A 2-hour information session and patient recall has minimal impact on glaucoma-treatment persistence in a mature practice.

PURPOSE: To study the impact of a 2-hour information session and 3 patients' phone calls on patient persistence with glaucoma medication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with glaucoma treatment, part of a 27-year old solo glaucoma practice, were invited to attend the information session. Patients who attended the session (n=342) were contacted by phone 1, 4, 10 months later and regular use of drops was stressed. Patients were unaware of the study. We compared the persistence of the patients before and after attending the session, and their persistence to that of patients who did not attend (n=1187). Persistence with glaucoma medication was assessed by examination of data (2002 to 2007) from a provincial medical and drug insurance database. RESULTS: Patients attending the session had glaucoma for 10 years. They had a better persistence than those who did not attend (P<0.05). Their persistence remained the same 1 year after attending the session but tended to be improved in the first 180 days (P<0.076). During the study period, there was a 4% increase in overall persistence (P<0.05). This could be due to an increase in prostaglandins prescriptions and changes in ß-blockers formulation. CONCLUSIONS: The information session and patient's recalls had a limited impact on patient persistence. This could be due to the selection of a population already persistent (78.9%). The results could have been different in less persistent patients and new patients. It could be different in another practice setting.

Follow-up of angle closure glaucoma suspects after laser iridotomy in Caucasians with normal intraocular pressure at diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term outcome of Caucasian eyes with iridotrabecular trabecular apposition or peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) and fellow eyes with narrow angles only, in eyes with intraocular pressure (IOP) <22 mm Hg at diagnosis and treated with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven Caucasian phakic patients (469 eyes) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years that had both an undilated and dilated gonioscopy after LPI. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included phakic patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years that had both an undilated and dilated gonioscopy after LPI. Excluded were patients with pseudoexfoliation, intraocular surgery, prior acute angle-closure glaucoma or antiglaucoma medication, suspicious glaucoma disk, secondary angle closure, or iridoplasty. We censored patients after any kind of intraocular surgery. Main outcome measures where the date of IOP elevation and beginning of antiglaucoma medication. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-nine eyes were included. Mean follow-up was 8.5 ± 5.53 years. No apposition/PAS was observed in 84.0% of the eyes after LPI. At 10 years, 38.7% of the eyes had increased IOP and 17.3% required medication. No difference in outcomes was observed between argon and neodymium-YAG LPI or between the eyes with and without apposition/PAS before LPI. Younger patients and those with no apposition/PAS after LPI had a better prognosis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Many angle closure glaucoma suspects developed increased IOP and required medical treatment after LPI.