RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the clinical outcomes of patients with pelvic bone sarcomas treated surgically and those treated with particle beam therapy. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study which compared the clinical outcomes of patients with pelvic bone sarcoma who underwent surgical treatment and particle beam therapy in Japan. METHODS: A total of 116 patients with pelvic bone sarcoma treated at 19 specialized sarcoma centers in Japan were included in this study. Fifty-seven patients underwent surgery (surgery group), and 59 patients underwent particle beam therapy (particle beam group; carbon-ion radiotherapy: 55 patients, proton: four patients). RESULTS: The median age at primary tumor diagnosis was 52 years in the surgery group and 66 years in the particle beam group (P < 0.001), and the median tumor size was 9 cm in the surgery group and 8 cm in the particle beam group (P = 0.091). Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among 116 patients with bone sarcoma (surgery group, 57 patients; particle beam group, 59 patients). After propensity score matching, the 3-year OS, LC, and MFS rates were 82.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.5-93.2%), 66.0% (95% CI, 43.3-81.3%), and 78.4% (95% CI, 55.5-90.5%), respectively, in the surgery group and 64.9% (95% CI, 41.7-80.8%), 86.4% (95% CI, 63.3-95.4%), and 62.6% (95% CI, 38.5-79.4%), respectively, in the particle beam group. In chordoma patients, only surgery was significantly correlated with worse LC in the univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The groups had no significant differences in the OS, LC, and MFS rates. Among the patients with chordomas, the 3-year LC rate in the particle beam group was significantly higher than in the surgery group.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Complete surgical resection with negative margins remains the cornerstone for curative treatment of rectal cancer; however, local recurrence can pose a significant challenge. Herein, we aimed to introduce a novel surgical technique for combined resection of the pubic arch and ischial bone in the context of treating recurrent rectal cancer. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a patient with a fourth local recurrence of rectal cancer, with no evidence of distant metastasis. The tumor directly invaded the posterior wall of the pubic arch. To achieve complete tumor resection, an osteotomy was performed using a thread wire saw at the bilateral pubic rami and ischial bones. Intraoperative frozen section analysis (rapid tissue examination) was conducted on tissue samples from the lateral margins of the planned osteotomy line. Samples were negative for adenocarcinoma (cancerous cells). The combined resection of the pubic arch and ischial bone was successfully performed with negative margins for adenocarcinoma, as confirmed by frozen section analysis. CONCLUSION: Mastery of the surgical technique for combined resection of the pubic arch and ischial bone may be clinically significant for achieving complete resection in cases of multiple resections for locally recurrent rectal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Isquion , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Hueso Púbico , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Hueso Púbico/cirugía , Hueso Púbico/patología , Isquion/cirugía , Isquion/patología , Masculino , Osteotomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , FemeninoRESUMEN
AIM: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to clarify the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who underwent prosthetic replacement reconstruction after lower extremity tumor resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of 27 patients with high-grade STS. The mean follow-up duration after prosthetic replacement was 44.7 months. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 63 years. The mean tumor size was 16 cm. For reconstruction, proximal femur replacement was performed in 15 patients, distal femur replacement in six, and total femur replacement in six. The major complications were infections in nine patients and aseptic loosening in four. Nine patients developed local recurrence. The cause of revision surgery was infection in five patients, aseptic loosening in three, and metal allergy in one. The 5-year prosthetic survival rate was 51.1%. At the final follow-up, amputation was performed in five patients. The 5-year limb salvage rate was 76.8%. The mean functional score of the 25 patients who could be assessed was 16.0 (53%). Of the 27 patients, five were excluded from the survival analysis because they underwent prosthetic replacement for local recurrence. The 5-year overall survival rate in the remaining 22 patients was 45.3%. CONCLUSION: We identified a high rate of surgical complications and poor survival in patients with high-grade STS who underwent tumor resection