RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are being increasingly used in critical care setting. However, PICCs are associated with a number of complications, particularly upper extremity venous thrombosis (UEVT), leading to post-thrombotic syndrome, pulmonary embolism and increased risk of catheter-related infection. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature surrounding PICCs and highlight the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of PICC-related thrombosis in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: We performed an electronic literature search of the databases PubMed, EMBASE and Google scholar using set search terms, from their commencement date to the end of January 2014. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: It has been shown that PICCs may double the risk of deep venous thrombosis compared with centrally inserted venous catheters, in critically ill patients. However, the incidence of PICC-related thrombosis in critically ill patients has not been quantified. Ultrasonography is the preferred diagnostic imaging modality. There are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the best treatment of PICC-related thrombosis in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and in most cohort studies, anticoagulation strategies with or without PICC removal have been used. CONCLUSIONS: Decision to insert a PICC should be taken after careful risk stratification. There is lack of high-quality evidence assessing prevention strategies and management of PICC-related thrombosis in the ICU. Well-designed RCTs are required to estimate the prevalence of UEVT in ICU patients with PICCs and evaluate the efficacy and magnitude of clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of therapeutic strategies.
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción del Catéter/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/etiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Enfermedad Crítica , Remoción de Dispositivos , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/fisiopatología , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/prevención & control , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/terapiaRESUMEN
Variability of peak flow measurements has been related to clinical outcomes in asthma. We hypothesised that the entropy, or information content, of airway impedance over short time scales may predict asthma exacerbation frequency. 66 patients with severe asthma and 30 healthy control subjects underwent impulse oscillometry at baseline and following bronchodilator administration. On each occasion, airway impedance parameters were measured at 0.2-s intervals for 150 s, yielding a time series that was then subjected to sample entropy (SampEn) analysis. Airway impedance and SampEn of impedance were increased in asthmatic patients compared with healthy controls. In a logistic regression model, SampEn of the resistance at 5 Hz minus the resistance at 20 Hz, a marker of the fluctuation of the heterogeneity of airway constriction over time, was the variable most strongly associated with the frequent exacerbation phenotype (OR 3.23 for every 0.1 increase in SampEn). Increased airway impedance and SampEn of impedance are associated with the frequent exacerbation phenotype. Prospective studies are required to assess their predictive value.