Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0300840, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Centralization of cancer care increases survival but increases the travel burden (i.e., travel durations, distances, and expenditures) in visiting hospitals. This study investigated the travel burdens to access cancer care for children aged 18 years and younger in Japan. METHODS: The study population comprised 10,709 patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019 obtained from a national population-based cancer registry in Japan. Their residences were classified as urban or rural. We counted the number of patients treated at specialized hospitals and investigated the treatment centralization across diagnostic groups by Pareto plot. Travel burdens to access care were estimated using a route-planner web service and summarized using median values. A multivariable logistic model was performed to investigate factors associated with the events of car travel duration exceeding 1 h. RESULTS: Of the patients, 76.7% lived in urban areas, and 82.5% received treatment in designated hospitals for childhood cancer. The Pareto plot suggested that the top five hospitals treated 63.5% of patients with retinoblastoma. The estimated travel burdens for all patients were 0.62 h (0.57 h in urban areas and 1.00 h in rural areas), 16.9 km, and 0.0 dollars of toll charges. Regarding travel duration, 21.7% of patients had travel exceeding 1 h, and rural areas, retinoblastoma, malignant bone tumors, and childhood cancer-hub hospitals were associated with travel duration exceeding 1 h (adjusted odds ratios of 6.93, 3.59, 1.94, and 1.91, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were treated in specialized hospitals and the treatments for specific diseases were centralized. However, most patients were estimated to travel less than 1 h, and the travel burden tended to increase for patients in rural areas, those with specific diseases, and those going to specialized hospitals. Cancer control measures in Japan have steadily improved centralized treatment while keeping the travel burden relatively manageable.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Retina , Retinoblastoma , Niño , Humanos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Japón/epidemiología , Viaje , Sistema de Registros
2.
Nagoya J Med Sci ; 85(3): 542-554, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37829484

RESUMEN

Centralization of childhood cancer treatment in specialized hospitals is necessary for quality treatment and care, but imposes a time and cost burden for patients and their families. We investigated the 20-year trend in the patients' car travel burden to reach cancer-care hospitals in Aichi Prefecture, Japan. From the Aichi population-based cancer registry data, 1,741 cases diagnosed in 1998-2017 under 15 years of age were extracted and assigned to three treatment groups: invasive treatment (n = 697), radiotherapy (n = 371), or chemotherapy groups (n = 1,462), allowing for duplicate assignment. Their travels to access each treatment hospital were estimated and summarized as the estimated travel times (ETT), estimated travel distances (ETD), and direct distances (DD). The ETTs were compared using the Brunner-Munzel test. The average cases per year for each hospital were plotted. The annual trends during 1998-2017 on ETT, ETD, and DD were investigated using Joinpoint regression models. The ETTs were 0.38-0.45 hours on median for three periods (1998-2005, 2006-2012, and 2013-2017) in three treatment groups and increased by 0.02-0.07 hours from 2006-2012 to 2013-2017, with a statistically significant difference in the radiotherapy group (0.07 hours, P = 0.037). The average cases per year increased for the top hospital in each group, and regression model analyses showed no joinpoint on the annual median trend. In conclusion, the increases in travel times were small and not considered clinically significant, and treatment centralization was observed from 2006-2012 to 2013-2017.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Datos de Salud Recolectados Rutinariamente , Humanos , Niño , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Hospitales , Factores de Tiempo , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36981965

RESUMEN

This retrospective study investigated the 3-year impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE) of 2011 on deaths due to neoplasm, heart disease, stroke, pneumonia, and senility among older adults in the primarily affected prefectures compared with other prefectures, previous investigations having been more limited as regards mortality causes and geographic areas. Using death certificates issued between 2006 and 2015 (n = 7,383,253), mortality rates (MRs) and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using a linear mixed model with the log-transformed MR as the response variable. The model included interactions between the area category and each year of death from 2010 to 2013. The RRs in the interaction significantly increased to 1.13, 1.17, and 1.28 for deaths due to stroke, pneumonia, and senility, respectively, in Miyagi Prefecture in 2011, but did not significantly increase for any of the other areas affected by the GEJE. Moreover, increased RRs were not reported for any of the other years. The risk of death increased in 2011; however, this was only significant for single-year impact. In 2013, decreased RRs of pneumonia in the Miyagi and Iwate prefectures and of senility in Fukushima Prefecture were observed. Overall, we did not find evidence of strong associations between the GEJE and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Terremotos , Neumonía , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Causas de Muerte , Japón/epidemiología , Tsunamis
4.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi ; 70(3): 163-170, 2023 Mar 23.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36775291

