicitis: Short duration antibiotics are noninferior to traditional long duration antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis usually manifests as either uncomplicated or complicated disease. Uncomplicated appendicitis is generally treated with an appendectomy without further antibiotic therapy. In contrast, complicated appendicitis can be treated in a myriad of ways. Nonoperative treatment has been proven to be effective but has variable failure rates. Operative management typically involves resection with postoperative antibiotics. The duration of antibiotic therapy is a topic of interest. Past studies have shown that a shorter duration of antibiotics (3-5 days) are equally as effective in treating intra-abdominal contamination. In the fall 2015, our practice pattern for antibiotic duration for acute complicated appendicitis changed to reflect this finding. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively review this change in practice. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine if a shorter duration of antibiotics for acute complicated appendicitis is as effective as a traditional longer duration of antibiotics with a historical cohort. We also aim to determine if the duration of stay improved with the shorter duration of antibiotics. METHODS: Appendicitis cases documented after September 2015 until the present were identified. Study inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥18 and patients undergoing an appendectomy (open or laparoscopic). Exclusion criteria included patients age <18, appendicitis cases not undergoing an operation, pregnant, or immunocompromised patients. Patient demographics, operation performed, pathology reports, antibiotic duration, duration of stay, infectious and postoperative complications, and 30-day readmission rates were collected through chart review. A sample of our treatment group prior to September 2015 was also obtained in a similar technique. RESULTS: The durations of stay between cohorts were not different; both were about 6.1 days. The duration of antibiotics was less in the post-2015 group (5.5 days vs 4.1 days, P = .005). The 30-day readmission rate was significantly less in the post-2015 group (16% vs 2%; P < .017). Neither in hospital infectious complications nor types of complications were statistically significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that adherence to short duration antibiotic treatment appears to be effective in decreasing the 30-day readmission rate without increasing in hospital infectious complications. Short duration of antibiotics did not, however, decrease the duration of hospital stay.

A Call to Follow-Up: Results Regarding Trauma Clinic Follow-Up Patterns.

The objective of this study was to assess the current practice pattern regarding posthospitalization follow-up of trauma patients among the members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST). An anonymous online multiple-choice survey of EAST members in 2016 was conducted. Ten questions relating to the follow-up care of injured patients were presented to the Active, Senior, and Associate members of EAST. Data were screened for quantitative concerns prior to analysis. Of the 1,610 members surveyed, 289 responded (18%). Approximately 52% of respondents stated that their institution has a dedicated trauma follow-up clinic where most injured patients are seen after discharge. Less than 20% reported that nontrauma multidisciplinary providers are present in clinics. Most (89.5%) reported that follow-up is a single visit, unless a patient has long-standing issues. Only 3 respondents stated that patients are regularly seen 3+ months out from injury, and a significant minority (17.7%) acknowledged no set follow-up timeline. Only 3.6% of participants indicated that they have a psychologist embedded in the trauma team, and 11.5% reported that no system is currently in place to manage mental health. Despite more than 20 years of literature highlighting the long-term physical and mental health sequelae after trauma, these survey results demonstrate that there is a lack of standardized and multidisciplinary follow-up. Given the improvement in outcomes with the identification and treatment of these sequelae, greater attention should be paid to functional recovery, social and psychological well-being, and chronic pain.

Enteric Fistula Treatment and Management: Results of an Institutional Inpatient Treatment Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Enterocutaneous fistulae (ECF) are abnormal communications between the gastrointestinal tract and skin that may occur following an abdominal operation and result in significant morbidity and even mortality. Standardized care of patients with ECF has not been implemented at the majority of tertiary hospitals. We sought to evaluate the benefits of a multidisciplinary team utilizing an evidence-based clinical treatment protocol for inpatient management of ECF. METHODS: We performed an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of outcomes after the implementation of an evidence-based clinical treatment protocol for patients admitted with ECF to the acute care surgical service at a large academic medical facility. Patients managed prior to the established protocol were considered part of the pre-protocol cohort (pre) while patients managed following implementation were included in the postprotocol cohort (post). A review of all eligible patients' hospital and clinic medical records was performed. RESULTS: In the pre cohort (n = 6), the average length of stay was 37 days, ranging from 16-67 days, with a 16% spontaneous closure rate and 60% requiring operative management for closure. A single patient was not offered surgery due to significant comorbidities. The post cohort (n = 13) demonstrated an average length of stay of just 16 days, ranging from 4 to 28 days, with an 84% spontaneous closure rate and 16% requiring operative closure. CONCLUSION: Utilization of a standardized treatment approach results in high spontaneous closure rates with a decreased hospital length of stay.

Implementation of an adhesive small bowel obstruction protocol using low-osmolar water soluble contrast and the impact on patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common condition leading to numerous hospital admissions and operations. Standardized care of adhesive SBO patients has not been widely implemented in hospital systems. METHODS: A prospective cohort of SBO patients was compared to a historical cohort of SBO patients after implementation of a SBO protocol using evidence-based guidelines and Omnipaque, a low-osmolar water soluble contrast. Patients without a history of abdominal surgery were excluded and data was collected through chart review. RESULTS: Univariate analyses demonstrated a decrease in both LOS by 1.35 days and in the proportion of patients receiving surgery (37% vs 25%; p < 0.05). There was a decrease in time to surgery, rate of SBR, and rate of complications, yet an increase in readmission, although these findings were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing an evidence-based SBO protocol can lead to shorter LOS and may result in fewer operations for adhesive SBO patients.

Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Comparison to the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator and the Tokyo Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: We compared observed postoperative outcomes from laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for acute cholecystitis (AC) to outcomes predicted by the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator.We also noted and compared any differences in observed outcomes across the different Tokyo Guidelines (TG) levels of AC severity.We hypothesized that ACS-NSQIP would accurately predict complications and length of stay (LOS) and that increased TG severity levels would correlate with more complications, increased conversion to open surgery, and longer LOS. METHODS: A review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis over eighteen months was performed. RESULTS: ACS-NSQIP predicted a complication rate of 4.6% (11% found) and LOS of 0.73 days (2.5 found), p < 0.05. Increased TG severity had LOS of 1.89, 2.75, and 5.33, respectively, p < 0.05. The complication numbers and conversion to open cholecystectomy were insignificant between the TG classes. CONCLUSION: ACS-NSQIP did not accurately predict complications or LOS. TG classifications did not show a significant difference in complications or conversion to open surgery, but positively correlated with LOS. ACS-NSQIP may not accurately predict patient outcomes and the TG, originally created with the purpose of differentiating levels of inflammation and severity, may only be useful for predicting LOS.

Cost Effectiveness of a Fast-Track Protocol for Urgent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies and Appendectomies.

BACKGROUND: Fast-track protocols (FTPs) are used to decrease length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs for elective outpatient procedures. Few institutions have implemented FTP for urgent procedures such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective single-institution cohort study including all patients undergoing urgent LC or LA between July 1, 2010 and May 1, 2013. Exclusion criteria included conversion to open procedure, perforated appendicitis, or procedure related to intra-abdominal injury. Analysis included a comparison of the three study groups: (1) before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of the fast-track protocol (FTP), (2) fast-track cohort (FT) and non-fast-track cohort (NFT), and (3) those completing the fast-track pathway (FT-C) and those who began but failed to complete the pathway (FT-F). RESULTS: There were significant reductions in LOS between all study groups compared: between PRE (n = 256) and POST (n = 472) cohorts by half a day (2.0 vs. 1.5 days, p < 0.02); between FT and NFT (0.68 vs. 1.82 days, p < 0.01); and FT-C and FT-F (0.49 vs. 1.05 days, p < 0.01). Total hospital charges were significantly reduced in FT compared with NFT ($22,347 vs. $30,868, p < 0.01) with an average savings of $8521. Total hospital charges were decreased in the FT-C compared with FT-F cohorts ($21,971 vs. $22,939, p = 0.3) with an average savings of $968. Readmissions, complications, and satisfaction were similar for all comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: FTPs for urgent appendectomies and cholecystectomies can significantly reduce hospital costs by reducing LOS without compromising patient outcomes.

Conversion of an enterocutaneous fistula associated with an open abdominal wound into a drain- controlled enterocutaneous fistula.

Open abdominal wounds with enterocutaneous fistulae present health care providers and patients with complex wound management issues. Frequently, large wounds with exposed bowel are present and require the utilization of multiple wound care modalities to provide a method of control and isolation of fistula effluent to allow for maximum wound healing. This case study presents a unique approach to management of low-output enterocutaneous fistula with an open abdominal wound. Through the use of negative pressure wound therapy, a standard surgical drain, and optimized nutrition, fistula drainage was redirected and the abdominal wound healed, leaving a drain-controlled.

Does opiate use in traumatically injured individuals worsen pain and psychological outcomes?

UNLABELLED: Opiate use for chronic pain is becoming increasingly controversial. There has been a shift away from supporting the use of opiates for treatment of chronic pain. In addition to lack of effectiveness, concerns for adverse clinical outcomes, addiction, and death have provided the impetus for this change. The purpose of this study was to investigate the percent of trauma patients still using opiates, their pain levels, and psychological outcomes 4 months posttrauma. This was a study to evaluate chronic pain at 4 months posttrauma in 101 participants from a single level 1 trauma center. Eighty of the 101 participants developed chronic pain 4 months after their initial traumatic injury (79%). Of those who developed chronic pain, 27 (26%) were still using opiates. Those using narcotics at 4 months posttrauma had significantly more pain, life interference, depression, and anxiety. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was not significantly influenced by narcotic use in this analysis. However, the mean associated with those using narcotics was higher and diagnostic for PTSD. Those taking opiates did not have significantly better relief from their pain using treatments or medications than those not using opiates (F = 8, P = .08). These findings bring into question the appropriate use of opiates for chronic pain and the possible exacerbating effects on pain and psychopathology in traumatically injured patients. PERSPECTIVE: This article identifies data that provide evidence that narcotic pain medication needs to be used carefully in traumatically injured patients with chronic pain, especially in those individuals with comorbid psychological pathology.

Chronic pain at 4 months in hospitalized trauma patients: incidence and life interference.

Many studies report on the incidence of chronic pain. However, deficiencies exist in prior research making it difficult to generalize results to trauma patients. This study evaluated the incidence of chronic pain in trauma patients at 4 months posttrauma and effect chronic pain has on life interference. The incidence of chronic pain was present in 79.2% of trauma patients 4 months posttrauma and a strong positive correlation (n = 80, r = 0.79, P < 0.001) existed between chronic pain severity and the effect on life interference. Chronic pain is prevalent and causes significant life interference in traumatically injured patients.