Inpatient or Outpatient: Does Initial Disposition Affect Outcomes in Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures?

Background The repair of trimalleolar fractures can be challenging for surgeons and may be managed as an inpatient or an outpatient. However, it is often unclear whether these patients should be admitted immediately or sent home from the emergency department (ED). This study aims to evaluate trimalleolar fractures treated surgically in the inpatient or outpatient settings to evaluate differences in outcomes for these patients. Methods A retrospective chart review of 223 patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation of a trimalleolar ankle fracture was performed from January 2015 to August 2022. Patients were classified by whether the fixation was performed as an inpatient or outpatient. Outcomes of interest included time from injury to surgery, complications, ED returns, and readmissions within 90 days. Results Inpatients had significantly higher ASA scores, BMI, and rates of comorbidities. Inpatient treatment was associated with faster time to surgery (median 2.0 vs. 9.0 days) and fewer delayed surgeries more than seven days from injury (18.4 vs. 67.9%). There were no differences in complications, 90-day ED returns, readmissions, or reoperation between groups. Conclusions Inpatient admission of patients presenting with trimalleolar ankle fractures resulted in faster time to surgery and fewer surgical delays than outpatient surgery. Despite having more preoperative risk factors, inpatients experienced similar postoperative outcomes as patients discharged home to return for outpatient surgery. Less restrictive admission criteria may improve the patient experience by providing more patients with support and pain control in the hospital setting while decreasing the time to surgery.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Following a Diagnosis of Dementia: A TriNetX Database Study.

Background: As life expectancy improves for patients with dementia, the demand for mobility-improving surgeries such as total joint arthroplasty (TJA) will increase. There is little research on patients with dementia undergoing TJA, although dementia has been shown to be a risk factor for complications. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes of patients with dementia undergoing TJA at 90 days, 2 years, and 5 years. Methods: The TriNetX database was retrospectively queried for all patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients were divided into cohorts by preoperative diagnosis of dementia and propensity score matched. The following outcomes were evaluated between groups at 90 days, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively: revision, resection arthroplasty, closed reduction (THA only), femur fracture plating, and prosthetic joint infection. Readmission and manipulation under anesthesia (TKA only) were evaluated at 90 days postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: After matching, there were no differences in demographics or comorbidities between groups. TKA (odds ratio [OR] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.15, P < .001) and THA (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.92-2.45, P < .001) patients with dementia were more likely to be readmitted than patients without dementia. At 2 years (OR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.14-3.77, P = .015) and 5 years (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.32-3.48, P = .002) postoperatively, THA patients with dementia were more likely to have proximal femur fracture plating than patients without dementia. Conclusions: Patients undergoing THA with dementia had worse outcomes than patients undergoing THA without dementia and TKA with dementia. The overall rate of complications was low, and a diagnosis of dementia should not be an absolute contraindication to proceeding with TJA.

The Relationship Between Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Intensity Scores and Early Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Lumbar Fusion.

Background The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and pain intensity measures quantify separate dimensions of pain from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to assess differences in these outcomes and to evaluate whether baseline PROMIS pain scores could be used as a leading indicator of increased pain and opioid consumption during early recovery after lumbar fusion. Methods A retrospective review of 199 consecutive patients undergoing posterolateral fusion (PLF) at a single institution was performed. All patients underwent one to three level lumbar PLF and preoperatively completed the PROMIS pain intensity and PROMIS pain interference measures. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the relationship between preoperative PROMIS scores and postoperative pain numeric rating scale (NRS) and oral morphine milligram equivalents (OMME) by day after controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Results In comparison to patients with the lowest preoperative pain intensity scores, those with the highest scores required significantly more OMME on postoperative day (POD) zero and one (both p<0.05) and had higher pain NRS on POD one (p=0.02). Patients with the highest pain interference scores reported higher pain NRS on POD zero (p=0.02) but required similar OMME at all time points. After controlling for age, sex, and BMI, each one-point increase in preoperative PROMIS pain interference scores was associated with increased OMME on POD zero (ß=0.29, p=0.04) and POD one (ß=0.64, p=0.03). Conclusions Patients with high pain intensity reported higher levels of pain and required more opioids during the first 24 hours postoperatively, while those with high pain interference reported higher levels of pain on the day of surgery but utilized similar amounts of opioids. After risk adjustment, increased baseline PROMIS pain interference scores - but not pain intensity - were associated with increased opioid use. These results suggest that both measures should be considered when identifying patients at risk for increased pain and opioid consumption after PLF.

