Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase pharmacogenetics for predicting fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in the randomised, phase III adjuvant TOSCA trial in high-risk colon cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) catabolises ∼85% of the administered dose of fluoropyrimidines. Functional DPYD gene variants cause reduced/abrogated DPD activity. DPYD variants analysis may help for defining individual patients' risk of fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity. METHODS: The TOSCA Italian randomised trial enrolled colon cancer patients for 3 or 6 months of either FOLFOX-4 or XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy. In an ancillary pharmacogenetic study, 10 DPYD variants (*2A rs3918290 G>A, *13 rs55886062 T>G, rs67376798 A>T, *4 rs1801158 G>A, *5 rs1801159 A>G, *6 rs1801160 G>A, *9A rs1801265 T>C, rs2297595 A>G, rs17376848 T>C, and rs75017182 C>G), were retrospectively tested for associations with ⩾grade 3 fluoropyrimidine-related adverse events (FAEs). An association analysis and a time-to-toxicity (TTT) analysis were planned. To adjust for multiple testing, the Benjamini and Hochberg's False Discovery Rate (FDR) procedure was used. RESULTS: FAEs occurred in 194 out of 508 assessable patients (38.2%). In the association analysis, FAEs occurred more frequently in *6 rs1801160 A allele carriers (FDR=0.0083). At multivariate TTT analysis, significant associations were found for *6 rs1801160 A allele carriers (FDR<0.0001), *2A rs3918290 A allele carriers (FDR<0.0001), and rs2297595 GG genotype carriers (FDR=0.0014). Neutropenia was the most common FAEs (28.5%). *6 rs1801160 (FDR<0.0001), and *2A rs3918290 (FDR=0.0004) variant alleles were significantly associated with time to neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds evidence on the role of DPYD pharmacogenetics for safety of patients undergoing fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

Effectiveness of bevacizumab added to standard chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: final results for first-line treatment from the ITACa randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We report the results from a first-line phase III randomized clinical trial on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of adding bevacizumab (B) to standard first-line chemotherapy (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: mCRC patients were randomized to receive first-line CT (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4) plus B (arm A) or CT only (arm B). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate (ORR) and safety. Three hundred and fifty patients and 310 events were required to have an 80% statistical power to detect a difference in PFS between the groups. RESULTS: Between November 2007 and March 2012, 376 patients were randomized. About 60% of patients received FOLFOX4 and 40% FOLFIRI. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 343 progressions and 275 deaths had been observed in the overall population. The median PFS was 9.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-10.3] and 8.4 (95% CI 7.2-9.0) months for arms A and B, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.70-1.07; P = 0.182). No statistically significant differences in OS or ORR were observed. B-containing regimens were associated with more frequent hypertension, bleeding, proteinuria and asthenia. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of B to standard first-line CT for mCRC did not provide a benefit in terms of PFS, OS or ORR. Further research is warranted to better identify the target population. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01878422.

Intermittent versus continuous chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomised 'GISCAD' trial.

BACKGROUND: In advanced colorectal cancer, chemotherapy is usually administered without pauses and until progression but patients can experience cumulative toxicity and cannot tolerate a heavy therapeutic charge. AIM: The aim of the present trial was to evaluate whether an intermittent chemotherapy with levo-leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + irinotecan (CPT-11) was at least as effective as the same regimen given continuously, both administered until progression, in patients affected with advanced colorectal cancer and not previously exposed to chemotherapy for metastatic disease. PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 337 patients from 27 institutions were randomised between levo-leucovorin, 100/mg/m(2) i.v. + 5-FU; 400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus + 5-FU; 600 mg/m(2) 22-h continuous infusion, days 1 and 2 + CPT-11; 180 mg/m(2) day 1, administered every 2 weeks 2 months on and 2 months off (arm A) and the same regimen administered continuously (arm B), until progression in both arms. The main end point was overall survival (OS), the secondary progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 41 months, OS was 18 months in arm A and 17 months in arm B [hazard ratio (HR), 0.88]. Also PFS was comparable in the two groups (6 months in both, with HR, 1.03), and even grades 3-4 toxicity (mainly myelosuppression, fever and diarrhoea) was similar. Second-line oxaliplatin-based treatment was administered in a similar percentage (66%) in the two arms. The median chemotherapy-free period (drug holiday) in arm A was 3.5 months. CONCLUSION: Reducing the charge of therapy in this population did not diminish the efficacy of treatment. Further studies with this strategy, including biologicals, are warranted.

