Potential causes of delays in paediatric perforated appendicitis: A prospective interview study.

AIM: Delays in care may be a driver of inequities in perforated appendicitis rates. The goal of this study was to explore potential causes of delay in care for children with perforated appendicitis. METHODS: We conducted an interview study of caregivers of children admitted with perforated appendicitis to a children's hospital between December 2022 and March 2023. Semi-structured interviews based on an iteratively revised interview guide were conducted in-person during the child's admission. All interviews were transcribed, coded and underwent a process of thematic analysis. RESULTS: We reached thematic saturation after 12 interviews. The median age for children was 13.5 years, 50% were male, 83% of caregivers self-identified as White, and one interview required an interpreter. Through thematic analysis, four major themes for potential causes of delay emerged. The first theme of symptom recognition includes delays related to recognising the symptoms, their severity and the need for medical evaluation. The second theme - accessing care - describes delays that occur after a decision was made to seek care until the child was evaluated. The third theme includes delays that occur in making the diagnosis after evaluation. The last theme captures potential delays in definitive treatment after a diagnosis of appendicitis is made. CONCLUSION: We identify four major themes from the patient and family perspective, each with multiple sub-themes, for potential delays in definitive care for children with perforated appendicitis. Additional research is needed to further characterise these potential delays and quantify their role in contributing to inequities in perforation rates.

Outcomes From a Nurse Practitioner Led Dynamic Compression System Bracing Program for Pectus Carinatum.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic compression system (DCS) is often effective at treating pectus carinatum (PC). However, some patients will fail therapy. This study reports outcomes from a nurse-practitioner led bracing program, and evaluates what factors are predictive of successful therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving all patients treated with DCS bracing at our institution between February 2018 and February 2022. Patients with at least three visits were included. The primary outcome was achieving neutral chest. Factors considered potentially predictive included patient age, sex, initial pressure of correction (PIC), and the change in pressure of correction between the first two visits (deltaPC1). A Cox proportional hazards model was used for analysis, and Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated the median time to correction. RESULTS: 283 patients were evaluated. The median age was 14 (IQR 12-15), the majority were male (90.1 %) and white (92.6 %). The median PIC and deltaPC1was 4.13 PSI (IQR 3.17-5.3), and 1.34 PSI (IQR 0.54-2.25), respectively. 117 patients achieved correction. The median estimated time to correction was 7.5 months (95 % CI 5.9-10.1). In the final Cox model, greater deltaPC1 was associated with increased risk of correction (HR: 2.46; 95 % CI 2.03-2.98), and increased PIC was associated with decreased risk of correction up to one year of therapy (0-3 months HR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.50-0.78; 3-12 months HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.45-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: DCS bracing administered by advanced care providers in collaboration with surgeons can effectively treat PC. The deltaPC1 and PIC are the factors most predictive of successful therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Pediatric Surgery Firearm Injury Collaborative Symposium.

Injury from a firearm is now the leading cause of death of children and youth under age 19 in the United States (U.S.) [1] and the incidence of these deaths continues to increase each year [2]. For every death from firearm violence, there are several young people who have been injured by a bullet but not killed. As pediatric surgeons, we are on the front lines of treating these young patients. We have the unforgettable memories of delivering the horrible news to parents in "quiet rooms." [3]. As these injuries fall within our scope of practice, it is incumbent on us as professionals to work to prevent these injuries, apply best practices and work for the best pathways to recovery for our patients who do survive. There is a diverse community of pediatric surgeons tackling this public health problem in a variety of ways [4]. In a pre-meeting symposium at the APSA 2023 Annual meeting, we brought together a community of pediatric surgeons working on this critical area. The following summarizes the presentations of the symposium, with topics including Risk Factors, Injury Prevention, Treatment, Public Initiatives, and National Collaborative Efforts. TYPE OF STUDY: Review Article, Proceedings of a Symposium. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 through 4 all presented.

