Examining the clinical course of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with the cosmos regimen: including patients with advanced liver disease and East Asian ancestry.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The COSMOS study was a phase 2a clinical trial that showed high cure rates of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and a favorable side effect profile using a 12-week regimen of simeprevir + sofosbuvir (SIM + SOF). Given the small number of patients treated with the SIM + SOF regimen in the COSMOS trial, there is uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy. We now report our experience with the COSMOS regimen in the multiethnic population of Hawaii, including patients of East Asian ancestry and with decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 138 patients treated with a fixed dose regimen of SIM 150 mg and SOF 400 mg daily at a single referral center. We collected data on demographics, side effects, laboratory studies and sustained virological response (SVR). Statistical analysis was performed with Stata v8.2 software. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the 138 patients initiated with SIM + SOF therapy were: 68.8 % cirrhotic (22.1 % of those Child-Pugh Class B), 37 % Asian, 11.6 % Pacific Islander, 63 % male, mean age 61.3 ± 7.8 years, mean BMI 27.8 ± 6.1 kg/m(2), 26.8 % diabetic, 63.8 % genotype 1a, 44.9 % previously treatment experienced. A total of 100 % of patients that completed therapy (n = 137) had undetectable viral loads at end of treatment (EOT). Twelve patients relapsed post-treatment resulting in an overall 12 week SVR (SVR12) rate of 89.1 %. 95 % of decompensated cirrhotic patients achieved SVR12, compared to 85.3 % of compensated cirrhotic patients and 93 % of non-cirrhotic patients. 92 % of Asian patients achieved SVR12 compared to 87.5 % in non-Asian patients. There were no statistically significant differences in SVR12 between treatment naive and treatment experienced patients (86.8 vs 91.9 %). 87.5 % of post-transplant patients achieved SVR12. The main side effects were headache 16.2 %, fatigue 24.2 %, pruritis 14.1 %; none were >grade 2 in severity. There were no differences in side effect profiles of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Pruritis only was statistically significant between Asians and non-Asians (22 vs 5.7 %). Trends toward improvement in platelet counts and total bilirubin were noted at 12-weeks post treatment, while improvement in albumin in cirrhotic patients reached statistical significance (3.77-4.01 mg/dL, p = 0.0108). CONCLUSIONS: The 12-week fixed dose course of SIM + SOF was well tolerated in a multiethnic population of primarily cirrhotic patients, including those with decompensated disease. This real world trial achieved SVR12 rates comparable to the COSMOS data. Higher incidence of adverse side effects was not observed with an exception of higher rate of pruritis in Asians. The increase in albumin in cirrhotic patients was statistically significant and suggested early improvement in synthetic function following viral eradication. Higher BMI (≥30 kg/m(2)) was the only factor that correlated with post-treatment relapse by multivariate analysis.

Real-world Experience with Sofosbuvir-based Regimens for Chronic Hepatitis C, Including Patients with Factors Previously Associated with Inferior Treatment Response.

The introduction of sofosbuvir, a direct acting antiviral, has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy, simplicity, and tolerability of sofosbuvir-based regimens and report high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) rates. The purpose of this study was to assess whether clinical trial findings translate into a real-world setting, particularly with treatment of chronic HCV in our diverse, multiethnic population of Hawai'i. Retrospective analysis was performed for 113 patients with genotype 1-6 HCV infection being treated at the Queen's Liver Center between January 2014 and March 2015. SVR rates for our cohort were slightly lower than the rates published by the clinical trials. Data analysis also suggested that most baseline characteristics previously associated with inferior response might not be as significant for sofosbuvir-based regimens; in our cohort, male gender was the only factor significantly related to increased risk of virologic relapse. Pacific Islanders also had higher rate of relapse compared to other ethnic groups, but the small number of patients treated in this subgroup make it difficult to validate this finding. While newer all-oral treatment regimens have been introduced since this study, we highlight the importance of comparing real-world versus clinical trial results for new treatments, and provide data analyses for treatment of chronic HCV in Hawai'i.

New triple therapy for chronic hepatitis C: real life clinical experience in a community setting.

Recent advances in treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus have improved significantly due to the introduction of two new protease inhibitors-telaprevir and boceprevir. In combination with the previous standard of care, peginterferon and ribavirin, telaprevir and boceprevir have demonstrated improved sustained virologic response rates for HCV genotype 1 patients by approximately 30%. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of large clinical trial data with respect to efficacy and side effects in a community setting in Honolulu, Hawai'i. This retrospective study was performed by reviewing the charts of 59 chronic HCV patients who were started on triple therapy from July 1, 2011 to July 7, 2012. Sustained virologic response was attained by 73% of patients treated with telaprevir and 46% of patients treated with boceprevir respectively. Our clinical experience with telaprevir demonstrates that SVR rates are compatible with published literature values. Rates of SVR in our cohort were also similar to those reported in cirrhotic patients - about 50%. Due to small number of patients treated with a boceprevir-based regimen, it is difficult to compare our experience with pivotal trial experience. The side effect profiles for the two protease inhibitors were similar to the literature values except for more rectal irritation and a higher incidence and severity of anemia on telaprevir therapy in the clinical setting. While not intended to be conclusive, our study demonstrates that clinical trial data are largely compatible with the outcomes obtained in our community setting.