RESUMEN
Background: Evidence is sparse on the effects of Medicare medication therapy management (MTM) on racial/ethnic disparities in medication adherence among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Objectives: This study examined the Medicare MTM program's effects on racial/ethnic disparities in the adherence to antidementia medications among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 100% of 2010-2017 Medicare Parts A, B, and D data linked to Area Health Resources Files. The study outcome was nonadherence to antidementia medications, and intervention was defined as new MTM enrollment in 2017. Propensity score matching was conducted to create intervention and comparison groups with comparable characteristics. A difference-in-differences model was employed with logistic regression, including interaction terms of dummy variables for the intervention group and racial/ethnic minorities. Results: Unadjusted comparisons revealed that Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients were more likely to be nonadherent than non-Hispanic White (White) patients in 2016. Differences in odds of nonadherence between Black and White patients among the intervention group were lower in 2017 than in 2016 by 27% (odds ratios [OR]: 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.82). A similar lowering was seen between Hispanic and White patients by 26% (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87). MTM enrollment was associated with reduced disparities in nonadherence for Black-White patients of 33% (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.78) and Hispanic-White patients of 19% (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.99). Discussion: The Medicare MTM program was associated with lower disparities in adherence to antidementia medications between Black and White patients, and between Hispanic and White patients in the population with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Conclusions: Expanding the MTM program may particularly benefit racial/ethnic minorities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia care.
RESUMEN
We used the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS), that normally receives input from the forepaw skin surface, in rat primary somatosensory cortex as a model system to study rapid and delayed lower jaw-to-forepaw cortical reorganization. Single and multi-unit recording from FBS neurons was used to examine the FBS for the presence of "new" lower jaw input following deafferentations that include forelimb amputation, brachial plexus nerve cut, and brachial plexus anesthesia. The major findings are as follows: (1) immediately following forelimb deafferentations, new input from the lower jaw becomes expressed in the anterior FBS; (2) 7-27 weeks after forelimb amputation, new input from the lower jaw is expressed in both anterior and posterior FBS; (3) evoked response latencies recorded in the deafferented FBS following electrical stimulation of the lower jaw skin surface are significantly longer in both rapid and delayed deafferents compared to control latencies for input from the forepaw to reach the FBS or for input from lower jaw to reach the LJBSF; (4) the longer latencies suggest that an additional relay site is imposed along the somatosensory pathway for lower jaw input to access the deafferented FBS. We conclude that different sources of input and different mechanisms underlie rapid and delayed reorganization in the FBS and suggest that these findings are relevant, as an initial step, for developing a rodent animal model to investigate phantom limb phenomena.
Asunto(s)
Neuronas , Corteza Somatosensorial , Ratas , Animales , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Corteza Somatosensorial/fisiología , Neuronas/fisiología , Amputación Quirúrgica , Miembro Anterior/inervación , Mapeo EncefálicoRESUMEN
The Medicare Parts C and D Star Ratings system was established to improve care quality in Medicare. Previous studies reported racial/ethnic disparities in the calculation of medication adherence measures of Star Ratings in patients with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. This study aimed to identify possible racial/ethnic disparities in the calculation of adherence measures of Medicare Part D Star Ratings among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia. This retrospective study analyzed the 2017 Medicare data and Area Health Resources Files. Non-Hispanic White (White) patients were compared to Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander (Asian), and other patients on their likelihood of being included in the calculation of adherence measures for diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. To adjust for the individual/community characteristics, logistic regression was used when the outcome is the inclusion in the calculation of one adherence measure; multinomial regression was used when examining the inclusion in the calculation of multiple adherence measures. Analyzing the data of 1438,076 Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD, this study found that Black (adjusted odds ratio, or