Role of IP-10 to Predict Clinical Progression and Response to IL-6 Blockade With Sarilumab in Early COVID-19 Pneumonia. A Subanalysis of the SARICOR Clinical Trial.

Background: The Clinical Trial of Sarilumab in Adults With COVID-19 (SARICOR) showed that patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and increased levels of interleukin (IL)-6 might benefit from blockade of the IL-6 pathway. However, the benefit from this intervention might not be uniform. In this subanalysis, we sought to determine if other immunoactivation markers, besides IL-6, could identify which subgroup of patients benefit most from this intervention. Methods: The SARICOR trial was a phase II, open-label, multicenter, controlled trial (July 2020-March 2021) in which patients were randomized to receive usual care (UC; control group), UC plus a single dose of sarilumab 200 mg (sarilumab-200 group), or UC plus a single dose of sarilumab 400 mg (sarilumab-400 group). Patients who had baseline serum samples for cytokine determination (IL-8, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interferon-inducible protein [IP]-10) were included in this secondary analysis. Progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) according to cytokine levels and treatment received was evaluated. Results: One hundred one (88%) of 115 patients enrolled in the SARICOR trial had serum samples (control group: n = 33; sarilumab-200: n = 33; sarilumab-400: n = 35). Among all evaluated biomarkers, IP-10 showed the strongest association with treatment outcome. Patients with IP-10 ≥2500 pg/mL treated with sarilumab-400 had a lower probability of progression (13%) compared with the control group (58%; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.90; P = .04). Conversely, patients with IP-10 <2500 pg/mL did not show these differences. Conclusions: IP-10 may predict progression to ARDS in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and IL-6 levels >40 pg/mL. Importantly, IP-10 value <2500 pg/mL might discriminate those individuals who might not benefit from sarilumab therapy among those with high IL-6 levels.

Poor increase on HAV vaccination coverage among people living with HIV after an immunization-based intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To assess HAV serologic and vaccination status among people who live with HIV (PLWH), and to evaluate the impact of a vaccination-based strategy on HAV-negative patients in Seville, Spain. METHODS: Study with two time-overlapping phases: (i) cross-sectional study of HAV immunity prevalence among PLWH followed at a Spanish hospital between August 2019 and March 2020. (ii) Patients seronegative for HAV, reliably unvaccinated were included in a before-and-after quasi-experimental study, with an intervention focused on HAV vaccination according to national recommendations in force. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty-six patients were included, of which 111 [17%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 14-20%] were seronegative for HAV. Of these, 48 [43% (95% CI, 34-53%)] individuals were MSM. The absence of HAV immunity was attributed in 69 [62% (95% CI, 52-71%)] patients to non-referral to vaccination, followed by lack of achievement of a correct vaccination scheme [n=26; 23% (95% CI, 16-32%)]. After the program implementation, 96 [15% (95% CI, 12-18%)] individuals were seronegative (17% vs. 15%, p=0.256), of whom 42 [41% (95% CI, 32-51%)] were MSM. The absence of immunity after the intervention was mainly attributed to: adherence failure in 23 [24.0% (95% CI, 15.8-33.7%)] patients, on-course immunization scheme in 34 [33% (95% CI, 24-43%)] individuals and pending appointment at the vaccine delivery unit in 20 [20.8% (95% CI, 13.2-30.3%)] patients. CONCLUSIONS: A sizeable proportion of PLWH remains susceptible for HAV infection in future outbreaks. A program based on referral to the vaccine delivery unit yields poor results, largely due to program adherence failures. New strategies are needed to increase HAV vaccination coverage.

Role of previous systemic antibiotic therapy on the probability of recurrence after an initial episode of Clostridioides difficile infection treated with vancomycin.

