Coagulation Abnormalities and Management in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and severity of coagulation abnormalities have not been extensively studied in pediatric populations with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Moreover, their association with an increased risk for thromboembolic events remains unclear, and there is a lack of evidence for optimal prophylactic antithrombotic management. The aim of our study was to present our experience in evaluation, management, and long-term outcomes of coagulation abnormalities in pediatric hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in all children hospitalized for COVID-19 during a 6-month period focusing on patients' coagulation abnormalities, the normalization of the coagulation profile with or without anticoagulation prophylaxis and the clinical outcome of the disease. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients (median age: 11.4 months) were enrolled in the study. Coagulation abnormalities were detected in 92.4% of patients with increased D-dimer levels to be the most common abnormality detected in 84.3% of patients. Prophylactic anticoagulation was initiated only in 7 (3.1%) selected patients with severe COVID-19 and at least 2 risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in all patients with previous history of VTE. Follow-up coagulation profile in 85 patients showed that changes over time had a tendency towards normalization irrespectively of the initiation of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. No thrombotic complications were observed 3 months upon discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Although abnormal findings in coagulation profile were very common, they were not associated with risk for VTE even in severe cases. A trend of normalization early in the course of the disease was observed regardless of the use of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis.

Heparin Binding Protein for the Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: The Prompt Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The validation of new biomarkers for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with sepsis at an early point is essential for successful treatment. Recent publications prompted us to investigate of heparin binding protein (HBP) for the emergency department (ED) admissions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, cross-sectional study, HBP and procalcitonin (PCT) were measured within the first hour upon admission to the ED in plasma samples of 371 patients with signs of infection. Patients were classified into non-sepsis and sepsis by the Sepsis-3 definitions and were followed up for outcome. RESULTS: HBP was significantly higher in patients with sepsis and was positively correlated to PCT and C-reactive protein, absolute neutrophil and monocyte counts, creatinine, bilirubin and lactate. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of HBP more than 19.8 ng/mL for the diagnosis of sepsis was 66.3%, 44.9%, 49.3%, and 62.2%, respectively; and for prediction of early death was 100%, 41.0%, 4.5%, and 100%, respectively. Single HBP and PCT could not predict 28-day mortality; this was performed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value 44.8%, 81.8%, 17.3%, and 94.6% when used in combination. CONCLUSION: Admission HBP can be used as a tool for the early diagnosis of sepsis and for the risk of early death in the ED.

Comparative Performance of Four Established Neonatal Disease Scoring Systems in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality and the Potential Role of Thromboelastometry.

BACKGROUND: To compare the prognostic accuracy of the most commonly used indexes of mortality over time and evaluate the potential of adding thromboelastometry (ROTEM) results to these well-established clinical scores. METHODS: The study population consisted of 473 consecutive term and preterm critically-ill neonates. On the first day of critical illness, modified Neonatal Multiple Organ Dysfunction (NEOMOD) scoring system, Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP II), Perinatal extension of SNAP (SNAPPE), and SNAPPE II, were calculated and ROTEM standard extrinsically activated (EXTEM) assay was performed simultaneously. Time-to-event methodology for competing-risks was used to assess the performance of the aforementioned indexes in predicting in-hospital mortality over time. Time-dependent receiver operator characteristics curves for censored observation were compared across indexes. The addition of EXTEM parameters to each index was tested in terms of discrimination capacity. RESULTS: The modified NEOMOD score performed similarly to SNAPPE. Both scores performed significantly better than SNAP II and SNAPPE II. Amplitude recorded at 10 min (A10) was the EXTEM parameter most strongly associated with mortality (A10 < 37 mm vs. ≥37 mm; sHR = 5.52; p < 0.001). Adding A10 to each index apparently increased the prognostic accuracy in the case of SNAP II and SNAPPE II. However, these increases did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Although the four existing indexes considered showed good to excellent prognostic capacity, modified NEOMOD and SNAPPE scores performed significantly better. Though larger studies are needed, adding A10 to well-established neonatal severity scores not including biomarkers of coagulopathy might improve their prediction of in-hospital mortality.