Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Can J Urol ; 25(2): 9255-9261., 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29680003

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal analgesia is an effective way to control pain and limit opioid use after surgery. The quadratus lumborum block and paravertebral block are two regional anesthesia techniques that leverage multimodal analgesia to improve postoperative pain control. We sought to compare the efficacy of these blocks for pain management following radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of radical cystectomy patients who received bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks (n = 125) or bilateral single shot quadratus lumborum blocks (n = 50) between 2014-2016. The primary outcome was postoperative opiate consumption on day 0. Secondary outcomes included self-reported pain scores and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Quadratus lumborum block patients had similar opioid use on postoperative day 0 compared with paravertebral block patients (29 mg versus 30 mg, p = 0.90). Pain scores on postoperative day 0 were similar between quadratus lumborum block and paravertebral block groups (4.0 versus 3.8, p = 0.72); however, the paravertebral block group had lower pain scores on days 1-3 compared with the quadratus lumborum block group (all p < 0.05). Hospital length of stay was similar between groups (6.6 days versus 6.2 days, p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in opioid consumption among patients receiving bilateral single shot quadratus lumborum blocks and bilateral continuous paravertebral blocks after radical cystectomy. These data suggest that the quadratus lumborum block is a viable alternative for delivering multimodal analgesia in cystectomy patients.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Cistectomía/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
2.
Can J Urol ; 24(4): 8895-8901, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832307

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the use of a high-arginine immunonutrient supplement prior to radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 40 patients to consume a total of four high-arginine immunonutrient shakes per day for 5 days prior to radical cystectomy. The primary outcome measures were safety, tolerability and adherence to the supplementation regimen. Ninety-day postoperative outcomes were also compared between supplemented patients and a cohort of 104 prospectively identified non-supplemented radical cystectomy patients. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare overall complications, infectious complications, and readmission rates between groups. RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events during supplementation. Four patients (10%) stopped supplementation due to nausea (n = 2) and bloating (n = 2). Thirty-three patients (83%) consumed all prescribed shakes. Immunonutrient supplementation was not significantly associated with overall complications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-2.33), infectious complications (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.49-3.07), or readmissions (OR 1.48; 95% CI 0.62-3.51) on multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative supplementation with a high-arginine immunonutrient shake was safe and well tolerated prior to radical cystectomy. Contrary to prior reports, immunonutrient supplementation was not associated with lower postoperative infectious complications in this cohort, perhaps owing to the 5 day supplementation period. Further study is needed to identify the optimal immunonutrient supplement regimen for radical cystectomy patients.


Asunto(s)
Arginina/uso terapéutico , Cistectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Cistectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inmunología
3.
Can J Urol ; 23(6): 8568-8575, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27995853

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Up to 25% of men with prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy will recur. In this setting, salvage radiotherapy may cure patients with local recurrence, but is unable to cure those with occult metastatic disease. The objective of this study is to examine how prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response to radiotherapy predicts subsequent disease progression and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a prospectively populated database of 3089 men who underwent open radical prostatectomy, 212 patients (7%) were identified who received early salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence. The main outcome was time to disease progression after salvage radiotherapy. Patients were stratified by PSA response after radiotherapy: 1) PSA < 0.1 ng/mL, 2) persistently detectable PSA, and 3) rising PSA. RESULTS: Patients received salvage radiotherapy at a median PSA of 0.20 ng/mL (IQR 0.10-0.30 ng/mL). At a median follow up of 47.3 months, a total of 52 (25%) patients experienced disease progression. On multivariable analysis, both persistent PSA (HR 5.12; 95% CI 1.98-13.23) and rising PSA (HR 16.55; 95% CI 6.61-41.48) were associated with increased risk of disease progression compared to those with PSA < 0.1 ng/mL after adjusting for pre-radiotherapy PSA, Gleason score, margin status, stage, and time to radiotherapy. Only rising PSA was associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: PSA response is associated with the risk of disease progression following salvage radiotherapy. This information can be used to counsel patients on the potential need for additional therapy and identify those at greatest risk for progression and cancer-related mortality.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análisis , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA