RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain in cancer patients is a complex clinical problem. Pain is systematically assessed and treated during palliative care, but little is known about how it is addressed before starting palliative care. AIM: This study primarily analyzed pain, symptoms, ongoing therapy at patients' admittance to the palliative care unit, and the relationships between pain and tumor, comorbidities, performance status and quality of life (QoL). Notably, patient satisfaction with the received antalgic therapy was assessed. METHODS: A multicentric, prospective, observational study was conducted in seven Italian palliative centers. The population consisted of adult cancer patients admitted to specialist palliative care units in hospice and home care. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 476 patients. Ninety-three patients reported moderate pain of 4.0 and worst pain of 5.9 at the initial medical examination. The pain was high, and QoL was lower in breakthrough pain. The pain was lower in older subjects when it was discontinuous and when it was also treated with corticosteroids. A total of 61% of the patients were unsatisfied with the prescribed pain therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Before the beginning of palliative care, physicians do not manage pain adequately. We support the idea that palliative care is not only intended for the last days of life but must be started early and simultaneously with oncological treatments. All that, in our opinion, is often ignored, and we hope that our study could have a positive influence and that the study results stimulate further research in this area with in-depth studies.
RESUMEN
We carried out a perspective study in order to assess the ease of insertion, the type and the incidence of perioperative complications connected with the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). We examined 300 consecutive patients, M/F 261/39, average age 4.2 yrs. (range 0.1-16), ASA I-II, who underwent surgical operations of short or average length not involving the pleural, the oropharyngeal or the peritoneum cavity. The choice about anesthesia was left to the discretion of the anesthesiologist. In 27 cases the position of the LM was controlled through a flexible fiberoptics. In 269 patients (89.6%) the LMA was correctly positioned during the first attempt. In 27 patients (9%), 2 or more attempts were necessary, and in 4 patients (1.4%) it was not possible to set the LMA. No differences of statistical significance were noticed between the different size of LMA, with regards to the facility of insertion. The control through fiberoptics showed a correct position, from an anatomical point of view, in 11 patients (41%), whereas in 13 patients (48%) some signs of partial obstruction were noticed (epiglottis interposing between the opening of LMA and larynx) and in 3 patients (11%) vocal cords are not visible. The following complications took place: laryngeal spasm on induction (2.3%), cough or movements on positioning (2.3%), hypoxia (4.3%), obstruction (1%), laryngeal spasm on awakening (1.7%), trauma (5%) and vomiting (0.3%). No connections were found between the size of LMA and total complications. Nevertheless, cough or movement during positioning and laryngeal spasm on awakening were significantly more frequent with LMA n. 3. In our experience, the LMA proved to be effectual and safe in the control of the airway during elective operations in pediatric surgery.