The role of cetuximab in pre-treated refractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: outcome study in clinical practice.

We carried out a multicentric retrospective study on cetuximab + chemotherapy in pre-treated refractory patients outside clinical protocols, by registering the main clinical and pathological parameters. We evaluated 144 pre-treated patients. Cetuximab was administered usually in combination with irinotecan (93.8%). A 45% disease control rate (complete plus partial responses plus stable disease) was obtained in 55 patients and was related to absence of weight loss (p<0.0001) and high grade (> or =2) skin toxicity (p<0.0001). Median time to progression (TTP) was 4 months (95%CI 2.7-5.3) and median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 months (95%CI 8.5-15.1). Performance status << or =1, no weight loss and high grade (>or =22) skin toxicity were related both to a longer TTP (p=0.035, p=0.035, p=0.0017) and OS (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p=0.006). According to multivariate analysis, the absence of weight loss was related to longer TTP (HR 0.331, p=0.004) and OS (HR 0.176, p<0.0001), and EGFR over-expression (3+) to longer TTP (HR 0.402, p=0.020).

A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the mobilizing efficacy of filgrastim, lenograstim and molgramostim following a disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. Mobilization consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 45 cases (44%), and cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide or vinblastine in 22 (21%), followed by randomization to either filgrastim or lenograstim or molgramostim at 5 microg/kg/day. One hundred and three patients were randomized, and 82 (79%) performed apheresis. Forty-four (43%) patients were chemonaive, whereas 59 (57%) were pretreated. A median number of one apheresis per patient (range, 1-3) was performed. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 8.4 x 10(6)/kg in the filgrastim arm versus 5.8 x 10(6)/kg in the lenograstim arm versus 4.0 x 10(6)/kg in the molgramostim arm (P=0.1). A statistically significant difference was observed for the median number of days of growth factor administration in favor of lenograstim (12 days) versus filgrastim (13 days) and molgramostim (14 days) (P<0.0001) and for the subgroup of chemonaive patients (12 days) versus pretreated patients (14 days) (P<0.001). In conclusion, all three growth factors were efficacious in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells with no statistically significant difference between CD34+ cell yield and the different regimens, and the time to apheresis is likely confounded by the different mobilization regimens.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of colon cancer: randomized multicenter trial of the Italian National Intergroup of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer (INTACC).

