Vestibular Schwannoma International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS Study.

PURPOSE: The present study assesses the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus observation for Koos grade 1 and 2 vestibular schwannoma (VS), benign tumors affecting hearing and neurological function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This multicenter study analyzed data from Koos grade 1 and 2 VS patients managed with SRS (SRS group) or observation (observation group). Propensity score matching balanced patient demographics, tumor volume, and audiometry. Outcomes measured were tumor control, serviceable hearing preservation, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: In 125 matched patients in each group with a 36-month median follow-up (P = .49), SRS yielded superior 5- and 10-year tumor control rates (99% CI, 97.1%-100%, and 91.9% CI, 79.4%-100%) versus observation (45.8% CI, 36.8%-57.2%, and 22% CI, 13.2%-36.7%; P < .001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates at 5 and 9 years were comparable (SRS 60.4% CI, 49.9%-73%, vs observation 51.4% CI, 41.3%-63.9%, and SRS 27% CI, 14.5%-50.5%, vs observation 30% CI, 17.2%-52.2%; P = .53). SRS were associated with lower odds of tinnitus (OR = 0.39, P = .01), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 0.11, P = .004), and any cranial nerve palsy (OR = 0.36, P = .003), with no change in cranial nerves 5 or 7 (P > .05). Composite endpoints of tumor progression and/or any of the previous outcomes showed significant lower odds associated with SRS compared with observation alone (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SRS management in matched cohorts of Koos grade 1 and 2 VS patients demonstrated superior tumor control, comparable hearing preservation rates, and significantly lower odds of experiencing neurological deficits. These findings delineate the safety and efficacy of SRS in the management of this patient population.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Brain Metastases.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important weapon in the management of brain metastases. Single-fraction SRS is associated with local control rates ranging from approximately 70% to 100%, which are largely dependent on lesion and postoperative cavity size. The rates of local control and improved neurocognitive outcomes compared with conventional whole-brain radiation therapy have led to increased adoption of SRS in these settings. However, when treating larger targets and/or targets located in eloquent locations, the risk of normal tissue toxicity and adverse radiation effects within healthy brain tissue becomes significantly higher. Thus, hypofractionated SRS has become a widely adopted approach, which allows for the delivery of ablative doses of radiation while also minimizing the risk of toxicity. This approach has been studied in multiple retrospective reports in both the postoperative and intact settings. While there are no reported randomized data to date, there are trials underway evaluating this paradigm. In this article, we review the role of hypofractionated SRS in the management of brain metastases and emerging data that will serve to validate this treatment approach. Pertinent articles and references were obtained from a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov.

Pre-operative vs. post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery for operative metastatic brain tumors: study protocol for a phase III clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Almost one third of cancer patients in the United States will develop brain metastases on an annual basis. Surgical resection is indicated in the setting of brain metastases for reasons, such as maximizing local control in select patients, decompression of mass effect, and/or tissue diagnosis. The current standard of care following resection of a brain metastasis has shifted from whole brain radiation therapy to post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, there is a significant rate of local recurrence within one year of postoperative SRS. Emerging retrospective and prospective data suggest pre-operative SRS is a safe and potentially effective treatment paradigm for surgical brain metastases. This trial intends to determine, for patients with an indication for resection of a brain metastasis, whether there is an increase in the time to a composite endpoint of adverse outcomes; including the first occurrence of either: local recurrence, leptomeningeal disease, or symptomatic radiation brain necrosis - in patients who receive pre-operative SRS as compared to patients who receive post-operative SRS. METHODS: This randomized phase III clinical trial compares pre-operative with post-operative SRS for brain metastases. A dynamic random allocation procedure will allocate an equal number of patients to each arm: pre-operative SRS followed by surgery or surgery followed by post-operative SRS. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: If pre-operative SRS improves outcomes relative to post-operative SRS, this will establish pre-operative SRS as superior. If post-operative SRS proves superior to pre-operative SRS, it will remain a standard of care and halt the increasing utilization of pre-operative SRS. If there is no difference in pre- versus post-operative SRS, then pre-operative SRS may still be preferred, given patient convenience and the potential for a condensed timeline. DISCUSSION: Emerging retrospective and prospective data have demonstrated some benefits of pre-op SRS vs. post-op SRS. This study will show whether there is an increase in the time to the composite endpoint. Additionally, the study will compare overall survival; patient-reported outcomes; morbidity; completion of planned therapies; time to systemic therapy; time to regional progression; time to CNS progression; time to subsequent treatment; rate of radiation necrosis; rate of local recurrence; and rate of leptomeningeal disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03750227 (Registration date: 21/11/2018).

Evaluating an Academic Radiation Oncology Position.

What are the factors that physicians could consider in an academic radiation oncology practice job offer? In this minireview, we discuss how prospective academic faculty could evaluate the "big 3" domains: (1) the compensation, including the direct and indirect payments; (2) the daily job, including aspects of the clinic, research, and education; and (3) the location, including geography, atmosphere, environment, and culture. If a prospective academic radiation oncologist believes that the academic practice is "great" in at least 2 of the 3 and "good" in the remaining 1, then they should likely sign the contract.

Estimating the risk of brain metastasis for patients newly diagnosed with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) affect clinical management and prognosis but limited resources exist to estimate BM risk in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Additionally, guidelines for brain MRI screening are limited. We aimed to develop and validate models to predict risk of BM at diagnosis for the most common cancer types that spread to the brain. METHODS: Breast cancer, melanoma, kidney cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) data were extracted from the National Cancer Database to evaluate for the variables associated with the presence of BM at diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression (LR) models were developed and performance was evaluated with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and random-split training and testing datasets. Nomograms and a Webtool were created for each cancer type. RESULTS: We identify 4,828,305 patients from 2010-2018 (2,095,339 breast cancer, 472,611 melanoma, 407,627 kidney cancer, 627,090 CRC, 164,864 SCLC, and 1,060,774 NSCLC). The proportion of patients with BM at diagnosis is 0.3%, 1.5%, 1.3%, 0.3%, 16.0%, and 10.3% for breast cancer, melanoma, kidney cancer, CRC, SCLC, and NSCLC, respectively. The average AUC over 100 random splitting for the LR models is 0.9534 for breast cancer, 0.9420 for melanoma, 0.8785 for CRC, 0.9054 for kidney cancer, 0.7759 for NSCLC, and 0.6180 for SCLC. CONCLUSIONS: We develop accurate models that predict the BM risk at diagnosis for multiple cancer types. The nomograms and Webtool may aid clinicians in considering brain MRI at the time of initial cancer diagnosis.

When patients are diagnosed with cancer, it is unknown which patients have a significant risk of cancer spread to the brain. Cancer spread to the brain is important to diagnose since it changes how patients are treated and affects their prognosis. This study used a large national database of patients diagnosed with cancer and studied the characteristics that were associated with cancer spread to the brain. The results can be used by doctors to assess the risk of cancer spread to the brain and determine which patients with cancer may benefit most from brain imaging.

Facial Nerve Schwannoma Treatment with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) versus Resection followed by SRS: Outcomes and a Management Protocol.

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and resection are treatment options for patients with facial nerve schwannomas without mass effect. Objective This article evaluates outcomes of patients treated with SRS versus resection + SRS. Method We retrospectively compared 43 patients treated with SRS to 12 patients treated with resection + SRS. The primary study outcome was unfavorable combined endpoint, defined as worsening or new clinical symptoms, and/or tumor radiological progression. SRS (38.81 ± 5.3) and resection + SRS (67.14 ± 11.8) groups had similar clinical follow-ups. Results At the time of SRS, the tumor volumes of SRS (mean ± standard error; 1.83 ± 0.35 mL) and resection + SRS (2.51 ± 0.75 mL) groups were similar. SRS (12.15 ± 0.08 Gy) and resection + SRS (12.16 ± 0.14 Gy) groups received similar radiation doses. SRS group (42/43, 98%) had better local tumor control than the resection + SRS group (10/12, 83%, p = 0.04). Most of SRS (32/43, 74%) and resection + SRS (10/12, 83%) group patients reached a favorable combined endpoint following SRS ( p = 0.52). Considering surgical associated side effects, only 2/10 patients of the resection + SRS group reached a favorable endpoint ( p < 0.001). Patients of SRS group, who are > 34 years old ( p = 0.02), have larger tumors (> 4 mL, 0.04), internal auditory canal (IAC) segment tumor involvement ( p = 0.01) were more likely to reach an unfavorable endpoint. Resection + SRS group patients did not show such a difference. Conclusion While resection is still needed for larger tumors, SRS offers better clinical and radiological outcomes compared to resection followed by SRS for facial schwannomas. Younger age, smaller tumors, and non-IAC situated tumors are factors that portend a favorable outcome.

