Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 22(5): 333-341, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189087

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) led to a global health crisis. Inappropriate use of antibiotics in COVID-19 patients has been a concern, leading to antimicrobial resistance. This study evaluated the patterns and predictors of empirical antibiotic therapy in COVID-19 patients and associated outcomes. METHODS: A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted with 525 patients admitted to Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, India, with moderate and severe COVID-19 from 1 March to 1 August 2021. They were divided based on empirical therapy, and predictors of antibiotic usage were assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty (91.4%) COVID-19 patients received at least one course of antibiotics, with 440 (83.8%) initiating empirical therapy. Patients with severe COVID-19 manifestations were more likely to be prescribed empirical antibiotics. Multivariable analysis showed that patients initiated on empirical antibiotics had significantly elevated levels of procalcitonin [OR: 3.91 (95% CI: 1.66-9.16) (p = 0.001)], invasive ventilation [OR: 3.93 (95% CI: 1.70-9.09) (p = 0.001)], shortness of breath [OR: 2.25 (95% CI: 1.30-3.89) (p = 0.003)] and higher CRP levels [OR: 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00-1.01) (p = 0.005)]. Most antibiotics (65.9%) were prescribed from the 'Watch' group, the highest being ceftriaxone. Only 23.8% of the patients had microbiologically confirmed infections. CONCLUSION: The study identified predictors for initiating empirical antibacterial therapy in our setting.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , India/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 21(2): 175-188, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36564016

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review evaluates the gut microbiota (GM) status in tuberculosis (TB) patients compared to healthy volunteers due to the disease or its treatment. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a systematic review of all articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase that assessed the impact of TB disease and anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) on GM from inception till January 2022 (Protocol registration number in PROSPERO: CRD42021261884). Regarding the microbial diversity indices and taxonomy, we found a significant difference in GM status between the TB and healthy control (HC) groups. We found an overabundance of Phylum Proteobacteria and depletion of some short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria genera like Bifidobacteria, Roseburia, and Ruminococcus in the TB group. We found that ATT exacerbates the degree of dysbiosis caused by Mycobacteria tuberculosis disease. EXPERT OPINION: The modulation of GM in TB patients in clinical practice may serve as a promising target to reverse the dysbiosis caused. Moreover, this can optimistically change the TB treatment outcome. We expect that appropriate probiotic supplementation with antimycobacterial treatment during tuberculosis disease will help stabilize the GM throughout the treatment phase and protect the GM from dysbiosis.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Disbiosis/microbiología , Tuberculosis/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA