RESUMEN
Spiradenocarcinomas are rare malignant skin adnexal tumors. We describe a novel case of a patient with an aggressive CDKN2A-mutated spiradenocarcinoma who responded to a CDK4/6 inhibitor. This case highlights the unique nature of spiradenocarcinomas as well as the potential benefit of targeted therapy.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidor p16 de la Quinasa Dependiente de Ciclina , Mutación , Humanos , Inhibidor p16 de la Quinasa Dependiente de Ciclina/genética , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina/genética , Femenino , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina/genética , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Masculino , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sudoríparas/genética , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sudoríparas/patología , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sudoríparas/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperazinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The usual workup for patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occurs in the ambulatory setting. A subset of patients present with acute care needs and receive the diagnosis while hospitalized. Palliative therapies are typically initiated when patients are outpatients, even when diagnoses are made when they are inpatients. Lengthy admission, rehabilitation needs after discharge, and readmissions are possible barriers to timely and adequate outpatient follow-up. The outcomes for these patients diagnosed in the hospital are not well characterized. We hypothesized that patients have been ill-served by current treatment patterns, as reflected by low rates of cancer-directed treatment and poor survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of new inpatient diagnoses of metastatic NSCLC at our institution between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients ultimately receiving cancer-directed therapy. Other outcomes included time to treatment, use of targeted therapy, palliative care/hospice utilization, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included, with a median age of 57 years. Twenty-seven patients (37%) ultimately received systemic therapy with a median time from diagnosis to treatment of 37.5 days. Overall, 5.4% patients died while admitted, 6.8% were discharged to a hospice, 21.9% were discharged to a facility, and 61.6% were discharged home. Only 20 patients (27%) received palliative care consultation. The median OS for our entire population was 2.3 months, with estimated 6-month and 1-year OS rates of 32% and 22%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with new inpatient diagnoses of metastatic NSCLC have extremely poor outcomes. Current management strategies resulted in few patients starting systemic therapy, yet most of the patients did not receive palliative care or hospice involvement. These findings demonstrate that there is a high unmet need to optimally support and palliate these patients.
RESUMEN
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are frequently implicated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Though these typically involve exon 19 in-frame deletions or L858R mutations in exon 21, uncommon EGFR mutations comprise 10-15 % of all EGFR mutations. These most frequently include G719X mutations in exon 18, L861Q mutations in exon 21, S768I mutations in exon 20, and in-frame insertions and/or duplications in exon 20. It is crucial to understand these distinct variants and their specific responses to active treatment options to optimize care. In this review, we discuss these uncommon mutations in depth and dissect the current literature regarding their treatment outcomes and subsequent evidence-based management guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mutación , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores ErbB/genética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Exones/genética , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: The PACIFIC trial demonstrated improved survival in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with durvalumab following definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This study sought to explore real-world outcomes with durvalumab consolidation therapy at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC at our institution from January 2012 to January 2022. We created two cohorts: one who received durvalumab following definitive CRT and a historical one who did not. Primary outcomes of interest included median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis on the durvalumab cohort to explore the associations between survival and time to durvalumab initiation, PD-L1 expression, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). RESULTS: We identified 79 patients with locally advanced NSCLC who were not surgical candidates. Patients treated with durvalumab (n=44) had significantly improved survival compared to the historical cohort (n=35) including a median PFS of 17.4 months versus 8.0 months (p=0.0019) and a median OS of 37.0 months versus 17.0 months (log-rank p-value=0.07, Wilcoxon p-value=0.02). Within the durvalumab group, outcomes did not significantly differ between those who initiated therapy before or after 42 days of finishing CRT, between various PD-L1 expression levels, or between high or low NLR. CONCLUSION: Patients who received durvalumab as consolidation therapy following definitive CRT demonstrated significantly improved survival compared to a historical cohort who did not receive durvalumab. Furthermore, durvalumab appears to benefit patients regardless of time to initiation, PD-L1 expression, or NLR.