Precision of liver and pancreas apparent diffusion coefficients using motion-compensated gradient waveforms in DWI.

BACKGROUND: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with optimized motion-compensated gradient waveforms reduces signal dropouts in the liver and pancreas caused by cardiovascular-associated motion, however its precision is unknown. We hypothesized that DWI with motion-compensated DW gradient waveforms would improve apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-repeatability and inter-reader reproducibility compared to conventional DWI in these organs. METHODS: In this IRB-approved, prospective, single center study, subjects recruited between October 2019 and March 2020 were scanned twice on a 3 T scanner, with repositioning between test and retest. Each scan included two respiratory-triggered DWI series with comparable acquisition time: 1) conventional (monopolar) 2) motion- compensated diffusion gradients. Three readers measured ADC values. One-way ANOVA, Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Eight healthy participants (4 male/4 female), with a mean age of 29 ± 4 years, underwent the liver and pancreas MRI protocol. Four patients with liver metastases (2 male/2 female) with a mean age of 58 ± 5 years underwent the liver MRI protocol. In healthy participants, motion-compensated DWI outperformed conventional DWI with mean repeatability coefficient of 0.14 × 10-3 (CI:0.12-0.17) vs. 0.31 × 10-3 (CI:0.27-0.37) mm2/s for liver, and 0.11 × 10-3 (CI:0.08-0.15) vs. 0.34 × 10-3 (CI:0.27-0.49) mm2/s for pancreas; and with mean reproducibility coefficient of 0.20 × 10-3 (CI:0.18-0.23) vs. 0.51 × 10-3 (CI:0.46-0.58) mm2/s for liver, and 0.16 × 10-3 (CI:0.13-0.20) vs. 0.42 × 10-3 (CI:0.34-0.52) mm2/s for pancreas. In patients, improved repeatability was observed for motion-compensated DWI in comparison to conventional with repeatability coefficient of 0.51 × 10- 3 mm2/s (CI:0.35-0.89) vs. 0.70 × 10-3 mm2/s (CI:0.49-1.20). CONCLUSION: Motion-compensated DWI enhances the precision of ADC measurements in the liver and pancreas compared to conventional DWI.

Efficacy and Safety of Adagrasib plus Cetuximab in Patients with KRASG12C-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Adagrasib, an irreversible, selective KRASG12C inhibitor, may be an effective treatment in KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer, particularly when combined with an anti-EGFR antibody. In this analysis of the KRYSTAL-1 trial, patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer received adagrasib (600 mg twice daily) plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Ninety-four patients received adagrasib plus cetuximab. With a median follow-up of 11.9 months, ORR was 34.0%, disease control rate was 85.1%, and median duration of response was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-7.6). Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.7-7.4) and median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.8-18.8). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients; grade 3-4 in 27.7% and no grade 5. No TRAEs led to adagrasib discontinuation. Exploratory analyses suggest circulating tumor DNA may identify features of response and acquired resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: Adagrasib plus cetuximab demonstrates promising clinical activity and tolerable safety in heavily pretreated patients with unresectable or metastatic KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer. These data support a potential new standard of care and highlight the significance of testing and identification of KRASG12C mutations in patients with colorectal cancer.

Targeted Agents in Esophagogastric Cancer Beyond Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2.

Gastroesophageal cancers are highly diverse tumors in terms of their anatomic and molecular characteristics, making drug development challenging. Recent advancements in understanding the molecular profiles of these cancers have led to the identification of several new biomarkers. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating new targeted agents with promising results. CLDN18.2 has emerged as a biomarker with established activity of associated targeted therapies. Other targeted agents, such as bemarituzumab and DKN-01, are under active investigation. As new agents are incorporated into the treatment continuum, the questions of biomarker overlap, tumor heterogeneity, and toxicity management will need to be addressed.

Farnesoid X receptor mediates macrophage-intrinsic responses to suppress colitis-induced colon cancer progression.