and reconstruction using prosthetic replacement of the lower extremities, although limb salvage was achieved in 81.5% of the patients. Careful follow-up is needed for surgical complications and oncological events after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Sarcoma , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are rare soft-tissue tumors. Intracranial metastasis from MPNSTs is quite rare. OBSERVATIONS: The authors report on a 73-year-old male whose MPNST metastasized to the brain and a 32-year-old male with leptomeningeal metastasis from MPNST and review 41 cases of MPNST that developed intracranial metastasis, as reported in the literature. LESSONS: Brain metastasis and leptomeningeal metastasis of MPNSTs show different clinical courses and require pathology-specific treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tumor-devitalized autografts treated with deep freezing, pasteurization, and irradiation are biological reconstruction methods after tumor excision for aggressive or malignant bone or soft tissue tumors that involve a major long bone. Tumor-devitalized autografts do not require a bone bank, they carry no risk of viral or bacterial disease transmission, they are associated with a smaller immunologic response, and they have a better shape and size match to the site in which they are implanted. However, they are associated with disadvantages as well; it is not possible to assess margins and tumor necrosis, the devitalized bone is not normal and has limited healing potential, and the biomechanical strength is decreased owing to processing and tumor-related bone loss. Because this technique is not used in many countries, there are few reports on the results of this procedure such as complications, graft survival, and limb function. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What was the rate of complications such as fracture, nonunion, infection, or recurrence in a tumor-devitalized autograft treated with deep freezing, pasteurization, and irradiation, and what factors were associated with the complication? (2) What were the 5-year and 10-year grafted bone survival (free from graft bone removal) of the three methods used to devitalize a tumor-containing autograft, and what factors were associated with grafted bone survival? (3) What was the proportion of patients with union of the tumor-devitalized autograft and what factors were associated with union of the graft-host bone junction? (4) What was the limb function after the tumor-devitalized autograft, and what factors were related to favorable limb function? METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study that included data from 26 tertiary sarcoma centers affiliated with the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. From January 1993 to December 2018, 494 patients with benign or malignant tumors of the long bones were treated with tumor-devitalized autografts (using deep freezing, pasteurization, or irradiation techniques). Patients who were treated with intercalary or composite (an osteoarticular autograft with a total joint arthroplasty) tumor-devitalized autografts and followed for at least 2 years were considered eligible for inclusion. Accordingly, 7% (37 of 494) of the patients were excluded because they died within 2 years; in 19% (96), an osteoarticular graft was used, and another 10% (51) were lost to follow-up or had incomplete datasets. We did not collect information on those who died or were lost to follow-up. Considering this, 63% of the patients (310 of 494) were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 92 months (range 24 to 348 months), the median age was 27 years (range 4 to 84), and 48% (148 of 310) were female; freezing was performed for 47% (147) of patients, pasteurization for 29% (89), and irradiation for 24% (74). The primary endpoints of this study were the cumulative incidence rate of complications and the cumulative survival of grafted bone, assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. We used the classification of complications and graft failures proposed by the International Society of Limb Salvage. Factors relating to complications and grafted autograft removal were analyzed. The secondary endpoints were the proportion of bony union and better limb function, evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. Factors relating to bony union and limb function were also analyzed. Data were investigated in each center by a record review and transferred to Kanazawa University. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence rate of any complication was 42% at 5 years and 51% at 10 years. The most frequent complications were nonunion in 36 patients and infection in 34 patients. Long resection (≥ 15 cm) was associated with an increased risk of any complication based on the multivariate analyses (RR 1.8 [95% CI 1.3 to 2.5]; p < 0.01). There was no difference in the rate of complications among the three devitalizing methods. The cumulative graft survival rates were 87% at 5 years and 81% at 10 years. After controlling for potential confounding variables including sex, resection length, reconstruction type, procedure type, and chemotherapy, we found that long resection (≥ 15 cm) and composite reconstruction were associated with an increased risk of grafted autograft removal (RR 2.5 [95% CI 1.4 to 4.5]; p < 0.01 and RR 2.3 [95% CI 1.3 to 4.1]; p < 0.01). The pedicle freezing procedure showed better graft survival than the extracorporeal devitalizing procedures (94% versus 85% in 5 years; RR 3.1 [95% CI 1.1 to 9.0]; p = 0.03). No difference was observed in graft survival among the three devitalizing methods. Further, 78% (156 of 200 patients) of patients in the intercalary group and 87% (39 of 45 patients) of those in the composite group achieved primary union within 2 years. Male sex and the use of nonvascularized grafts were associated with an increased risk of nonunion (RR 2.8 [95% CI 1.3 to 6.1]; p < 0.01 and 0.28 [95% CI 0.1 to 1.0]; p = 0.04, respectively) in the intercalary group after controlling for confounding variables, including sex, site, chemotherapy, resection length, graft type, operation time, and fixation type. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 83% (range 12% to 100%). After controlling for confounding variables including age, site, resection length, event occurrence, and graft removal, age younger than 40 years (RR 2.0 [95% CI 1.1 to 3.7]; p = 0.03), tibia (RR 6.9 [95% CI 2.7 to 17.5]; p < 0.01), femur (RR 4.8 [95% CI 1.9 to 11.7]; p < 0.01), no event (RR 2.2 [95% CI 1.1 to 4.5]; p = 0.03), and no graft removal (RR 2.9 [95% CI 1.2 to 7.3]; p = 0.03) were associated with an increased limb function. The composite graft was associated with decreased limb function (RR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2 to 0.7]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study revealed that frozen, irradiated, and pasteurized tumor-bearing autografts had similar rates of complications and graft survival and all resulted in similar limb function. The recurrence rate was 10%; however, no tumor recurred with the devitalized autograft. The pedicle freezing procedure reduces the osteotomy site, which may contribute to better graft survival. Furthermore, tumor-devitalized autografts had reasonable survival and favorable limb function, which are comparable to findings reported for bone allografts. Overall, tumor-devitalized autografts are a useful option for biological reconstruction and are suitable for osteoblastic tumors or osteolytic tumors without severe loss of mechanical bone strength. Tumor-devitalized autografts could be considered when obtaining allografts is difficult and when a patient is unwilling to have a tumor prosthesis and allograft for various reasons such as cost or socioreligious reasons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Autoinjertos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Japón , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction after periacetabular bone tumor resection involves important tradeoffs; large bone grafts or endoprostheses are reported to offer fair walking function in general but can be technically demanding and carry a high risk of severe complications. Conversely, hip transposition avoids implant-related risks, but stability and functional return may be less consistent. Fewer studies are available on hip transposition, which is also appealing in more resource-constrained environments, and little is known about the time course from surgery to functional return after hip transposition. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the time course of recovery of walking function after hip transposition, especially in the first 6 months? (2) What factors are associated with a greater likelihood of early functional recovery? (3) Is early (2-month) functional recovery associated with a greater likelihood of walking ability and higher Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores? METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, six tertiary care centers in Japan treated 48 patients with internal hemipelvectomy for malignant tumors. During that time, the preferred reconstructive approach was hip transposition, and 92% (44 of 48) of our patients were treated with this procedure. Among them, 86% (38 of 44) had follow-up of at least 6 months, had no local recurrence during that time, and were included in our retrospective study. We chose 6 months as the minimum follow-up duration because the endpoints in this study pertained to early recovery rather than reconstructive durability. Hip transposition involved moving the proximal end of the femur (femoral head, resection end of the trochanteric area, and spacers such as prostheses) upward to the underside of the resected ilium or the lateral side of the sacrum if sacroiliac joint resection was performed. The end of the proximal femur was stabilized to the remaining ilium or sacrum using polyethylene tape, polyethylene terephthalate mesh, an iliotibial tract graft, or an external fixator, according to the surgeon's preference. The median age at surgery was 46 years (range 9 to 76 years), there were 23 women and 15 men, and the median follow-up duration was 17 months (range 6 to 110 months). The postoperative time course of functional recovery was assessed with a record review, the timing of functional milestones was identified (wheelchair, walker, bilateral crutches, single crutch or cane, and walking without an aid), and the MSTS score at the final follow-up was assessed. Additionally, demographic and surgical factors were reviewed, and their association with short-term functional recovery and the final functional outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients started using a walker at median postoperative day (POD) 20 (IQR 14 to 36) and with bilateral crutches at median POD 35 (IQR 20 to 57). At POD 60, which was the approximate median date of discharge, 76% (29 of 38) of patients were able to walk using bilateral crutches (the early recovery group) and 24% (nine of 38) of patients were not able to do so (the delayed recovery group). No baseline factors were different between the two groups. The early recovery group had a higher median MSTS score than the delayed recovery group: 57% (range 17% to 90%) versus 45% (13% to 57%) (p = 0.047). Moreover, more patients acquired better function (a single crutch or cane or more) in the early recovery group, with a median of 5 months (95% CI 4 to 11) than did those in the delayed recovery group (median not reached) (p = 0.0006). The HR was 15.2 (95% CI 2.5 to 93). Forty-two percent (16 of 38) underwent additional surgery for wound management. CONCLUSION: It took patients a fair amount of time to recover walking function after hip transposition, and patients who could not walk on bilateral crutches at POD 60 seemed less likely to regain walking function and were likely to have lower MSTS scores thereafter. Wound-related complications were frequent. This method may be a realistic alternative for younger patients who have the strength for a long rehabilitation period or those who want to minimize prosthesis-related complications. Future studies with more patients are necessary to understand the risk factors associated with delayed recovery.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Neoplasias Óseas , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , CaminataRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare type of malignancy comprising a variety of histological diagnoses. Chemotherapy constitutes the standard treatment for advanced STS. Doxorubicin-based regimens, which include the administration of doxorubicin alone or in combination with ifosfamide or dacarbazine, are widely accepted as first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS. Trabectedin, eribulin, pazopanib, and gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD), which is the empirical standard therapy in Japan, are major candidates for second-line chemotherapy for advanced STS, although clear evidence of the superiority of any one regimen is lacking. The Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) conducts this trial to select the most promising regimen among trabectedin, eribulin, and pazopanib for comparison with GD as the test arm regimen in a future phase III trial of second-line treatment for patients with advanced STS. METHODS: The JCOG1802 study is a multicenter, selection design, randomized phase II trial comparing trabectedin (1.2 mg/m2 intravenously, every 3 weeks), eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks), and pazopanib (800 mg orally, every day) in patients with unresectable or metastatic STS refractory to doxorubicin-based first-line chemotherapy. The principal eligibility criteria are patients aged 16 years or above; unresectable and/or metastatic STS; exacerbation within 6 months prior to registration; histopathological diagnosis of STS other than Ewing sarcoma, embryonal/alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma and myxoid liposarcoma; prior doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for STS, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-control rate, response rate, and adverse events. The total planned sample size to correctly select the most promising regimen with a probability of > 80% is 120. Thirty-seven institutions in Japan will participate at the start of this trial. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized trial to evaluate trabectedin, eribulin, and pazopanib as second-line therapies for advanced STS. We endeavor to perform a subsequent phase III trial comparing the best regimen selected by this study (JCOG1802) with GD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( jRCTs031190152 ) on December 5, 2019.
Asunto(s)
Liposarcoma Mixoide , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Adulto , Trabectedina/uso terapéutico , Japón , Sarcoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Gemcitabina , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Oncología Médica , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como AsuntoRESUMEN
The purpose to the present study is to research the association between age at surgery and survival outcomes of patients with sarcoma in head and neck. Twenty-six patients with head and neck sarcoma who underwent by surgery from 2003 to 2017 were enrolled in the present observation study. Patients who did not undergo chemotherapy were significantly older age at surgery by Mann-Whitney U test. Fifty-five was the cutoff age that predicted death by receiver operating curve analysis. Shorter survival rates of overall, disease-specific, local recurrence-free and disease-free were associated with older age by log-rank test. Age (≥55 years/<55 years) was correlated with shorter overall survival by multivariate analysis of Cox's proportional hazards model adjusting with chemotherapy (absence/presence). In conclusion, older age predicts worse overall survival in head and neck sarcoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Sarcoma , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to demonstrate surgical operative approach of total pelvic exenteration combined with sacral resection with rectal cancer and elucidate the relationships between the level of sacral resection and short-term outcomes. METHODS: Twenty cases were selected. Data regarding sex, age, body mass index, neoadjuvant therapy, location of sacral resection ("Upper" or "Lower" relative to the level between the 3rd and 4th sacral segment), operative time, bleeding, and curability (R0/R1) were collected and compared to determine their association with complications exhibiting a Clavien-Dindo grade III. RESULTS: The complication rate was significantly higher for recurrent cancers (n = 10, 76.9%) than for primary cancers (n = 1, 14.3%) (P = .007), and for "Upper" resection (n = 8, 72.7%) than for "Lower" resection (n = 3, 33.3%) (P = .078). Significant differences were observed when complication rates for "Lower" and primary cancer resection (n = 3, .0%) were compared between "Upper" and recurrent cancers (n = 8, 100.0%) (P = .007). CONCLUSION: In patients with recurrent rectal cancer, "Upper" sacral resection during total pelvic exenteration is associated with a high complication rate, highlighting the need for careful monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Exenteración Pélvica , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Región Sacrococcígea , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Affinos (Kuraray, Japan) is a ß-tricalcium phosphate bone substitute with a unidirectional porous structure. This study aimed to investigate its efficacy on the healing process after filling for bone defects. Fifty-six patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into cohort 1 (n = 30), including bones other than phalanges and metacarpal/tarsal bones, and cohort 2 (n = 26), including phalanges and metacarpal/tarsal bones. Semi-quantified scores for material resorption and trabeculation through the defect were evaluated with radiographs after surgery. In some patients, levels of bone metabolic markers were assessed. The values of resorption and trabeculation increased steadily with time, and trabeculation progressed compared with resorption in both cohorts. In cohort 1, multiple regression analyses showed that the diaphyseal lesion, smaller defect volume, and increased resorption values at 3 months were associated with increased values of resorption 12 months after surgery (R2 = 0.66, p < 0.001). The trabeculation values at 2 months were positively related to the trabeculation values 12 months after surgery (R2 = 0.35, p = 0.002). In cohort 2, the increased resorption values at 2 months and smaller defect volume significantly correlated with the increased resorption values 12 months after surgery (R2 = 0.58, p < 0.001). The ratio from the baseline of pyridinoline cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen at 3 months was negatively associated with the trabeculation values 12 months after surgery (R = - 0.791, p = 0.004). Evaluation of radiographic images and bone metabolic markers in the early postoperative period may predict the healing status at 12 months postoperatively in the defects followed by Affinos filling.