Comprehensive liquid biopsy analysis as a tool for the early detection of minimal residual disease in breast cancer.

Liquid biopsy (LB) provides a unique minimally invasive tool to follow-up cancer patients over time, to detect minimal residual disease (MRD), to study metastasis-biology and mechanisms of therapy-resistance. Molecular characterization of CTCs offers additionally the potential to understand resistance to therapy and implement individualized targeted treatments which can be modified during the disease evolution and follow-up period of a patient. In this study, we present a long-term follow-up of operable breast cancer patients based on a comprehensive liquid biopsy analysis. We performed a comprehensive liquid biopsy analysis in peripheral blood of 13 patients with early-stage operable breast cancer at several time points for a period of ten years, consisting of: (a) CTC enumeration using the CellSearch system, (b) phenotypic analysis of CTCs using Immunofluorescence, (c) gene expression analysis, in EpCAM(+) CTCs for CK-19, CD24,CD44, ALDH1, and TWIST1, (d) analysis of PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations in EpCAM(+) CTCs and corresponding plasma ctDNA and (e) DNA methylation of ESR1 in CTCs. 10/13 (77%) patients were found negative for LB markers in PB during the whole follow-up period, and these patients did not relapse during the follow-up. However, 3/13(18%) patients that were positive for at least one LB marker relapsed within the follow-up period. The molecular characteristics of CTCs were highly different even for the same patient at different time points, and always increased before the clinical relapse. Our results indicate that liquid biopsy can reveal the presence of MRD at least 4 years before the appearance of clinically detectable metastatic disease demonstrating that a comprehensive liquid biopsy analysis provides highly important information for the therapeutic management of breast cancer patients.

ESR1 NAPA Assay: Development and Analytical Validation of a Highly Sensitive and Specific Blood-Based Assay for the Detection of ESR1 Mutations in Liquid Biopsies.

A considerable number of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+ BrCa) patients develop resistance to endocrine treatment. One of the most important resistance mechanisms is the presence of ESR1 mutations. We developed and analytically validated a highly sensitive and specific NaME-PrO-assisted ARMS (NAPA) assay for the detection of four ESR1 mutations (Y537S, Y537C, Y537N and D538G) in circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and paired plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patients with ER+ BrCa. The analytical specificity, analytical sensitivity and reproducibility of the assay were validated using synthetic oligos standards. We further applied the developed ESR1 NAPA assay in 13 ER+ BrCa primary tumour tissues, 13 non-cancerous breast tissues (mammoplasties) and 64 liquid biopsy samples: 32 EpCAM-positive cell fractions and 32 paired plasma ctDNA samples obtained at different time points from 8 ER+ metastatic breast cancer patients, during a 5-year follow-up period. Peripheral blood from 11 healthy donors (HD) was used as a control. The developed assay is highly sensitive (a detection of mutation-allelic-frequency (MAF) of 0.5% for D538G and 0.1% for Y537S, Y537C, Y537N), and highly specific (0/13 mammoplasties and 0/11 HD for all mutations). In the plasma ctDNA, ESR1 mutations were not identified at the baseline, whereas the D538G mutation was detected in five sequential ctDNA samples during the follow-up period in the same patient. In the EpCAM-isolated cell fractions, only the Y537C mutation was detected in one patient sample at the baseline. A direct comparison of the ESR1 NAPA assay with the drop-off ddPCR using 32 identical plasma ctDNA samples gave a concordance of 90.6%. We present a low cost, highly specific, sensitive and robust assay for blood-based ESR1 profiling. The clinical performance of the ESR1 NAPA assay will be prospectively evaluated in a large number of well-characterized patient cohorts.

PIM-1 Is Overexpressed at a High Frequency in Circulating Tumor Cells from Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.

PIM-1 is an oncogene involved in cell cycle progression, cell growth, cell survival and therapy resistance, activated in many types of cancer, and is now considered as a very promising target for cancer therapy. We report for the first time that PIM-1 is overexpressed in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC). We first developed and validated a highly sensitive RT-qPCR assay for quantification of PIM-1 transcripts. We further applied this assay to study PIM-1 expression in EpCAM(+) CTC fraction isolated from 64 peripheral blood samples of 50 mCRPC patients. CTC enumeration in all samples was performed using the FDA-cleared CellSearch® system. PIM-1 overexpression was detected in 24/64 (37.5%) cases, while in 20/24 (83.3%) cases that were positive for PIM-1 expression, at least one CTC/7.5 mL PB was detected in the CellSearch®. Our data indicate that PIM-1 overexpression is observed at high frequency in CTCs from mCRPC patients and this finding, in combination with androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) expression in CTCs, suggest its potential role as a very promising target for cancer therapy. We strongly believe that PIM-1 overexpression in EpCAM(+) CTC fraction merits to be further evaluated and validated as a non-invasive circulating tumor biomarker in a large and well-defined patient cohort with mCRPC.

Direct comparison study between droplet digital PCR and a combination of allele-specific PCR, asymmetric rapid PCR and melting curve analysis for the detection of BRAF V600E mutation in plasma from melanoma patients.

Background In metastatic melanoma, 40%-50% of patients harbor a BRAF V600E mutation and are thereby eligible to receive a combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Compared to standard-of-care tissue-based genetic testing, analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood enables a comprehensive assessment of tumor mutational status in real-time and can be used for monitoring response to therapy. The aim of our study was to directly compare the performance of two highly sensitive methodologies, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and a combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis, for the detection of BRAF V600E in plasma from melanoma patients. Methods Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from 120 plasma samples of stage I to IV melanoma patients. Identical plasma-cfDNA samples were subjected to BRAF V600E mutational analysis using in parallel, ddPCR and the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis. Results BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 9/117 (7.7%) ctDNA samples by ddPCR and in 22/117 (18.8%) ctDNA samples by the combination of ARMS/asymmetric- rapid PCR/melting curve analysis. The concordance between these two methodologies was 85.5% (100/117). The comparison of plasma-ctDNA analysis using ddPCR and tissue testing revealed an overall agreement of 79.4% (27/34), while the corresponding agreement using the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis was 73.5% (25/34). Moreover, comparing the detection of BRAF-mutant ctDNA with the clinics, overall agreement of 87.2% (48/55) for ddPCR and 79.2% (42/53) was demonstrated. Remarkably, the duration of sample storage was negatively correlated with correctness of genotyping results highlighting the importance of pre-analytical factors. Conclusions Our direct comparison study has shown a high level of concordance between ddPCR and the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in plasma.

The potential of ctDNA analysis in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous and dynamic disease, exhibiting unique somatic alterations that lead to disease recurrence and resistance. Tumor biopsy and conventional imaging approaches are not able to provide sufficient information regarding the early detection of recurrence and real time monitoring through tracking sensitive or resistance mechanisms to treatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has emerged as an attractive noninvasive methodology to detect cancer-specific genetic aberrations in plasma including DNA mutations and DNA methylation patterns. Numerous studies have reported on the potential of ctDNA analysis in the management of early and advanced stages of breast cancer. Advances in high-throughput technologies, especially next generation sequencing and PCR-based assays, were highly important for the successful application of ctDNA analysis. However, before being integrated into clinical practice, ctDNA analysis needs to be standardized and validated through the performance of multicenter prospective and well-designed clinical studies. This review is focused on the clinical utility of ctDNA analysis, especially at the DNA mutation and methylation level, in breast cancer patients, incorporating the latest advances in technological approaches and involving key studies in the early and metastatic setting.

PIK3CA hotspot mutations in circulating tumor cells and paired circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer: a direct comparison study.

Liquid biopsy analysis, mainly based on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), provides an extremely powerful tool for the molecular profiling of cancer patients in real time. In this study, we directly compared PIK3CA hotspot mutations (E545K, H1047R) in EpCAM-positive CTCs and paired plasma-ctDNA in breast cancer (BrCa). PIK3CA hotspot mutations in CTCs and ctDNA were analyzed using our previously developed highly sensitive (0.05%), specific, and validated assay in plasma-ctDNA from 77 early and 73 metastatic BrCa patients and 40 healthy donors. We further analyzed and directly compared PIK3CA hotspot mutations in DNAs isolated from CellSearch® cartridges (CTCs) and paired plasma-ctDNA, in 56 cases of early and 27 cases of metastatic breast cancer, and 16 corresponding primary tumors. In plasma-ctDNA, PIK3CA hotspot mutations were identified in 30/77(39.0%) early and 35/73(47.9%) metastatic BrCa cases; none (0/40, 0%) of the healthy donors' plasma-ctDNA samples were positive. Our direct comparison study in DNAs isolated from CellSearch® cartridges (CTCs) and paired plasma-ctDNA from the same blood draws has shown a lack of concordance in early BrCa (27/56, 48.2%), while the concordance in the metastatic setting was higher (18/27, 66.6%). Our results were validated by ddPCR methodology, and the concordance between our assay and ddPCR for PIK3CA E545K hotspot mutation was 30/37 (81.1%). In many cases, PIK3CA hotspot mutations were detected in samples found to be negative for CTCs in CellSearch® . Our data demonstrated for the first time that (a) PIK3CA hotspot mutations are present at high frequencies in CTCs isolated from CellSearch® cartridges and paired plasma-ctDNA both in early and metastatic BrCa, (b) the detection and concordance of PIK3CA hotspot mutations between plasma-ctDNA and CTCs are higher in the metastatic setting, (c) PIK3CA mutational status significantly changes after therapeutic intervention, and (d) PIK3CA mutation detection in CTCs and plasma-ctDNA provides complementary information.