Bile acids (BAs) affect the intestinal environment by ensuring barrier integrity, maintaining microbiota balance, regulating epithelium turnover, and modulating the immune system. As a master regulator of BA homeostasis, farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is severely compromised in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC). At the front line, gut macrophages react to the microbiota and metabolites that breach the epithelium. We aim to study the role of the BA/FXR axis in macrophages. This study demonstrates that inflammation-induced epithelial abnormalities compromised FXR signaling and altered BAs' profile in a mouse CAC model. Further, gut macrophage-intrinsic FXR sensed aberrant BAs, leading to pro-inflammatory cytokines' secretion, which promoted intestinal stem cell proliferation. Mechanistically, activation of FXR ameliorated intestinal inflammation and inhibited colitis-associated tumor growth, by regulating gut macrophages' recruitment, polarization, and crosstalk with Th17 cells. However, deletion of FXR in bone marrow or gut macrophages escalated the intestinal inflammation. In summary, our study reveals a distinctive regulatory role of FXR in gut macrophages, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target for addressing IBD and CAC.

Treatment of Oligometastatic GI Cancers.

Oligometastatic state is believed to potentially represent a transitional stage between early, locoregional state disease and widely metastatic disease. Historically, locoregional approaches, particularly in advanced colorectal cancers, have demonstrated efficacy in select patients with limited burden of metastatic disease. Recent strides in systemic therapies, including biomarker-based treatments and immunotherapy, alongside innovations in surgical techniques and novel locoregional approaches such as stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation, have ushered in a new era of therapeutic possibilities across all oligometastatic GI cancers. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in high-quality prospective evidence guiding patient selection and treatment decisions across various disease types. Ongoing clinical trials are anticipated to provide crucial insights into oligometastatic states, fostering the refinement of disease-specific oligometastatic state definitions and treatment algorithms. This article reviews existing data on the management of oligometastatic GI cancer, summarizes current state of knowledge for each disease state, and provides updates on ongoing studies in this space.

Current and Future Biomarkers in Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Biomarker-based therapies have shown improved patient outcomes across various cancer types. The purpose of this review to summarize our knowledge of current and future biomarkers in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). METHODS: In this publication, we will review current standard biomarkers in patients with upper GI cancers. We will also discuss novel biomarkers that are under investigations and their associated therapies that are currently in clinical trials. RESULTS: EGAa are a group of heterogeneous diseases, both anatomically and molecularly. There are several established biomarkers (HER2, PD-L1, microsattelite instability or mismatch repair protein expression) that allow for individualized treatments for patients with these cancers. There are also several emerging biomarkers for EGA, some of which have clinically relevant associated therapies. Claudin 18.2 is the furthest along among these. Anti-claudin antibody, zolbetuximab, improved overall survival in biomarker select patients with advanced GEA in two phase 3 studies. Other novel biomarkers, such as FGFR2b and DKN01, are also in the process of validation, and treatments based on the presence of these biomarkers are currently in clinical studies. CONCLUSION: Ongoing efforts to identify novel biomarkers in EGA have led to enhanced subclassification of upper GI cancers. These advances, coupled with the strategic application of targeted therapies and immunotherapy when appropriate, hold promise to further improve patients outcomes.

Undifferentiated Carcinoma of Esophagus with SMARCA4 Deletion Expressing Synaptophysin: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

Undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus is an entity that is included in WHO classification of digestive systems fifth edition (2018). The definition of this entity is a malignant esophageal epithelial tumor that lacks definite microscopic features of squamous, glandular, or neuroendocrine differentiation. It is a challenging diagnosis to make due to lack of diagnostic criteria. We report a case from a 45 years old man with a mass in the lower third of esophagus. Biopsy showed an epitheloid neoplasm with sheet like growth pattern and no glandular formation. The tumor cells had prominent nucleoli and indistinct cell borders. There were occasional rhabdoid cells. By immunostains, tumor cells were focally positive for pankeratin, keratin 7, synaptophysin, negative for CDX2 and p40, INSM1, chromogranin, and CD56. Background intestinal metaplasia (Barrett esophagus) was present. Next generation sequencing of the tumor revealed SMARCA4 deep deletion. The tumor showed loss of SMARCA4 by immunostain. This case demonstrates that undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus with SMARCA4 deletion can express synaptophysin. Awareness of this entity is important for the correct classification of this tumor.