RESUMEN

Worldwide, research based on geographic information of official statistical data, including cancer registries, is utilized for cancer control and public health policies. The National Cancer Registry of Japan was launched in 2016, making it possible to use data on cancer incidence systematically. Given the nature of this comprehensive survey, the usefulness of the National Cancer Registry would be further enhanced when it is utilized at small-regional levels, such as in municipalities or even smaller geographical units. It is essential to maintain a balance between privacy protection and data usability. Currently, the national and prefectural councils determine the availability of the data from the National Cancer Registry at the small-regional level on an individual application basis. Under this framework, use of the data is often restricted or declined. This paper showcases three model countries where geographic information obtained from cancer registry data are widely utilized: the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. It further discusses measures to ensure that data are effectively used, without compromising data privacy. In the three countries, data-providing systems have been established to compile the necessary data from the cancer registry and other linked databases, in accordance with the purpose of use. The relationships between healthcare access and various outcomes are elaborately examined at the small-regional level. In Japan, similar utilization of data has not been fully implemented, and there remain many hurdles to the application of the data use. For the National Cancer Registry to promote research and further enhance cancer control, it is necessary to establish a system that enables effective and safe utilization of the data from the National Cancer Registry, including linkage with other data and on-site use.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Japón/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Privacidad , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud
5.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0272285, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35913902

RESUMEN

The 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake (within Fukushima, Iwate, and Miyagi prefectures) was a complex disaster; it caused a tsunami and the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, resulting in radiation exposure. This study investigated the earthquake's effects on the migration patterns of pregnant women and their concerns regarding radiation exposure. We also considered the following large-scale earthquakes without radiation exposure: Great Hanshin-Awaji (Hyogo prefecture), Niigata-Chuetsu, and Kumamoto. Pregnant women were categorized as outflow and inflow pregnant women. Data on the annual number of births three years before and after the earthquake were used as a denominator to calculate the outflow and inflow rates per 100 births. The odds ratios of annual outflow and inflow rates after the earthquake, using three years before the earthquake as the baseline, were calculated. The odds-ratio for outflow significantly increased for Hyogo, Fukushima, Miyagi, and Kumamoto prefectures after the earthquake, particularly for Fukushima, showing a significant increase until three years post the Great East Japan Earthquake (disaster year: odds-ratio: 2.66 [95% confidence interval: 2.44-2.90], 1 year post: 1.37 [1.23-1.52], 2 years post: 1.13 [1.00-1.26], 3 years post: 1.18 [1.05-1.31]), while the remaining three prefectures reported limited increases post one year. The inflow decreased after the earthquake, particularly in Fukushima, showing a significant decrease until 2 years post the Great East Japan Earthquake (disaster year: 0.58 [0.53-0.63], 1 year post: 0.76 [0.71-0.82], 2 years post: 0.83 [0.77-0.89]). Thus, pregnant women's migration patterns changed after large-scale earthquakes, suggesting radiation exposure concerns possibly have a significant effects. These results suggested that plans for receiving assistance and support that considers the peculiarities of disaster related damage and pregnant women's migration patterns are needed in both the affected and non-affected areas.


Asunto(s)
Terremotos , Accidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Exposición a la Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Parto , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Tsunamis
6.
Oncologist ; 26(5): e735-e741, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33604941

RESUMEN

LESSONS LEARNED: The 3-year disease-free survival rate of the twice-daily regimen was not inferior to that of the conventional three-times-daily regimen, and the twice-daily regimen did not lead to an increase in adverse events. The effectiveness of the twice-daily regimen highlights an increased number of treatment options for patients. This will facilitate personalized medicine, particularly for elderly or frail patients who may experience more severe side effects from the combination therapy. BACKGROUND: Tegafur-uracil (UFT)/leucovorin calcium (LV) is an adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for colorectal cancer. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to assess the noninferiority of a twice-daily compared with a three-times-daily UFT/LV regimen for stage II/III colorectal cancer in an adjuvant setting. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to group A (three doses of UFT [300 mg/m2 per day]/LV [75 mg per day]) or B (two doses of UFT [300 mg/m2 per day]/LV [50 mg per day]). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS: In total, 386 patients were enrolled between July 28, 2011, and September 27, 2013. The 3-year disease-free survival rates of group A (n = 194) and B (n = 192) were 79.4% and 81.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.6-84.4-74.5-85.9), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events in group A and B were diarrhea (3.9% vs. 7.3%), neutropenia (2.9% vs. 1.6%), increase in aspartate aminotransferase (4.0% vs. 3.9%), increase in alanine aminotransferase (6.2% vs. 6.8%), nausea (1.7% vs. 3.4%), and fatigue (1.1% vs. 2.3%). CONCLUSION: Group B outcomes were not inferior to group A outcomes, and adverse events did not increase.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Tegafur , Administración Oral , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Calcio , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Humanos , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Uracilo/efectos adversos
7.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 21(6): 1725-1730, 2020 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32592370

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In 2013, 15 childhood cancer hub hospitals in Japan were designated to provide quality medical treatment and care. The present study assessed hospital accessibility by investigating travel times and distances from patient residences. METHODS: A total of 37,309 residence/hospital pairs were generated using the addresses of 15 hub hospitals that were designated in 2019 and local government offices in 2014. Using the Google Directions Application Programming Interface (API), travel times and distances were calculated on the assumption that each patient would arrive by driving to the hospitals by 10 am on Wednesday, November 6, 2019. Thus, after identifying the nearest hospital for each residence and deriving adjusted estimated travel times (AETT), the data were summarized according to the regional block using weighted population descriptive statistics for children under 15 years of age in 2015. The cumulative distribution functions of the weighted mean of AETT were also plotted. RESULTS: Childhood cancer patients could access the nearest hub hospital by traveling approximately 1.78 hours (AETT, range: 0.1 to 41.8) and 91.86 km (range: 1.0 to 1438.0). Moreover, a total of 94.5% of patients had the nearest hub hospital within their own regional block. The cumulative distribution functions of AETT indicated that many children in three blocks with multiple hub hospitals have shorter travel times and better hospital accessibility than those in other blocks. CONCLUSIONS: Although feasibility is ultimately dependent on each patient's condition and situation, child cancer patients on average can likely complete hospital visits from home and return within a single day. However, this is likely not the case for children who live at considerable distances from hub hospitals. We found regional differences in travel times and distances, depending on whether a given block contained multiple hub hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Factores de Tiempo
8.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 29(5): 722-728, 2019 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31317181

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of Eurolung risk models in a Japanese population and assess their utility as predictive indicators for the prognosis. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2014, 612 anatomic lung resections were performed among 694 lung cancer patients in our institution. We analysed the cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality and compared them with the predicted results. We also investigated the association between the Eurolung aggregate risk scores and the long-term outcomes using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The percentage of cardiopulmonary complications was lower than that predicted by Eurolung 1 (22.4% vs 24.6%). The mortality rate was significantly lower than predicted by Eurolung 2 (0.7% vs 3.0%). The morbidity rate was stratified by Aggregate Eurolung 1. The stratification of the mortality rate by the Eurolung 2 aggregate score was also in line with the increase in score, although the observed number of deaths was quite small (4 cases). The 5-year overall survival was clearly separated according to the stratified Aggregate Eurolung 1 and 2 (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Besides pathological stage, both the Aggregate Eurolung 1 (score 0-7 vs 8-20) and 2 (score 0-8 vs 9-19) scores were shown to be independently associated with overall survival on multivariable. CONCLUSIONS: Eurolung risk models cannot be directly applied to the patients in our institution. However, Eurolung aggregate risk scores were helpful not only for stratifying morbidity and mortality after anatomic lung resection but also for predicting the long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neumonectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 39(2): 127-31, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19060293

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the tendency to centralize childhood cancer treatment among cancer treatment hospitals in Osaka, Japan over a 28-year period. METHODS: The subjects were patients under the age of 15, newly diagnosed with cancer in Osaka between 1975 and 2002 (n = 4738). They were categorized into three groups by the time diagnosed (1975-84, 1985-93 and 1994-2002). The International Classification of Childhood Cancer was used as the disease classification. The degree of centralization was examined using a Pareto analysis, the Gini coefficient and the annual average number of cases per hospital. RESULTS: During this period, the number of children with cancer in Osaka has decreased by nearly half, from 2.1 to 1.2 million and the number of hospitals treating childhood cancer decreased from 37 to 20. However, the Pareto curve and Gini coefficient were almost constant (0.747, 0.737, 0.756 in Gini coefficient for the three diagnosed periods). The annual average numbers of cases per hospital were much low and marginally increased from 5.6 during 1975-84 to 6.1 during 1994-2002 in the hospitals that treated 90% of all cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of centralization appeared to be almost constant from 1975 to 2002 regardless of the decrease in hospitals treating cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Neoplasias/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...