The prognostic importance of the pan-immune-inflammation value in patients with septic shock.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), a novel biomarker combining neutrophil platelet, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts, some of the most widespread indicators of systemic inflammation, can predict mortality and prognosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock. METHOD: This prospective study was performed with 82 patients aged 18 or over admitted to a tertiary ICU with diagnoses of septic shock. Patients with hematological disease and neutropenia were excluded. PIV was calculated with the formula [neutrophil count (103/µL) × platelet count (103/µL) × monocyte count (103/µL)]/lymphocyte count (103/µL). RESULTS: Median age, presence of hypertension, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) levels, and neutrophil, monocyte, and platelet counts were lower in the low-PIV group than in the high-PIV group (p < 0.05). The highest area under ROC curve (AUC) was determined for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (0.94 (0.89 - 0.99)), followed by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (0.81 (0.70 - 0.91)), APACHE II (0.80 (0.69 - 0.91)) and lactate (0.77 (0.67 - 0.88)). Median survival was longer in the low-PIV group than in the high-PIV group (28 (15.25 - 40.76) vs 16 (9.46 - 22.55) days, respectively, p < 0.05). The univariate Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model showed that high PIV (HR = 2.13 (1.03-4.38)), low GCS (HR = 3.31 (1.34 - 8.15)), high SOFA (HR = 9.41 (2.86 - 30.95)), high APACHE II (HR = 3.08 (1.47 - 6.45)), high lactate (HR = 6.56 (2.73 - 15.75)), and high procalcitonin (PCT) (HR = 2.73 (1.11 - 6.69)) values were associated with a decreased survival time among ICU patients (p < 0.05). The multivariate CPH model showed the age-adjusted risk estimates for these six laboratory parameters. High lactate (HR = 7.97 (2.19 - 29.08)) and high SOFA scores (HR = 4.85 (1.22 - 19.32)) were significantly associated with shorter survival in ICU patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings of this research suggest that PIV could predict the longer survival in patients with septic shock. Despite PIV score's capability to show inflammation, it is not significantly associated with mortality in the multivariate analysis.

The role of proadrenomedullin, interleukin 6 and CD64 in the diagnosis and prognosis of septic shock.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis and septic shock are disorders of tissue perfusion and microcirculation associated with increased mortality. The role of biomarkers such as proadrenomedullin (PRO-ADM), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and neutrophil CD64 (CD64) in the diagnosis and prognosis of septic shock has been studied. METHODS: GCS, SOFA score, APACHE 2 score, lactate, CRP, procalcitonin, PRO-ADM, IL-6, CD64 level and 28-day mortality were evaluated in patients with septic shock followed-up in the intensive care unit of Marmara University Hospital between July 2021 and December 2021. The study was planned as prospective, non-drug clinical research Committee. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between patient groups in gender, BMI, and presence of comorbidities (p > 0.05). The alive patient group had significantly higher GCS values and lower SOFA, APACHE 2, lactate and CD64 values than the dead patient group (p < 0.01). The cut-off values of laboratory parameters were determined using ROC analysis to predict mortality, SOFA and CD64 had high AUC. This is also a good indicator for mortality.The multivariate logistic regression model was estimated using the backward selection method. The mortality of ICU patients was predicted by a SOFA-value ≥ 12 (OR (95%CI) = 56.13 (5.44-578.64)), CD64 value ≥ 28.54 (OR (95% CI) = 23.78 (2.61-216.85)), and ADM-value ≥ 86.79 (OR (95% CI) = 15.86 (1.02-246.49)) (p < 0.05) . CONCLUSION: In conclusion, serum CD64 level, PRO-ADM level, and SOFA score proved to be effective parameters for predicting prognosis and mortality in septic shock. However, IL-6 proved to be a weak biomarker and failed to predict mortality. CD64, which is easier and more practical to use, can be used instead of the SOFA score.