Clinical Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Nonspinal Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

There are limited data available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for nonspinal bone metastases. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize local control (LC), overall survival (OS), pain response rates, and toxicity after SBRT. The primary outcomes were 1-year LC, incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, and overall pain response rate at 3 months. The secondary outcome was 1-year OS. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for assessment of study bias, with a median score of 5 for included studies (range, 4-8). Weighted random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. We identified 528 patients with 597 nonspinal bone lesions in 9 studies (1 prospective study and 8 retrospective observational studies) treated with SBRT. The estimated 1-year LC rate was 94.6% (95% CI, 87.0%-99.0%). The estimated 3-month combined partial and complete pain response rate after SBRT was 87.7% (95% CI, 55.1%-100.0%). The estimated combined acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate was 0.5% (95% CI, 0%-5.0%), with an estimated pathologic fracture rate of 3.1% (95% CI, 0.2%-9.1%). The estimated 1-year OS rate was 71.0% (95% CI, 51.7%-87.0%). SBRT results in excellent LC and palliation of symptoms with minimal related toxicity. Prospective investigations are warranted to further characterize long-term outcomes of SBRT for patients with nonspinal bone metastases.

Extent of Surgical Resection as a Predictor of Tumor Progression in Skull Base Chordomas: A Multicenter Volumetric Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Skull-base chordomas are aggressive tumors with a propensity for recurrence/progression. Even with standard of care (SoC), 5-year recurrence rates are variable (19%-54%). This high recurrence/progression rate correlates with increased morbidity and mortality. We sought to analyze a multicenter cohort of skull base chordomas to identify predictors of progression in patients receiving SoC. METHODS: The [Blinded]-Neurosurgery data registry was queried for skull base chordomas treated from 2008-2020. Patients with the histopathologic diagnosis of chordoma were included. The cohort was composed of patients with preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Tumor volume and radiologic characteristics were obtained from axial T2 sequences using a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine viewer. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method, and time-to-event multivariate regression was performed to identify independent predictors of progression. RESULTS: The cohort included 195 patients, of which 66 patients met inclusion criteria; median age was 44, and 28 (42%) were females. Fifty-four (82%) received SoC, 7 (11%) resection only, and 5 (8%) radiotherapy only. Median preoperative and postoperative tumor volumes were 11.55 cm3 (0.33-54.89) and 0.34 cm3 (0-42.52), respectively. Recurrence rate with SoC was 37%. Postoperative tumor volume (P = 0.010) correlated with progression. A postoperative volume of >4.9 cm3 (P = 0.044), ≤81.3% of tumor resection (P = 0.02), and lower-clivus location (P < 0.005) correlated with decreased time to progression. CONCLUSIONS: Skull base chordomas can be challenging to resect. Even though maximal resection and radiotherapy improve rate of tumor progression, many of these lesions eventually recur. We have identified a postoperative tumor volume of ≥4.9 cm3 and extent of resection of ≤81.3% in this cohort as predictors of progression in patients receiving SoC.

Local control and survival after stereotactic radiosurgery for colorectal cancer brain metastases: an international multicenter analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to characterize local tumor control (LC), overall survival (OS), and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery for colorectal brain metastasis (CRBM). METHODS: Ten international institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation provided data for this retrospective case series. This study included 187 patients with CRBM (281 tumors), with a median age of 62 years and 56.7% being male. Most patients (53.5%) had solitary tumors, although 10.7% had > 5 tumors. The median tumor volume was 2.7 cm3 (IQR 0.22-8.1 cm3), and the median margin dose was 20 Gy (IQR 18-22 Gy). RESULTS: The 3-year LC and OS rates were 72% and 20%, respectively. Symptomatic adverse radiation effects occurred in 1.6% of patients. In the multivariate analysis, age > 65 years and tumor volume > 4.0 cm3 were significant predictors of tumor progression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-4.9; p = 0.003 and HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7-6.9; p < 0.001, respectively). Better performance status (Karnofsky Performance Scale score > 80) was associated with a reduced risk of tumor progression (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.73; p = 0.004). Patient age > 62 years (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3; p = 0.03) and the presence of active extracranial disease (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.4; p = 0.009) were significantly associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a high LC rate and a low rate of symptomatic adverse radiation effects for the majority of CRBMs. The OS and LC favored younger patients with high functional performance scores and inactive extracranial disease.

Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: An Evidence-Based Review and Summary Recommendations of Clinical Outcomes for Skull-Base Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas.

Skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma are rare radioresistant tumors treated with surgical resection and/or radiotherapy. Because of the established dosimetric and biological benefits of heavy particle therapy, we performed a systematic and evidence-based review of the clinical outcomes of patients with skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). A literature review was performed using a MEDLINE search of all articles to date. We identified 227 studies as appropriate for review, and 24 were ultimately included. The published data illustrate that CIRT provides benchmark disease control outcomes for skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma, respectively, with acceptable toxicity. CIRT is an advanced treatment technique that may provide not only dosimetric benefits over conventional photon therapy but also biologic intensification to overcome mechanisms of radioresistance. Ongoing research is needed to define the magnitude of benefit, patient selection, and cost-effectiveness of CIRT compared to other forms of radiotherapy.

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable brain tumors.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a method of delivering conformal radiation, which allows minimal radiation damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Adjuvant radiation therapy has been shown to improve local control in a variety of intracranial neoplasms, such as brain metastases, gliomas, and benign tumors (i.e., meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, etc.). For brain metastases, adjuvant SRS specifically has demonstrated positive oncologic outcomes as well as preserving cognitive function when compared to conventional whole brain radiation therapy. However, as compared with neoadjuvant SRS, larger post-operative volumes and greater target volume uncertainty may come with an increased risk of local failure and treatment-related complications, such as radiation necrosis. In addition to its role in brain metastases, neoadjuvant SRS for high grade gliomas may enable dose escalation and increase immunogenic effects and serve a purpose in benign tumors for which one cannot achieve a gross total resection (GTR). Finally, although neoadjuvant SRS has historically been delivered with photon therapy, there are high LET radiation modalities such as carbon-ion therapy which may allow radiation damage to tissue and should be further studied if done in the neoadjuvant setting. In this review we discuss the evolving role of neoadjuvant radiosurgery in the treatment for brain metastases, gliomas, and benign etiologies. We also offer perspective on the evolving role of high LET radiation such as carbon-ion therapy. METHODS: PubMed was systemically reviewed using the search terms "neoadjuvant radiosurgery", "brain metastasis", and "glioma". ' Clinicaltrials.gov ' was also reviewed to include ongoing phase III trials. RESULTS: This comprehensive review describes the evolving role for neoadjuvant SRS in the treatment for brain metastases, gliomas, and benign etiologies. We also discuss the potential role for high LET radiation in this setting such as carbon-ion radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Early clinical data is very promising for neoadjuvant SRS in the setting of brain metastases. There are three ongoing phase III trials that will be more definitive in evaluating the potential benefits. While there is less data available for neoadjuvant SRS for gliomas, there remains a potential role, particularly to enable dose escalation and increase immunogenic effects.

Immune checkpoint inhibition and single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: an international multicenter study of 395 patients.