NCI10066: a Phase 1/2 study of olaparib in combination with ramucirumab in previously treated metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Our preclinical work revealed tumour hypoxia induces homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), increasing sensitivity to Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We aimed to induce tumour hypoxia with ramucirumab thereby sensitising tumours to olaparib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multi-institution single-arm Phase 1/2 trial enrolled patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma refractory to ≥1 systemic treatment. In dose escalation, olaparib was evaluated at escalating dose levels with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg day 1 in 14-day cycles. The primary endpoint of Phase 1 was the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and in Phase 2 the primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients received ramucirumab and olaparib. The RP2D was olaparib 300 mg twice daily with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg. In evaluable patients at the RP2D the ORR was 6/43 (14%) (95% CI 4.7-25.6). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.3-4.2) and median overall survival (OS) was 7.3 months (95% CI 5.7-13.0). Non-statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed for patients with tumours with mutations in HRD genes. CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib and ramucirumab is well-tolerated with efficacy that exceeds historical controls with ramucirumab single agent for gastric cancer in a heavily pre-treated patient population.

Esophageal carcinoma with SMARCA4 mutation: Unique diagnostic challenges.

Esophageal carcinoma with SMARCA4 deficiency or dysfunction is a recently recognized entity. This study describes the clinicopathologic features of four cases of esophageal carcinoma with SMARCA4 mutation, three with deep deletion and one with missense mutation. Patients include 3 males and 1 female, with an age range of 45-68 years old. Histologically, the neoplasms showed frequent mitotic activity, large nucleus and prominent nucleoli. Glandular differentiation was variable from not identifiable to approximately 20% in the biopsy material. Percentage of rhabdoid morphology was also variable from not identifiable to 20% of the biopsy material. For these cases, one case was diagnosed SMARCA4 deficient esophageal carcinoma based on the biopsy of a retroperitoneal lymph node showing loss of BRG1 by immunostain, and next generation sequencing confirmed deep deletion of SMARCA4. The other three cases had diagnosis of undifferentiated carcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma, and the SMARCA4 deep deletion or mutation was discovered by next generation sequencing. Molecular analysis showed TP53 mutation in all the three cases with SMARCA4 deep deletion. Two of the patients deceased 72 and 78 days after diagnosis, and the other two patients showed limited or no treatment response to chemotherapy. In conclusion, esophageal carcinoma with SMARCA4 mutation may pose significant diagnostic challenge for surgical pathologists due to its variable morphology and immunoprofile, and accurate classification of this entity requires recognition of the spectrum of morphology and utilization of BRG1 immunostain and next generating sequencing.

Motion-robust, blood-suppressed, reduced-distortion diffusion MRI of the liver.

PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of liver diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI using cardiac-motion-robust, blood-suppressed, reduced-distortion techniques. METHODS: DW-MRI data were acquired at 3T in an anatomically accurate liver phantom including controlled pulsatile motion, in eight healthy volunteers and four patients with known or suspected liver metastases. Standard monopolar and motion-robust (M1-nulled, and M1-optimized) DW gradient waveforms were each acquired with single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) and multishot EPI (msEPI). In the motion phantom, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in the motion-affected volume. In healthy volunteers, ADC was measured in the left and right liver lobes separately to evaluate ADC reproducibility between the two lobes. Image distortions were quantified using the normalized cross-correlation coefficient, with an undistorted T2-weighted reference. RESULTS: In the motion phantom, ADC mean and SD in motion-affected volumes substantially increased with increasing motion for monopolar waveforms. ADC remained stable in the presence of increasing motion when using motion-robust waveforms. M1-optimized waveforms suppressed slow flow signal present with M1-nulled waveforms. In healthy volunteers, monopolar waveforms generated significantly different ADC measurements between left and right liver lobes ( p = 0 . 0078 $$ p=0.0078 $$ , reproducibility coefficients (RPC) =  470 × 1 0 - 6 $$ 470\times 1{0}^{-6} $$ mm 2 $$ {}^2 $$ /s for monopolar-msEPI), while M1-optimized waveforms showed more reproducible ADC values ( p = 0 . 29 $$ p=0.29 $$ , RPC = 220 × 1 0 - 6 $$ \mathrm{RPC}=220\times 1{0}^{-6} $$ mm 2 $$ {}^2 $$ /s for M1-optimized-msEPI). In phantom and healthy volunteer studies, motion-robust acquisitions with msEPI showed significantly reduced image distortion ( p < 0 . 001 $$ p<0.001 $$ ) compared to ssEPI. Patient scans showed reduction of wormhole artifacts when combining M1-optimized waveforms with msEPI. CONCLUSION: Synergistic effects of combined M1-optimized diffusion waveforms and msEPI acquisitions enable reproducible liver DWI with motion robustness, blood signal suppression, and reduced distortion.

Esophagogastric Cancers: Integrating Immunotherapy Therapy Into Current Practice.

Immunotherapy (IO) agents have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes across many tumor types. There have been great efforts to introduce immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment paradigm of esophagogastric cancers as well. A number of randomized phase III trials, which will be reviewed here, established the role of these agents in both early-stage and advanced-stage disease. Adjuvant nivolumab is US Food and Drug Administration-approved after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and resection of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers on the basis of the phase III CheckMate 577 trial. In the advanced setting, patients with programmed death receptor ligand-1-positive tumors should be recommended IO in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting on the basis of the results from KEYNOTE 590, CheckMate 649, and CheckMate 648. Across trials, chemotherapy continues to play a critical role in the first-line setting and should be offered to all patients who are eligible for systemic therapy, including those with biomarker select tumors. In the later lines of treatment, IO has modest activity, and prior studies have grown largely irrelevant because of the enrollment of IO-naive patients. Similar to other disease types, patients with microsatellite unstable (microsatellite instability high) tumors represent a unique cohort that is more sensitive to IO. However, there are no randomized studies evaluating how best to apply IO in early or advanced stages specifically for the treatment of patients with microsatellite instability high upper GI tumors. Questions remain how to best select patients who benefit from IO treatments, how to augment IO activity in programmed death receptor ligand-1-negative tumors, and how to incorporate IO in late-line settings or for recurrent disease that has been treated with IO-containing regimens during early stages.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Amplified Gastroesophageal Cancer: Retrospective Global Experience.

PURPOSE: Subset analyses from phase III evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition (EGFRi) suggest improved outcomes in patients with EGFR-amplified gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), but large-scale analyses are lacking. This multi-institutional analysis sought to determine the role of EGFRi in the largest cohort of patients with EGFR-amplified GEA to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 patients from 15 tertiary cancer centers in six countries met the inclusion criteria. These criteria required histologically confirmed GEA in the metastatic or unresectable setting with EGFR amplification identified by using a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved assay, and who received on- or off-protocol EGFRi. Testing could be by tissue next-generation sequencing, plasma circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing, and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization performed by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments approved laboratory. Treatment patterns and outcomes analysis was also performed using a deidentified clinicogenomic database (CGDB). RESULTS: Sixty patients with EGFR-amplified GEA received EGFRi, including 31 of 60 patients (52%) with concurrent chemotherapy. Across treatment lines, patients achieved a 43% objective response rate with a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.4). Patients receiving EGFRi in first-, second-, and third-line therapy achieved a median overall survival of 20.6 months (95% CI, 13.5 to not reached [NR]), 9 months (95% CI, 7.9 to NR), and 8.4 months (7.6 to NR), respectively. This survival far exceeded the 11.2-month (95% CI, 8.7 to 14.2) median overall survival from first-line initiation of non-EGFRi therapy in patients with EGFR-amplified GEA in the CGDB. Despite this benefit, analysis of the CGDB (January 2011-December 2020) suggests that only 5% of patients with EGFR-amplified GEA received EGFRi. CONCLUSION: Patients with EGFR-amplified GEA derive significant benefit from EGFRi. Further prospective investigation of EGFRi in a well-selected patient population is ongoing in an upcoming trial of amivantamab in EGFR and/or MET amplified GEA.