Managing an epidemic within a pandemic: orthopedic opioid prescribing trends during COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: In response to the opioid epidemic, a multitude of policy and clinical-guideline based interventions were launched to combat physician overprescribing. However, the sudden rise of the Covid-19 pandemic disrupted all aspects of healthcare delivery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how opioid prescribing patterns changed during the Covid-19 pandemic within a large multispecialty orthopedic practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,048,559 patient encounters from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022 at a single orthopedic practice was performed. Primary outcomes were the percent of encounters with opioids prescribed and total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per opioid prescription. Differences in outcomes were assessed by calendar year. Encounters were then divided into two groups: pre-Covid (1/1/2019-2/29/2020) and Covid (3/1/2020-12/31/2022). Univariate analyses were used to evaluate differences in diagnoses and outcomes between periods. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess changes in outcomes during Covid after controlling for differences in diagnoses. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The percentage of encounters with opioids prescribed decreased from a high of 4.0% in 2015 to a low of 1.6% in 2021 and 2022 (p < 0.001). MMEs per prescription decreased from 283.6 ± 213.2 in 2015 to a low of 138.6 ± 100.4 in 2019 (p < 0.001). After adjusting for diagnoses, no significant differences in either opioid prescribing rates (post-COVID OR = 0.997, p = 0.893) or MMEs (post-COVID ß = 2.726, p = 0.206) were observed between the pre- and post-COVID periods. CONCLUSION: During the Covid-19 pandemic opioid prescribing levels remained below historical averages. While continued efforts are needed to minimize opioid overprescribing, it appears that the significant progress made toward this goal was not lost during the pandemic era.

Colorectal Anastomosis Versus Colostomy Creation in High MELD Patients: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Liver failure patients are at increased risk of surgical complications. The decision to perform a colonic anastomosis vs a colostomy in urgent colorectal surgery remains unclear. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database was queried for patients undergoing nonelective colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2018. MELD score was calculated and stratified into 3 groups. Subgroup analysis of the high-MELD group was performed. RESULTS: Higher MELD scores were associated with significantly higher mortality. Colostomy formation was consistent between intermediate and high-MELD groups. In high-MELD patients, colonic anastomosis was associated with higher mortality than those receiving colostomy (41.1% vs 28.4%, P < .001). Patients receiving colostomy had higher rates of wound complications, but lower rates of return to OR and non-wound complications. Regression analysis revealed that colostomy formation remained an independent predictor of survival (mortality OR = .594, P < .001). DISCUSSION: High-MELD patients undergoing nonelective colorectal surgery have increased risk of complications such as mortality. Patients in this group receiving an anastomosis have increased complications and mortality, and may benefit from colostomy formation.

Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion Patients Stratified by the Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) Classification System.

Background and objective The Meyerding classification system remains the most common classification system for spondylolisthesis based on the percentages of vertebral translation. However, the majority of patients with degenerative disease fall into Grade 1, limiting its utility in this subset of patients. The Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification system provides a simple radiographic framework for classifying degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) patients by incorporating disc height, kyphosis, and anterior translation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes vary across different CARDS groups in patients undergoing one- or two-level lumbar fusion for DLS. Methods The patients were classified into one of the following four CARDS groups - Type A: advanced disc space collapse with no evidence of kyphosis; Type B: partially preserved disc space with less than 5.0 mm of translation; Type C: partially preserved disc space with greater than 5.0 mm of translation; and Type D: kyphotic alignment. Univariate analyses were performed to compare demographics, symptoms, clinical outcomes, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical (PH) and mental health (MH) scores across groups. Results Ninety-one patients were included in the study. Based on the CARDS classification, there were three (3%) Type A patients, 25 (28%) Type B, 58 (64%) Type C, and five (5%) Type D. No significant differences in baseline demographics, symptom duration, or PROMIS scores were observed across groups. Interbody utilization varied, ranging from 19% in CARDS C (n=11) to 60% in CARDS B (n=15) and D (n=3) patients (p=0.005). Thirty-day clinical outcomes were similar across groups. At an average follow-up of 8.9 months, improvements in PROMIS PH and MH scores and rates of clinically significant improvement were similar across groups. Conclusions Based on our findings, patients undergoing lumbar fusion for DLS present with similar demographic and clinical characteristics and experience similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes when stratified using the CARDS classification system. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) can be effective for various radiographic presentations of DLS. Further research is warranted to assess the utility of CARDS in preoperative planning.

