A Prediction Model to Optimize Invasive Mediastinal Staging Procedures for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With a Radiologically Normal Mediastinum: The Quebec Prediction Model.

BACKGROUND: Current guideline-recommended criteria for invasive mediastinal staging in patients with a radiologically normal mediastinum fail to identify a significant proportion of patients with occult mediastinal disease (OMD), despite it leading to a large number of invasive staging procedures. RESEARCH QUESTION: Which variables available before surgery predict the probability of OMD in patients with a radiologically normal mediastinum? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified all cTxN0/N1M0 non-small cell lung cancer tumors staged by CT imaging and PET with CT imaging in our institution between 2014 and 2018 who underwent gold standard surgical lymph node dissection or were demonstrated to have OMD before surgery by invasive mediastinal staging techniques and divided them into a derivation and an independent validation cohort to create the Quebec Prediction Model (QPM), which allows calculation of the probability of OMD. RESULTS: Eight hundred three patients were identified (development set, n = 502; validation set, n = 301) with a prevalence of OMD of 9.1%. The developed prediction model included largest mediastinal lymph node size (P < .001), tumor centrality (P = .23), presence of cN1 disease (P = .29), and lesion standardized uptake value (P = .09). Using a calculated probability of more than 10% as a threshold to identify OMD, this model had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in the derivation cohort of 73.9% (95% CI, 58.9%-85.7%), 81.1% (95% CI, 77.2%-84.6%), 28.3% (95% CI, 23.4%-33.8%), and 96.8% (95% CI, 95.0%-98.1%), respectively. It performed similarly in the validation cohort (P = .77, Hosmer-Lemeshow test; P = .5163, Pearson χ2 and unweighted sum-of-squares statistics; and P = .0750, Stukel score test) and outperformed current guideline-recommended criteria in identifying patients with OMD (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] for American College of Chest Physicians guidelines criteria, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.59-0.71]; AUC for European Society of Thoracic Surgeons guidelines criteria, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.54-0.67]; and AUC for the QPM, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.80-0.90]). INTERPRETATION: The QPM allows the clinician to integrate available information from CT and PET imaging to minimize invasive staging procedures that will not modify management, while also minimizing the risk of unforeseen mediastinal disease found at surgery.

Lung cancer resection and postoperative outcomes in COPD: A single-center experience.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increases postoperative morbidity and is associated with diminished long-term survival after lung cancer resection. Whether this is also true for mild-to-moderate COPD is uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all the patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between 2002 and 2012 in a university-affiliated hospital. The severity of airflow limitation was stratified according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) from stage 1 to 4. Data from 1456 cases of lung cancer surgery were reviewed and 1126 patients were included in the study: 672 (59.7%) patients had COPD (GOLD 1, n = 340; GOLD 2, n = 282; GOLD 3, n = 50) and 454 patients had a normal spirometry (controls). Following lung cancer resection, patients with COPD had a higher rate of postoperative morbidities of any kind (p < 0.0001), in particular, pneumonia (7.0% vs. 3.7%; p = 0.0251) and prolonged air leak (17.0% vs. 8.2%; p < 0.0001) than controls. In-hospital mortality was increased in GOLD 3 COPD but the incidence of other postoperative complications was not influenced by COPD severity. Neither COPD nor its severity influenced long-term survival in this population. To conclude, patients with COPD undergoing lung cancer surgery were at higher risk of postoperative complications than patients with normal respiratory function but the procedure was considered safe. The presence of COPD itself did not influence long-term survival. The results of our study apply mainly to patients with a GOLD 1 and 2 COPD since only a small number of patients with GOLD 3 COPD were involved.

Central location and risk of imaging occult mediastinal lymph node involvement in cN0T2-4 non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate pre-operative staging is a cornerstone in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Central location and size greater than 3 cm are amongst indications for pre-operative invasive mediastinal staging but the quality of the evidence behind this recommendation is low. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of cT2-4N0M0 NSCLCL after CT and TEP-CT which underwent surgical resection with lymph node dissection or had a positive invasive pre-operative mediastinal staging in our institution from 2014 to 2018. RESULTS: Three hundred and ten patients met inclusion criteria, 79 (25.5%) central and 231 (74.5%) peripheral tumors. Central tumor location was associated with a higher prevalence of pN2-3 disease (17.7% vs. 6.1%, P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, central tumor location remained the only factor statistically associated with imaging occult mediastinal disease (OR 3.23, 95% CI: 1.45-7.18). NPV of PET-CT for occult mediastinal disease was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72-0.90) in central and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) in peripheral tumor. Central location was also associated with a higher prevalence of occult N1 to N3 disease (43.0% vs. 15.2%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that invasive mediastinal staging is required in central cT2-4N0 NSCLC but can be questioned in peripheral one, especially in cT2N2 subgroup if the patient is a candidate for lobar resection.