Objectives: To investigate the role of previous antibiotic therapy in the risk of recurrence after a Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treated with vancomycin. Methods: Multicentre observational study. Patients with a CDI episode achieving clinical cure with oral vancomycin and followed up 8 weeks were included. Previous antibiotic exposure up to 90 days was collected. Multivariate analysis of predictors of recurrence adjusted by the propensity score (PS) of being previously treated with each non-CDI antibiotic was performed. Results: Two hundred and forty-one patients were included; 216 (90%) had received systemic antibiotics. Fifty-three patients (22%) had a CDI recurrence. Rates of recurrence were lower in those treated with piperacillin/tazobactam in the last month when compared with those not receiving piperacillin/tazobactam [3 (7%) versus 50 (25%); P = 0.01], whereas higher rates were seen in those treated with cephalosporins in the last month [26/87 (30%) versus 27/154 (17%); P = 0.03]. In multivariate analysis controlled by the inverse probability of treatment weighting by PS, receiving ≥5 days of piperacillin/tazobactam in the last month as the last antibiotic regimen prior to CDI was independently associated with a lower risk of recurrence [adjusted OR (AOR) 0.13; 95% CI: 0.06-0.29; P < 0.0001] whereas exposure for ≥5 days to cephalosporins (versus piperacillin/tazobactam) was associated with an increased risk (AOR 10.9; 95% CI: 4.4-27.1; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Recent use of piperacillin/tazobactam might be associated with a lower risk of CDI recurrence, while recent use of cephalosporins might promote an increased risk. These findings should be considered when treating hospitalized patients.

Poor increase on HAV vaccination coverage among people living with HIV after an immunization-based intervention / Pobre incremento de la cobertura vacunal frente al VHA en personas que viven con el VIH, tras una intervención basada en la inmunización

Objectives: To assess HAV serologic and vaccination status among people who live with HIV (PLWH), and to evaluate the impact of a vaccination-based strategy on HAV-negative patients in Seville, Spain. Methods: Study with two time-overlapping phases: (i) cross-sectional study of HAV immunity prevalence among PLWH followed at a Spanish hospital between August 2019 and March 2020. (ii) Patients seronegative for HAV, reliably unvaccinated were included in a before-and-after quasi-experimental study, with an intervention focused on HAV vaccination according to national recommendations in force. Results: Six hundred and fifty-six patients were included, of which 111 [17%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 14–20%] were seronegative for HAV. Of these, 48 [43% (95% CI, 34–53%)] individuals were MSM. The absence of HAV immunity was attributed in 69 [62% (95% CI, 52–71%)] patients to non-referral to vaccination, followed by lack of achievement of a correct vaccination scheme [n=26; 23% (95% CI, 16–32%)]. After the program implementation, 96 [15% (95% CI, 12–18%)] individuals were seronegative (17% vs. 15%, p=0.256), of whom 42 [41% (95% CI, 32–51%)] were MSM. The absence of immunity after the intervention was mainly attributed to: adherence failure in 23 [24.0% (95% CI, 15.8–33.7%)] patients, on-course immunization scheme in 34 [33% (95% CI, 24–43%)] individuals and pending appointment at the vaccine delivery unit in 20 [20.8% (95% CI, 13.2–30.3%)] patients. Conclusions: A sizeable proportion of PLWH remains susceptible for HAV infection in future outbreaks. A program based on referral to the vaccine delivery unit yields poor results, largely due to program adherence failures. New strategies are needed to increase HAV vaccination coverage.(AU)

Objetivos: Evaluar la prevalencia de inmunidad frente al VHA en personas que viven con VIH así como el impacto de una intervención basada en la vacunación de pacientes seronegativos frente al VHA. Métodos: Estudio con dos fases solapadas en el tiempo: 1) transversal de prevalencia de inmunidad frente al VHA en personas que viven con VIH seguidas en un hospital de tercer nivel, entre agosto de 2019 y el inicio de las medidas nacionales de contención de la epidemia por SARS-CoV-2, marzo de 2020. 2) Cuasiexperimental, con una intervención centrada en la vacunación frente a VHA de pacientes seronegativos, en la unidad responsable de esta. Resultados: Ciento once (17%, [95% IC, 14-20%]) de los 656 pacientes incluidos eran seronegativos frente al VHA. Las principales causas de la ausencia de inmunidad fueron: 69 (62% [95% IC, 52-71%]) individuos no derivados a la unidad responsable de la vacunación; 26 pacientes (23% [95% CI, 16-32%]) no completaron el esquema vacunal. Tras la intervención, 96 (15% [95% IC, 12-18%]) pacientes continuaron siendo seronegativos frente al VHA (comparada con la prevalencia basal, p=0,256), 42 (18% [95% IC, 13-23%]) eran HSH. Las principales causas de la ausencia de inmunidad fueron: 26 (23% [95% IC, 15-32%]) individuos presentaron fallos de adherencia al circuito vacunal; 34 (33% [95% IC, 24-43%]) pacientes habían recibido una sola dosis; 22 (22% [95% IC, 14-31%]) seguían sin una primera valoración por parte de la unidad responsable de la vacunación. Conclusiones: Una proporción considerable de personas que viven con VIH, particularmente HSH, sigue siendo susceptible a la infección por VHA. La derivación sistemática a la unidad responsable de la vacunación se traduce en modestos incrementos de la prevalencia de inmunidad. Son necesarias nuevas estrategias para aumentar la cobertura vacunal.(AU)

