Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 5254, 2024 03 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438485

RESUMEN

We investigated the effects of acute-phase intensive electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) on physical function in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Consecutive COVID-19 patients requiring IMV admitted to a university hospital ICU between January and April 2022 (EMS therapy group) or between March and September 2021 (age-matched historical control group) were included in this retrospective observational case-control study. EMS was applied to both upper and lower limb muscles for up to 2 weeks in the EMS therapy group. The study population consisted of 16 patients undergoing EMS therapy and 16 age-matched historical controls (median age, 71 years; 81.2% male). The mean period until initiation of EMS therapy after ICU admission was 3.2 ± 1.4 days. The EMS therapy group completed a mean of 6.2 ± 3.7 EMS sessions, and no adverse events occurred. There were no significant differences between the two groups in Medical Research Council sum score (51 vs. 53 points, respectively; P = 0.439) or ICU mobility scale at ICU discharge. Addition of upper and lower limb muscle EMS therapy to an early rehabilitation program did not result in improved physical function at ICU discharge in severe COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Respiración Artificial , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/terapia , Músculos
2.
Circ J ; 88(9): 1360-1371, 2024 Aug 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were divided into groups according to intervention duration (<6 and ≥6 months). We searched for studies published up to July 2023 in Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, without limitations on data, language, or publication status. We included randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of CR and usual care on mortality, prehospitalization, peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2), and quality of life. Seventy-two studies involving 8,495 patients were included in this review. It was found that CR reduced the risk of rehospitalization for any cause (risk ratio [RR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.92) and for heart failure (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-1.00). Furthermore, CR was found to improve exercise tolerance (measured by peak V̇O2and the 6-min walk test) and quality of life. A subanalysis performed based on intervention duration (<6 and ≥6 months) revealed a similar trend. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that although CR does not reduce mortality, it is effective in reducing rehospitalization rates and improving exercise tolerance and quality of life, regardless of the intervention duration.


Asunto(s)
Rehabilitación Cardiaca , Terapia por Ejercicio , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/rehabilitación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Rehabilitación Cardiaca/métodos , Enfermedad Crónica , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Consumo de Oxígeno
3.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 14529, 2023 09 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37666912

RESUMEN

This prospective observational cohort study was performed to investigate the physical function and mental health trajectories of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). The study population consisted of 64 patients (median age, 60 years; 85.9% male; median IMV duration, 9 days). At ICU discharge, 28.1% of the patients had Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score < 48 points, and prolonged IMV was significantly associated with lower MRC sum score and handgrip strength. Symptoms were similar between groups at ICU discharge, and the symptoms most commonly reported as moderate-to-severe were impaired well-being (52%), anxiety (43%), tiredness (41%), and depression (35%). Although muscle strength and mobility status were significantly improved after ICU discharge, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System score did not improve significantly in the prolonged IMV group. EuroQol five-dimension five-level summary index was significantly lower in the prolonged than short IMV group at 6 months after ICU discharge. We found substantial negative physical function and mental health consequences in the majority of surviving COVID-19 patients requiring IMV, with prolonged period of IMV showing greater negative effects not only immediately but also at 6 months after discharge from the ICU.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Salud Mental , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia
4.
J Pers Med ; 13(4)2023 Apr 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37109016

RESUMEN

Impella 5.0 circulatory support via subclavian artery (SA) access may be a safe approach for patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR). In this case series, we retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, physical function, and CR data of six patients who underwent Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA prior to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation between October 2013 and June 2021. The median age was 48 years, and one patient was female. Grip strength was maintained or increased in all patients before LVAD implantation (pre-LVAD) compared to after Impella 5.0 implantation. The pre-LVAD knee extension isometric strength (KEIS) was less than 0.46 kgf/kg in two patients and more than 0.46 kgf/kg in three patients (unavailable KEIS data, n = 1). With Impella 5.0 implantation, two patients could ambulate, one could stand, two could sit on the edge of the bed, and one remained in bed. One patient lost consciousness during CR due to decreased Impella flow. There were no other serious adverse events. Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA allows mobilization, including ambulation, prior to LVAD implantation, and CR can be performed relatively safely.

5.
Circ J ; 87(2): 306-311, 2023 01 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36351594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of delayed ambulation on the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains to be clarified.Methods and Results: The long-term and in-hospital outcomes of 887 patients who underwent isolated CABG (455 off-pump cases, 135 urgent cases) were evaluated, with a focus on the timing of first ambulation. In-hospital mortality cases were excluded. Early ambulation (first ambulation within 3 days after operation) was achieved in 339 (38%) patients. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, longer operation time and urgent case, EuroSCORE II, re-thoracotomy, and respiratory time were associated with delayed (≥4 days) ambulation. Delayed ambulation was associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications, such as pneumonia, and stroke (P<0.01). Following discharge, 22.2% of patients experienced major cardiac events and 13.8% died during the follow-up period (median follow-up 60 months). Cox hazards analysis revealed that delayed ambulation was associated with long-term adverse events (hazard ratio 1.04 per day, P<0.001). With adjustment for preoperative factors, the estimated future risk of adverse events was found to be increased day-by-day during the delay until initial ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: In isolated CABG patients, delayed ambulation was associated with poor outcomes, even in the long-term period. The results support the current guideline recommending early ambulation protocol after cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria Off-Pump , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Humanos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria Off-Pump/efectos adversos , Ambulación Precoz/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Pronóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Disabil Rehabil ; 40(10): 1114-1118, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486829

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Open surgery is performed to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), although the subsequent surgical stress leads to worse physical status. Preoperative self-efficacy has been reported to predict postoperative physical status after orthopedic surgery; however, it has not been sufficiently investigated in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the correlation between preoperative self-efficacy and postoperative six-minute walk distance (6MWD) in open AAA surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients who underwent open AAA surgery were included. Functional exercise capacity was measured using preoperative and 1 week postoperative 6MWD. Self-efficacy was preoperatively measured using self-efficacy for physical activity (SEPA). The correlations of postoperative 6MWD with age, height, BMI, preoperative 6MWD, SEPA, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, operative time, and blood loss were investigated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Single regression analysis showed that postoperative 6MWD was significantly correlated with age (r = -0.553, p ≤ 0.001), height (r = 0.292, p = 0.014), Charlson's comorbidity index (r = -0.268, p = 0.025), preoperative 6MWD (r = 0.572, p ≤ 0.001), SEPA (r = 0.586, p ≤ 0.001), and HADS-depression (r = -0.296, p = 0.013). Multiple regression analysis showed that age (p = 0.002), preoperative 6MWD (p = 0.013), and SEPA (p = 0.043) score were significantly correlated with postoperative 6MWD. CONCLUSIONS: Self-efficacy was an independent predictor for postoperative 6MWD after elective open AAA surgery. This suggests the importance of assessing not only physical status but also psychological factors such as self-efficacy. Implications for Rehabilitation Preoperative self-efficacy has been limited to reports after orthopedic surgery. We showed that preoperative self-efficacy predicted postoperative 6MWD after AAA surgery. Treatment to improve self-efficacy might be useful in patients receiving AAA surgery in rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Autoeficacia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/rehabilitación , Prueba de Paso/métodos , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/psicología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Pronóstico , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA