The effect of a deep-learning tool on dentists' performances in detecting apical radiolucencies on periapical radiographs.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of a deep-learning (DL) tool in assisting dentists in detecting apical radiolucencies on periapical radiographs. METHODS: Sixty-eight intraoral periapical radiographs with CBCT-proven presence or absence of apical radiolucencies were selected to serve as the testing subset. Eight readers examined the subset, denoted the positions of apical radiolucencies, and used a 5-point confidence scale to score each radiolucency. The same subset was assessed by readers under two conditions: with and without Denti.AI DL tool predictions. For the two sessions, the performance of the readers was compared. The comparison was performed with the alternate free response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) methodology. RESULTS: Localization of lesion accuracy (AFROC-AUC), specificity and sensitivity (by lesion) detection demonstrated improvements in the DL aided session in comparison with the unaided reading session. Subgroup performance analysis revealed an increase in sensitivity for small radiolucencies and in radiolucencies located apical to endodontically treated teeth.. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the DL technology (Denti.AI) enhances dental professionals' abilities to detect apical radiolucencies on intraoral radiographs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DL tools have the potential to improve diagnostic efficacy of dentists in identifying apical radiolucencies on periapical radiographs.

Tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks.

OBJECTIVES: Analysis of dental radiographs is an important part of the diagnostic process in daily clinical practice. Interpretation by an expert includes teeth detection and numbering. In this project, a novel solution based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is proposed that performs this task automatically for panoramic radiographs. METHODS: A data set of 1352 randomly chosen panoramic radiographs of adults was used to train the system. The CNN-based architectures for both teeth detection and numbering tasks were analyzed. The teeth detection module processes the radiograph to define the boundaries of each tooth. It is based on the state-of-the-art Faster R-CNN architecture. The teeth numbering module classifies detected teeth images according to the FDI notation. It utilizes the classical VGG-16 CNN together with the heuristic algorithm to improve results according to the rules for spatial arrangement of teeth. A separate testing set of 222 images was used to evaluate the performance of the system and to compare it to the expert level. RESULTS: For the teeth detection task, the system achieves the following performance metrics: a sensitivity of 0.9941 and a precision of 0.9945. For teeth numbering, its sensitivity is 0.9800 and specificity is 0.9994. Experts detect teeth with a sensitivity of 0.9980 and a precision of 0.9998. Their sensitivity for tooth numbering is 0.9893 and specificity is 0.9997. The detailed error analysis showed that the developed software system makes errors caused by similar factors as those for experts. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the proposed computer-aided diagnosis solution is comparable to the level of experts. Based on these findings, the method has the potential for practical application and further evaluation for automated dental radiograph analysis. Computer-aided teeth detection and numbering simplifies the process of filling out digital dental charts. Automation could help to save time and improve the completeness of electronic dental records.