Abnormal desmopressin-induced forearm vasodilatation in patients with heart failure: dependence on nitric oxide synthase activity.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral vasodilatation in response to muscarinic agonists has been shown to be subnormal during heart failure. However, a more recent study suggested that the abnormal muscarinic-induced vasodilatation was not due to abnormal nitric oxide synthase activity. This study was designed to show that nitric oxide synthase contributes to desmopressin-induced forearm vasodilatation and to determine whether vasodilatation mediated by nitric oxide synthase is abnormal during heart failure. METHODS: Desmopressin (10, 50, and 100 ng/min) was infused into the brachial artery of 10 healthy subjects and eight patients with heart failure, and forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethsymography. Desmopressin responses were then recorded during inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with L-monomethylarginine or after aspirin. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, desmopressin caused a significant (p < 0.001) dose-dependent increase in forearm blood flow of 0.9 +/- 0.6, 4.0 +/- 2.6, and 7.9 +/- 2.6 ml/min/dl, respectively. Desmopressin responses in heart failure of 0.8 +/- 0.6, 1.7 +/- 1.4, and 3.1 +/- 1.0 ml/min/dl were significantly less (p < 0.001) than normal. L-Monomethylarginine reduced desmopressin responses in normal subjects (p < 0.01), and this inhibitory effect was significantly (p < 0.01) greater than in patients with heart failure. Aspirin did not affect desmopressin-induced vasodilatation. CONCLUSION: Nitric oxide synthase contributes to desmopressin-induced forearm vasodilatation. In response to desmopressin, patients with heart failure have subnormal vasodilatation mediated through nitric oxide synthase.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of supplemental oral L-arginine in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure have reduced peripheral blood flow at rest, during exercise, and in response to endothelium-dependent vasodilators. Nitric oxide formed from L-arginine metabolism in endothelial cells contributes to regulation of blood flow under these conditions. A randomized, double-blind crossover study design was used to determine whether supplemental oral L-arginine can augment peripheral blood flow and improve functional status in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen subjects were given 6 weeks of oral L-arginine hydrochloride (5.6 to 12.6 g/d) and 6 weeks of matched placebo capsules in random sequence. Compared with placebo, supplemental oral L-arginine significantly increased forearm blood flow during forearm exercise, on average from 5.1 +/- 2.8 to 6.6 +/- 3.4 mL. min-1. dL-1 (P < .05). Furthermore, functional status was significantly better on L-arginine compared with placebo, as indicated by increased distances during a 6-minute walk test (390 +/- 91 versus 422 +/- 86 m, P < .05) and lower scores on the Living With Heart Failure questionnaire (55 +/- 28 versus 42 +/- 26, P < .05). Oral L-arginine also improved arterial compliance from 1.99 +/- 0.38 to 2.36 +/- 0.30 mL/mm Hg (P < .001) and reduced circulating levels of endothelin from 1.9 +/- 1.1 to 1.5 +/- 1.1 pmol/L (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental oral L-arginine had beneficial effects in patients with heart failure. Further studies are needed to confirm the therapeutic potential of supplemental oral L-arginine and to identify mechanisms of action in patients with heart failure.

Use of the Living With Heart Failure questionnaire to ascertain patients' perspectives on improvement in quality of life versus risk of drug-induced death.

Treatments for heart failure, such as flosequinan, may have opposite effects on survival and quality of life. The Living With Heart Failure questionnaire was used to examine patients' willingness to risk drug-induced death for improved quality of life. In addition, patients' opinions concerning worthwhile improvements in the Living With Heart Failure score were described to provide a perspective for interpreting the results of clinical trials. A sample of 101 patients with heart failure were interviewed in cardiology clinics. Median (interquartile range) Living With Heart Failure questionnaire score were 54 (interquartile range, 34-74). Forty-nine percent of the patients would accept a1 in 100 risk of drug-induced death if the corresponding improvements in the Living With Heart Failure score were 20 (interquartile range, 10-25). In contrast, 40% were willing to accept a risk of drug-induced death equal to or greater than 5 in 100 for significantly (P < .001) smaller score improvements of 5 (interquartile range, 5-10). Living With Heart Failure scores that increase with perceived limitations secondary to heart failure tended to be higher, although not significantly (P = .22), in the subgroup that accepted greater risk of drug-induced death: 45 (interquartile range, 34-73) versus 58 (interquartile range, 42-77). A score improvement of 5, which has been commonly observed in clinical trials, would be sufficient reason for 72% of patients to take a medication that did not have side effects or significant costs. A 5-point improvement was less acceptable when costs or risks were associated with therapy: 52% would pay $60 per month and 38% would risk drug-induced death. These data suggest that many patients with heart failure would accept some risk of drug-induced death for improved quality of life. A 5-point improvement in the Living With Heart Failure score may be clinically significant depending on costs and adverse effects. The Living With Heart Failure questionnaire can be used to help patients evaluate the benefits versus risks of medical interventions.

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of peripheral conduit arteries in patients with heart failure.

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of peripheral resistance vessels is abnormal in patients with heart failure, but there are little in vivo data on endothelium-dependent vasodilation of peripheral conduit vessels. This study assessed endothelium-dependent vasodilation of forearm conduit and resistance vessels in normal subjects and patients with heart failure. The effects of intraarterial endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilators on both forearm conduit (brachial artery) and resistance vessels were assessed in 9 patients with New York Heart Association class II-III heart failure and 11 normal subjects of similar age. Brachial artery diameter was measured by two-dimensional, moderate-frequency (8 MHz) ultrasound, and forearm blood flow was measured by strain gauge plethysmography. The endothelium-dependent vasodilator, methacholine (0.3 and 1.5 micrograms/min), increased brachial artery diameter by 7.6 +/- 1.3% and 12.2 +/- 1.5% in normal subjects as compared to 6.9 +/- 2.1% and 10.4 +/- 2.4% in patients with heart failure (P = NS, normal vs heart failure). The endothelium-independent vasodilator, nitroglycerin (0.15 microgram), also produced similar increases in brachial artery diameter in the two groups (8.2 +/- 1.3% in normal subjects vs 11.1 +/- 1.4% in patients with heart failure, P = NS). In contrast, forearm blood flow responses to methacholine were significantly (P < .05) greater in normal subjects (4.1 +/- 0.5 and 9.2 +/- 1.4 mL/min/100 mL forearm volume) than in patients with heart failure (2.0 +/- 0.8 and 5.1 +/- 1.3 mL/min/100 mL forearm volume). Forearm blood flow responses to the endothelium-independent vasodilator, sodium nitroprusside, were similar between the two groups. This study suggests that endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation of the brachial artery is not impaired in patients with class II-III heart failure. This finding contrasts with abnormal endothelium-dependent vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels. These data suggest that there are regional differences in endothelial function in patients with heart failure.

Effects of cardiac transplantation on endothelium-dependent dilation of the peripheral vasculature in congestive heart failure.

Patients with congestive heart failure demonstrate attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the peripheral vasculature, but there are no data regarding the effect of therapies on this abnormality or whether this abnormality is reversible. This study was performed to address the hypothesis that abnormalities in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in heart failure are improved by heart transplantation. Forearm blood flow responses to the intraarterial administration of a dose range of methacholine, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, and nitroprusside, an endothelium-independent vasodilator, were examined in 2 separate protocols. In protocol 1, forearm blood flow responses to methacholine in 14 heart transplant recipients were 5.02 +/- 3.11, 11.55 +/- 7.20 and 11.61 +/- 10.24 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume. These responses were significantly greater than those in 10 patients with heart failure (2.23 +/- 1.22, 4.60 +/- 3.43 and 6.70 +/- 4.91 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume; p < 0.05). In contrast, the responses to nitroprusside were nearly identical in the 2 groups. In protocol 2, six patients were studied before and 4 months (range 1 to 11) after transplantation. Methacholine responses before transplantation were 2.5 +/- 1.3, 5.2 +/- 1.5 and 7.3 +/- 1.5 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume and were significantly improved after transplantation to 5.7 +/- 1.2, 12.1 +/- 3.0 and 14.2 +/- 2.2 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume (p < 0.05). Peak reactive hyperemia responses increased significantly from 19.0 +/- 3.7 to 44.8 +/- 6.4 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume (p < 0.01) after transplantation. These data demonstrate that heart transplantation was associated with a significant improvement in the forearm blood flow responses to methacholine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Impaired forearm vasodilation to hyperosmolal stimuli in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy or to ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) have impaired peripheral vasodilation during exercise. Hyperosmolality is one local stimulus that produces vasodilation during exercise in normal subjects. This study addressed the hypothesis that vasodilation to hyperosmolal stimuli is impaired in patients with CHF. Forearm blood flow responses to intrabrachial artery infusions of isoosmolar (280 mosm/kg) and hyperosmolal (480 and 660 mosm/kg) solutions of saline and glucose were compared in 9 patients with CHF and 13 normal subjects. Forearm blood flow was measured by strain gauge plethysmography. In the normal subjects, hyperosmolal infusions of 480 and 660 mosm/kg increased forearm blood flow by 3.12 +/- 0.40 and 6.80 +/- 0.67 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume, respectively (both p < 0.001 compared with isoosmolal infusions). In contrast, in the patients with CHF, these infusions increased forearm blood flow by 2.19 +/- 0.44 and 4.06 +/- 0.92 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume (p < 0.05 normal vs CHF). The impaired forearm blood flow responses in heart failure occurred despite significantly greater (p < 0.05, normal vs CHF) increases in venous osmolality (17.3 +/- 6.5 vs 9.6 +/- 1.3 mosm/kg for the 660 mosm/kg infusion). There were no differences between groups in forearm venous hematocrit, calcium, and sodium or potassium changes during hyperosmolal infusions. It is concluded that peripheral vasodilation to hyperosmolal stimuli is impaired in patients with CHF.

Plasma endothelin concentrations in humans with end-stage heart failure and after heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Endothelin is an endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor peptide that increases systemic and renal vascular resistance at pathophysiologic concentrations. Recent studies have demonstrated its presence in the circulation and its elevation in animals with congestive heart failure, suggesting that endothelin may contribute to the vasoconstrictive state of heart failure. The current study was designed with two objectives: 1) to demonstrate the elevation of circulating endothelin in patients with heart failure, and 2) to determine the short- and long-term response of endothelin levels after heart transplantation. METHODS: Plasma endothelin concentrations were measured in two patient groups. Group 1 included 24 patients with end-stage heart failure who were studied during evaluation for potential heart transplantation. Group 2 included 12 patients from Group 1 who had had heart transplantation. Plasma endothelin concentrations were measured before and on days 1, 3 and 7 after heart transplantation. Eight of these patients also had levels measured 3 to 12 months later. RESULTS: Plasma endothelin concentrations were significantly elevated in patients with heart failure compared with those in an age-matched control group (11.7 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.8 +/- 0.3 pg/ml). In response to heart transplantation, plasma endothelin concentrations increased further and were sustained during a long-term follow-up. These later changes were associated with a significant increase in arterial pressure and serum creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that endothelin concentrations are increased in patients with heart failure and increase further after heart transplantation. It suggests a possible role for endothelin in the cardiovascular and renal adaptive responses to human heart transplantation.