Kidney Volume Growth and Kidney Function of En Bloc Pediatric Kidney Transplants: A Case Series.

Rationale & Objective: Kidney transplant is a mainstay of kidney replacement therapy. Given a continued shortage of organs, pediatric en bloc kidney transplants may have substantial utility. We present our long-term experience with en bloc transplants from donors aged 3 to 60 months, including changes in kidney function and kidney volume over time as well as biopsy findings. Study Design: Case series. Setting & Participants: Medical records from a single academic medical center were reviewed. Aggregate serial volumes of 22 en bloc kidney allografts from 2010 to 2017 were assessed at the time of transplant and during follow-up. Estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were described at 3 months after transplant (baseline) as well as over the ensuing 3 years. Interstitial fibrosis, a finding determined by histopathologic review, which results from an accumulation of collagen that is produced from mediators produced from complex interaction of multiple inflammatory cells, was assessed on 20 protocol biopsies obtained from 6 patients, of which 4 patients had 4 biopsies and 2 patients had 1 biopsy. Results: Kidney volume was obtained from 51 ultrasound studies performed up to 74 months after transplant. Kidney volume generally increased and eGFR rose over time after the transplant, with 23% patients achieving an eGFR of >75 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 3 months posttransplant. The remainder achieved an eGFR >75 mL/min/1.73 m2 over the ensuing 3 years. Interstitial fibrosis noted on biopsies appeared to foreshadow an eventual reduction in kidney volume. Limitations: Retrospective study, possible selection bias, single-center experience. Conclusions: The kidney en bloc allografts increased in size after transplantation, with associated improved kidney function. Chronic damage to the graft, from interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, resulted in long-term reduction in kidney volume.

Robotic Assisted Living Donor Nephrectomies: A Safe Alternative to Laparoscopic Technique for Kidney Transplant Donation.

OBJECTIVE: To review outcomes after laparoscopic, robotic-assisted living donor nephrectomy (RLDN) in the first, and largest series reported to date. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Introduction of minimal invasive, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has increased live kidney donation, paving the way for further innovation to expand the donor pool with RLDN. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 1084 consecutive RLDNs performed between 2000 and 2017. Patient demographics, surgical data, and complications were collected. RESULTS: Six patients underwent conversion to open procedures between 2002 and 2005, whereas the remainder were successfully completed robotically. Median donor age was 35.7 (17.4) years, with a median BMI of 28.6 (7.7) kg/m2. Nephrectomies were preferentially performed on the left side (95.2%). Multiple renal arteries were present in 24.1%. Median operative time was 159 (54) minutes, warm ischemia time 180 (90) seconds, estimated blood loss 50 (32) mL, and length of stay 3 (1) days. The median follow-up was 15 (28) months. Complications were reported in 216 patients (19.9%), of which 176 patients (81.5%) were minor (Clavien-Dindo class I and II). Duration of surgery, warm ischemia time, operative blood loss, conversion, and complication rates were not associated with increase in body mass index. CONCLUSION: RLDN is a safe technique and offers a reasonable alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery, in particular in donors with higher body mass index and multiple arteries. It offers transplant surgeons a platform to develop skills in robotic-assisted surgery needed in the more advanced setting of minimal invasive recipient operations.

Robotic Kidney Transplant: The Modern Era Technical Revolution.

Since the mid 20th century, transplantation has been a fast-developing field of contemporary medicine. The technical aspects of transplant operations were developed in the 1950s, with little significant change for >50 y. Those techniques allowed completion of various organ transplants and successful patient outcomes, but they also carried the inherent disadvantages of open surgery, such as postoperative pain, wound complications and infections, and prolonged length of hospital stay. The introduction and adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the early 1990s to various surgical specialties including general, gynecologic, and urologic surgery led to significant improvements in postoperative patient care and outcomes. Organ transplantation, with its precision demanding vascular anastomoses, initially had been considered infeasible to accomplish with conventional laparoscopic devices. The institution of robotic surgical technology in the late 1990s and its subsequent wide utilization in fields of surgery changed its accessibility and acceptance. With the steady camera, 3D views, and multidirectional wrist motions, surgical robotics opened new horizons for technically demanding surgeries such as transplantation to be completed in a minimally invasive fashion. Furthermore, the hope was this technique could find a niche to treat patients who otherwise are not deemed surgical candidates in many fields including transplantation. Here in, robotics in kidney transplantation and its ability to help provide equity through access to transplantation will be discussed.