ORâ =â 0.79, 95% confidence interval, or 95% CIâ =â 0.73-0.84) and Hispanic (ORâ =â 0.82, 95% CIâ =â 0.75-0.89) patients were less likely than White patients to be included in the calculation of adherence measure for diabetes medications. Further, Black patients were less likely to be included in the calculation of the adherence measure for hypertension medications than White patients (ORâ =â 0.81, 95% CIâ =â 0.78-0.84). All minorities were less likely to be included in calculating the adherence measure for hyperlipidemia medications than Whites. The ORs for Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were 0.57 (95% CIâ =â 0.55-0.58), 0.69 (95% CIâ =â 0.64-0.74), and 0.83 (95% CIâ =â 0.76-0.91), respectively. Minority patients were generally likely to be included in the measure calculation of fewer measures than White patients. Racial/ethnic disparities were observed in the calculation of Star Ratings measures among patients with ADRD and diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. Future studies should explore possible causes of and solutions to these disparities.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Diabetes Mellitus , Hipertensión , Medicare Part C , Medicare Part D , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , BlancoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Previous analysis of policy scenarios reported potential disparities in eligibility in the Medicare Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program. With recently released MTM data, this study aimed to determine if racial/ethnic disparities exist in MTM enrollment among Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). METHODS: Medicare claims/records (from 2013-2014 and 2016-2017) linked to the Area Health Resources File were examined. Included individuals were patients with ADRD and diabetes, hypertension or hyperlipidemia. The proportions of MTM enrollment were compared between non-Hispanic White (White) patients and racial/ethnic minority groups in descriptive analysis. Racial/ethnic disparities were then examined using a logistic regression adjusting for patient and community characteristics. Disparities across study periods were compared by estimating a logistic regression model with interaction terms between dummy variables for each racial/ethnic minority group and 2016-2017. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, minorities had higher enrollment proportions than Whites. In 2016-2017, for example, enrollment percentages for Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders (Asians) and Others were respectively 14.44%, 16.71%, 19.83%, 16.66%, and 17.78%. In adjusted analyses, Blacks had lower enrollment odds than Whites within all cohorts. In the entire study sample in 2016-2017, for example, Blacks with ADRD had 9% lower odds of MTM enrollment (odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-0.97) than Whites. These disparities decreased over time among the ADRD sample and all sub-groups. The interaction term between Blacks and 2016-2017, for instance, indicated that disparities were lowered by 11% (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI = 1.05-1.16) across study periods among those with ADRD. CONCLUSIONS: Blacks with ADRD, and diabetes, hypertension or hyperlipidemia have lower likelihood of MTM enrollment than Whites. Racial disparities were reduced over time but not eliminated.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Hipertensión , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Medicare , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico , Grupos Minoritarios , Estados Unidos , Población BlancaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Individuals with major limb amputation(s) frequently experience phantom limb sensations, which are described as vivid impressions of either parts or entire missing limb(s). Despite the high incidence and prevalence of phantom limb pain, the underlying pathophysiology of phantom limb pain remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate a possible role of microRNAs in the pathophysiology of phantom limb pain. DESIGN: Adults with acquired limb amputation and varying degrees of phantom limb pain consented to provide clinical data and blood samples. One hundred forty participants with single or multiple limb amputation(s) were enrolled. The Visual analog scale and neuropathic pain symptom inventory were administered to evaluate the pain. Serum samples were analyzed for microRNA expression and bioinformatic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants did not experience phantom limb pain, whereas 73 participants experienced varying severities of phantom limb pain measured on a pain scale. Linear regression analysis suggested that the time since amputation is inversely related to severity of the pain. A significantly increased expression of 16 microRNAs was observed in participants experiencing phantom limb pain. Bioinformatic analysis shows a possible role of these microRNAs in regulating genes expressed in peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of association of microRNA in phantom limb pain.
Asunto(s)
MicroARNs , Neuralgia , Miembro Fantasma , Adulto , Humanos , Miembro Fantasma/epidemiología , Amputación Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Dimensión del Dolor , Neuralgia/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is the mostcommon cause of dementia, a neurological disorder characterized by memory loss and judgment impairment. Hyperlipidemia, a commonly co-occurring condition, should be treated to prevent associated complications. Medication adherence may be difficult for individuals with AD due to the complexity of AD management. Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMRs), a required component of Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management (MTM), have been shown to improve medication adherence. However, many MTM programs do not target AD. Additionally, racial/ethnic disparities in MTM eligibility have been revealed. Thus, this study examined the effects of CMR receipt on reducing racial/ethnic disparities in the likelihood of nonadherence to hyperlipidemia medications (statins) among the AD population. METHODS: This retrospective study used 2015-2017 Medicare data linked to the Area Health Resources Files. The likelihood of nonadherence to statin medications across racial/ethnic groups was compared between propensity-score-matched CMR recipients and non-recipients in a ratio of 1 to 3. A difference-in-differences method was utilized to determine racial/ethnic disparity patterns using a logistic regression by including interaction terms between dummy variables for CMR receipt and each racial/ethnic minority group (non-Hispanic Whites, or Whites, as reference). RESULTS: The study included 623,400 Medicare beneficiaries. Blacks and Hispanics had higher statin nonadherence than Whites: Compared to Whites, Blacks' nonadherence rate was 4.53% higher among CMR recipients and 7.35% higher among non-recipients; Hispanics' nonadherence rate was 2.69% higher among CMR recipients and 7.38% higher among non-recipients. Differences in racial/ethnic disparities between CMR recipients and non-recipients were significant for each minority group (p < 0.05) except Others. The difference between Whites and Hispanics in the odds of statin nonadherence was 11% lower among CMR recipients compared to non-recipients (OR = 0.89; 95% Confidence Interval = 0.85-0.94 for the interaction term between dummy variables for CMR and Hispanics). Interaction terms between dummy variables for CMR and other racial/ethnic minorities were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving a CMR was associated with a disparity reduction in nonadherence to statin medications between Hispanics and Whites among patients with AD. Strategies need to be explored to increase the number of MTM programs that target AD and promote CMR completion.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Medicare Part D , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Revisión de Medicamentos , Grupos Minoritarios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The population of Americans with limb loss is on the rise, with a different profile than in previous generations (e.g., greater incidence of amputation due to diabetes). This study aimed to identify the key characteristics of phantom limb sensation (PLS) and pain (PLP) in a current sample of Americans with limb loss. METHODS: This cross-sectional study is the first large-scale (n=649) study on PLP in the current population of Americans with limb loss. A convenience sample of military and civilian persons missing one or more major limbs was surveyed regarding their health history and experience with phantom limb phenomena. RESULTS: Of the participants surveyed, 87% experienced PLS and 82% experienced PLP. PLS and PLP typically first occurred immediately after amputation (47% of cases), but for a small percentage (3-4%) onset did not occur until over a year after amputation. Recent PLP severity decreased over time (ß=0.028, 95% CI: -0.05-0.11), but most participants reported PLP even 10 years after amputation. Higher levels of recent PLP were associated with telescoping (ß=0.123, 95% CI: 0.04-0.21) and higher levels of pre-amputation pain (ß=0.104, 95% CI: 0.03-0.18). Those with congenitally missing limbs experienced lower levels of recent PLP (t (37.93)=3.93, p<0.01) but there were no consistent differences in PLP between other amputation etiologies. CONCLUSIONS: Phantom limb phenomena are common and enduring. Telescoping and pre-amputation pain are associated with higher PLP. Persons with congenitally missing limbs experience lower levels of PLP than those with amputation(s), yet PLP is common even in this subpopulation.
Asunto(s)
Amputados , Miembro Fantasma , Amputación Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Incidencia , Miembro Fantasma/epidemiología , Miembro Fantasma/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article provides a definition of and introduction to cognitive rehabilitation. It discusses different approaches to cognitive rehabilitation (ie, restorative, compensatory, and metacognitive). It also reviews types of memory impairment and how they can be distinguished to improve treatment design and implementation. RECENT FINDINGS: Neural plasticity as a biological substrate for functional changes from cognitive rehabilitation is an exciting new area of research. SUMMARY: This article provides a high-level review of cognitive rehabilitation and presents a complex case example.
Asunto(s)
Cognición , Trastornos de la Memoria , Humanos , Trastornos de la Memoria/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Older patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are challenged with adhering to complex medication regimens. We examined effects of Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR), a required Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program component, on medication adherence among AD patients. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 100% of 2016-2017 Medicare claims covering the entire United States, linked to Area Health Resources Files. Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years were included. Propensity score matching identified comparable intervention and comparison groups with the intervention defined as receiving a CMR in 2017. A difference-in-differences analysis included in multivariate logistic regressions an interaction term between CMR receipt and year 2017. The outcome measured was nonadherence to diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia medications, with nonadherence defined as proportion of days covered <80% for study medications. RESULTS: Unadjusted comparisons indicated the proportion of nonadherence for intervention group members decreased from 2016 to 2017 but increased for the comparison group. In adjusted analyses, reduction in medication nonadherence among the intervention group remained higher: odds ratios for the interaction term were 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54-0.71), 0.54 (95% CI = 0.50-0.58) and 0.50 (95% CI = 0.47-0.53) respectively for diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia medications. This suggests that the likelihood of nonadherence in the intervention group was respectively reduced by 38%, 46% and 50% more than the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: CMR was found to reduce nonadherence to diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia medications among older Medicare beneficiaries with AD. This provides evidence that the MTM program is effective for a population with unique medication compliance challenges.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Medicare Part D , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Individuals with upper extremity (UE) amputation abandon prostheses due to challenges with significant device weight-particularly among myoelectric prostheses-and limited device dexterity, durability, and reliability among both myoelectric and body-powered prostheses. The Modular Prosthetic Limb (MPL) system couples an advanced UE prosthesis with a pattern recognition paradigm for intuitive, non-invasive prosthetic control. Pattern recognition accuracy and functional assessment-Box & Blocks (BB), Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JHFT), and Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)-scores comprised the main outcomes. 10 participants were included in analyses, including seven individuals with traumatic amputation, two individuals with congenital limb absence, and one with amputation secondary to malignancy. The average (SD) time since limb loss, excluding congenital participants, was 85.9 (59.5) months. Participants controlled an average of eight motion classes compared to three with their conventional prostheses. All participants made continuous improvements in motion classifier accuracy, pathway completion efficiency, and MPL manipulation. BB and JHFT improvements were not statistically significant. ACMC performance improved for all participants, with mean (SD) scores of 162.6 (105.3), 213.4 (196.2), and 383.2 (154.3), p = 0.02 between the baseline, midpoint, and exit assessments, respectively. Feedback included lengthening the training period to further improve motion classifier accuracy and MPL control. The MPL has potential to restore functionality to individuals with acquired or congenital UE loss.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/rehabilitación , Amputados/rehabilitación , Diseño de Prótesis/instrumentación , Extremidad Superior/fisiopatología , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Miembros Artificiales , Electromiografía/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Military service members are frequently subjected to subconcussive blast events during training and deployment. Emerging evidence suggests blast exposures of these magnitudes may have long-term consequences for dimensions of cognitive function. Less is known about cognitive sequelae acutely following deployment-related subconcussive blast events. The current study addressed this knowledge gap by assessing the extent to which subconcussive blast exposure affected performance on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics 4 TBI-MIL (ANAM). Baseline-referenced and normative comparisons of archival ANAM data were analyzed for a cohort of personnel who were exposed to blast (blast group; n = 27) and personnel who were not exposed to blast (no-blast group; n = 36) that were otherwise asymptomatic for a concussion. The blast group exhibited statistically significant lower scores compared to the no-blast group (between-subjects), baseline assessments (within-subjects), and an age-matched normative population. Normative comparisons revealed that the scores for the reaction time subtests (i.e., procedural and both simple reaction time tasks) were outside the range of normal functioning (1 SD) and reliable change indices revealed clinically meaningful change only for simple reaction time. The results highlight covert effects of subconcussive blast exposure that may warrant further monitoring in the immediate aftermath of a blast event.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Conmoción Encefálica , Trastornos del Conocimiento , Personal Militar , Traumatismos por Explosión/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Cognición , Humanos , Pruebas NeuropsicológicasRESUMEN
Barrel subfields in rodent primary somatosensory cortex (SI) are important model systems for studying cortical organization and reorganization. During cortical reorganization that follows limb deafferentation, neurons in deafferented forelimb SI become responsive to previously unexpressed inputs from the lower jaw. Although the lower jaw barrel subfield (LJBSF) is a likely source of the input, this subfield has received little attention. Our aim was to describe the structural and functional organization of the normal LJBSF. To investigate LJBSF organization, a nomenclature for lower jaw skin surface was developed, cytochrome oxidase (CO) was used to label flattened-cut LJBSF sections, microelectrodes were used to map the lower jaw skin surface representation in SI, and electrolytic lesions, recovered from electrode penetrations, were used to align the physiological map to the underlying barrel map. LJBSF is a tear-shaped subfield containing approximately 24 barrels, arranged in eight mediolateral rows and a barrel-free zone capping the anterior border. The representation of the lower jaw skin consisting of chin vibrissae and microvibrissae embedded in common fur is somatotopically organized in a single map in the contralateral SI. This physiological map shows that the activity from the vibrissae aligns with the CO-staining of the underlying LJBSF. LJBSF barrels receive topographically ordered barrel-specific input from individual vibrissa and microvibrissae in the lower jaw but not from trident whiskers. The barrel-free zone receives topographically ordered input from the lower lip. These data demonstrating that the LJBSF is a highly organized subfield are essential for understanding its possible role in cortical reorganization.