Disparities in Patient Reported Outcome Measure Completion Rates and Baseline Function in Newly Presenting Spine Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate disparities in patient reported outcome measures (PROM) completion rates and baseline function scores among newly presenting spine patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies have demonstrated that minority patients and those of low socioeconomic status may present with worse physical and mental health on PROMs. As PROMs are increasingly used in clinical care, research, and health policy, accurate assessment of health status among populations relies on the successful completion of PROM instruments. METHODS: A retrospective review of 10,803 consecutive new patients presenting to a single multidisciplinary spine clinic from June 2020 to September 2022 was performed. Univariate statistics were performed to compare demographics between patients who did and did not complete PROMs. Multivariable analysis was used to compare PROM instrument completion rates by race, ethnicity, and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and baseline scores among responders. RESULTS: 68.4% of patients completed PROMs at the first clinic visit. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and diagnosis type, patients of non-white race (OR=0.661, 95%-CI=0.599-0.729, P<0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR=0.569, 95%-CI=0.448-0.721, P<0.001), and increased social vulnerability (OR=0.608, 95%-CI=0.511-0.723, P<0.001) were less likely to complete PROMs. In the multivariable models, patients of non-white race reported lower levels of physical function (ß=-6.5, 95%-CI=-12.4 to -0.6, P=0.032) and higher levels of pain intensity (ß=0.6, 95%-CI=0.2-1.0, P=0.005). Hispanic ethnicity (ß=1.5, 95%-CI=0.5-2.5, P=0.004) and increased social vulnerability (ß=1.1, 95%-CI=0.4-1.8, P=0.002) were each associated with increased pain intensity. CONCLUSION: Among newly presenting spine patients, those of non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, and with increased social vulnerability were less likely to complete PROMs. As these subpopulations also reported worse physical function or pain intensity, additional strategies are needed to better capture patient reported health status in order to avoid bias in clinical care, outcomes research and health policy.

Social Determinants of Health in Maryland Hip Arthroscopy Patients.

Background Prior studies have demonstrated racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) completion rates, and improvement exists across multiple orthopedic conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess whether these disparities are present in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy (HA) procedures. Methods A retrospective study of 306 patients undergoing HA from 2021 to 2023 was performed. Social determinants of health (SDOH) were compared between HA patients and the general Maryland population. Patients were then classified by whether they completed baseline and six-month PROMs (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) instrument). Patients who completed PROMIS-PF were classified by whether or not they achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at six months. Demographics and SDOH were compared using univariate analyses between patients who did and did not complete PROMs and between those who did and did not achieve MCID. SDOH were evaluated at the zip-code level using regional health information exchange measures. Results Compared to the Maryland population, HA patients resided in areas of lower social vulnerability. Preoperative and six-month PROMs were completed by 102 (33%) patients. No significant differences in demographics or any SDOH were found between patients who did and did not complete PROMs. Six-month MCID was achieved in 75 of 102 (74%) patients with complete PROMs; no significant differences in demographics or SDOH were observed between patients who did and did not achieve MCID. Conclusions For patients undergoing HA, disparities in patient-reported outcome completion rates and postoperative functional improvement do not appear to be present across demographics and SDOH, indicating equitable care is being delivered.