Pilot bowel management program at Mbarara Hospital, Uganda.

PURPOSE: Children with Hirschsprung's disease (HD) and anorectal malformations (ARM) may benefit from a bowel management program (BMP) to treat constipation and fecal incontinence. This study describes a pilot BMP in Uganda. METHODS: Patients treated for HD or ARM were recruited for the BMP. Local staff underwent training and progressively took over decision-making. The rates of patient involuntary bowel movements (IBMs) and provider confidence were evaluated pre- and post-BMP with questionnaires. The results were compared with Fischer's exact test. RESULTS: Ten staff-2 surgeons, 6 nurses and 2 physiotherapists-and 12 patients participated. Patient median age was 4.5 years (IQR 3-6.6) and ten were male. Ten reported at least daily IBMs prior to the BMP. All patients underwent a clean-out. The parents were then taught to perform daily enemas or irrigations. Specific regimens were determined by patient history and imaging and titrated throughout the BMP. There were differences in the rates of both daytime and nighttime IBMs before and after the BMP (p = 0.0001 and 0.002, respectively). All staff reported increased confidence. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the first BMP in Uganda. BMPs can successfully treat constipation and fecal incontinence in low-income countries, although there are challenges with resources and follow-up.

Addressing health equity in pediatric surgical care in the United States- Progress and challenges.

There are notable inequities in health outcomes for children based on their social determinants of health (SDOH), including where they are born and live, their primary language, their race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and more. These health inequities are not restricted to resource limited settings; here we highlight three broad topics that are relevant to pediatric surgeons in the United States (US): access to care and disparities, and examples of inequities in firearm-related injuries and appendicitis. Most of our patients will at some point require operative interventions, yet there can be significant challenges in accessing this care and navigating our health systems, particularly around complex perioperative care. There are significant opportunities to improve equitable care by helping patients navigate our health systems and connecting them with additional resources, including screening for primary care services. Firearm-related injuries are now the leading cause of death in children in the US, with significant associated morbidity for non-fatal injuries. There are notable inequities in the risk of injury and types of injuries experienced by children based on their SDOH. Appendicitis is one of the most common pathologies managed by pediatric surgeons, with similar inequities in the rates of perforated appendicitis based on a child's SDOH. For both issues, addressing the inequities our patients experience requires moving upstream and working towards prevention. Key opportunities include better research and data to understand the drivers for observed inequities, multidisciplinary collaboration, community engagement, and public health advocacy among others. As a profession, we have a responsibility to work to address the health inequities our patients experience.

Utility of the material community deprivation index as a metric to identify at-risk children for severe traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality with lasting effects including neurological deficits and psychological comorbidities. Recent studies have shown that social determinants of health are key factors that impact clinical outcomes in other pediatric traumatic injuries, suggesting that these health disparities may have a significant impact on patients sustaining TBI as well. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review a cohort of pediatric patients diagnosed with TBI and elucidate the relationships among socioeconomic deprivation, patient-specific demographics, and morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients (≤ 18 years of age) treated for TBI at a level I pediatric trauma center between 2016 and 2020. Patients with concussion-related injuries without intracranial findings and those with nonaccidental trauma were excluded from the study. In addition to evaluating basic patient demographics, the authors geocoded patient addresses to allow identification of the patient's home census tract using the material community deprivation index (MCDI). The MCDI is a unique composite index score created by the combination of six census variables and ranges from 0 to 1 in severity. RESULTS: Of the 513 patients included in this study, 71 (13.8%) were diagnosed with severe TBI, 28 (5.5%) with moderate TBI, and 414 (80.7%) with mild TBI. Patients in quartile 4 (MCDI ≥ 0.45) were at a significantly higher risk of having a severe TBI than patients in quartile 1 (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.1-4.71; p = 0.02). Black patients were more likely to have a firearm-related TBI (OR 3.74, 95% CI 2.01-8.7; p = 0.018) than non-Black patients. Patients who lived in a neighborhood with a lower MCDI were significantly more likely to be discharged home than those who lived in an area with a higher MCDI (OR 2.78, 95% CI 7.90-32.93; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that inequities continue to exist within the pediatric TBI population and that the MCDI is a valuable tool to identify at-risk subpopulations. More specifically, patients who lived in a neighborhood with a higher MCDI were at higher risk of sustaining a severe TBI. By partnering with communities, families, and policymakers, healthcare providers could serve as advocates for these patients and work to minimize the social disparities that continue to exist.

Long-Term Male Sexual Function and Fecal Incontinence Outcomes for Adult Patients with Hirschsprung Disease or Anorectal Malformation.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize sexual function and fecal incontinence related quality of life (QOL) outcomes for adult males with anorectal malformation (ARM) or Hirschsprung's Disease (HD). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of male patients ≥18 years with ARM or HD. Patients were identified from our institutional database, contacted and consented by telephone, and sent a REDCap survey via email. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) evaluated erectile dysfunction (ED) and ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD), respectively. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQLS) assessed fecal incontinence-related outcomes. A linear regression analysis of IIEF-5 scores compared to CCIS scores was used to evaluate for an association between ED and incontinence. RESULTS: Of 63 patients contacted, 48 completed the survey. The median age for respondents was 22.5 years (IQR 20-25). There were 19 patients with HD and 29 patients with ARM. On the IIEF-5 survey, 35.3% report some level of ED. On the MSHQ-EjD survey, the median score was 14 out of 15 (IQR 10.75-15), indicating few EjD concerns. The median CCIS was 5 (IQR 2.25-7.75) and the median FIQL scores ranged from 2.7 to 3.5 depending on the domain assessed, demonstrating some QOL challenges secondary to fecal incontinence. On linear regression analysis, IIEF-5 and CCIS scores were weakly associated (B = -0.55, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Male adult patients with ARM or HD may have ongoing concerns with sexual function and fecal incontinence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. TYPE OF STUDY: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Children with Medically Refractory Fecal Incontinence or Severe Constipation.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for medically refractory fecal incontinence or severe constipation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated with SNS after failed medical management at a single center between 9/1/2015 and 6/30/2022. Demographic and clinical data was extracted from the electronic medical record. Rates of involuntary bowel movements were evaluated using a bowel severity score questionnaire and compared pre- and post-SNS using McNemar and McNemar-Bowker tests. RESULTS: 70 patients underwent SNS placement. The median age was 12.8 years (IQR 8.6-16.0) and 61.4% were male. The most common diagnosis was idiopathic constipation (67.1%), followed by anorectal malformation (15.7%), and others. 43 patients had severity scores recorded both pre- and at least 90 days post-SNS insertion. The rates of daytime and nighttime involuntary bowel movements were significantly different pre-compared to post-SNS placement (p = 0.038 and p = 0.049, respectively). The rate of daytime and nighttime fecal continence increased from 44% to 58.1% and 53.5%-83.7%, respectively. The rate of at least weekly daytime and nighttime fecal incontinence decreased from 48.8% to 18.7% and 34.9%-7.0%, respectively. Minor pain/neurological symptoms occurred in 40% of patients, while 5.7% developed a wound infection. Further surgery for the SNS was required in 40% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: SNS placement can be an effective treatment for medically refractory fecal incontinence. Minor complications and the need for further procedures are common, while more serious complications like wound infections are rare. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Cohort Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Association of race and socioeconomic status with time to pain control among pediatric trauma patients managed nonoperatively.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated racial/ethnic inequities in acute pain control among hospitalized injured children. We hypothesized that there would be inequities in time to pain control based on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all injured children (7-18 years) admitted to our level 1 trauma center between 2010 and 2019 with initial recorded numerical rating scale (NRS) scores of >3 who were managed nonoperatively. A Cox regression survival analysis was used to evaluate the time to pain control, defined as achieving an NRS score of ≤3. RESULTS: Our cohort included 1,787 admissions. The median age was 14 years (interquartile range, 10-18), 59.5% were male, 76.6% identified as White, 19.9% as Black, and 2.4% as Hispanic. The median initial NRS score was 7 (interquartile range, 5-9), and the median time to pain control was 4.9 hours (95% confidence interval, 4.6-5.3). Insurance status, as a marker of socioeconomic status, was not associated with time to pain control ( p = 0.29). However, the interaction of race/ethnicity and deprivation index was significant ( p = 0.002). Specifically, the socioeconomic deprivation of a child's home neighborhood was an important predictor for non-White children ( p <0.003) but not for White children ( p = 0.41) and non-White children from higher deprivation neighborhoods experienced greater times to pain control (hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.07). Being female, older, presenting with higher initial NRS scores, and having history of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were all associated with longer times to pain control. Other injury characteristics and psychiatric history were evaluated but ultimately excluded, as they were not significant. CONCLUSION: Greater neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation was associated with prolonged time to pain control for non-White children admitted after injury and managed nonoperatively. Further work is needed to understand inequities in pain control for injured patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Socioeconomic Factors and Pediatric Injury.

