Quality of Life of Patients After Immediate or Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: It is known that breast reconstruction improves quality of life (QoL) in women who underwent mastectomy. Previous studies showed that autologous immediate breast reconstruction is as safe as delayed breast reconstruction. However, there is not much known about the influence of the timing of the breast reconstruction on QoL. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effect of timing of the breast reconstruction on QoL, using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 543 patients aged 18 years or older who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction after mastectomy (for prophylactic or oncological reasons) at least 12 months ago were selected in 3 hospitals in the Netherlands and invited to complete the BREAST-Q. Mean QoL outcomes were compared between patients who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction. Furthermore, QoL outcomes were compared with recently published normative data of the BREAST-Q. RESULTS: Patients who underwent immediate reconstruction reported higher scores on satisfaction with psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, physical well-being of the chest, and physical well-being of the abdomen. Patients who underwent delayed reconstruction reported higher scores on satisfaction with breasts, outcome, and nipples. However, after adjusting for potentially influencing factors, none of the differences were significant. Compared with the normative BREAST-Q data, both of our patient groups reported higher scores on satisfaction with breasts, psychological well-being, and sexual well-being, whereas they reported lower scores on satisfaction with physical well-being of the chest and the abdomen. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients who underwent immediate or delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction have comparable QoL more than 1 year after surgery, irrespective of the timing of the breast reconstruction.

Aesthetic outcome and complications of simple interrupted versus running subcuticular sutures in facial surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The suturing technique and its associated complications could affect cosmetic outcome after facial surgery. Literature on this topic is limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cosmetic results 12 months after treatment and complications associated with simple interrupted sutures (SIS) versus running subcuticular sutures (RSS) in facial surgery. METHODS: A randomized, controlled multicenter trial was performed. Adults receiving dermatologic surgery on the face were randomized to receive SIS or RSS for wound closure. The primary outcome was the overall opinion score on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the complication rates and scores according to alternative methods for assessment of cosmetic outcome. The observer of cosmetic outcome was blinded to treatment assignment. RESULTS: 142 patients were randomized to receive SIS (n = 73) or RSS (n = 69). Twelve months after surgery, the median score of the overall opinion on the POSAS was 2.0 (range 1-8) according to the patients and 3.0 (range 1-8) according to the observer in both groups. In the RSS group, hyper- or hypoesthesia was reported more often. LIMITATIONS: The cosmetic result was assessed by 1 observer. CONCLUSION: SIS and RSS in facial surgery resulted in comparable cosmetic outcomes. RSS was more often associated with hyper- or hypoesthesia.