Social vulnerability adversely affects emergency-department utilization but not patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple studies demonstrate social deprivation is associated with inferior outcomes after total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty; its effect on patient-reported outcomes is debated. The primary objective of this study evaluated the relationship between social vulnerability and the PROMIS-PF measure in patients undergoing THA and TKA. A secondary aim compared social vulnerability between patients who required increased resource utilization or experienced complications and those who didn't. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 537 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 was performed. The Centers for Disease Control Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) were used to quantify socioeconomic disadvantage. The cohort was split into THA and TKA populations; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 48.6% of patients achieved PROMIS-PF MCID at 1-year postoperatively. Higher levels of overall social vulnerability (0.40 vs. 0.28, p = 0.03) were observed in TKA patients returning to the ED within 90-days of discharge. Increased overall SVI (OR = 9.18, p = 0.027) and household characteristics SVI (OR = 9.57, p = 0.015) were independent risk factors for 90-day ED returns after TKA. In THA patients, increased vulnerability in the household type and transportation dimension was observed in patients requiring 90-day ED returns (0.51 vs. 0.37, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Despite an increased risk for 90-day ED returns, patients with increased social vulnerability still obtain good 1-year functional outcomes. Initiatives seeking to mitigate the effect of social deprivation on TJA outcomes should aim to provide safe alternatives to ED care during early recovery.

Non-White Race and Concomitant Orthopedic Conditions Are Risk Factors for Failure to Achieve Clinically Relevant Improvement After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Data from the American Joint Replacement Registry demonstrate that 1-year minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are substantially lower when using general patient reported outcome measures, such as Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), than joint specific measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient characteristics and outcomes associated with MCID achievement after TKA using the PROMIS-PF measure. METHODS: A retrospective review of 263 patients undergoing TKA with preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMIS-PF scores from March 12, 2020 to February 8, 2022 was performed. Three multivariate models were built to evaluate predictors of MCID achievement. Preoperative predictors evaluated included demographics, comorbidities, history of spine and knee surgery, and baseline PROMIS-PF. Postoperative clinical outcomes evaluated included lengths of stay, discharge statuses, complications, and utilizations of other orthopaedic services. RESULTS: There were 109 patients (41%) who achieved an MCID at 1-year postoperatively. Non-white patients had 2.17 times lower odds of achieving MCID. No clinical outcomes assessed were independently predictive of MCID achievement. During the 1-year postoperative period, 63% of patients sought care for another orthopaedic condition. Patients requiring postoperative injections on another joint had a 2.27 times lower odds of achieving MCID. Those seen for spine conditions postoperatively had a 2.44 lower odds of achieving MCID. CONCLUSIONS: Race, postoperative injections, and treatment for spine conditions after TKA were independent predictors of failure to achieve MCID. These results may guide preoperative patient consultation and risk-adjustment in future studies using PROMIS-PF as an endpoint for evaluation of TKA outcomes.

Addressing the Challenge of Spine Patient Triage: Development of a Simple Algorithm for Identification of Potential Surgical Candidates.

INTRODUCTION: Given that most spine conditions do not require surgical intervention, using surgeons to manage the subset of patients potentially requiring surgery is the most efficient resource allocation strategy. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple algorithm for identifying patients most likely to require spine surgery that could be used to appropriately triage this population to surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective review of 5,886 consecutive new patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine clinic from March 2021 to September 2022 was conducted. The primary outcome was whether a patient underwent spine surgery during the study period. A total of 64 independent variables were recorded from patient intake and the first visit. A gradient boosted model was generated to identify the independent variables most associated with undergoing surgery. The five most important variables were entered into a multiple logistic regression model, and a simplified decision support tool was generated and assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 440 of 5886 patients (7.5%) underwent surgery during the study period. The following variables were identified as the top five predictors of spine surgery: patient goal of interest in learning about spine surgery, history of spine injections, difficulty walking a mile, radicular symptoms greater than axial symptoms, and increased age. Each of these variables was confirmed to be independently associated with undergoing surgery (all P < 0.001). The decision support tool yielded a sensitivity of 60.0%, specificity of 76.6%, likelihood ratio of 2.56, positive predictive value of 17.2%, and negative predictive value of 96.0% for predicting surgery. An AUC of 0.683 was achieved. CONCLUSION: A simple 5-question algorithm incorporating patient demographics, symptoms, treatment history, physical function, and patient goals may improve the ability of practices to identify potential spine surgery candidates before their first visit. Prospective application and evaluation of the algorithm to evaluate whether it improves the triage of appropriate patients to spine surgeons is warranted.

