Hyperthymic temperament predicts neural responsiveness for monetary reward.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthymic temperament is cheerful action orientation, and is suggested to have a protective effect on depressive symptoms. Responsiveness for reward, which is diminished in depressive patients, is suggested to be related to hyperthymic temperament. Moreover, neural hypoactivation in the reward system in depressive patients is well known. However, only a few previous studies have investigated the neurobiological substrate of hyperthymic temperament. We investigated the relationship between hyperthymic temperament and responsiveness to monetary rewards at the neural level. METHODS: Healthy participants performed a modified version of the monetary incentive delay task in a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner. We explored the brain regions where neural responsiveness for monetary reward was predicted by hyperthymic temperament. RESULTS: Brain areas in the reward system were widely activated for reward anticipation. Activation in the left thalamus and left putamen was positively predicted by hyperthymic temperament. Conversely, activation in the ventral striatum and right insula was not modulated by hyperthymic temperament. No region activated for reward outcome was not modulated by hyperthymic temperament. LIMITATIONS: Behavioral responsiveness to reward was not predicted by hyperthymic temperament or neural activity. Moreover, we did not correct P values for multiple regression analysis, considering that this was an exploratory study. CONCLUSIONS: We found a neurobiological foundation for the protective aspect of hyperthymic temperament against depression in the reward system. Our findings suggest that the hyperthymic temperament may modulate attentional or motor responses or optimal selection of behavior based on reward, rather than value representation.

Hyperthymic temperament predicts neural responsiveness for nonmonetary reward.

Aim: Hyperthymic temperament is a cheerful action orientation that is suggested to have a protective effect on depressive symptoms. We recently reported that hyperthymic temperament can positively predict activation of reward-related brain areas in anticipation of monetary rewards, which could serve as a biomarker of hyperthymic temperament. However, the relationship between hyperthymic temperament and neural responsiveness to nonmonetary rewards (i.e., feedback indicating success in a task) remains unclear. Methods: Healthy participants performed a modified monetary incentive delay task inside a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanner. To examine the effect of nonmonetary positive feedback, the participants performed feedback and no-feedback trials. We explored brain regions whose neural responsiveness to nonmonetary rewards was predicted by hyperthymic temperament. Results: There was premotor area activation in anticipation of a nonmonetary reward, which was negatively predicted by hyperthymic temperament. Moreover, brain areas located mainly in the primary somatosensory area and somatosensory association area were activated by performance feedback, which was positively predicted by hyperthymic temperament. Conclusion: We found that hyperthymic temperament is related to neural responsiveness to both monetary and nonmonetary rewards. This may be related to the process of affective regulation in the somatosensory area.

Factors Leading to Improved Gait Function in Patients with Subacute or Chronic Central Nervous System Impairments Who Receive Functional Training with the Robot Suit Hybrid Assistive Limb.

The factors that lead to the improvement of gait function in patients with diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) who use a hybrid assistive limb (HAL) are not yet fully understood. The purpose of the present study was to analyze these factors to determine the prognosis of the patients' gait function. Patients whose CNS disease was within 180 days since onset were designated as the subacute-phase patients, and patients whose disease onset had occurred more than 180 days previously were designated as chronic-phase patients. Fifteen subacute-phase patients and 15 chronic-phase patients were given HAL training. The study analyzed how post-training walking independence in these patients was affected by the following factors: age, disease, lesion area, lower limb function, balance, period until the start of training, number of training sessions, additional rehabilitation, higher-order cognitive dysfunction, HAL model, and the use of a non-weight-bearing walking-aid. In subacute-phase patients, walking independence was related to lower limb function (rs = 0.35). In chronic-phase patients, there was a statistically significant correlation between post-training walking independence and balance (rs = 0.78). In addition, in patients with a severe motor dysfunction that was accompanied by inattention and global cognitive dysfunction, little improvement occurred, even with double-leg model training, because they had difficulty wearing the device. The results demonstrated that the factors that improved walking independence post HAL training differed between patients with subacute- and chronic-stage CNS diseases. The findings may serve as valuable information for future HAL training of patients with CNS diseases.

Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating.

It is important to understand the role of individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC). We investigated the relation between differences in WMC and N1 in event-related brain potentials as a measure of early selective attention for an auditory distractor in three-stimulus oddball tasks that required minimum memory. A high-WMC group (n=13) showed a smaller N1 in response to a distractor and target than did a low-WMC group (n=13) in the novel condition with high distraction. However, in the simple condition with low distraction, there was no difference in N1 between the groups. For all participants (n=52), the correlation between the scores for WMC and N1 peak amplitude was strong for distractors in the novel condition, whereas there was no relation in the simple condition. These results suggest that WMC can predict the interference control for a salient distractor at auditory gating even during a selective attention task.