Effect of flipped classroom methodology on the student performance of gastrointestinal and renal physiology entrants and repeaters.

BACKGROUND: Physiology is a subject that is considered difficult; it is associated with academic failure and causes high levels of stress and anxiety in students. METHODS: This study compared the effectiveness of a traditional lecture-based methodology with that of a flipped classroom scheme focusing on cooperative ludic learning among gastrointestinal and renal physiology students. Two groups were subjected to these two different methods to teach gastrointestinal and renal physiology content divided into 14 topics. Additionally, two subgroups were identified in each group: entrants and repeaters. There were no differences in age or gender between the subgroups. RESULTS: Levels of self-perceived stress (measured by the SISCO scale), biological stress (measured by awakening salivary cortisol levels), and anxiety (measured by the Zung scale) were high in all of the students; the cortisol levels increased in the entrants and some of the scores in SISCO scale increased in the repeaters, throughout the study. The self-reported study time was longer in the students subjected to the flipped classroom-based method. The final exam results were better only in the new students facing the flipped methodology, but not in the repeaters, who scored lower on the final evaluation. The quantitative and qualitative assessments completed by the participants regarding the different aspects of the flipped-classroom-based methodology were favorable; however, the participants believed that traditional lectures should be maintained for specific topics. CONCLUSIONS: A methodology based on flipped teaching was an effective strategy to improve academic performance ingastrointestinal and renal physiology, but only in new students.

Dosis de células madre en el tratamiento de osteoartritis de rodilla / Stem cell doses in knee osteoarthritis

Resumen La osteoartritis (OA) es una enfermedad degenerativa, cuyo tratamiento convencional incluye medicamentos, fisioterapia o prótesis. Las células madre con Plasma Rico en Plaquetas y factores de crecimiento son una opción que promete controlar los síntomas, mejorar la función y regenerar el cartílago; sin embargo, no se han especificado muchos detalles del tratamiento, como el tipo y la cantidad de células madre que se deben aplicar para obtener mejores resultados. En este estudio buscamos comparar la efectividad, la seguridad y los costos de dos dosis (1X107vs 3X107) de células madre derivadas de tejido adiposo (ADSC), aplicadas por vía intraarticular. Diez pacientes, con OA de rodilla grados II y III, fueron aleatorizados para recibir 10 (n = 5) o 30 millones (n = 5) de ADSC autólogos. Al inicio y 6 a 10 meses después de la inyección, se evaluaron de acuerdo con los criterios clínicos (evaluación médica, escala WOMAC, calidad de vida) y paraclínicos (artroscopia, resonancia, biopsia). En términos de efectividad y seguridad no se observaron diferencias entre los dos grupos de dosificación, ya que todos los pacientes tuvieron una mejoría de acuerdo con los criterios médicos y la escala WOMAC (P = 0,001); en el control artroscópico, 7 pacientes tuvieron una respuesta "buena / muy buena", 1 "neutral" y 2 abandonaron el control; Las biopsias confirman la regeneración articular, aunque no hubo diferencias en las resonancias magnéticas anteriores y posteriores. En la osteoartritis de rodilla, la aplicación de 10 o 30 millones de ADSC fue igualmente efectiva y segura; sin embargo, el protocolo con 10 millones de células no requiere expansión in vitro, requiere menos tiempo, es más simple y tiene un costo menor. Este estudio muestra una buena razón para realizar ensayos clínicos aleatorios para obtener evidencia de mayor calidad.

Abstract Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease where conventional treatment includes drugs, physiotherapy, or prostheses. Stem cells and growth factors are a promising option in controlling symptoms, functional improvement and cartilage regeneration; however, many treatment details have not been specified, such as type and number of stem cells that should be applied to obtain optimal results. In this study we sought to compare effectiveness, safety and costs of two doses (1X107vs 3X107) of adipose tissue derived stem cells (ADSC), applied intra-articularly. Ten patients, with knee OA grades II and III, were randomized to receive 10 (n=5) or 30 million (n=5) of autologous ADSCs. At baseline and 6 to 10 months after injection, they were evaluated according to clinical (medical evaluation, WOMAC scale, quality of life) and paraclinical criteria (arthroscopy, resonance, biopsy). In terms of effectiveness and safety there were no differences observed among the two dosage groups since all patients had improvement according to medical criteria and the WOMAC scale (P=0,001); in the arthroscopic control, 7 patients had "good/very good" response, 1 "neutral" and 2 forwent control; biopsies confirm joint regeneration, although there were no differences in the before and after magnetic resonances. In knee osteoarthritis, the application of 10 or 30 million ADSCs was equally effective and safe; however, the protocol with 10 million cells does not require in vitro expansion, requires less time, is simpler and has a lower cost. This study shows good reason to undertake randomized clinical trials to gain higher quality evidence.