Validation of the pediatric surgical risk assessment scoring system.

BACKGROUND: Within the adult population, there exist numerous validated risk stratification tools aimed at predicting postoperative outcomes using preoperative and intraoperative parameters. However, similar tools for the pediatric population are scarce. We previously developed and reported on a scoring system to predict postoperative complications in children undergoing surgery at Boston Children's Hospital. The objective of this study was to validate our scoring system to determine its effectiveness in identifying children at risk for major complications or death within 30 days following surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A computer program randomly selected 2015 out of 11,734 patients who underwent surgery at our institution in 2009. The severity of the complications was graded based on the Clavien classification system, with major complications being a grade III or higher. The Preoperative Complication Score (PCS) and the Overall Complication Score (OCS) were calculated for all patients, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each scoring system. RESULTS: The overall incidence of major complications was 3.9% (79 patients). Proportionally, cardiac surgery had the highest percentage of major complications (20% of the performed surgeries). Both PCS and OCS demonstrated excellent correlation with postoperative outcomes with c-statistic values of 0.740 (CI 0.682-0.800, p < 0.001) and 0.767 (CI 0.712-0.822, p < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We determined that both the PCS and OCS are effective in identifying children at risk for major complications and death following surgery. Further studies will be needed to determine if these scoring systems are applicable to children undergoing surgery at other institutions and if the use of the scoring systems would result in improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs.

Current controversies in pediatric urologic robotic surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Minimally invasive surgeries such as conventional laparoscopic surgery and robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) have significant advantages over the traditional open surgical approach including lower pain medication requirements and decreased length of hospitalization. However, open surgery has demonstrated better success rates and shorter surgery time when compared to the other modalities. Currently, it is unclear which approach has better long-term clinical outcomes, greater benefits and less cost. RECENT FINDINGS: There are limited studies in the literature comparing these three different surgical approaches. In this review, we will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of RALS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for commonly performed pediatric urological procedures such as pyeloplasty, ureteral reimplantation, complete and partial nephrectomy, bladder augmentation and creation of continent catheterizable channels. SUMMARY: Although it is not yet possible to demonstrate the superiority of one single surgical modality over another, RALS has been shown to be feasible, well tolerated and advantageous in reconstructive urological procedures. With experience, the outcomes of RALS are improving, justifying its usage. However, cost remains a significant issue, limiting the accessibility of RALS, which in the future may improve with market competition and device innovation.