RESUMEN
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is defined as pain that develops or increases in intensity after a surgical procedure or tissue injury and persists beyond the healing process, lasting at least three months after the precipitating event. Often neuropathic in nature, CPSP can be challenging to manage. CPSP is a common complication, with data suggesting an incidence ranging from 5% to 85%, depending on the type of procedure. Meralgia paresthetica (MP) and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric neuralgias (IH/IL N) are two possible clinical scenarios of CPSP following lower abdominal procedures. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a minimally invasive technique of peripheral neuromodulation effective in various pain etiologies; however, evidence is scarce regarding its use in MP and IH/IL N. This case series aims to assess the potential role of PRF in the management of CPSP following abdominal wall procedures. This case series was set in a single oncological center between January 2017 and February 2022 and included adult patients (>18 years old) referred to our unit with a high suspicion of postsurgical MP or IH/IL N refractory to conservative treatment. PRF was performed after a positive diagnostic block in patients whose pain could not be controlled despite optimal medical treatment. The efficacy of PRF was assessed regarding pain intensity using the verbal numeric scale (VNS) and the duration of pain relief in weeks. The follow-up period was from the initial PRF procedure to the end of data collection. Parametric data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), and non-parametric data as median (minimum-maximum). Seventeen patients were included: 82.35% (n=14) were female, and the mean age was 58.0 ± 11.35 years. MP was present in 47.1% (n=8) and IH/IL N in 52.9% (n=9). Transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap reconstruction (TRAM) was the most common procedure (n=5, 29.41%). Diagnostic blocks were performed in 88.24% (n=15) of the patients. Initial VNS scores were 7.59 ± 2.62; 2.82 ± 2.62 at 24 hours; and 2.47 ± 1.58 at 15 days. During follow-up, 70.59% (n=12) of patients had no recurrence of initial symptoms. A second PRF was performed in 29.41% (n=5) cases based on the recurrence of symptoms, following a mean period of pain relief of 112 (8-238) weeks. No major or minor complications were identified during early or late follow-up. PRF can be a useful tool to improve the multimodal management of postsurgical abdominal wall chronic pain.
RESUMEN
Background Opioids have long been the cornerstone of drugs used for perioperative analgesia. Sufentanil has an advantageous pharmacological profile for its use in continuous intravenous (IV) infusion, yet remains poorly described. Our institution has implemented analgesia protocols with IV sufentanil infusions for cancer surgery with appropriate monitoring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IV sufentanil infusion. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted through the analysis of patients' records and the acute pain service database. Inclusion criteria were adult patients admitted for elective cancer surgery and with postoperative IV sufentanil infusion during one year period. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed by using Software SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp., Armonk USA): Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Chi-square and Fisher tests; Bonferroni chi-square residual analysis, binary logistic regression; p<0.05. Results The study population of 304 patients had a median age of 66 years (22-91) and 229 (75.3%) were men. 38 (12.5%) were chronic opioid users. Head and neck/otorhinolaryngology (ORL) surgery was performed in 155 (51.0%) and abdominopelvic surgery in 123 (40.5%). The median days of IV sufentanil infusion were 2 (1-13). At rest and with movement, analgesia was considered good, i.e., over 90% of patients with visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score ≤ 3. We found that patients submitted to musculoskeletal surgery had higher VAS pain scores; this group also presented older patients with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification and more chronic opioid users (p<0.05). 144 patients (47.4%) had at least one adverse effect related to IV sufentanil infusion, notably transient and not requiring any specific treatment. These patients were older and had longer infusion periods (p<0.05). 237 (98.3%) of the adverse effects occurred during the first 3 days and the most common were: sedation (n=104, 42.8%), hypotension (n=32, 13.2%), hypoxemia (n=31, 12.8%) and nausea/vomiting (n=25, 10.3%). The reported incidence of respiratory depression was 2.9% (n=9), with three patients (1%) requiring advanced treatment. Conclusion Multimodal analgesic protocols with IV sufentanil infusions provided good postoperative analgesia for head and neck/ORL and abdominopelvic cancer surgeries. The adverse effects associated with the IV sufentanil infusions were mild and mainly managed with opioid dose reductions. Our study showed that this approach can be a safe option for postoperative multimodal analgesia in cancer surgery with appropriate monitoring in high-dependency units.