S100B protein as a biomarker and predictor in traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prognostic potential of S100B protein in patients with craniocerebral injury, correlation between S100B protein and time, selected internal diseases, body habitus, polytrauma, and season. METHODS: We examined the levels of S100B protein in 124 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). RESULTS: The S100B protein level 72 h after injury and changes over 72 h afterwards are statistically significant for prediction of a good clinical condition 1 month after injury. The highest sensitivity (81.4%) and specificity (83.3%) for the S100B protein value after 72 h was obtained for a cut-off value of 0.114. For the change after 72 h, that is a decrease in S100B value, the optimal cut-off is 0.730, where the sum of specificity (76.3%) and sensitivity (54.2%) is the highest, or a decrease by 0.526 at the cut-off value, where sensitivity (62.5%) and specificity (62.9%) are more balanced. The S100B values were the highest at baseline; S100B value taken 72 h after trauma negatively correlated with GCS upon discharge or transfer (r=-0.517, P<0.0001). We found no relationship between S100B protein and hypertension, diabetes mellitus, BMI, or season when the trauma occurred. Changes in values and a higher level of S100B protein were demonstrated in polytraumas with a median of 1.070 (0.042; 8.780) µg/L compared to isolated TBI with a median of 0.421 (0.042; 11.230) µg/L. CONCLUSION: S100B protein level with specimen collection 72 h after trauma can be used as a complementary marker of patient prognosis.

Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors on the development of chronic subdural haematoma.

AIMS: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) have been recently discussed in connection with the medical treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). They may improve the treatment results. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of ACEI on the development of CSDH. The first question was to assess the impact of ACEI on postoperative CSDH healing. The second was to assess the impact of ACEI on the development of CSDH as such. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study recruited patients treated surgically for CSDH at our department in the 2013-2018 period. Based on medical records, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical condition of the patients, their history (mainly pharmacological - the use of ACEI) and the course of treatment focussing on the reoccurrence of disease necessitating further therapeutic interventions. For the purpose of evaluating the impact of ACEI on postoperative CSDH healing, the patients were divided into two groups: those using ACEI and those without this medication. The results were compared. We also compared the prevalence of ACEI use in patients with CSDH with the prevalence of ACEI in the comparable population. The difference of the rates allowed us to evaluate the impact of ACEI on the development of CSDH itself. RESULTS: Of the 217 patients after surgery for CSDH, 79 continued the use of ACEI; the remaining 138 patients did not use this medication. Patients using ACEI after the surgery experienced a recurrence in 24 (30.4%) cases; patients without ACEI in 37 (26.8%) cases. A negligibly higher number of recurrences was recorded in patients with postoperative use of ACEI, but this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.574). Of a total of 230 patients who underwent surgery for CSDH, 81 were using ACEI chronically (35.2%). In the control group of 100 patients, 38 (38.0%) patients used ACEI. The difference was not statistically significant (P=0.629), so it is not possible to assume that ACEIs influence the development of CSDH as such. CONCLUSION: The initial high hopes for a positive ACEI effect on the healing of CSDH are now waived after the publication of several recent studies. According to our present knowledge, the development of CSDH does not appear to be influenced by ACEI use.

Distal Aneurysms of Cerebellar Arteries-Case Series.

(1) Background: Distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries are very rare. The authors report their case series of distal aneurysms of the cerebellar arteries solved successfully by microsurgery or by endovascular treatment (Table 1) (2) Materials and Methods: Between January 2010 and March 2020, 346 aneurysms were treated in our institution. Eleven aneurysms in seven patients were located on distal cerebellar arteries and, in three patients, the aneurysms were combined with arteriovenous malformations. There were four women and three men, ranging from 50 to 72 years of age. Five patients presented with different grades of subarachnoid hemorrhage or intraventricular bleeding, and two patients were diagnosed because of headache. Aneurysm location was the posterior inferior cerebellar artery in six cases, the superior cerebellar artery in three cases, and the anterior inferior cerebellar artery in 2 cases. One patient had three aneurysms, and two patients had two aneurysms. (3) Results: Nine aneurysms were treated by microsurgery trapping or clipping and, in two patients, the associated arteriovenous malformation (AVM) was resected. Two aneurysms were treated by endovascular coiling, and one associated AVM was successfully embolized. Clinical follow-up was a mean of 11.5 months (range, 3-45 months). (4) Conclusion: The authors present their experience with the treatment of 11 peripheral aneurysms on distal branches of the cerebellar circulation in seven patients which were excluded from circulation by microsurgery or endovascular treatment. In three patients, the associated AVM was treated (two with microsurgery, one with embolization).