Combination Immunotherapy With LIGHT and Interleukin-2 Increases CD8 Central Memory T-Cells In Vivo.

BACKGROUND: The generation of long-term durable tumor immunity and prolonged disease-free survival depends on the ability to generate and support CD8+ central memory T-cells. Microsatellite-stable colon cancer is resistant to currently available immunotherapies; thus, development of novel mechanisms to increase both lymphocyte infiltration and central memory formation are needed to improve outcomes in these patients. We have previously demonstrated that both interleukin-2 (IL-2) and LIGHT (TNFSF14) independently enhance antitumor immune responses and hypothesize that combination immunotherapy may increase the CD8+ central memory T-cell response. METHODS: Murine colorectal cancer tumors were established in syngeneic mice. Tumors were treated with control, soluble, or liposomal IL-2 at established intervals. A subset of animal tumors overexpressed tumor necrosis superfamily factor LIGHT (TNFSF14). Peripheral blood, splenic, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated for phenotypic studies and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Tumors exposed to a combination of LIGHT and IL-2 experienced a decrease in tumor size compared with IL-2 alone that was not demonstrated in wild-type tumors or between other treatment groups. Combination exposure also increased splenic central memory CD8+ cells compared with IL-2 administration alone, while not increasing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In the periphery, the combination enhanced levels of circulating CD8 T-cells and central memory T-cells, while also increasing circulating T-regulatory cells. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of IL-2, whether soluble or liposomal, with exposure to LIGHT results in increased CD8+ central memory cells in the spleen and periphery. New combination immunotherapy strategies that support both effector and memory T-cell functions are critical to enhancing durable antitumor responses and warrant further investigation.

Simultaneous robotic kidney transplantation and bariatric surgery for morbidly obese patients with end-stage renal failure.

Patients with obesity have limited access to kidney transplantation, mainly due to an increased incidence of surgical complications, which could be reduced with selective use of robotic-assisted surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial compares the safety and efficacy of combining robotic sleeve gastrectomy and robotic-assisted kidney transplant to robotic kidney transplant alone in candidates with class II or III obesity. Twenty candidates were recruited, 11 were randomized to the robotic sleeve gastrectomy and robotic-assisted kidney transplant group and 9 to the robotic kidney transplant group. At 12-month follow-up, change in body mass index was -8.76 ± 1.82 in the robotic sleeve gastrectomy and robotic-assisted kidney transplant group compared to 1.70 ± 2.30 in the robotic kidney transplant group (P = .0041). Estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, readmission rates, and graft failure rates up to 12 months were not different between the two groups. Length of surgery was longer in the robotic sleeve gastrectomy and robotic-assisted kidney transplant group (405 minutes vs. 269 minutes, p = .00304) without increase in estimated blood loss (120 ml vs. 117 ml, p = .908) or incidence of surgical complications. Combined robotic-assisted kidney transplant and sleeve gastrectomy is safe and effective compared to robotic-assisted kidney transplant alone.

Tracheostomy Following Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: With increased demand for liver transplantation, sicker patients are being transplanted frequently. These patients are at a higher risk of significant postoperative morbidity, including respiratory failure. This study evaluated the phenotype that characterizes liver transplant candidates who may benefit from early tracheostomy. METHODS: A single center retrospective review of all liver transplant candidates between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients who eventually required tracheostomies were identified and compared to their counterparts. RESULTS: Of the 130 liver transplants performed during the study period, 11 patients required tracheostomy. Although patients in the tracheostomized population (TP) did not have significantly worse preoperative functional status (<4 metabolic equivalents; 64% vs 42%, P = .21), they had a higher native model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (37 vs 30, P < .05) at the time of transplantation. Patients who eventually succumbed to respiratory failure had lower arterial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratios at the start of surgery and remained unchanged for the duration of surgery compared with the nontracheostomy group (P < .05). TP patients required more net fluid intraoperatively (7.3 vs 5.0 L, P < .05), increased length of time to attempted extubation (3.5 vs 1 day, P < .05), longer ventilation days (15 vs 1 day, P < .05), increased length of stay (37 vs 9 days, P < .05), and higher 1-year mortality (36% vs 8%, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, patients with a high MELD score (>30), net postoperative fluid balance >6 L, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤300 who fail to wean off mechanical ventilation after 72 hours may benefit from tracheostomy during the postoperative period.

Simultaneous recipient external iliac endarterectomy and renal transplant - a propensity score matched analysis.

Patients with end-stage renal disease and severe iliac atherosclerosis are frequently denied renal transplant due to technical challenges, and risk of potential steal syndrome in the allograft, or ipsilateral limb. Few studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of performing an endarterectomy in this setting. A single-center retrospective review of renal transplant patients from 1/2013 to 12/2017 was performed. Patients requiring endarterectomy at the time of transplant were matched to a nonendarterectomized cohort in a 1:2 fashion using propensity score matching. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Simultaneous endarterectomy and renal transplant were performed in 23 patients and subsequently matched to 42 controls. Ankle-brachial index was lower in the endarterectomized group (P = 0.04). Delayed graft function (26.1% vs. 19%, P = 0.54), graft loss (8.7% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.53), 1-year mortality (8.7% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.53), and renal function at 12 months were comparable in both groups. There were no incidents of ipsilateral limb loss in the endarterectomized population. This is the first matched study investigating endarterectomy and renal transplant. Long-term follow-up of limb and graft function is indicated. Despite the small sample size, our findings suggest that a combined procedure can safely provide renal transplantation access to a previously underserved population.

Robotic kidney transplantation in the obese patient: 10-year experience from a single center.

Despite increasing obesity rates in the dialysis population, obese kidney transplant candidates are still denied transplantation by many centers. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of a robotic-assisted kidney transplant (RAKT) cohort from January 2009 to December 2018. A total of 239 patients were included in this analysis. The median BMI was 41.4 kg/m2 , with the majority (53.1%) of patients being African American and 69.4% of organs sourced from living donors. The median surgery duration and warm ischemia times were 4.8 hours and 45 minutes respectively. Wound complications (mostly seromas and hematomas) occurred in 3.8% of patients, with 1 patient developing a surgical site infection (SSI). Seventeen (7.1%) graft failures, mostly due to acute rejection, were reported during follow-up. Patient survival was 98% and 95%, whereas graft survival was 98% and 93%, at 1 and 3 years respectively. Similar survival statistics were obtained from patients undergoing open transplant over the same time period from the UNOS database. In conclusion, RAKT can be safely performed in obese patients with minimal SSI risk, excellent graft function, and patient outcomes comparable to national data. RAKT could improve access to kidney transplantation in obese patients due to the low surgical complication rate.

Geographic Disparities in Liver Allocation and Distribution in the United States: Where Are We Now?

BACKGROUND: Equitable deceased donor liver allocation and distribution has remained a heated topic in transplant medicine. Despite the establishment of numerous policies, mixed reports regarding organ allocation persist. METHODS: Patient data was obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing liver transplant database between January 2016 and September 2017. A total of 20,190 patients were included in the analysis. Of this number, 8790 transplanted patients had a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 25 (17-33), after a wait time of 129 (32-273) days. Patients were grouped into low MELD and high MELD regions using a score 25 as the cutoff. RESULTS: Significant differences were noted between low and high MELD regions in ethnicity (white 77.4% vs 60.4%, Hispanic 8.1% vs 24.5%; P < .001) and highest level of education (grade school 4.8% vs 8.5%, Associate/Bachelor's degree 19% vs 15.7%, P < .001), respectively. Patients in high MELD regions were more likely to be multiply listed if they had a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (12.1% vs 15%, P = .046). Wait-list mortality (4.8% vs 6%, P < .001) and wait-list time (110 [27-238] vs 156 [42-309] days, P < .001) were greater in the high MELD regions. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight some of the existing disparities in the recently updated allocation and distribution policy of deceased donor livers. Our findings are consistent with previous work and support the liver distribution policy revision.