In vitro determination of the remineralizing potential and cytotoxicity of non-fluoride dental varnish containing bioactive glass, eggshell, and eggshell membrane.

PURPOSE: This study compares in vitro remineralization potential and cytotoxicity of fluoride-free varnish combinations containing bioactive glass, eggshell, and membrane powder and fluoride varnish formulations on artificial caries lesions. METHODS: Artificial caries lesions were formed in two windows on third molars. One of the windows was coated with one of the following varnish formulations: FV (fluoride varnish), F-BAGV (fluoride and bioactive glass containing varnish), BAGV (bioactive glass containing varnish), EPV (eggshell powder containing varnish), EMP-EPV (eggshell membrane protein and eggshell powder containing varnish), STMP-EMP-EPV (sodium trimetaphosphate-treated eggshell membrane protein and eggshell powder containing varnish). The samples were remineralized, then investigated under scanning electron microscopy, and elemental analyses were performed by X-ray dispersive analysis (EDX). In addition, the traditional colorimetric tetrazolium-based reduction assay (XTT) and the modern impedance-based real-time cell analysis system (RTCA) were used to investigate their cytotoxicity. RESULTS: The varnish applied area's Ca/P ratio was lower than stoichiometric hydroxyapatite except for EPV (1.66) and STMP-EMP-EPV (1.67) groups. Undiluted extracts of all varnishes, 1:2 dilutions of FV and F-BAGV groups were cytotoxic in XTT assay. In RTCA, the normalised cell index of the EMP-EPV and STMP-EMP-EPV groups was higher than the control group. CONCLUSION: Bioactive glass, eggshell, eggshell membrane proteins and STMP-treated eggshell and eggshell membrane protein containing varnish have similar remineralizing effect to fluoride-containing varnish on demineralized enamel. Integrating biological or bioactive components instead of fluoride into the dental varnishes might reduce cytotoxicity.

Effects of mouthwashes on color stability and surface roughness of three different resin-based composites.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different types of mouthwashes (Klorhexidin, Curasept ADS 205, Meridol, Listerine Cool Citrus) on the surface roughness and color changes of a microhybrid (Point 4), a bulk fill (SonicFill), and a nanohybrid (Nova Compo-N) resin-based composite (RBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disk-shaped specimens were prepared from tested RBCs and divided into four subgroups which immersed in four different types of mouthwashes. The specimens were subjected to immersion cycles in the mouthwashes and artificial saliva (n = 8). Each cycle consisted of complete immersion in a mouthwash for 21 min and afterwards in saliva for 12 h at 37°C, and this cycle was repeated 8 times. The surface roughness was evaluated using a profilometer and coloration was evaluated using a spectrophotometer before and after immersion time. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the evaluation of surface roughness data was performed, and interrelation between groups was identified with the Sheffe's multiple comparison test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the Ra values of the RBCs before and after immersion in mouthwashes (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between ΔE value of the SF and NCN groups before and after immersion time (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mouthwashes contribute to oral health, especially in patients at high risk of caries. However, in such patients, patient-specific recommendations should be made when using mouthwashes due to the large number of composite fillings.

Efficacy of using erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser-treated dentine in a dentine barrier test device.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using erbium, chromium-doped:yttrium scandium gallium garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser-treated dentine in a dentine barrier test device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The test materials (G-Bond™ and Vitrebond™) were applied onto laser-treated or laser-untreated dentine discs. After 24 h of exposure with perfusion of the test chamber, cell survival was evaluated based on enzyme activity and compared to a nontoxic control material. The mean of the control was set to 100% viability. Data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's honest significant difference tests. RESULTS: The responses of bovine pulp-derived cells after exposure to G-Bond and Vitrebond on Er,Cr:YSGG laser-treated and laser-untreated dentin were statistically different from negative control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment was not successful enough in decreasing the cytotoxic effects of the dental materials. Different parameters of Er,Cr:YSGG laser or different laser types could be investigated as an alternative to minimizing the cytotoxic effects of dental materials.

Cytotoxicity evaluation of dentin contacting materials with dentin barrier test device using erbium-doped yttrium, aluminum, and garnet laser-treated dentin.

OBJECTIVES: The effect of dentin contacting materials on three-dimensional cultures of pulp-derived cells was evaluated in a dentin barrier test device using erbium-doped yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser-treated dentin. METHODS: The test materials (iBond(®), G-Bond™, and Vitrebond™) were applied on laser-treated or untreated dentin discs. After 24 h of exposure with perfusion of the test chamber, cell survival was evaluated by enzyme activity and related to a nontoxic control material. The mean values of control tissues were set to represent 100% viability. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Vitrebond was the most toxic material for both laser-treated and untreated dentin. On untreated dentin, G-bond was cytotoxic to the pulp-derived cells (p < 0.05), and iBond was similar to the negative control group (p > 0.05). However, G-Bond and iBond were not cytotoxic when they were applied to Er:YAG laser-treated dentin (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Er:YAG laser treatment of dentin may protect the pulp cells from toxic substances of dentin contacting restorative materials; however, this effect is material related. Taking into consideration the limitations of this in vitro study, the Er:YAG laser treatment of dentin before restoration might be an option for decreasing the cytotoxic effects of the dental materials. Further research is required for clinical applications.