Evaluating the temporal association between the recency of prescribed controlled substance acquisition and fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have explored psychosocial effects as possible triggers of opioid overdose (OOD). However, little is known about the temporal association between OOD and prescribed controlled substance (CS) acquisition. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between OOD and acquiring prescribed CSs prior to OOD. METHODS: This study is an exploratory descriptive analysis using Arkansas Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (AR-PDMP) data linked to death certificate and statewide inpatient discharge records. All persons with ≥1 AR-PDMP prescription fill(s) between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017 were included (n = 1,946,686). For persons that experienced OOD and had ≥1 PDMP record(s), the difference in days between OOD and the most recent AR-PDMP prescription filled prior to an OOD was recorded. To account for censoring, a sensitivity analysis was conducted restricting the study group to "New AR-PDMP Entrants" that had at least a 180-day gap between consecutive AR-PDMP fill dates. RESULTS: 28,998,307 AR-PDMP records were analyzed for 1,946,686 individuals. 7195 persons experienced 9223 OODs and 414 (4.49%) of those were fatal. Of these, 6236 experienced ≥1 OOD and acquired prescribed CSs prior to or on the day of the first OOD. Of those that experienced ≥1 OOD(s), 2201 (30.59%) had an AR-PDMP record in the 0- to 5-day period prior to their overdose and 497 (6.91%) had an AR-PDMP record the day prior to their overdose. Among New AR-PDMP Entrants that experienced ≥1 OOD(s), 408 (27.38%) had an AR-PDMP record in the 0- to 5-day period prior to their overdose. CONCLUSION: Though the vast majority of persons accessing CSs in Arkansas did not experience an OOD, a sizable proportion of persons that experience an OOD(s) obtained prescribed CSs immediately prior.

Leveraging the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program to Curb Opioid Prescribing in Arkansas.

Effective means of accurately identifying problematic opioid prescribing are needed. Using an iterative approach with the Arkansas State Medical Board Pain Subcommittee, we modified existing opioid prescriber criteria to create seven metrics to be deployed in Arkansas. These included metrics of dose and days' supply, concomitant use of opioid and benzodiazepines, solid dosage units, and numbers of opioid patients and certain opioid prescriptions. Two of these metrics (average MME daily dose per prescription and total oxycodone 30 mg or hydromorphone prescriptions) were weighted by 2, creating a maximum score of 9 of which each prescriber could receive. Twenty prescribers with a score of 7 or greater were identified and referred to the Arkansas State Medical Board Pain Subcommittee for review and subsequent investigation if deemed necessary. Of those 20 prescribers, four were previously investigated and under disciplinary action, and three were under current investigation for misconduct related to prescribing practices. Five prescribers had new investigations opened due to the findings from the metrics, and disciplinary action was taken. Therefore, 12 of the 20 prescribers referred to the Arkansas State Medical Board were deemed worthy of investigation and disciplinary action. The Arkansas opioid prescriber metrics are able to accurately identify prescribers with potentially problematic opioid prescribing.