Praluzatamab Ravtansine, a CD166-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: An Open-Label Phase I/II Trial.

PURPOSE: Praluzatamab ravtansine (CX-2009) is a conditionally activated Probody drug conjugate (PDC) comprising an anti-CD166 mAb conjugated to DM4, with a protease-cleavable linker and a peptide mask that limits target engagement in normal tissue and circulation. The tumor microenvironment is enriched for proteases capable of cleaving the linker, thereby releasing the mask, allowing for localized binding of CX-2009 to CD166. CX-2009 was evaluated in a phase I/II clinical trial for patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic cancer receiving ≥2 prior treatments. CX-2009 was administered at escalating doses every 3 weeks (0.25-10 mg/kg) or every 2 weeks (4-6 mg/kg). Primary objective was to determine the safety profile and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). RESULTS: Of 99 patients enrolled, the most prevalent subtype was breast cancer (n = 45). Median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 1-19). Dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 8 mg/kg every 3 weeks and 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks. On the basis of tolerability, the RP2D was 7 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Tumor regressions were observed at doses ≥4 mg/kg. In the hormone receptor-positive/HER2-nonamplified breast cancer subset (n = 22), 2 patients (9%) had confirmed partial responses, and 10 patients (45%) had stable disease. Imaging with zirconium-labeled CX-2009 confirmed uptake in tumor lesions and shielding of major organs. Activated, unmasked CX-2009 was measurable in 18 of 22 posttreatment biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: CD166 is a novel, ubiquitously expressed target. CX-2009 is the first conditionally activated antibody-drug conjugate to CD166 to demonstrate both translational and clinical activity in a variety of tumor types.

Durvalumab plus tremelimumab alone or in combination with low-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to previous PD(L)-1 therapy: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is resistant to PD-1 and PD-L1 (PD[L]-1)-targeted therapy have poor outcomes. Studies suggest that radiotherapy could enhance antitumour immunity. Therefore, we investigated the potential benefit of PD-L1 (durvalumab) and CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) inhibition alone or combined with radiotherapy. METHODS: This open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial was done by the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network at 18 US sites. Patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and progression during previous PD(L)-1 therapy were eligible. They were randomly assigned (1:1:1) in a web-based system by the study statistician using a permuted block scheme (block sizes of three or six) without stratification to receive either durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of 13 cycles) plus tremelimumab (75 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of four cycles) alone or with low-dose (0·5 Gy delivered twice per day, repeated for 2 days during each of the first four cycles of therapy) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (24 Gy total delivered over three 8-Gy fractions during the first cycle only), 1 week after initial durvalumab-tremelimumab administration. Study treatment was continued until 1 year or until progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (best locally assessed confirmed response of a partial or complete response) and, along with safety, was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02888743, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Aug 24, 2017, and March 29, 2019, 90 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 78 (26 per group) were treated. This trial was stopped due to futility assessed in an interim analysis. At a median follow-up of 12·4 months (IQR 7·8-15·1), there were no differences in overall response rates between the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group (three [11·5%, 90% CI 1·2-21·8] of 26 patients) and the low-dose radiotherapy group (two [7·7%, 0·0-16·3] of 26 patients; p=0·64) or the hypofractionated radiotherapy group (three [11·5%, 1·2-21·8] of 26 patients; p=0·99). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dyspnoea (two [8%] in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group; three [12%] in the low-dose radiotherapy group; and three [12%] in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group) and hyponatraemia (one [4%] in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group vs two [8%] in the low-dose radiotherapy group vs three [12%] in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in one (4%) patient in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group (maculopapular rash), five (19%) patients in the low-dose radiotherapy group (abdominal pain, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, hypokalemia, and respiratory failure), and four (15%) patients in the hypofractionated group (adrenal insufficiency, colitis, diarrhoea, and hyponatremia). In the low-dose radiotherapy group, there was one death from respiratory failure potentially related to study therapy. INTERPRETATION: Radiotherapy did not increase responses to combined PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibition in patients with NSCLC resistant to PD(L)-1 therapy. However, PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 therapy could be a treatment option for some patients. Future studies should refine predictive biomarkers in this setting. FUNDING: The US National Institutes of Health and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Microwave ablation for colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver: a single-center retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and intermediate-term efficacy of percutaneous microwave (MW) ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all CRLM treated with MW ablation from 3/2011 to 7/2020 (102 tumors; 72 procedures; 57 patients). Mean age was 60 years (range, 36-88) and mean tumor size was 1.8 cm (range, 0.5-5.0 cm). The patient population included 19 patients with extra-hepatic disease. Chemotherapy (pre- and/or post-ablation) was given in 98% of patients. Forty-five sessions were preceded by other focal CRLM treatments including resection, ablation, radiation, and radioembolization. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) and multivariate analysis (Cox Proportional Hazards model) was used to test predictors of OS. RESULTS: Technical success (complete ablation) was 100% and median follow-up was 42 months (range, 1-112). There was a 4% major complication rate and an overall complication rate of 8%. Local tumor progression (LTP) rate during the entire study period was 4/98 (4%), in which 2 were retreated with MW ablation for a secondary LTP-rate of 2%. LTP-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 93%, 58%, and 39% and median LTP-free survival was 48 months. OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 96%, 66%, 47% and median OS was 52 months. There were no statistically significant predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: MW ablation of hepatic colorectal liver metastases appears safe with excellent local tumor control and prolonged survival compared to historical controls in selected patients. Further comparative studies with other local treatment strategies appear indicated.