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the addition of leucovorin to the combination 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole prolongs disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with radically resected colon cancer (Dukes' B(2-3) and C). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (1703) were accrued between March 1992 and February 1995 in a large-scale clinical trial within five Italian cooperative groups. After stratification for center, patients were randomized as follows: arm A, 5-fluorouracil [450 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on days 1-5] and levamisole (150 mg orally for 3 days, every 14 days for 6 months) versus arm B, 6-S-leucovorin (100 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5) followed by 5-fluorouracil (370 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5), plus levamisole (as arm A), every 4 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 6.4 years no significant difference was seen for either disease-free survival (58% versus 60%, not significant) or 5-year overall survival (68% versus 71%, not significant), respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity (World Health Organization grade 3/4) was more frequent in arm B (8% versus 18%, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial the schedules used showed no statistically significant differences in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Prophylaxis with GM-CSF mouthwashes does not reduce frequency and duration of severe oral mucositis in patients with solid tumors undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation rescue: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mouthwashes in the prevention of severe mucositis induced by high doses of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients affected by solid tumors and undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation rescue were randomized to receive placebo versus GM-CSF mouthwash 150 micro g/day. Patients were stratified on the basis of the conditioning treatment and the consequent different risk of severe oral mucositis. Treatment was administered from the day after the end of chemotherapy until the resolution of stomatitis and/or neutrophil recovery. RESULTS: The statistical analyses were intention-to-treat and involved all patients who entered the study. The severity of stomatitis was evaluated daily by the physicians according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Both study and control groups were compared with respect to the frequency [30% versus 36%, chi(2) exact test, not significant (NS)] and mean duration (4.8 +/- 4.7 versus 4.4 +/- 2.7 days, t-test, NS) of severe stomatitis (grade > or =3). Oral pain was evaluated daily by patients themselves by means of a 10 cm analog visual scale: the mean (+/- standard error of the mean) maximum mucositis scores were 4.8 +/- 3.5 versus 4.2 +/- 3.5 cm (t-test, NS). Furthermore, 15/46 patients in the study group (33%) and 19/44 patients in the control group experienced pain requiring opioids (chi(2) exact test, NS). CONCLUSION: We did not find any evidence to indicate that prophylaxis with GM-CSF mouthwash can help to reduce the severity of mucositis in the setting of the patients we studied.

Thymidylate synthase protein expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to leucovorin-modulated bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil but not methotrexate-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND: Different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) schedules and/or biochemical modulators may result in different mechanisms of cytotoxicity, potentially affecting the correlation between thymidylate synthase (TS) expression and the clinical response to the fluoropyrimidine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TS levels were measured immunohistochemically on archival specimens of colorectal cancer metastases from 124 patients homogeneously treated in a series of clinical trials at our institutions with: (A) leucovorin (LV)-modulated infusional 5-FU (n = 48); (B) LV-modulated bolus 5-FU (n = 41); (C) methotrexate (MTX)-modulated bolus 5-FU (n = 35). RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation between TS levels and the clinical response was observed with the regimens involving continuous infusion and/or LV modulation (response rate in patients with low and high TS: 66% versus 24%, P = 0.003, and 50% versus 0%, P = 0.0001, in group A and B, respectively). Conversely, TS levels failed to predict the clinical response within the group of patients treated with MTX-modulated bolus 5-FU (response rate 21% versus 13%, P = 0.50, with low and high TS, respectively). Consistently, the median time to progression/overall survival time in patients with low and high TS were 9 versus 6 months/19 versus 14 months (P = 0.009/0.035, group A), 8 versus 2 months/12 versus 6 months (P = 0.002/0.0006, group B) and 3 versus 2 months/12 versus 13 months (P = 0.14/0.74, group C). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between intratumoral TS levels and the clinical response to 5-FU depends strongly on the schedule of administration/biochemical modulators that are used in different 5-FU regimens. These data strengthen the notion that different 5-FU schedules have different mechanisms of cytotoxicity.

Role of biological markers in the clinical outcome of colon cancer.

We investigated a number of biological markers, evaluated under strict intralaboratory quality control conditions, in terms of their role in predicting clinical outcome of patients with colon cancer treated with 5-FU-containing regimens. Colon cancer tissue from 263 patients enrolled onto two randomised clinical trials were studied for their cytofluorimetrically determined DNA content and their immunohistochemically evaluated microvessel density, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, thymidylate synthase expression and tumour lymphocyte infiltration. Disease-free survival and overall survival of patients were analysed as a function of the different variables. At a median follow up of 57 months, age, gender and Dukes' stage showed an impact on disease-free survival, whereas no biological marker emerged as an indicator of better or worse disease-free survival. Only histological grade and Dukes' stage were found to influence overall survival. The different biological variables, studied with particular attention for determination reliability, proved to have no impact on the clinical outcome of patients with colon cancer. Therefore, other markers must be identified to complement clinico-pathological variables in the management of this disease.

Locoregional therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: the possibilities of intraarterial chemotherapy, and new hepatic-directed modalities.

