A rare entity in ED: Normal lipase level in acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis can have a variable presentation and diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, serum amylase and lipase levels and computed tomography. Negative predictive value of serum lipase in diagnosing acute pancreatitis is approximately to 100 percent and a normal blood lipase level in acute pancreatitis is an extremely rare condition. Here we reported two cases with normal serum amylase and lipase levels.

Recognizing acute appendicitis criteria on abdominal CT: do emergency physicians need a preliminary report?

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is invaluable for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) in the emergency setting when used appropriately with proper risk stratification. The aim of this study is to investigate the capability and accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) at recognizing AA criteria in intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal CT and to investigate the level of interobserver agreement among them. METHODS: Consecutive patients who presented to Izmir University Hospital from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014, were evaluated. Patients with histopathologically confirmed AA and had intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal CT were enrolled. Abdominal CT were interpreted by 4 EPs in a blind fashion. To compare differences in performances between observers, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and κ values were calculated. The results were then compared with the radiology department's official reports. RESULTS: There were 48 patients eligible for the study. Among these patients, 19 were male (41%), with a mean age of 34.4 years (±11.3 years). Five patients were CT-negative appendicitis according to official radiology reports that were accepted as the criterion standard. The best sensitivity and negative predictive values were achieved at criterion "enlargement of the appendix," whereas the least sensitivity was for criterion "lack of opacification in an enlarged appendix." CONCLUSIONS: The recognition of the CT criteria for AA among EPs is substantial at best, and their ability to recognize the primary criteria for diagnosing AA is good. Emergency physicians have to gain a higher level of expertise to use this invaluable diagnostic tool more efficiently.

Inter-Observer Agreement on Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation for Diagnosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke Among Emergency Physicians.

OBJECTIVES: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a highly sensitive tool for the detection of early ischemic stroke and is excellent at detecting small and early infarcts. Nevertheless, conflict may arise and judgments may differ among different interpreters. Inter-observer variability shows the systematic difference among different observers and is expressed as the kappa (Κ) coefficient. In this study, we aimed to determinate the inter-observer variability among emergency physicians in the use of DW-MRI for the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Cranial DW-MRI images of 50 patients were interpreted in this retrospective observational cross-sectional study. Patients who were submitted to DW-MRI imaging for a suspected acute ischemic stroke were included in the study, unless the scans were ordered by any of the reviewers or they were absent in the system. The scans were blindly and randomly interpreted by four emergency physicians. Inter-observer agreement between reviewers was evaluated using Fleiss' Κ statistics. RESULTS: The mean kappa value for high signal on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and for reduction on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were substantial (k=0.67) and moderate (k=0.60) respectively. The correlation for detection of the presence of ischemia and location was substantial (k: 0.67). There were 18 false-positive and 4 false-negative evaluations of DWI, 15 false positive and 8 false-negative evaluations of ADC. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that DW-MRI is reliable in screening for ischemic stroke when interpreted by emergency physicians in the emergency department. The levels of stroke identification and variability show that emergency physicians may have an acceptable level of agreement.

Acute pancreatitis due to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a rare complication.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is considered the treatment of choice for most renal and upper ureteral stones. Although extensive data have documented its safety, serious complications have been reported in 1% of patients, including acute pancreatitis, perirenal hematoma, urosepsis, venous thrombosis, biliary obstruction, bowel perforation, lung injury, and rupture of aortic aneurysms. Here, we report a 41-year-old woman who underwent ESWL for a calculus at the right renal pelvis and immediately developed acute pancreatitis after the procedure. Although the possibility of post-ESWL acute pancreatitisis extremely low, physicians must be aware of this complication in emergency departments.

Spontaneous Bladder Rupture and Pelvic Fracture Due To Bladder Cancer.

Bladder rupture is a rare complication following bladder cancer, but has a high mortality rate. Since bladder rupture is an emergency, the diagnosis and treatment of the cancer is usually delayed. Here we report a 56-year-old male patient who presented to our emergency department with severe abdominal pain, abdominal distension, left leg pain and difficulty in walking without history of significant trauma and ended up with diagnoses of spontaneous bladder rupture and non-traumatic pelvic fracture caused by bladder carcinoma.