Impact of COVID19 pandemic on the incidence of health-care associated Clostridioides difficile infection.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of COVID19 pandemic on the incidence of health-care associated Clostridioides difficile infection (HA-CDI). METHODS: Retrospective study conducted in the Hospital Universitario de Valme (HUV) and the Hospital General Universitario de Alicante (HGUA) in Spain between January 2019 and February 2021. The study period was divided into non-COVID19 period (2019 and months from 2020 to 2021 with ≤30 hospitalized COVID19 patients) and COVID19 period (months from 2020 to 2021 with >30 COVID19 patients). HA-CDI incidence rates (IR) were calculated as the number of new CDI cases per 10.000 occupied bed-days (OBD) and antimicrobial consumption by means of the defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 OBD. RESULTS: During the COVID19 period, HA-CDI IR in the HUV was 2.6 per 10.000 OBD, which was lower than what was observed during the non-COVID19 period (4.1 per 10.000 OBD; p = 0.1). In the HGUA, HA-CDI IR during COVID19 period was 3.9 per 10.000 OBD, which was not significantly different to the IR observed during the non-COVID19 period (3.7 per 10.000 OBD; p = 0.8). There was a slight increase in the total antibiotic consumption during COVID19 period in both hospitals, with significant increases of certain high-risk antibiotics as cephalosporins. CONCLSUSIONS: HA-CDI incidence has not increased during the COVID19 pandemic in two tertiary centers in Spain, in spite of a slightly higher antibiotic consumption during the COVID19 period in both hospitals. These findings suggest that, in the presence of strict infection control measures, hospital antibiotic consumption might have a lower impact than expected on HA-CDI.

High Incidence of Asymptomatic Phase I IgG Seroconversion After an Acute Q Fever Episode: Implications for Chronic Q Fever Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of acute Q fever, including its clinical and serological evolution and progression to chronic Q fever. METHODS: Observational cohort study (January 2011-September 2020) performed at Valme University Hospital (Seville, Spain). Inclusion criteria: (1) patients aged ≥18 years; (2) acute Q fever diagnosis, defined as suggestive symptoms in the presence of phase II immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer >1:256; (3) at least 6 months' follow-up after the acute Q fever episode. The incidence of seroconversion to a chronic Q fever serological pattern, defined as phase I IgG titers ≥1:1024 6 months after acute Q fever diagnosis, was assessed. RESULTS: During the study period, 117 patients were included. Thirty-four (29%) patients showed phase I IgG titers ≥1:1024 6 months after acute Q fever diagnosis. All patients with classic serological criteria for chronic Q fever diagnosis remained asymptomatic despite no specific treatment, with a median (quartile 1-quartile 3 [Q1-Q3]) follow-up of 26.5 (14-44) months in this subgroup. No cases of Q fever endocarditis nor other persistent focalized infection forms were observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of acute Q fever patients develop classic serological criteria for chronic Q fever diagnosis in the absence of additional data of chronic Q fever. Consequently, phase I IgG cutoff titers >1:800 should not be used as a criterion to consider such a diagnosis. The incidence of persistent focalized infection forms after acute Q fever is extremely low and does not justify the use of prophylaxis strategies.

Early Use of Sarilumab in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Pneumonia and Features of Systemic Inflammation: the SARICOR Randomized Clinical Trial.