Liver metastasis of colorectal cancer is a life-threatening prognostic factor. Hepatic resection, when possible, is the best therapeutic modality, although the overall survival rate is still low (30%). The diagnosis has been carried out by clinical examination, abnormal alkaline phosphatase, lactic acid dehydrogenase and tumor markers, abdominal liver echography and computed tomography scan. Angiography and intraoperative echography are useful for resection. The number of hepatic metastases and the surgical margin are probably the most significant prognostic factors. Colorectal cancer may spread predominantly to the liver making regional treatment strategies viable options. Subtotal hepatic resections and segmentectomies are potentially curable procedures for single or small numbers of hepatic metastases without other sites of disease. However, there have been no prospective randomized trials comparing patients with unresected liver metastases and resected metastases. Regional chemotherapy with floxuridine seems useful combined with hepatic resection or as palliative therapy. Gastric ulcer and biliary sclerosis are the main related toxicities. Patients with localized, unresectable hepatic metastases or concomitant bad medical condition may be candidates for radiation, percutaneous ethanol injection, cryosurgery, radiofrequency, hypoxic flow-stop perfusions with bioreductive alkylating agents, hepatic arterial ligation, embolization and chemoembolization. These new hepatic-directed modalities of treatment are being investigated and may offer new approaches to providing palliation and prolonging survival. This review reports the possibilities of intraarterial chemotherapy and other novel hepatic directed approaches to the treatment of liver metastases from this common disease.

5-fluorouracil modulated by leucovorin, methotrexate and mitomycin: highly effective, low-cost chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

We have reported that an alternating regimen of bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (FU) was superior to bolus FU in terms of response rate and progression-free survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Biochemical modulation was an essential part of this regimen and it was selective for the schedule of FU administration: bolus FU was in fact modulated by methotrexate (MTX) while continuous infusion FU was potentiated by 6-s-leucovorin (LV). Considering the low cost and the favourable report on the activity of mitomycin C (mito) added to CI FU, we have incorporated this agent in the infusional part of our treatment programme. 105 patients with untreated, advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were accrued from 13 Italian centres and treated with the following regimen. 2 biweekly cycles of FU bolus (600 mg/m(2)), modulated by MTX (24 h earlier, 200 mg/m(2)) were alternated with a 3-week continuous infusion of FU (200 mg/m(2)daily), modulated by LV (20 mg/m(2)weekly bolus). Mito, 7 mg/m(2), was given on the first day of the infusional period. After a 1 week rest, the whole cycle (8 weeks) was repeated, if indicated. 5 complete and 34 partial responses were obtained (response rate, 37% on the intention to treat basis; 95% confidence limits, 28-46%). After a median follow-up time of 26 months, 37 patients are still alive. The median progression-free survival is 7.7 months with an overall survival of 18.8 months and a 2-year survival rate of 30%. The regimen was very well tolerated with fewer than 13% of patients experiencing WHO grade III-IV toxicity. These results are consistent with those obtained by our group in 3 previous trials of schedule specific biochemical modulation of FU. They also indicate a highly active, little toxic, inexpensive regimen of old drugs to be used (a) as an alternative to the more expensive combinations including CPT-11 or oxaliplatin or (b) as the basis for combination programmes with these agents.

Global approach to hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: indication and outcome of intra-arterial chemotherapy and other hepatic-directed treatments.

Liver metastases of colorectal cancer is present in more than 20% of new diagnosed patients and in 40-60% of relapsed patients. It is a life-threatening prognostic aspect. Hepatic resection, when possible, is the best therapeutic modality, although the overall survival rate is still low (30%). Angiography and intraoperative ultrasonography are useful for resection. The number of hepatic metastases and the surgical margin are probably the most significant prognostic factors. Colorectal cancer may spread predominantly to the liver making regional treatment strategies viable options. Subtotal hepatic resections and segmentectomies are potentially curable procedures for single or small numbers of hepatic metastases without other sites of disease. However, there have been no prospective randomized trials comparing patients with unresected liver metastases and resected metastases. Regional chemotherapy with floxuridine seems usefull combined with hepatic resection or as palliative therapy. Gastric ulcer and biliary sclerosis are the main related toxicities. Patients with localized, unresectable hepatic metastases or concomitant bad medical condition may be candidates for radiation, percutaneous ethanol injection, cryosurgery, percutaneous radiofrequency, hypoxic flow-stop perfusions with bioreductive alkylating agents, hepatic arterial ligation, embolization and chemoembolization. These new hepatic-directed modalities of treatment are being investigated and may offer new approaches to providing palliation and prolonging survival. This review will report the possibilities of intra-arterial chemotherapy and other novel hepatic-directed approaches to the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

A sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic treatment for patients with malignant gliomas: a phase II pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic treatment on the basis of an earlier report by The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with histologically diagnosed malignant gliomas entered the study. Fifteen patients had glioblastoma multiforme (83%). BCNU (40 mg/sqm/die) and Cisplatin (40 mg/sqm/die) were administered concurrently for 3 days every 3-4 weeks. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy whole cranial irradiation plus a 15 Gy boost on the preoperative volume. RESULTS: Thirteen patients had measurable disease and were evaluable for response. After chemotherapy we obtained 3 CRs (complete remission) and 4 PRs (partial remission) (RR (response rate 54%). Three PRs were converted to CRs after radiotherapy, for a complete remission rate of 46% (6/13). The median duration of response was 10 months. The median survival of the entire patients population was 9 months with 33% survival rates at 1 year. Hematological toxicity grade 4 in one patient and grade 3 in two patients were the major complications due to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic regimen appears to have significant activity in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas.

Schedule specific biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized study. GISCAD, IOR and collaborating centers.

BACKGROUND: We have recently suggested that bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may work via a RNA directed mechanism while continuous infusion 5-FU may kill cells via a thymidylate synthase related pathway. It may thus be possible to selectively modulate each schedule biochemically. We have compared an alternating regimen of bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU, selectively modulated for the schedule of administration, with modulated bolus 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients from nineteen Italian centers were randomized to the control arm consisting of biweekly cycles of MTX, 200 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by bolus 5-FU 600 mg/m2 on day 2 and 6-S-leucovorin rescue, or to the experimental arm consisting of two biweekly cycles of the same regimen as in the control arm alternated to three weeks of continuous infusion 5-FU (200 mg/m2 day) + weekly bolus 6-S-leucovorin, 20 mg/m2. RESULTS: Nine CR and twenty-seven PR were obtained on one hundred eleven evaluable patients treated in experimental arm (RR = 32%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 24%-42%), while two CR and eleven PR were observed among one hundred three evaluable patients in control arm (RR = 13%, 95% CI: 7%-21%). WHO grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 13% of cycles of experimental arm and in 8% of cycles in control arm. The PFS was significantly longer in experimental arm (6.2 vs. 4.3 months, odds ratio 0.66, P = 0.003), while the overall survival was similar in both arms (14.8 months in experimental arm vs. 14.1 months in control arm); quality of life was similar as well. Eighty percent of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy in control arm were treated with continuous infusion 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: Alternating, schedule-specific biochemical modulation of FU is more active than MTX --> 5-FU as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, the overall survival was similar suggesting that alternating bolus and infusional 5-FU upfront may be as effective as giving them in sequence as first- and second-line treatment.

[Adjuvant concomitant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer]. / La chemioterapia adiuvante concomitante del carcinoma pancreatico.

Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer death. Despite improvement in diagnosis and treatment in the last 15 years, mortality rates essentially equal the incidence of the disease. Combination treatment with chemoradiation yields up to now better results than chemotherapy or radiotherapy given alone in consideration of substantial radio and chemoresistance of the cancer cells. This study will review the most important literature data about combination adjuvant treatment and preoperative (primary) chemoradiation in pancreatic cancer. Some other reports will be given on locoregional chemotherapy and finally a brief view on a possible perspective for promising future treatments coming from data of molecular pathology. Adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery has been shown to be superior to operation alone in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer in many studies, in terms both of local control and median overall survival. Unfortunately, a consistent percentage of patients cannot receive adjuvant treatment since late recovery after surgery or post-operative morbidity. Owing to this last reason, many authors prefer primary chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant treatment find out its background in other relevant biological and clinical evaluations. Some studies report encouraging results with primary chemoradiation using 5-fluorouracil. Other experiences with relatively new drugs, with potent radiosensiting effect, such as gemcitabine or taxol are going on; many of these are phase I studies. Clinical research in the field of preoperative treatment is up to now emerging in some important Oncological Institutions. The principal actual aim seems to be that of forsee periods of treatment which will be brief and use the dose of chemotherapy that is active, giving acceptable toxicity. Ongoing trials will give, in the next years, the answer about the improvement of efficacy of treatments largely expected by all researchers.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in heavily pretreated patients with germ cell tumors: a report of 34 cases.

The aim of the study was to evaluate peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization by disease-specific chemotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with germ cell tumor (GCT), scheduled for high-dose chemotherapy. Thirty-four consecutive patients, 29 males and five females, with advanced GCT referred to our department for high-dose chemotherapy were evaluated retrospectively. Sixteen patients were mobilized by vinblastine 0.11 mg/kg on days 1 and 2, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 days 1-5 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 days 1-5 (VeIP). In 10 patients, etoposide 75 mg/m2 days 1-5 was used instead of vinblastine (VIP), while in eight patients the mobilization was attempted by administering 7 g/m2 of cyclophosphamide. The choice of either etoposide or vinblastine was predicated upon which of these two drugs was associated with best results during premobilization chemotherapy. Cyclophosphamide was selected in patients refractory to previous cisplatin-based salvage chemotherapy. Twenty-five out of 34 patients underwent a successful PBPC collection. In 17 of them one leukapheresis procedure was sufficient to collect the target number of CD34+ cells, while in eight patients a double procedure was necessary. Altogether 33 aphereses were performed in 25 patients. In nine patients leukapheresis was not attempted. This was due to the fact that the chemotherapy failed to mobilize the target number of CD34+ cells in eight of them, treated with the VeIP mobilizing regimen, while one patient treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide rapidly progressed during therapy and for this reason leukapheresis was not undertaken. In conclusion, in heavily pretreated patients with GCT, PBPC mobilization is feasible by a further course of salvage chemotherapy. The choice of either etoposide (VIP) or vinblastine (VeIP) can be predicated upon which of these two drugs was associated with best results during premobilization chemotherapy. In our hands, VeIP seems to be less satisfactory as mobilizing treatment than VIP, possibly due to a superior number of premobilization courses of chemo therapy in some patients. Moreover, high-dose cyclophosphamide remains a good alternative for mobilizing patients refractory to salvage chemotherapy.

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors following peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue after high-dose chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a prospective study.

The use of high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic rescue is increasing worldwide for solid tumors. Several studies have suggested that the period of absolute neutrophil count (ANC, < 500/ml) may be shortened in patients who receive peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). To estimate the clinical value of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, we examined a cohort of 26 consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer who received one or two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with PBPC rescue with or without filgrastim. Thirty-five courses of high-dose ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) chemotherapy were administered and evaluated. All patients received PBPC rescue. Sixteen patients (21 courses) received subcutaneous filgrastim (5 mg/kg) following PBPC infusion. Recovery to > or = 500 ANC occurred at a median time of 7 days post PBPC infusion among patients who received filgrastim versus 10 days among patients who received standard support care only (P < 0.01). The administration of filgrastim was not associated with a reduction in the duration of hospitalization, in the total number of days on nonprophylactic antibiotics, number of red blood cell transfusions, time to platelet engraftment, or number of febrile days. This could be the consequence of the high hematopoietic cell dose administered in the study. Therefore, any effect of filgrastim was probably masked by the use of a large number of PBPC. Larger prospective randomized studies, specifically focused on the utility of the administration of growth factors following high-dose chemotherapy and PBPC rescue, may be warranted to know whether the administration of filgrastim after PBPC transplantation is really necessary.