Treatment Approach to Adenocarcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater.

OPINION STATEMENT: ACs are rare tumors, and thus, there is a lack of prospective trials supporting treatment decisions. Moreover, although anatomically uniform, ACs comprise of biologically distinct entities, depending on what cell type they arise from. This makes the interpretation of limited data even more challenging. Overall, the clinical outcomes of patients with AC are better than those with pancreatic cancer. However, recurrence rates remain high after curative resection. Despite the absence of definitive evidence, we believe that these high recurrence rates are a rational justification for consideration of adjuvant therapy in resected disease, and therapy selection should take tumor biology, stage, resection margins, as well as patient comorbidities and performance status into account. Largely extrapolating from pancreas cancer, we recommend consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy with 6 months of dose-modified FOLFIRINOX in fit patients with pancreatobiliary subtype tumors. Alternative regimens include gemcitabine in combination with capecitabine. If chemoradiotherapy is being added, 6 weeks of radiotherapy in conjunction with 5-FU or capecitabine can be considered. For intestinal subtypes, we recommend 3-6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX. Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of contemporary, multi-agent chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with resected and advanced ampullary adenocarcinoma. However, the logistics of performing large randomized trials in patients with a rare cancer is challenging, and the data collection, even in a carefully designed study, would likely take many years. As such, relying on data from basket trials and retrospective analysis will likely serve as guidance for treatment decisions in the near future. Treatment of metastatic disease should employ regimens that are typically used to treat pancreas cancer for tumors of pancreatobiliary subtype and 5-FU-based regimens for intestinal subtypes. Studies specific for patients with advanced AC are much needed. Molecular testing using next-generation sequencing and testing for microsatellite instability (MSI) should be performed on all tumors. We now have disease agnostic options based on these results. Pembrolizumab is approved for MSI-H tumors and tumors with high tumor mutational burden regardless of the primary site. Larotrectinib is approved for tumors with NTRK fusions. At a time when numerous therapeutic agents are in development, for example, those targeting specific K-RAS alterations or NRG fusions, identifying molecular aberrations can significantly impact patient outcomes as well as provide further insights into the biology of disease. In addition, based on recent data suggesting a significant prevalence of germline alterations in patients with ampullary tumors, referral to genetics counselors and germline testing is warranted in a significant proportion of patients with AC.

Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Gland Tumors focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. NETs are generally subclassified by site of origin, stage, and histologic characteristics. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of NETs often involves collaboration between specialists in multiple disciplines, using specific biochemical, radiologic, and surgical methods. Specialists include pathologists, endocrinologists, radiologists (including nuclear medicine specialists), and medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists. These guidelines discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. This article is focused on the 2021 NCCN Guidelines principles of genetic risk assessment and counseling and recommendations for well-differentiated grade 3 NETs, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas.

