Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DMP 728, a platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, in healthy subjects.

DMP 728 showed a dose-dependent inhibition of platelet aggregation at doses of 0.05 to 0.9 mg per subject, with a maximal inhibition (> 90%) of platelet aggregation at doses of 0.9 mg per subject and higher. Minimal changes in bleeding time from baseline were observed at doses up to 0.6 mg per subject. At the 0.9 mg/subject dose level, bleeding time was prolonged by approximately twofold to threefold above the baseline. At higher doses (1.5 mg/subject to 3.9 mg/subject), bleeding time prolongation was > 30 minutes during the infusion. In all dose groups, bleeding times returned to the control value within 8 hours after cessation of the infusion. Maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve of DMP 728 increased linearly and proportionally to the dose. No clinical changes in vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, physical examinations, coagulation tests, or stool hemoccult tests were observed at any of the doses. In conclusion, DMP 728 is a potent antiplatelet agent and well tolerated at doses ranging from 0.05 to 3.0 mg/subject.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of a phenytoin prodrug given i.v. or i.m. in patients.

ACC-9653, a prodrug of phenytoin synthesized to be water soluble, is converted to phenytoin by phosphatases. In this study, 43 patients received ACC-9653 IV or IM. Side effects were transient and minor. The conversion half-lives of ACC-9653 after intravenous and intramuscular administration averaged 8.4 and 32.7 minutes, respectively. Peak phenytoin concentrations occurred 42 minutes after IV and 151 minutes after IM administration.

Nicardipine versus placebo for the treatment of postoperative hypertension.

Postoperative hypertension can cause serious complications, including bleeding from fresh anastomoses, cardiovascular accident, and myocardial ischemia. Therefore rapid control of blood pressure is essential to prevent poor outcome. In this study, 30 American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II patients who did not have cardiac surgery and subsequently developed postoperative hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either nicardipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, or placebo. Intravenous nicardipine was given as a loading bolus of 10 mg/hr for 5 minutes and was titrated to 15 mg/hr if needed to achieve a therapeutic response. After therapeutic response, intravenous nicardipine was decreased to 3 mg/hr and subsequently titrated in increments of 1.0 to 2.5 mg/hr to maintain blood pressure control. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures during titration and maintenance did not differ significantly from preoperative levels in patients treated with nicardipine. The mean time to therapeutic response for the nicardipine-treated group was 8.67 +/- 1.46 minutes, and the median time to offset of action was 15 minutes. Eleven of the 12 patients who received placebo were crossed over to antihypertensive therapy, and of these, 10 received intravenous nicardipine. In this group all achieved therapeutic response in 7.3 +/- 1.18 minutes. The usefulness of intravenous nicardipine for postoperative hypertension was demonstrated in this study by: (1) the rapid control of blood pressure, (2) its continued efficacy during maintenance, and (3) little need to adjust dosage to control blood pressure.

Nicardipine in severe hypertension: oral therapy following intravenous treatment.

Nicardipine is an investigational dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker. In the present study, 21 patients with severe hypertension were treated with oral nicardipine, alone or in combination with beta-blockers and diuretics for 4-5 weeks, following initial control of their blood pressure with intravenous nicardipine. Each of the 21 patients had a satisfactory response to intravenous nicardipine which was administered as an infusion following initial blood pressure lowering. At 1 h prior to discontinuation of the intravenous treatment, oral nicardipine therapy was begun as a 40 mg dose. Oral nicardipine, 40 mg t.i.d., was continued for the remainder of hospitalization and for a 4-5-week outpatient follow-up period. The dose of oral nicardipine was downtitrated and additional antihypertensive drugs, beta-adrenergic blocking agents and/or diuretics, were added to maintain blood pressure in an acceptable range. Compared to baseline, mean supine systolic blood pressure was lowered significantly (p less than 0.001) by 57 mmHg at the end of intravenous maintenance and by 50 mmHg at the end of oral treatment. Likewise, significant (p less than 0.001) decreases in diastolic blood pressure of 43 and 32 mmHg, respectively, were observed for the same time periods. At the end of oral treatment, 6 patients remained on nicardipine monotherapy, 8 patients were on two-drug therapy and 7 patients required three-drug therapy. Side-effects were mild except for a moderate headache reported in one patient during intravenous treatment. From these observations we conclude that oral nicardipine is a useful new agent for initial, single treatment of chronic severe hypertension, although a significant number of patients eventually need additional antihypertensive therapy.

Changes of plasma renin activity and atrial natriuretic factor during intravenous nicardipine treatment of severe hypertension.

Intravenous nicardipine was given to 32 severe hypertensive patients in an increasing dose, titration fashion. Samples for plasma renin activity and plasma atrial natriuretic factor concentration were obtained at the following times: before treatment, at the time of titration response and at the end of a maintenance period. The mean time required to achieve the titration response was 29 min. Plasma renin activity was increased by 32% (p less than 0.05) at the titration response and 181% (p less than 0.005) at the end of an 8-12 h maintenance nicardipine infusion. Atrial natriuretic factor concentration was unchanged from baseline at titration response and was decreased by 25% (p less than 0.005) at the end of maintenance. Mean plasma nicardipine dose was 6.95 mg/h at the titration response and 8.76 mg/h at the end of maintenance. These results suggest that alterations in plasma renin activity and atrial natriuretic factor concentrations may be associated with blood pressure reduction rather than with a direct drug action on release mechanisms.

Phenytoin prodrug 3-phosphoryloxymethyl phenytoin (ACC-9653): pharmacokinetics in patients following intravenous and intramuscular administration.

A phenytoin prodrug, 3-phosphoryloxymethyl phenytoin (ACC-9653; 1), has been developed with more favorable physicochemical properties than phenytoin for parenteral administration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of 1 following iv and im administration in adult patients receiving chronic oral phenytoin monotherapy. Each patient (9 males, 1 female) received a single iv dose of undiluted 1 equivalent to their twice daily phenytoin dose (100-200 mg). An equivalent dose of im 1 was administered in the gluteus maximus muscle one week later. Serial blood samples were obtained after each dose. Phenytoin and 1 concentrations were measured using HPLC. Compartmental analysis using weighted nonlinear least squares, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis were performed on each patient's concentration-time data. Data following iv 1 in eight of ten patients were best described using a two-compartment model. Mean pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for iv 1 in these patients were central volume of distribution (Vdc) of 0.040 +/- 0.0084 L/kg and plasma disappearance half-life (t1/2 alpha) of 8.0 +/- 2.9 min ("conversion" t1/2). Overall mean clearance (CL) was 0.24 +/- 0.080 L/kg/h in the 10 patients. Mean pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for im 1 were a rate constant (ka) of 2.47 +/- 1.41 h-1 and an absolute bioavailability (F) of 100.5 +/- 20.3%. Mean observed tmax values for phenytoin were 0.57 +/- 0.26 and 1.46 +/- 0.76 h following iv and im 1, respectively. Model-independent estimates of clearance agreed well with the compartmental analyses. Steady-state predose phenytoin concentrations did not significantly vary from the comparable concentrations following iv 1 administration (p = 0.22).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of intracoronary nicardipine on methylergonovine-induced coronary artery spasm in patients with variant angina.

In a double-blind, randomized placebo controlled study, the effect of intracoronary (IC) nicardipine (0.4 mg) on methylergonovine (0.4 mg) induced coronary artery spasm was assessed in 16 patients with a history of variant angina. Reversal of the methylergonovine-induced coronary artery spasm was observed in 100% of patients treated with IC nicardipine and 25% of patients treated with placebo (p less than 0.01). There were no significant differences between the nicardipine and placebo treatment groups with respect to heart rate, blood pressure, proportion of patients experiencing chest pain or ST segment changes. These findings demonstrate that IC nicardipine is safe and could be effective in the reversal of coronary artery spasm in patients with variant angina.

Phenytoin prodrug: preclinical and clinical studies.

The currently available phenytoin (PHT) solution has many disadvantages stemming from poor aqueous solubility of PHT. A novel approach to solve the problem has been the synthesis of a phosphate ester of PHT (PHT prodrug ACC-9653). This water-soluble compound is metabolized rapidly into PO4 and PHT. A four center open-label, baseline-controlled study of 43 patients with epilepsy maintained on oral twice-daily PHT monotherapy was performed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of the prodrug. Patients received an i.v. or i.m. dose of ACC-9653 at a dose equivalent to the patients' morning dose of PHT. Intravenous dosages were infused at a rate of 75 mg/min, and i.m. dosages were given as one or two injections. After a period of 6 days, during which patients were again maintained with oral PHT, they were given a dose of ACC-9653 via whichever route they had not yet received. The Tmax of the prodrug averaged 5.7 and 36 min (0.095 and 0.606 h) after i.v. and i.m. administrations, respectively. The elimination half-life of ACC-9653 (conversion from prodrug to PHT) after i.v. and i.m. administration was 8.4 and 32.7 min (0.140 and 0.545 h), respectively, and both were independent of the dose. The plasma clearance of ACC-9653 was not dependent on dose or route of administration and averaged 19.8 +/- 1.16 and 17.8 +/- 0.83 L/h after i.v. and i.m. administrations, respectively. The area under curve ratio of PHT after i.m. and i.v. ACC-9653 was 1.17 +/- 0.13 which was not significantly different from 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Safety, tolerance and pharmacokinetics of intravenous doses of the phosphate ester of 3-hydroxymethyl-5,5-diphenylhydantoin: a new prodrug of phenytoin.

A new prodrug of phenytoin, the disodium phosphate ester of 3-hydroxymethyl-5,5-diphenylhydantoin (ACC-9653), was administered intravenously over 30 minutes to four different groups of volunteers at doses of 150, 300, 600, and 1200 mg. The prodrug and phenytoin were measured in plasma samples, collected at specified times, by specific high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assays. The prodrug, after achieving a maximum concentration at the end of the 30-minute infusion (Cmax 20, 36, 75, 129 micrograms/mL) declined rapidly with a half-life (t1/2) of about 8 minutes. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (10, 19, 43, 77 mg.hr/L) was proportional to dose whereas the total clearance, 14 L/hr, was independent of dose. The volume of distribution of the prodrug, a polar, water-soluble molecule was about 2.6 L, indicating that most of the dose remained in the plasma. The concentration of phenytoin reached 90% of its maximum about 12 minutes after the end of the infusion of ACC-9653. At the dose of 1200 mg of prodrug, the average peak concentration of phenytoin was about 17 micrograms/mL, near the upper limit of the therapeutic range. Adverse reactions (lightheadedness, nystagmus, incoordination) were minor and attributed to phenytoin. No significant abnormalities in ECG, Holter monitoring, or EEG were noted after the infusion of ACC-9653.

Intravenous nicardipine for the treatment of severe hypertension.

PURPOSE: Severe hypertension responds to treatment with nifedipine given orally or sublingually. Nicardipine hydrochloride, a water soluble dihydropyridine analogue similar to nifedipine, has less of a negative ionotropic effect and produces less reflex tachycardia than nifedipine. Our purpose was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of intravenous nicardipine in a group of patients with severe hypertension (defined as a supine diastolic blood pressure of more than 120 mm Hg). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with severe hypertension received treatment with intravenous nicardipine. Nicardipine titration was performed using doses of 4 to 15 mg/hour to achieve therapeutic goal (diastolic blood pressure 95 mm Hg or less or decrease in diastolic blood pressure of more than 25 mm Hg). After this therapeutic end-point was reached, patients received maintainance therapy with nicardipine for varying lengths of time: one hour (Group I), six hours (Group II), or 24 hours. When blood pressure control was lost, patients in Groups I and II entered a second maintenance period lasting a maximum of 24 hours. Onset and offset of action of nicardipine at various infusion rates and times of infusion were measured. RESULTS: Onset time to achieve therapeutic response was rapid at 15 mg/hour (0.31 +/- 0.13 hours) when compared with lower doses (1.11 +/- 0.36 hours at 4 mg/hour; 0.54 +/- 0.09 hours at 5 mg/hour; 0.52 +/- 0.09 hours at 7 to 7.5 mg/hour). Those who showed a therapeutic response received maintenance infusions with nicardipine for one (n = 7), six (n = 6), or 24 (n = 5) hours. Sustained blood pressure control at a constant rate of nicardipine infusion was seen in all patients during the maintenance period. After discontinuation of nicardipine, the time for offset of action (increase in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more) was independent of duration of infusion. Decreases in both systolic and diastolic pressures correlated well with plasma nicardipine levels. Heart rate increased by about 10 beats/minute, but this increase did not correlate with plasma nicardipine levels. Side effects were minimal, consisting of headache and flushing. In seven patients, local phlebitis developed at the site of infusion. This occurred after at least 14 hours of infusion at a single site, and the incidence can probably be reduced by shortening the infusion time at a single site. CONCLUSION: Nicardipine appears to be a safe and effective drug for intravenous use in the treatment of severe hypertension.

Efficacy of esmolol in the treatment and transfer of patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias to alternate oral antiarrhythmic agents.

The efficacy and safety of esmolol, a titratable intravenous beta-adrenergic blocking agent with a short elimination half-life (t 1/2 = 9.0 min) was evaluated in a multicenter open-label study for the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (heart rate greater than 100 bpm). The study also investigated the feasibility of transferring patients from esmolol to alternate oral antiarrhythmic agents without loss of therapeutic response. Of the 113 patients studied, 95 (84%) achieved therapeutic response (reduction in heart rate of 15% or more or conversion to sinus rhythm). Most of these patients (93%) achieved the therapeutic response at esmolol doses of 200 micrograms/kg/min or lower. Transfer from esmolol to an oral antiarrhythmic agent(s) was studied in 76 patients. Alternate antiarrhythmic agents used in this study were digoxin (N = 25), propranolol (N = 21), verapamil (N = 10), metoprolol (N = 11), quinidine (N = 2), and a combination of two antiarrhythmic agents (N = 7). Sixty-seven (88%) patients were successfully transferred to oral antiarrhythmic agents without loss of the therapeutic response obtained with esmolol. The most frequent adverse effect observed during the study was hypotension, which resolved quickly (16 +/- 14 min) either by decreasing the dose or by discontinuation of esmolol infusion. This study supports previous observations concerning the safety and efficacy of esmolol in the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the majority of patients successfully treated with esmolol can be safely and effectively transferred to oral therapy with alternate antiarrhythmic agents.

Hemodynamic effects of flestolol, a titratable short-acting intravenous beta-adrenergic receptor blocker.

The hemodynamic effects of flestolol were evaluated in 30 patients undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained during baseline (prior to flestolol), at steady state during IV flestolol infusion (1, 5, and 10 micrograms/kg/min) and at 20 to 30 minutes after discontinuation (postinfusion). Flestolol-induced hemodynamic changes were similar to those induced by other beta blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Significant dose-dependent reduction in heart rate, rate pressure product, and increase in peripheral vascular resistance were seen. Flestolol produced clinically insignificant decrease in myocardial contractility as shown by slight decrease in LVdp/dt, CI, and LVEF. Hemodynamic data from patients with paced heart rate, further confirms a direct mild cardiac depressant effect of flestolol, a finding common to other beta blockers. Consistent with the short elimination half-life of flestolol (t1/2 = 6.5 minutes), most of the hemodynamic changes rapidly returned to preinfusion level within 20 to 30 minutes following its discontinuation. Thus flestolol, with its unique pharmacokinetic profile and titrability, may be beneficial in the treatment of critically ill patients.

Esmolol: a short-acting titratable beta-blocker in acute myocardial ischemia.

Esmolol (Brevibloc) is a potent, titratable, cardioselective beta-blocker with a short elimination half-life (t1/2 = 9.2 min) and no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. It was designed for use in critically ill patients who would benefit from the short duration of beta-adrenergic blockade. Esmolol's short duration of action allows for rapid onset and control of hemodynamic effects. Its safety and efficacy has been demonstrated in patients with acute myocardial ischemia. This review provides a brief summary of the pharmacology of esmolol, as well as experimental and clinical evidence on the use of esmolol in acute myocardial ischemia.

Esmolol: a titratable short-acting intravenous beta blocker for acute critical care settings.

Esmolol (Brevibloc) is an intravenous, short-acting, titratable, cardioselective beta blocker with a very rapid onset and offset of action (t1/2 = 9.2 minutes). Esmolol-induced beta blockade can be maintained as long as infusion is continued. It exhibits neither intrinsic sympathomimetic activity nor significant membrane-stabilizing activity. It is rapidly metabolized by an esterase in the erythrocyte cytosol to an inactive acid metabolite. Its hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects are similar to those of other beta blockers. Unlike the effects of other beta blockers, however, the effects of esmolol dissipate rapidly to baseline within 30 minutes after its discontinuation. Evidence obtained from clinical studies indicates that esmolol is effective and safe in reducing the ventricular rate in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, and in reducing the heart rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and/or unstable angina. Esmolol has also been shown to be effective and safe in attenuating the tachycardia and hypertension seen during the intraoperative period. Data from postoperative patients indicate that esmolol is ideal as sole-agent therapy for the treatment of moderate postoperative hypertension associated with a hyperdynamic state. The short duration of action and titratability of esmolol make it an ideal drug for use in patients in whom the clinical need for beta blockade is limited in duration, and it offers additional safety in patients in whom beta blockade is beneficial; however, it might be precluded because of coexisting contraindications. To date, experience with esmolol in over 1200 patients has been gathered, and the adverse effect profile is basically similar to that reported here.

Esmolol-digoxin drug interaction.

An open-label baseline-controlled study was conducted in 11 healthy male subjects to study the possible interaction between the cardioselective, short-acting beta blocker esmolol and digoxin when administered concurrently under steady-state conditions. Steady-state concentration, elimination half-life, and the total body clearance of esmolol were not changed significantly (P greater than .05) by digoxin. Digoxin peak concentration and the time to reach the peak concentration were not affected by esmolol. However, the digoxin AUC during the six-hour esmolol infusion increased from 2.60 +/- 0.59 to 2.88 +/- 0.75 ng.hr/mL (P less than .05). There were no clinically significant changes in the heart rate and blood pressure during this drug interaction study. The PR intervals were similar between digoxin monotherapy and esmolol plus digoxin combined treatment. Although digoxin did not influence the kinetics of esmolol, the small increase seen in digoxin serum concentration during the combination therapy warrants that caution be exercised during concurrent administration of esmolol and digoxin to patients.

Hemodynamic effects of esmolol, an ultrashort-acting beta blocker.

The hemodynamic effects of esmolol were evaluated in 12 male patients at rest (mean age, 51 +/- 10 years) undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained during baseline (prior to esmolol), at steady state (during an intravenous infusion of esmolol 300 micrograms/kg/min), and at 30 minutes after stopping esmolol (postinfusion). Esmolol produced hemodynamic effects similar to the effects of other beta blockers. Significant reductions in rate-pressure product (mean decrease, 15%), cardiac index (mean decrease, 17%), stroke volume index (mean decrease, 13%), left ventricular stroke work index (mean decrease, 20%), and left ventricular ejection fraction (mean decrease, 18%) were observed. In contrast to other beta blockers, all hemodynamic effects of esmolol had returned to baseline values within 30 minutes after the infusion stopped. One patient exhibited hypotension during the esmolol infusion; this episode resolved without sequelae after discontinuation of esmolol. In summary, the effects of esmolol at rest on hemodynamic parameters and left ventricular function are similar to other beta-adrenergic blocking agents. Due to its ultrashort half-life, esmolol can be administered safely in critically ill patients whose disease status makes treatment with currently available beta blockers risky.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flestolol, a new short-acting, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flestolol, a new short-acting, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist, were examined in nine healthy subjects after a constant intravenous infusion of 5 micrograms/kg/min for 72 hours. Flestolol blood levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. In all subjects, flestolol blood concentration attained steady state 30 minutes after initiation of infusion. The mean +/- standard deviation steady-state concentration of flestolol was 31.1 +/- 12.0 ng/mL. The elimination half-life averaged 7.2 minutes. The mean +/- standard deviation total body clearance was 181 +/- 66 mL/min/kg. The apparent volume of distribution and the area under the curve averaged 1.89 L/kg and 2.23 micrograms-hr/mL, respectively. Flestolol did not cause any significant change (P greater than .05) in the heart rate or systolic or diastolic blood pressure from the baseline. Flestolol significantly (P less than .05) attenuated the isoproterenol-induced increase in heart rate and systolic blood pressure and decrease in diastolic blood pressure in comparison with baseline. The average maximum reduction in isoproterenol tachycardia was in the range of 63% to 79% during flestolol infusion. There was a rapid recovery from beta blockade after termination of flestolol infusion; the recovery averaged 96% 20 minutes after the infusion was stopped. We conclude that flestolol exhibits a very short half-life and is cleared mainly by extrahepatic routes. It is an effective beta blocker and possesses a short duration of action.

Tolerance and beta-adrenergic blocking activity of flestolol, a short-acting beta blocker.

The tolerance and beta-adrenergic blocking activity of flestolol, a short-acting beta-blocker, was investigated in 30 subjects. Flestolol infused intravenously at doses up to 100 micrograms/kg/min was found to be well tolerated. A dose-dependent attenuation of isoproterenol-induced tachycardia and increase in systolic blood pressure occurred with flestolol at doses ranging from 0.5 to 15.0 micrograms/kg/min. The average percent reduction in isoproterenol-induced tachycardia (beta-blockade) at each dose of flestolol, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 15.0, and 50.0 micrograms/kg/min, was 15.1%, 45.9%, 67.0%, 85.9%, and 90.3%, respectively. The onset of beta-blockade occurred within 30 minutes. After the end of flestolol infusion there was a marked reduction in beta-blockade within 6 minutes, with complete recovery from beta-blockade within 30 to 45 minutes. There was a statistically significant (P less than 0.01) positive correlation between flestolol dosage and its blood levels (r = 0.91) as well as between the flestolol-induced beta-blockade and its dosage (r = 0.62).