Randomized phase II noncomparative trial of oral and intravenous doxifluridine plus levo-leucovorin in untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Doxifluridine (5-dFUR) is a fluoropyrimidine derivative that has been shown to be active on a variety of solid tumors. The clinical use of intravenous (i.v.) 5-dFUR as a bolus injection or short term infusion has been limited because of its unpredictable severe neurotoxicity. Unlike fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-dFUR is effective when administered orally. METHODS: This randomized, parallel-group, Phase II trial of two schedules of 5-dFUR was conducted between April 1993 and September 1994. A total of 130 previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma were randomized to receive oral levo-leucovorin (1-leucovorin) 25 mg/dose followed by oral 5-dFUR 750 mg/m2 twice daily for 4 days every 12 days (arm A) or i.v. 1-leucovorin 25 mg/dose followed by i.v. 5-dFUR 3000 mg/m2 for 5 days every 21 days (arm B). RESULTS: The two treatment arms were well balanced in terms of age, sex, and disease extension. Metastases were present in more than 90% of the total population, with the liver being the most common site. A median of 7 oral courses (range, 1-15) and 5 intravenous courses (range, 1-9) were administered. Intent-to-treat analysis rate of the randomized patients revealed a response rate of 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-26) in arm A and 41% (95% CI, 29-54) in arm B. However, 7 cases in arm A and 12 in arm B were inadequately treated, and the response rates, according to standard analysis, were respectively 17% (95% CI, 8-28) and 51% (95% CI, 37-65). The median time to treatment failure was 4 months (range, 1-23) and 7 months (range, 1-9), respectively, for the two groups; median survival was 11 months (range, 1-24) in both groups. National Cancer Institute Grade 3 and 4 diarrhea were observed in 25% of the orally treated patients and in 18% of those receiving i.v. treatment. Stomatitis was reported mainly in arm B (15%). Mild and moderate neurotoxicity was observed in 6% of the patients in both arms; no severe neurotoxicity was reported. CONCLUSIONS: 5-dFUR with l-leucovorin, administered either orally or intravenously, produces response rates that are similar to those offered by the regimens containing 5-FU that are usually used to treat advanced colorectal carcinoma. This study documents the good tolerance of the i.v. schedule administered as a 1-hour infusion; furthermore, oral administration seems to be promising and feasible as a home treatment.

[High-dose chemotherapy and peripheral hemtopoietic cells (PBPC) in solid tumors]. / Chemioterapia ad alte dosi e cellule progenitrici periferiche (PBPC) nei tumori solidi.

High-dose chemotherapy is a policy which is increasing in the field of solid tumors both in Europe and in North America. Hundreds of patients undergo ABMT or PBPCT in Europe every year especially for breast carcinoma. Waiting for the results of several ongoing trials, high-dose chemotherapy has shown to be of extreme interest in the adjuvant setting of patients with high risk breast cancer in phase II trials. The best results had been reported by Peters and Gianni; with a minimum follow-up of 5 years 65 and 56% of their patients with ten or more axillary lymph nodes are alive disease free. These results are better than any others with standard doses. The only one published trial (from South Africa) on advanced disease clearly favours high-doses of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and etoposide versus standard doses of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and vincristine in terms of overall survival and time to relapse. The use of PBPC replacing ABMT has allowed an easier tolerability of the procedure and a reduction of the costs. There is a clear reduction of the toxic death rate to 1% in 1995 for breast cancer patients compared with 20% of fifteen years ago. Germ cell tumors in responding relapse after salvage chemotherapy seem to be ideal candidates for ABMT/PBPC programs with an expected 40% disease free survival. The clinical impact of the PBPC contamination by tumor cells is still nowadays a matter of debate at least for breast carcinoma and neuroblastoma. This review will focus on the present situation of high-dose chemotherapy for solid tumors with some insights to new technologies and their applications.