Purpose of Review: The goal of this review is to describe how socioeconomic status (SES) is evaluated in the pediatric trauma literature and further consider how differences in SES can lead to inequities in pediatric injury. Recent Findings: Insurance status, area-level income, and indices of socioeconomic deprivation are the most common assessments of socioeconomic status. Children from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds experience higher rates of firearm-related injuries, motor vehicle-related injuries, and violence-related injuries, contributing to inequities in morbidity and mortality after pediatric injury. Differences in SES may also lead to inequities in post-injury care and recovery, with higher rates of readmission, recidivism, and PTSD for children from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Summary: Additional research looking at family-level measures of SES and more granular measures of neighborhood deprivation are needed. SES can serve as an upstream target for interventions to reduce pediatric injury and narrow the equity gap.

Children from disadvantaged neighborhoods experience disproportionate injury from interpersonal violence.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in pediatric injury have been widely documented and are driven, in part, by differential exposures to social determinants of health (SDH). Here, we hypothesized that neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and specific sociodemographic characteristics would be associated with interpersonal violence-related injury admission. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients ≤16 years, residing in Hamilton County, admitted to our level 1 pediatric trauma center. Residential addresses were geocoded to link admissions with a census tract-level socioeconomic deprivation index. Admissions were categorized as resulting from interpersonal violence or not - based on a mechanism of injury (MOI) of abuse or assault. The percentage of interpersonal violence-related injury admissions was compared across patient demographics and neighborhood deprivation index tertiles. These factors were then evaluated with multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Interpersonal violence accounted for 6.2% (394 of 6324) of all injury-related admissions. Interpersonal violence-related injury admission was associated with older age, male sex, Black race, public insurance, and living in tertiles of census tracts with higher socioeconomic deprivation. Those living in the most deprived tertile experienced 62.2% of all interpersonal violence-related injury admissions but only 36.9% of non-violence related injury admissions (p < 0.001). After adjustment, insurance and neighborhood deprivation accounted for much of the increase in interpersonal violence-related admissions for Black compared to White children. CONCLUSIONS: Children from higher deprivation neighborhoods, who are also disproportionately Black and publicly insured, experience a higher burden of interpersonal violence-related injury admissions. Level of evidence Level III.

Use Of Area-Based Socioeconomic Deprivation Indices: A Scoping Review And Qualitative Analysis.