CX-072 (pacmilimab), a Probody ® PD-L1 inhibitor, in advanced or recurrent solid tumors (PROCLAIM-CX-072): an open-label dose-finding and first-in-human study.

BACKGROUND: Probody® therapeutics are antibody prodrugs that are activated in the tumor microenvironment by tumor-associated proteases, thereby restricting the activity to the tumor microenvironment and minimizing 'off-tumor' toxicity. We report dose-escalation and single-agent expansion phase data from the first-in-human study of CX-072 (pacmilimab), a Probody checkpoint inhibitor directed against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). METHODS: In the dose-escalation phase of this multicenter, open-label study (NCT03013491), adults with advanced solid tumors (naive to programmed-death-1/PD-L1 or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors) were enrolled into one of seven dose-escalation cohorts, with pacmilimab administered intravenously every 14 days. The primary endpoints were safety and determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In the expansion phase, patients with one of six prespecified malignancies (triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]; anal squamous cell carcinoma [aSCC]; cutaneous SCC [cSCC]; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma [UPS]; small bowel adenocarcinoma [SBA]; and thymic epithelial tumor [TET]); or high tumor mutational burden (hTMB) tumors were enrolled. The primary endpoint was objective response (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v.1.1). RESULTS: An MTD was not reached with doses up to 30 mg/kg. A recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 10 mg/kg was chosen based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic findings in the expansion phase. Ninety-eight patients enrolled in the expansion phase: TNBC (n=14), aSCC (n=14), cSCC (n=14), UPS (n=20), SBA (n=14), TET (n=8), and hTMB tumors (n=14). Of 114 patients receiving pacmilimab at the RP2D, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 10 patients (9%), serious TRAEs in six patients (5%), and treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs in two patients (2%). Grade ≥3 immune-related AEs occurred in two patients (rash, myocarditis). High PD-L1 expression (ie, >50% Tumor Proportion Score) was observed in 22/144 (19%) patients. Confirmed objective responses were observed in patients with cSCC (n=5, including one complete response), hTMB (n=4, including one complete response), aSCC (n=2), TNBC (n=1), UPS (n=1), and anaplastic thyroid cancer (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Pacmilimab can be administered safely at the RP2D of 10 mg/kg every 14 days. At this dose, pacmilimab had a low rate of immune-mediated toxicity and showed signs of antitumor activity in patients not selected for high PD-L1 expression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03013491.

A phase 1b expansion study of TAS-102 with oxaliplatin for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: TAS-102, a novel antimetabolite, is approved for treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This study sought to determine whether the addition of TAS-102 to oxaliplatin (TAS-OX) was safe and effective in metastatic CRC previously treated with oxaliplatin. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm phase 1b study enrolled patients with metastatic CRC previously treated with 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. In dose escalation, TAS-102 was given at 3 dose levels: 25, 30, and 35 mg/m2 twice daily on day 1 to day 5 with 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 in 14-day cycles. The primary endpoint of dose escalation was the recommended dose for expansion, and in dose expansion, the primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). RESULTS: Forty-one patients were treated with TAS-OX. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the 11 patients treated in escalation. The recommended dose for expansion was 35 mg/m2 TAS-102 twice daily on day 1 to day 5 in combination with 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 in 14-day cycles. In the intention-to-treat population, the ORR was 2.4% (95% CI, 0%-12.9%) with 1 of 41 patients having a partial response, although 12 (29%) had tumor shrinkage. The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.4-4.8 months) and median overall survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.7-10 months). CONCLUSIONS: TAS-OX is safe with no unexpected toxicities at standard doses of each agent. The combination did not result in a clinically meaningful ORR, although progression-free survival and overall survival were encouraging in this heavily pretreated population. LAY SUMMARY: For metastatic colorectal cancer, the treatment combination of TAS-102 and oxaliplatin was found to be well-tolerated and revealed no unexpected side effects. Twelve of 41 patients had reductions in the size of their tumor, and the study treatment delayed the time to tumor growth as opposed to what would be expected.