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of early treatment with sarilumab, added to standard of care (SOC), in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Methods included phase II, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥ 40 pg/mL and/or d-dimer > 1,500 ng/mL. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive SOC (control group), SOC plus a single subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 200 mg (sarilumab-200 group), or SOC plus a single subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 400 mg (sarilumab-400 group). The primary outcome variable was the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) at day 28. One-hundred and 15 participants (control group, n = 39; sarilumab-200, n = 37; sarilumab-400, n = 39) were included. At randomization, 104 (90%) patients had supplemental oxygen and 103 (90%) received corticosteroids. Eleven (28%) patients in the control group, 10 (27%) in sarilumab-200, and five (13%) in sarilumab-400 developed the primary outcome (hazard ratio [95% CI] of sarilumab-400 vs control group: 0.41 [0.14, 1.18]; P = 0.09). Seven (6%) patients died: three in the control group and four in sarilumab-200. There were no deaths in sarilumab-400 (P = 0.079, log-rank test for comparisons with the control group). In patients recently hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and features of systemic inflammation, early IL-6 blockade with a single dose of sarilumab 400 mg was safe and associated with a trend for better outcomes. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04357860.).

Manejo de la psicosis en pacientes con VIH: a propósito de un caso / Psychosis management in patients with HIV: case report

La infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) puede dar lugar a alteraciones neuropsiquiátricas tales como déficits cognitivos, alteraciones comportamentales o sintomatología psiquiátrica como manía o psicosis secundaria. La evolución y curso pronóstico de los individuos con VIH que presentan comorbilidad psiquiátrica dependerá en gran medida de que se ofrezca un tratamiento adecuado que incluya, por una parte, tratamiento del factor etiológico (VIH) y, por otra, tratamiento de los síntomas psíquicos en cuestión. A partir de la presentación del caso clínico de una paciente con encefalitis en el contexto de una infección por VIH no conocida, que debuta con sintomatología psicótica en forma de trastorno por ideas delirantes de tipo somático, ofrecemos una revisión acerca del manejo de la psicosis en pacientes VIH. Dicha revisión se centra en la epidemiología, etiopatogenia y presentación clínica de la psicosis asociada al VIH así como en el manejo farmacológico recomendado (antirretroviral y antipsicótico) y su particular respuesta al mismo. Ofrecemos al mismo tiempo amplia información acerca de las principales interacciones entre los fármacos antipsicóticos y antirretrovirales que otorgarán al clínico un manejo más adecuado de dichos pacientes

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection can cause neuropsychiatric disorders such as cognitive impairment, behavioural difficulties or psychiatric symptoms -for instance, mania and psychosis. HIV patients with psychiatric comorbidities need an appropriate treatment which tackles the HIV infection as much as the particular mental symptoms. Here we present the case of a patient suffering from delusions, which turned out to be caused by encephalitis secondary to a previously unknown HIV infection. A review of psychosis in HIV-infected patients is also presented. This review is focused on the epidemiology, etiopathogenesis and clinical presentation of HIV-induced psychosis, as well as the recommended pharmacological treatment (antiretroviral therapy and antipsychotic medication) and the expected treatment response. We also present wide information concerning pharmacological interactions between antiretroviral and antipsychotic medications that we hope will help the clinician to better manage this complex condition

Psychosis management in patients with hiv: case report.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection can cause neuropsychiatric disorders such as cognitive impairment, behavioural difficulties or psychiatric symptoms –for instance, mania and psychosis. HIV patients with psychiatric comorbidities need an appropriate treatment which tackles the HIV infection as much as the particular mental symptoms. Here we present the case of a patient suffering from delusions, which turned out to be caused by encephalitis secondary to a previously unknown HIV infection. A review of psychosis in HIV-infected patients is also presented. This review is focused on the epidemiology, etiopathogenesis and clinical presentation of HIV-induced psychosis, as well as the recommended pharmacological treatment (antiretroviral therapy and antipsychotic medication) and the expected treatment response. We also present wide information concerning pharmacological interactions between antiretroviral and antipsychotic medications that we hope will help the clinician to better manage this complex condition.