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Óseas , Sustitutos de Huesos , Enfermedades de los Cartílagos , Enfermedades Óseas/cirugía , Fosfatos de Calcio , Colágeno Tipo I , Humanos , Porosidad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The high rate of aseptic loosening of cemented stems has led to their frequent use in endoprosthetic reconstruction. However, problems, such as stem breakage and stress shielding at the insertion site, remain. The Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group (JMOG) has developed Kyocera Modular Limb Salvage System (KMLS) cementless stems with a unique tapered press-fit and short fixation design. This study aimed to clarify the short-term postoperative outcomes of this prosthesis and validate the stem design. METHODS: One hundred cases of KMLS cementless stems (51 male patients; median age, 49 years; mean follow-up period, 35 months), with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, for the proximal femur (PF), distal femur (DF), and proximal tibia were prospectively registered for use. Prosthesis survival, complication rates, postoperative functional, and radiographical evaluation were analyzed. Complications or failures after insertion of the KMLS endoprostheses were classified into five types and functional results were analyzed according to the MSTS scoring system at postoperative 1 year. The diaphyseal interface and anchorage were graded by the ISOLS system at postoperative 2 years. RESULTS: The overall prosthesis survival rates at 2 and 4 years were 88.2 and 79.6%, respectively. The prosthesis-specific survival rate excluding infection and tumor recurrence was 90.2 and 87.9%, respectively. Younger age (p = 0.045) and primary tumor (p = 0.057) were associated with poor prognosis of prosthesis-specific survival excluding infection and tumor recurrence. Complications were observed in 31 patients, 13 patients underwent revision surgery. The mean MSTS functional score at 1 year postoperatively was 68%. Early implant loosening was significantly more common in the DF (p = 0.006) and PF/DF straight stem (p = 0.038). The ISOLS radiographic evaluation at 2 years after surgery revealed good bone remodeling and anchorage in most cases (bone remodeling: 90% / excellent and good, anchorage: 97% / excellent and good). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor endoprosthesis long-term fixation to the diaphysis of the lower extremity remains challenging. The KMLS cementless stem with a unique tapered press fit design showed good short-term results in maintaining bone stock. To prevent early loosening, a curved stem should be used in PF and DF, but long-term follow-up is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Recuperación del Miembro , Falla de Prótesis , Humanos , Japón , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Extremidad Inferior , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Diseño de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This randomised phase II/III trial aimed to determine whether perioperative chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD) is non-inferior to the standard Adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS: Patients with localised high-risk STS in the extremities or trunk were randomised to receive AI or GD. The treatments were repeated for three preoperative and two postoperative courses. The primary endpoint was OS. RESULTS: Among 143 enrolled patients who received AI (70 patients) compared to GD (73 patients), the estimated 3-year OS was 91.4% for AI and 79.2% for GD (hazard ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.80-8.14, P = 0.78), exceeding the prespecified non-inferiority margin in the second interim analysis. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival was 79.1% for AI and 59.1% for GD. The most common Grade 3-4 adverse events in the preoperative period were neutropenia (88.4%), anaemia (49.3%), and febrile neutropenia (36.2%) for AI and neutropenia (79.5%) and febrile neutropenia (17.8%) for GD. CONCLUSIONS: Although GD had relatively mild toxicity, the regimen-as administered in this study-should not be considered a standard treatment of perioperative chemotherapy for high-risk STS in the extremities and trunk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCTs031180003.
Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina , Humanos , Ifosfamida/efectos adversos , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/cirugía , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with pelvic and retroperitoneal bone and soft tissue sarcoma (BSTS). Overall, 187 patients with BSTS in the pelvis and retroperitoneal region treated at 19 specialized sarcoma centers in Japan were included. The prognostic factors related to overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. The 3-year OS and LC rates in the 187 patients were 71.7% and 79.1%, respectively. The 3-year PFS in 166 patients without any distant metastases at the time of primary tumor diagnosis was 48.6%. Osteosarcoma showed significantly worse OS and PFS than other sarcomas of the pelvis and retroperitoneum. In the univariate analyses, larger primary tumor size, soft tissue tumor, distant metastasis at the time of primary tumor diagnosis, P2 location, chemotherapy, and osteosarcoma were poor prognostic factors correlated with OS. Larger primary tumor size, higher age, soft tissue tumor, chemotherapy, and osteosarcoma were poor prognostic factors correlated with PFS in patients without any metastasis at the initial presentation. Larger primary tumor size was the only poor prognostic factor correlation with LC. This study has clarified the epidemiology and prognosis of patients with pelvic and retroperitoneal BSTS in Japan.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of JCOG1610 (randomized controlled phase III trial) was to confirm the superiority of preoperative denosumab to curettage with adjuvant local therapy for patients with giant cell tumor of bone without possible post-operative large bone defect. METHODS: The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival and the total sample size was set at 106 patients. Patient accrual began in October 2017. However, the accrual was terminated in December 2020 due to a recommendation from the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee because of poor patient accrual. Now, we report the descriptive results obtained in this study. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients had been registered from 13 Japanese institutions at the time of termination on December 2020. Eleven patients were assigned to Arm A (curettage and adjuvant local therapy) and 7 to Arm B (preoperative denosumab, curettage and adjuvant local therapy). Median follow-up period was 1.6 (range: 0.5-2.8) years. Protocol treatment was completed in all but one patient in Arm A who had a pathological fracture before surgery. All patients in Arm B were treated with five courses of preoperative denosumab. Relapse-free survival proportions in Arm A and B were 90.0% (95% confidence interval: 47.3-98.5) and 100% (100-100) at 1 year, and 60.0% (19.0-85.5) and 62.5% (14.2-89.3) at 2 years, respectively [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.51 (0.24-9.41)]. CONCLUSION: In terms of relapse-free survival, the superiority of preoperative denosumab was not observed in patients with giant cell tumor of bone without possible post-operative large bone defect.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Denosumab , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Legrado , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
Chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary malignant bone tumor. In this multicenter study, we sought to evaluate the disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and prognostic factors in patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DDCS) or grade 3 chondrosarcoma (G3CS) in Japan. We retrospectively investigated the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in 62 patients with DDCS and 19 patients with G3CS at 15 institutions participating in the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. We also clarified significant clinicopathological factors for oncological outcomes. In surgery for primary lesions aimed at cure, a histologically negative margin (R0) was obtained in 93% (14/15) of patients with G3CS and 100% (49/49) of patients with DDCS. The 5-year DSS was 18.5% in patients with DDCS and 41.7% in patients with G3CS (p = 0.13). Local control was obtained in 80% (12/15) and 79.6% (39/49) of patients with G3CS and DDCS in the primary lesion after surgery with a wide surgical margin, respectively. In multivariate analysis, stage and no treatment/palliative treatment for the primary lesion were independent prognostic factors for DSS of DDCS, and age and no treatment/palliative treatment for DSS of G3CS. The 5-year DFS rate was 22.8% in 26 patients with DDCS who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, and 21.4% in 14 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The prognosis of DDCS remains poor, although R0 resection was carried out in most cases. Effective and/or intensive chemotherapeutic regimens or agents should be considered or developed for patients with high-grade chondrosarcoma, particularly for those with DDCS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Condrosarcoma , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Condrosarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Condrosarcoma/patología , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: These clinical practice guidelines are intended to provide recommendations based on the best evidence obtained to date on key issues in clinical practice to improve the prognosis, diagnostic and therapeutic processes for patients with soft tissue tumors. METHODS: The Guidelines Development Committee and Systematic Review Committee were composed of a multidisciplinary team of specialists who play an important role in soft tissue tumor care. Clinical questions (CQs) were determined by choosing key decision-making points based on Algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors. The guidelines were developed according to the "Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014" and "Minds Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2017." Recommendation strength was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations were decided based on agreement by 70% or more voters. RESULTS: Twenty-two CQs were chosen by the Guidelines Development Committee. The Systematic Review Committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ, a clinical value judgment was added by experts, and the text of each recommendation was determined. CONCLUSION: We established 22 CQs and recommendations for key decision-making points in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors according to the Minds Clinical Practice Guideline development methods. We hope that these guidelines will assist the decision-making of all medical staff engaged in the treatment and diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, and eventually lead to improved soft tissue tumor care in the country.
