Pharmacogenetic testing in primary care could bolster depression treatment: A value proposition.

Pharmacogenetic testing could reduce the time to identify a safe and effective medication for depression; however, it is underutilized in practice. Major depression constitutes the most common mental disorder in the US, and while antidepressant therapy can help, the current trial -and error approach can require patients to endure multiple medication trials before finding one that is effective. Tailoring the fit of pharmacogenetic testing with prescribers' needs across a variety of settings could help to establish a generalizable value proposition to improve likelihood of adoption. We conducted a study to explore the value proposition for health systems using pharmacogenetic testing for mental health medications through prescribers' real-world experiences using implementation science concepts and systematic interviews with prescribers and administrators from four health care systems. To identify a value proposition, we organized the themes according to the Triple Aim framework, a leading framework for health care policy which asserts that high-value care should focus on three key metrics: (1) better health care quality and (2) population-level outcomes with (3) reduced per capita costs. Primary care providers whom we interviewed said that they value pharmacogenetic testing because it would provide more information about medications that they can prescribe, expanding their ability to identify medications that best-fit patients and reducing their reliance on referrals to specialists; they said that this capacity would help meet patients' needs for access to mental health care through primary care. At the same time, prescribers expressed differing views about how pharmacogenetic testing can help with quality of care and whether their views about out-of-pocket cost would prevent them from offering it. Thus, implementation should focus on integrating pharmacogenetic testing into primary care and using strategies to support prescribers' interactions with patients.

Pre-emptive pharmacogenomics implementation among polypharmacy patients 65 years old and older: a clinical pilot.

Aim: Pre-emptive testing of pharmacogenomic (PGx) variations has potential to improve medication safety and effectiveness; however, testing is not routine. Given the newfound payor coverage of multigene testing and the potential value of testing within aging patients, it is imperative to test local PGx testing capabilities, report results to patients and providers, and determine the value of testing. Materials & methods: We designed a randomized clinical pilot of a pre-emptive PGx testing process using the electronic health record compared with usual care among an aging primary care population. Results & conclusion: The impact of the program on prescribing patterns, healthcare utilization and costs of care will be evaluated. We hypothesize that implementation of a pre-emptive multigene PGx panel is feasible among elderly, polypharmacy, primary care patients, measured by the number of enrolled patients with PGx results entered in the medical record. Health system wide PGx implementation, including capacity needed to integrate these valuable results, is also described.

A Mixed-Methods Protocol to Identify Best Practices for Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Clinical Settings.

Using a patient's genetic information to inform medication prescriptions can be clinically effective; however, the practice has not been widely implemented. Health systems need guidance on how to engage with providers to improve pharmacogenetic test utilization. Approaches from the field of implementation science may shed light on the complex factors affecting pharmacogenetic test use in real-world settings and areas to target to improve utilization. This paper presents an approach to studying the application of precision medicine that utilizes mixed qualitative and quantitative methods and implementation science frameworks to understand which factors or combinations consistently account for high versus low utilization of pharmocogenetic testing. This approach involves two phases: (1) collection of qualitative and quantitative data from providers-the cases-at four clinical institutions about their experiences with, and utilization of, pharmacogenetic testing to identify salient factors; and (2) analysis using a Configurational Comparative Method (CCM), using a mathematical algorithm to identify the minimally necessary and sufficient factors that distinguish providers who have higher utilization from those with low utilization. Advantages of this approach are that it can be used for small to moderate sample sizes, and it accounts for conditions found in real-world settings by demonstrating how they coincide to affect utilization.

How community pharmacists envision using pharmacogenomic data: A qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 300 medications contain pharmacogenomic information in their labeling approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. As this number continues to grow, community pharmacists will be called on to use available pharmacogenomic data at the point of dispensing. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study aimed to describe how pharmacists envision the integration of pharmacogenomic data into the current workflows of community pharmacy practice. METHODS: Community pharmacists from a regional supermarket chain pharmacy in the greater Pittsburgh area were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. Participating pharmacists were presented with 3 clinical scenarios, followed by questions, to gain insight into how they envisioned the integration of pharmacogenomic data into community pharmacy workflow. The interview transcriptions were transcribed and coded. The content was analyzed to deduce the final themes. Supporting quotes were selected to illustrate each theme. RESULTS: Ten community pharmacists from 3 different pharmacy locations participated in the study. A thematic analysis produced 6 themes: (1) integrating pharmacogenomic data into the dispensing software, (2) receiving an alert for pharmacogenomic information within the dispensing software, (3) accessing pharmacogenomic clinical guidelines to guide drug-decision-making, (4) contacting the prescriber by adding a task to the call queue, (5) placing a mandatory counseling alert on medications that were adjusted using pharmacogenomic data, and (6) counseling the patient on the first refill of a medication that was adjusted using pharmacogenomic data. CONCLUSION: This study describes how pharmacists envisioned the integration of pharmacogenomic data into community pharmacy workflow. The participants sought the integration of pharmacogenomic data into existing dispensing software, alerts for actionable prescribing changes using patient-specific pharmacogenomic data when available, and access to clinical decision support. In addition, the participants preferred to engage prescribers and receive alerts to counsel patients at prescription pick-up. These findings are key to integrating pharmacogenomic data into community pharmacy practice.

P2Y12 inhibitors in neuroendovascular surgery: An opportunity for precision medicine.

INTRODUCTION: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), primarily the combination of aspirin with a P2Y12 inhibitor, in patients undergoing intravascular stent or flow diverter placement remains the primary strategy to reduce device-related thromboembolic complications. However, selection, timing, and dosing of DAPT is critical and can be challenging given the existing significant inter- and intraindividual response variations to P2Y12 inhibitors. METHODS: Assessment of indexed, peer-reviewed literature from 2000 to 2020 in interventional cardiology and neuroendovascular therapeutics with critical, peer-reviewed appraisal and extraction of evidence and strategies to utilize DAPT in cardio- and neurovascular patients with endoluminal devices. RESULTS: Both geno- and phenotyping for DAPT are rapidly and conveniently available as point-of-care testing at a favorable cost-benefit ratio. Furthermore, systematic inclusion of a quantifying clinical risk score combined with an operator-linked, technical risk assessment for potential adverse events allows a more precise and individualized approach to new P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The latest evidence, primarily obtained from cardiovascular intervention trials, supports that combining patient pharmacogenetics with drug response monitoring, as part of an individually tailored, precision medicine approach, is both predictive and cost-effective in achieving and maintaining individual target platelet inhibition levels. Indirect evidence supports that this gain in optimizing drug responses translates to reducing main adverse events and overall treatment costs in patients undergoing DAPT after intracranial stent or flow diverting treatment.

Study of pharmacogenomic information in FDA-approved drug labeling to facilitate application of precision medicine.

Pharmacogenomics (PGx), studying the relationship between drug response and genetic makeup of an individual, is accelerating advances in precision medicine. The FDA includes PGx information in the labeling of approved drugs to better inform on their safety and effectiveness. We herein present a summary of PGx information found in 261 prescription drug labeling documents by querying the publicly available FDALabel database. A total of 362 drug-biomarker pairs (DBPs) were identified. We profiled DBPs using frequency of the biomarkers and their therapeutic classes. Four categories of applications (indication, safety, dosing and information) were discussed according to information in labeling. This analysis facilitates better understanding, utilization and translation of PGx information in drug labeling among researchers, healthcare professionals and the public.