Asunto(s)
Neuronas/citología , Corteza Somatosensorial/citología , Corteza Somatosensorial/fisiología , Vibrisas/inervación , Animales , Mapeo Encefálico , Femenino , Maxilares/inervación , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-DawleyRESUMEN
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI, also known as a concussion) as a consequence of battlefield blast exposure or blunt force trauma has been of increasing concern to militaries during recent conflicts. This concern is due to the frequency of exposure to improvised explosive devices for forces engaged in operations both in Iraq and Afghanistan coupled with the recognition that mTBI may go unreported or undetected. Blasts can lead to mTBI through a variety of mechanisms. Debate continues as to whether exposure to a primary blast wave alone is sufficient to create brain injury in humans, and if so, exactly how this occurs with an intact skull. Resources dedicated to research in this area have also varied substantially among contributing NATO countries. Most of the research has been conducted in the US, focused on addressing uncertainties in management practices. Development of objective diagnostic tests should be a top priority to facilitate both diagnosis and prognosis, thereby improving management. It is expected that blast exposure and blunt force trauma to the head will continue to be a potential source of injury during future conflicts. An improved understanding of the effects of blast exposure will better enable military medical providers to manage mTBI cases and develop optimal protective measures. Without the immediate pressures that come with a high operational tempo, the time is right to look back at lessons learned, make full use of available data, and modify mitigation strategies with both available evidence and new evidence as it comes to light. Toward that end, leveraging our cooperation with the civilian medical community is critical because the military experience over the past 10 years has led to a renewed interest in many similar issues pertaining to mTBI in the civilian world. Such cross-fertilization of knowledge will undoubtedly benefit all. This paper highlights similarities and differences in approach to mTBI patient care in NATO and partner countries and provides a summary of and lessons learned from a NATO lecture series on the topic of mTBI, demonstrating utility of having patients present their experiences to a medical audience, linking practical clinical care to policy approaches.
RESUMEN
Nearly 380,000 U.S. service members between 2000 and 2017 were, and at least 300,000 athletes annually are, diagnosed with concussion. It is imperative to establish a gold-standard diagnostic test to quickly and accurately diagnose concussion. In this non-randomized, prospective study, we examined the reliability and validity of a novel neurocognitive assessment tool, the Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA), designed to be a more sensitive, yet efficient, measure of concussion symptomatology. In this study, the DANA Brief version was compared to an established measure of concussion screening, the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE), in a group of non-concussed service members. DANA Brief subtests demonstrated low to moderate reliability, as measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC; values range: 0.28-0.58), which is comparable to other computerized neurocognitive tests that are widely-implemented to diagnose concussion. Statistically significant associations were found between learning and memory components of the DANA Brief and the diagnostic MACE cognitive test score (DANA Brief subtests: CDD: R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.023; CDS: R 2 = 0.10, p = 0.010). However, a more robust relationship was found between DANA Brief components involving attention and working memory, including immediate memory, and the MACE cognitive test score (DANA Brief subtests: GNG: R 2 = 0.08, p = 0.003; PRO: R 2 = 0.08, p = 0.002). These results provide evidence that the DANA Rapid version, a 5-min assessment self-administered on a hand-held portable device, based on the DANA Brief version, may serve as a clinically useful and improved neurocognitive concussion screen to minimize the time between injury and diagnosis in settings where professional medical evaluation may be unavailable or delayed. The DANA's portability, durability, shorter test time and lack of need for a medical professional to diagnose concussion overcome these critical limitations of the MACE.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Equestrian athletes (horse riders) are at high risk for head injury, including concussions. MATERIALS & METHODS: Adults riders were recruited via social media posting to complete a branching survey collecting data on demographics, riding experience, helmet use, injury history and concussion symptom knowledge. Results are reported as frequencies and percentages, with associations tested using chi-square with significance level p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 2598 subjects, about 75% reported always wearing a helmet. Of those who did not, the most common reasons were that helmets are unnecessary (57.4%) or do not fit well (48.6%). Many indicated improper storage conditions and/or did not follow manufacturer's replacement recommendations. Most (75.4%) reported a high level of comfort with recognizing concussion signs, with half experiencing a prior head injury. CONCLUSION: This information suggests opportunities for intervention to improve helmet use through increased fit, while the responses indicate a need for further education on proper helmet use.