Evaluation of Preanalytical Conditions and Implementation of Quality Control Steps for Reliable Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Analyses in Liquid Biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy provides important information for the prognosis and treatment of cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated the effects of preanalytical conditions on gene expression and DNA methylation analyses in liquid biopsies. METHODS: We tested the stability of circulating tumor cell (CTC) messenger RNA by spiking MCF-7 cells in healthy donor peripheral blood (PB) drawn into 6 collection-tube types with various storage conditions. CTCs were enriched based on epithelial cell adhesion molecule positivity, and RNA was isolated followed by cDNA synthesis. Gene expression was quantified using RT-quantitative PCR for CK19 and B2M. We evaluated the stability of DNA methylation in plasma under different storage conditions by spiking DNA isolated from MCF-7 cells in healthy donor plasma. Two commercially available sodium bisulfite (SB)-conversion kits were compared, in combination with whole genome amplification (WGA), to evaluate the stability of SB-converted DNA. SB-converted DNA samples were analyzed by real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP) for ACTB, SOX17, and BRMS1. Quality control was assessed using Levey-Jennings graphs. RESULTS: RNA-based analysis in CTCs is severely impeded by the preservatives used in many PB collection tubes (except for EDTA), as well as by time to analysis. Plasma and SB-converted DNA samples are stable and can be used safely for MSP when kept at -80 °C. Downstream WGA of SB-converted DNA compensated for the limited amount of available sample in liquid biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of preanalytical conditions and implementation of quality control steps is extremely important for reliable liquid biopsy analysis, and a prerequisite for routine applications in the clinic.

ESR1 Methylation: A Liquid Biopsy-Based Epigenetic Assay for the Follow-up of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Endocrine Treatment.

Purpose: Liquid biopsy provides real-time monitoring of tumor evolution and response to therapy through analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and plasma-circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). ESR1 epigenetic silencing potentially affects response to endocrine treatment. We evaluated ESR1 methylation in CTCs and paired plasma ctDNA. We evaluated ESR1 methylation in CTCs and paired plasma ctDNA as a potential biomarker for response to everolimus/exemestane treatment.Experimental Design: A highly sensitive and specific real-time MSP assay for ESR1 methylation was developed and validated in (i) 65 primary breast tumors formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), (ii) EpCAM+ CTC fractions (122 patients and 30 healthy donors; HD), (iii) plasma ctDNA (108 patients and 30HD), and (iv) in CTCs (CellSearch) and in paired plasma ctDNA for 58 patients with breast cancer. ESR1 methylation status was investigated in CTCs isolated from serial peripheral blood samples of 19 patients with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving everolimus/exemestane.Results:ESR1 methylation was detected in: (i) 25/65 (38.5%) FFPEs, (ii) EpCAM+ CTC fractions: 26/112 (23.3%) patients and 1/30 (3.3%) HD, and (iii) plasma ctDNA: 8/108 (7.4%) patients and 1/30 (3.3%) HD. ESR1 methylation was highly concordant in 58 paired DNA samples, isolated from CTCs (CellSearch) and corresponding plasma. In serial peripheral blood samples of patients treated with everolimus/exemestane, ESR1 methylation was observed in 10/36 (27.8%) CTC-positive samples, and was associated with lack of response to treatment (P = 0.023, Fisher exact test).Conclusions: We report for the first time the detection of ESR1 methylation in CTCs and a high concordance with paired plasma ctDNA. ESR1 methylation in CTCs was associated with lack of response to everolimus/exemestane regimen. ESR1 methylation should be further evaluated as a potential liquid biopsy-based biomarker. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1500-10. ©2017 AACR.