PURPOSE: Approximately 80% of brain metastases originate from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are frequently utilized in this setting. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) when SRS and ICI are administered concurrently. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted through the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Logistic regression models and competing risks analyses were utilized to identify predictors of any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN). RESULTS: The study included 395 patients with 2,540 brain metastases treated with single fraction SRS and ICI across 11 institutions in four countries with a median follow-up of 14.2 months. The median age was 67 years. The median margin SRS dose was 19 Gy; 36.5% of patients had a V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3. On multivariable analysis, V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3 was a significant predictor of developing any grade RN (OR: 2.18) and SRN (OR: 3.95). At 1-year, the cumulative incidence of any grade and SRN for all patients was 4.8% and 3.8%, respectively. For concurrent and non-concurrent groups, the cumulative incidence of any grade RN was 3.8% versus 5.3%, respectively (p = 0.35); and for SRN was 3.8% vs. 3.6%, respectively (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: The risk of any grade RN and symptomatic RN following single fraction SRS and ICI for NSCLC brain metastases increases as V12 Gy exceeds 10 cm3. Concurrent ICI and SRS do not appear to increase this risk. Radiosurgical planning techniques should aim to minimize V12 Gy.

Selected-Lesion Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SL-SRS) as a Novel Strategy in the Treatment of Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases.

INTRODUCTION: With the diminishing use of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), there is increasing debate regarding the maximum number of brain metastases that should be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). In patients with >10-15 lesions, some groups are proposing a new approach - selected-lesion SRS (SL-SRS) - where only a subset of intracranial lesions are chosen for irradiation. This study is an initial look into this practice. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional exploratory survey study. A survey of 19 questions was created by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF) using open-ended and multiple-choice style questions on SL-SRS practices and indications with the goal of qualitatively understanding how SL-SRS is being implemented worldwide. The survey was distributed to physicians in the United States (US) and internationally who are members of the IRRF and who perform SRS frequently. Ten out of 50 IRRF institutions provided responses reflecting the practices of 16 physicians. RESULTS: SL-SRS is being performed at 8/10 institutions. The most common reasons for using SL-SRS included patients with prior WBRT, patients with progressing systemic disease with central nervous system (CNS)-penetrating or immunotherapies available, specific requests from medical oncology, and cooperative studies using this approach. Lesion size was cited as the most important factor when choosing to irradiate any single lesion. The majority of respondents reported 30 mm and 40 mm as size cutoffs (by largest dimension) for treatment of a lesion in eloquent and non-eloquent locations, respectively. Eloquence of lesion location and attributable symptoms were also considered important. Progression of untreated lesions was the most common reason reported for bringing patients back for additional treatment. CONCLUSION: The responses to this survey show that SL-SRS is being used, allowing for small/asymptomatic brain metastases to be left safely unirradiated. It is currently used in patients who have >10-15 lesions with prior WBRT, those with progression of extracranial disease but with acceptable systemic treatment options, and those with poor functional status. The incorporation of this new approach into clinical trials should be considered for the safe study of the efficacy of new CNS-penetrating systemic therapies.

The incorporation of cognitive-sparing techniques into prophylactic cranial irradiation in the management of small cell lung cancer.

The use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) remains an important component in the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This is due to the high rates of subclinical brain metastases at the time of diagnosis. Following a response to initial treatment, PCI historically has been associated with improvements in overall survival and decreased development of brain metastases in patients with limited stage (LS-SCLC) and extensive stage (ES-SCLC) SCLC. However, PCI is commonly withheld in these settings in favor of observation, largely due to its association with cognitive sequelae following treatment. While randomized data has demonstrated that in patients with ES-SCLC, PCI may be withheld in favor of close MRI surveillance without a detriment in overall survival or cognitive functioning, these patients did not undergo formal neuropsychological assessments. In recent years, cognitive sparing techniques incorporated into whole brain radiation therapy and PCI, such as the addition of memantine and hippocampal avoidance, have demonstrated significant improvements in cognitive outcomes. As the overall survival in patients with SCLC continues to improve due to the incorporation of novel systemic therapies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors), the role of PCI and maximizing quality of life remains a highly relevant topic. This article reviews the role of PCI and cognitive-sparing techniques in the management of SCLC.