Asunto(s)
Ortopedia , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Algoritmos , Humanos , Japón , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The distal femur is a common site of bone tumors. After surgical resection, prosthetic replacement is a major reconstruction method. We aimed to elucidate the long-term outcomes of the Kyocera Modular Limb Salvage (KMLS) systems after resection of tumors in the distal part of the femur. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2014, 125 patients were treated at 14 institutions. There were 59 males and 66 females, with a mean age of 35 years. The mean follow-up period was 132 months. RESULTS: There had been 65 additional surgeries, including 56 revisions and 9 amputations: 15 for aseptic loosening, 14 for stem breakage, 13 for deep infection, 13 for rotator-hinge bushing failure, 5 for local recurrence, and 5 for others. Implant survival rates at 10 and 15 years were 58.5% and 39.4%. The cumulative incidence of 15-year revision for femoral stem breakage was 31.7% in patients with cementless fixation. The 15-year cumulative incidence of revision for aseptic loosening was 19.8% in patients with cement fixation. CONCLUSIONS: KMLS systems represent a reliable system with long-term results. Stem breakage should be considered in patients with cementless and/or smaller femoral stem sizes. Aseptic loosening should be considered in patients with cement systems after 10 years.
RESUMEN
Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare, and little is known about the factors that affect the delays in the initial treatment. The aim of this study is to quantify the period between onset of symptoms and start of treatment of STS and determine the factors affecting delays in initial treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective study of all STS treated in our institution between October 2009 and March 2019. We analysed patient record to determine the period from onset of symptoms to start of initial treatment. We also collected data with regard to patient characteristics and features of the tumour. Tumours were classified into upper extremity, lower extremity, trunk and others based on location of the tumour. Statistical tests were done to identify factors that affected delay in initial treatment. Results: The study included 134 patients (76 male and 58 female) with STS with an average age of 56.6 years. The tumours involved the upper extremity in 20 patients, lower extremity and trunk in 50 patients each and other areas in 14 patients. The most frequent histological subtypes were liposarcomas (n = 31, 23.5%) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (n = 24, 18.2%). Initial treatment was delayed by an average of 9.9 months for all groups. The period of treatment delay for tumours involving the upper extremity was shorter (7.9 months) and these tumours were smaller at initial presentation (57.6 mm) compared to tumours in other locations (p < 0.05). Other factors that were positively associated with treatment delays were a history of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.037) and smoking (p = 0.026). Conclusion: Patients with upper-extremity STS may have the benefit of a relatively better prognosis as they present earlier and with a smaller tumour. In addition, factors, such as diabetes and smoking, which indicate a low interest in health also influenced the delay in the initial treatment. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).
Asunto(s)
Liposarcoma , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Sarcoma/epidemiología , Sarcoma/terapia , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This systematic review assessed and compared the efficacy of marginal resection to wide resection in patients with atypical lipomatous tumours (ALT) by evaluating the local recurrence rates, overall survival and adverse event rates. METHODS: We evaluated studies published between 1 January 1990 and 31 January 2019. The risks of bias in the selected studies were analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Three case-control studies and three case series studies were identified. A meta-analysis was performed of six studies to evaluate the local recurrence rate after resection. Comparison of marginal and wide resections showed that the local recurrence rate was not significantly higher in the marginal resection group (14.2 and 1.4%, odds ratio: 2.88, 95% confidence interval 0.99-8.33, P = 0.05). We observed no difference in overall survival. In one study, the rates of adverse events were 14.7% in the marginal resection group and 45.4% in the wide treatment group (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.11-80.91, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our analyses, five of six studies reported no recurrence for wide resection, compared to three to seven recurrences in the marginal resection group. One study reported only one case of recurrence for wide resection. Because ALT has a relatively good prognosis, the use of marginal resection is acceptable to preserve musculoskeletal function.
Asunto(s)
Liposarcoma , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Extremidades , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , TorsoRESUMEN
In recent years, denosumab has been used to treat giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) not only in cases where surgery is complicated but also preoperatively to decrease the preoperative grade or to facilitate surgery for Campanacci grade II and III cases. However, there are no clear protocols regarding the preoperative use of denosumab before en bloc resection. There are a few reports of recurrent cases after en bloc resection; however, the association with the use of denosumab is unknown. We present the clinical, radiological and histopathological findings of a case of Campanacci grade III GCTB at the distal end of the ulna, which resulted in soft tissue recurrence after en bloc resection with the preoperative use of denosumab.