Injections prior to hip arthroscopy are associated with increased risk of repeat hip arthroscopy at 1 and 5 years.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that intra-articular hip injections prior to hip arthroscopy (HA) can be a helpful diagnostic tool. However, local anesthetic and corticosteroid injections can be chondrotoxic and corticosteroid injections have been shown to increase the risk of infection during subsequent surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative injections adversely affect outcomes of HA using a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TriNetX database was retrospectively queried. Patients undergoing HA for femoroacetabular impingement with at least 1 year of claims runout were included in the analysis. Patients were grouped by whether they had a hip injection within 1 year prior to HA. The rates of repeat HA, total hip arthroplasty (THA), infection, osteonecrosis, and new onset hip OA at 1- and 5-years postoperatively were compared between groups. Statistical significance was assessed at α = 0.05. RESULTS: 6511 HA patients with previous injection and 1178 HA patients without previous injection were included. Patients with a previous injection were overall younger (32.3 vs. 34.7 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (69 vs. 48%, p < 0.001) and had a higher BMI (26.3 vs. 25.7 kg/m2, p = 0.043). At 1 and 5-years postoperatively, patients with any injection were 1.43 (p < 0.001) and 1.89 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA, respectively. At 1 and 5-years postoperatively, patients who underwent a corticosteroid injection were 2.29 (p < 0.001) and 1.89 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA than patients with local anesthetic injection only and 1.56 (p < 0.001) and 2.08 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA than patients with no injection. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarticular hip injections prior to hip arthroscopy, particularly corticosteroid injections, are associated with increased risk of repeat hip arthroscopy at 1 and 5 years. Additional studies are needed to elucidate this risk.

Recurrent cyclops lesion after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone tendon bone allograft: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Cyclops lesions are a known complication of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with symptomatic cyclops syndrome occurring in up to 11% of surgeries. Recurrent cyclops lesions have been rarely documented; this case study documents the successful treatment of a recurrent cyclops lesion. CASE SUMMARY: A 28-year-old female presented following a non-contact injury to the right knee. Workup and clinical exam revealed an ACL tear, and arthroscopic reconstruction was performed. Two years later a cyclops lesion was discovered and removed via arthroscopic synovectomy. Seven months postoperatively, the patient presented with pain, stiffness, and difficulty achieving terminal extension. A smaller recurrent cyclops lesion was diagnosed, and a repeat synovectomy was performed. The patient recovered fully. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of recurrent cyclops lesion after bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft ACL reconstruction presenting as cyclops syndrome.

Optimizing Patient Outcomes in Spinal Surgery: An Investigation Into Anesthesiologists' Case Volume.

Introduction Nearly one million patients in the United States undergo spine surgical procedures annually to seek relief from chronic back and neck pain. A multidisciplinary approach is key to ensuring the efficiency and safety of the surgical process, with the anesthesia team, nursing, surgeon, and healthcare facilities all playing a role. The purpose of this study is to capture potential associations between the anesthesiologists' case volume and patient postoperative outcomes in the early recovery period. Methods A retrospective review of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), lumbar decompression (LD), and lumbar fusion (LF) patients from July 2019 to June 2023 was performed. Anesthesiologists were categorized into low, medium, and high volumes of spine surgical cases. Univariate analysis was performed on patient demographics, intraoperative measures, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) measures, and postoperative measures by anesthesiologist volume. Results This study included 545 ACDF, 815 LD, and 1,144 LF patients. There were no differences between groups in ACDF patients by anesthesiologist volume. When examining patients undergoing LD, there was a difference in patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of three or greater (low volume: 41.7% vs. medium volume: 53.7% vs. high volume: 45.0%; p=0.029). When examining patients undergoing LF, there were differences in patients with low temperatures in PACU (low volume: 2.8% vs. medium volume: 7.3% vs. high volume: 4.2%; p=0.044) and the percentage of patients with a 90-day emergency department return (low volume: 7.7% vs. medium volume: 11.9% vs. high volume: 7.0%; p=0.024). Conclusion While this study found a minimal impact of anesthesiologist volume on postoperative outcomes, recent literature has emphasized the critical role of teamwork and specialized surgical teams to enhance efficiency and patient care. Further studies are warranted to identify other variables in anesthesia, nursing, and surgical team workflow that may impact postoperative outcomes in spinal surgeries.