There is considerable interest among researchers, clinicians, and policy makers in understanding the impact of place on health. In this scoping review and qualitative analysis, we sought to assess area-level socioeconomic deprivation indices used in public health and health outcomes research in the US. We conducted a systematic scoping review to identify area-level socioeconomic deprivation indices commonly used in the US since 2015. We then qualitatively compared the indices based on the input-variable domains, data sources, index creation characteristics, index accessibility, the geography over which the index is applied, and the nature of the output measure or measures. We identified fifteen commonly used indices of area-level socioeconomic deprivation. There were notable differences in the characteristics of each index, particularly in how they define socioeconomic deprivation based on input-variable domains, the geography over which they are applied, and their output measures. These characteristics can help guide future index selection and application in clinical care, research, and policy decisions.

Social determinants of health as drivers of inequities in pediatric injury.

A child's social determinants of health (SDH), including their neighborhood environment, insurance status, race and ethnicity, English language proficiency and geographic location, all significantly impact their risk of injury and outcomes after injury. Children from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods experience overall higher rates of injury and different types of injuries, including higher rates of motor vehicle-, firearm-, and violence-related injuries. Similarly, children with public insurance or no insurance, as a proxy for lower socioeconomic status, experience higher rates of injuries including firearm-related injuries and non-accidental trauma, with overall worse outcomes. Race and associated racism also impact a child's risk of injury and care received after injury. Black children, Hispanic children, and those from other minority groups disproportionately experience socioeconomic disadvantage with sequelae of injury risk as described above. Even after controlling for socioeconomic status, there are still notable disparities with further evidence of racial inequities and bias in pediatric trauma care after injury. Finally, where a child lives geographically also significantly impacts their risk of injury and available care after injury, with differences based on whether a child lives in a rural or urban area and the degree of state laws regarding injury prevention. There are clear inequities based on a child's SDH, most predominantly in a child's risk of injury and the types of injuries they experience. These injuries are preventable and the SDH provide potential upstream targets in injury prevention efforts.

The Effect of Social Determinants of Health on Telemedicine Access During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Social determinants of health contribute to inequalities in access to care and inferior outcomes in pediatric populations. Before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telemedicine was shown to be an effective tool to bridge the gap between health care providers and rural or underserved populations. The pandemic has rapidly changed the current landscape of health care. Telemedicine has played a critical role in health care delivery between providers and patients because of the need for social distancing. That being said, it has become apparent that SDOH have affected access to telemedicine for communities that already suffer from inequities in health care access. Solutions directed toward addressing issues such as lack of broadband access, digital literacy and language barriers, and obstacles within the health care system are crucial to ensure telemedicine access is equitable for all patients and does not contribute toward worsening health care disparities. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(8):e311-e315.].

Hirschsprung's disease in low- and middle-income countries.

Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is one of the most common causes of pediatric bowel obstruction in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper describes the unique aspects of presentation, diagnosis, management and post-operative care and outcomes of HD in LMICs. In LMICs, patients with HD are much more likely to present in a delayed fashion with subsequent increased morbidity and mortality including higher rates of chronic obstruction, malnutrition with failure to thrive, complete obstruction and perforation. There are multifactorial causes for delay, with opportunities to improve initial timely diagnosis and referral, support families to address socioeconomic and cultural barriers, and improve workforce and infrastructure resources to provide definitive care. In LMICs, the diagnosis is often made based on clinical presentation and radiographic findings as pathological services may be limited. Initial diversion with multi-stage procedure, instead of a single-stage pull-through, predominates. This is also a result of multifactorial causes, including initial presentation to general surgeons at first-level hospitals instead of pediatric surgeons, delayed presentation with sick, malnourished children with significantly distended bowel, and a lack of fresh-frozen pathological services to guide the extent of resection. Post-operatively, HD patients in LMICs experience higher complication and mortality rates - likely stemming from sicker baseline presentations and more limited resources. Significant recent advances in care have occurred for patients with HD in LMICs, while opportunities to continue to improve care remain.