What is the Optimal Construct to Reduce Failure in Arthroscopic Four Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair?

Background: Re-tear following rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a concerning complication that can lead to poor patient outcomes and necessitate the need for revision surgery. The purpose of our study was to look at the combined construct of knotted vs. knotless medial row and suture vs. suture tape, focusing primarily on re-tear rates following surgery. Methods: A retrospective observational study of 343 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic double row, 4-anchor rotator cuff repair from February 2014 to March 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities and tear characteristics between patients who experienced a symptomatic re-tear and those who did not. Results: The overall symptomatic re-tear rate was 7.6%. Patients who had a knotted medial row repair had a significantly lower rate of re-tear (4.7 vs. 11.3%, p = 0.022). Patients that had a knotted medial row and suture tape repair were significantly less likely to experience a re-tear (OR: 0.180, p = 0.001). Discussion: The use of suture tape and a knotted medial row repair decreases the incidence of symptomatic re-tear following rotator cuff repair. The combined construct of suture tape and a knotted medial row in rotator cuff repair decreases the risk for symptomatic re-tear following surgery.

Effect of Lower Extremity Osteoarthritis on Outcomes of Lumbar Decompression.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate how hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) and total joint arthroplasty impact the outcomes of patients undergoing lumbar decompression. METHODS: A retrospective review of 342 patients undergoing lumbar decompression without fusion from January 2019 and June 2021 at a single institution was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare outcomes between patients with and without concomitant hip or knee OA. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of patients had a hip or knee OA diagnosis and were higher risk as they were older, had higher BMIs, were more likely to be former smokers, had higher ASA scores, and were more likely to undergo 3+ level surgery. Postoperatively, after adjusting for differences between groups, hip or knee OA patients were more likely to be readmitted (OR=12.45, p=0.026) or have a complication (OR=13.77, p=0.031). However, patient reported outcomes as measured by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-physical function. were similar at 1-3 months and 3-6 months. Higher levels of physical function were observed at 3-6 months postoperatively in hip OA patients with a history of THA. CONCLUSION: Patients with concomitant hip or knee OA are at higher risk for readmission and postoperative complications but may achieve similar levels of physical function as those without OA.

The Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Approach on Short-Term Postoperative and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Background While multiple studies have compared outcomes between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral (PL) total hip arthroplasty (THA), the debate over the optimal approach remains. Proponents of the DAA suggest that its muscle-sparing properties and unrestricted rehabilitation facilitate a more rapid return to function. The majority of studies demonstrate that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are similar between approaches beyond the one-year timeframe, but results are mixed when evaluating earlier time points. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and PROs between DAA and PL THAs at six weeks postoperatively. Methods A retrospective review of 749 primary THAs (151 PL, 598 DAA) from March 2020 to November 2022 was performed. All surgeries were performed by one of the five board-certified and fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. All patients completed Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) questionnaires preoperatively and at six weeks postoperatively. A univariate comparison of clinical outcomes (length of stay (LOS), home discharge rate, 90-day ED returns, and readmissions) and six-week PROMIS-PF scores between approaches was performed. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of the approach on outcomes after adjusting for baseline differences between groups. Results Patients undergoing DAA THA experienced significantly shorter average LOS (0.71 vs. 1.36 days, p<0.001), higher rates of home discharge (99.0 vs. 92.1%, p<0.001), and lower rates of 90-day readmissions (0.7 vs. 6.0%, p<0.001) than those undergoing the PL approach. At six weeks postoperatively, DAA patients achieved higher average PROMIS-PF scores (42.2 vs. 39.9, p=0.001). After adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index and baseline physical function, the DAA was significantly associated with shorter LOS (ß=-0.52, p<0.001), increased odds of home discharge (OR=5.70, p=0.001), reduced risk of 90-day readmission (OR=0.14, p=0.001), and higher PROMIS-PF scores at six weeks postoperatively (ß=1.37, p=0.045). Conclusion In comparison to patients undergoing PL THA, those treated using the DAA experienced improved clinical and PROs over the six-week postoperative period. While both approaches resulted in satisfactory outcomes, these results support the assertion that DAA THA may result in more rapid recovery and return to function.

Predictors of same day cancellation of elective surgery.

Same day cancellations of surgery have adverse effects on both patients and health care systems. To date, the majority of research has evaluated reasons for same day cancellation, and relatively little is known about risk factors for cancellation. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the accuracy of a model for preoperatively predicting which patients are at risk for experiencing same day cancellation. While accurately predicting which patients are likely to experience same day cancellation remains challenging, predictive models may aid in the early identification of patients at risk for cancellation. Future studies are required to assess whether the use of predictive analytics leads to reduced cancellation rates in practice.

Absorbable Sutures and Telemedicine for Patients Undergoing Trigger Finger Release.

Background In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of care processes that reduce the need for in-person clinic visits while maintaining low complication rates is needed. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing trigger finger release with various suture and follow-up visit types to assess the feasibility of shifting towards telemedicine-based follow-up protocols. Methods A retrospective review of 329 patients undergoing trigger finger release was performed. Patients were classified based on whether or not they received in-office follow-ups; whether they received absorbable or non-absorbable sutures; and whether they were treated using a telemedicine and absorbable suture protocol or other combination of sutures and follow-ups. Univariate statistics were performed to compare outcomes between groups. Results Patients who did not undergo in-office follow-up were more likely to experience residual stiffness or contracture (11.4% vs. 4.1%; p=0.033) but had no significant differences in 30-day reoperation, emergency department (ED) returns, wound complaints, and Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores. When comparing chromic absorbable sutures to non-absorbable sutures, those with absorbable sutures were significantly more likely to have telemedicine visits but were also more likely to have wound complaints (17.9% vs. 8.5%; p=0.022). There was no significant difference in two- and six-week pain scores, 30-day reoperation, ED returns, residual symptoms, and Quick DASH scores. When comparing patients treated using the absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol with those receiving any other type of suture and postoperative follow-up, no significant differences in any postoperative clinical outcome measures were observed. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the use of an absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol for patients undergoing trigger finger release yields similar outcomes as traditional methods of care. However, the use of absorbable sutures may result in decreased patient satisfaction with surgical wound healing.

Disparities in Hand Surgery Exist in Unexpected Populations.

Background The purpose of our study is to investigate disparities in the patient populations and outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR).  Methods A retrospective review of 777 CTR and 395 TFR patients from May 2021 to August 2022 was completed. The shortened form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (QuickDASH) was recorded to evaluate physical function preoperatively and at one and three months postoperatively. This study was deemed institutional review board-exempt by the institutional clinical research committee. Results Compared to CTR, TFR patients resided in zip codes with higher levels of social vulnerability across dimensions of 'household composition and disability' (p=0.018) and 'minority status and language' (p=0.043). When analyzing QuickDASH scores by demographics and procedure, preoperative scores were statistically significantly higher for non-married (p=0.002), White (p=0.003), and female sex (p=0.001) CTR patients. Further, one-month postoperative scores were statistically higher for White and non-married CTR patients (0.016 and 0.015, respectively). At three months postoperatively, female and non-married patients had statistically significant higher scores (0.010 and 0.037, respectively). In TFR patients, one-month postoperative QuickDASH scores for White and female patients were statistically significantly higher (0.018 and 0.007, respectively). There were no significant differences in QuickDASH scores between rural and non-rural patients, household income (HHI) above or below the median, or the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) dimensions.  Conclusion Our study found marital status, sex, and race were associated with disparities in pre-and postoperative physical function in patients undergoing carpal tunnel or trigger finger release. However, future studies are warranted to confirm and develop solutions to disparities within this population.