Relationships between socioeconomic deprivation and pediatric firearm-related injury at the neighborhood level.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in pediatric injury are widely documented and partly driven by differential exposures to social determinants of health (SDH). Here, we examine associations between neighborhood-level SDH and pediatric firearm-related injury admissions as a step to defining specific targets for interventions to prevent injury. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients 16 years or younger admitted to our Level I pediatric trauma center (2010-2019) after a firearm-related injury. We extracted patients' demographic characteristics and intent of injury. We geocoded home addresses to enable quantification of injury-related admissions at the neighborhood (census tract) level. Our population-level exposure variable was a socioeconomic deprivation index for each census tract. RESULTS: Of 15,686 injury-related admissions, 140 were for firearm-related injuries (median age, 14 years; interquartile range, 11-15 years). Patients with firearm-related injuries were 75% male and 64% Black; 66% had public insurance. Nearly half (47%) of firearm-related injuries were a result of assault, 32% were unintentional, and 6% were self-inflicted; 9% died. At the neighborhood level, the distribution of firearm-related injuries significantly differed by deprivation quintile ( p < 0.05). Children from the highest deprivation quintile experienced 25% of injuries of all types, 57% of firearm-related injuries, and 70% of all firearm-related injuries from assault. They had an overall risk of firearm-related injury 30 times that of children from the lowest deprivation quintile. CONCLUSION: Increased neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation is associated with more firearm-related injuries requiring hospitalization, at rates far higher than injury-related admissions overall. Addressing neighborhood-level SDH may help prevent pediatric firearm-related injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, Level III.

Endorectal Advancement Flaps for Perianal Fistulae in Crohn's Disease: Careful Patient Selection Leads to Optimal Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal fistulae resultant from Crohn's disease (CD) is a clinical challenge. The advent of immune therapy (IT) has altered the way in which fistulae have responded to treatment. Endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) is a surgical procedure that is used to treat complex fistulae. We have employed ERAF as our second stage treatment of choice in this patient population. Our aim was to determine the success of ERAF in treating perianal fistulas in patients with CD in an era of IT. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective review from 2007 to 2017 of all patients with CD and a perianal fistulae who underwent ERAF. RESULTS: Forty-one flaps were performed in 39 patients with perianal CD with an average follow-up of 797 days. There were no significant differences in patient demographics; however, all patients who were diverted at the time of surgery had successful healing. Of patients, 73.2% were on IT at an average of 380 days prior to surgery. The duration of single-agent therapy was associated with better healing rates (p = 0.03). The overall failure rate was 19.5% (n = 8). Six patients underwent secondary techniques for fistulae closure; five were successful. In combination with the patients who did not initially fail, the overall healing rate was 92.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates several factors that may improve fistulae closure for CD patients. Patients who were diverted prior to surgery did not have a fistulae recurrence. Patients who were on IT longer prior to ERAF were more likely to achieve successful closure.

The Effect of a Global Surgery Resident Rotation on Physician Practices Following Residency: The Mount Sinai Experience.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to evaluate the impact of Mount Sinai's international rotation on physician practices and attitudes following residency. DESIGN: An anonymous, retrospective study was conducted using an email survey. The initial survey was sent out in July 2015 with a second opportunity in September 2015. SETTING: Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City. PARTICIPANTS: All 62 graduates of the Mount Sinai General and Plastic Surgery residencies who participated in the international rotation over the last 10 years. RESULTS: The primary outcome was level of involvement in service medicine with a secondary outcome examining participants views on the value of international rotations during residency. The response rate for the survey was 71% (44/62). Since leaving residency, 53% have been involved in one or more types of service medicine, 59% have been involved in at least one experience practicing medicine in an underserved area and 45% state that their current practice incorporates global surgery or service. 61% report that the rotation encouraged an interest in practicing in an underserved area and 44% (8/18) of those with no prior interest in global health reported that the rotation encouraged an interest. Respondents generally believe global health work could be rewarding (89%), provide opportunity for professional development (77%), and that residency should include global health electives (93%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a mandatory global health rotation may encourage an interest in service medicine. Thus, program directors should continue to provide and encourage participation in international rotations during surgical residency.